Connect with us

Editorial

Probe reports, skewed logic and emerging threats

Published

on

Thursday 24th October, 2024

Former MP Udaya Gammanpila has raised many hackles by releasing a presidential probe committee report on intelligence coordination and investigative processes in respect of the Easter Sunday terror attacks (2019). Among those who have seen red are prominent ruling party politicians and some religious dignitaries. Their ire is baffling, for Gammanpila has only done what Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as an Opposition MP, kept pressuring the Rajapaksa-Wickremesinghe government to do.

Dissanayake would tear into the then government leaders for refusing to respect ‘the people’s sacred right’ to know what the presidential probe committee reports on the Easter Sunday tragedy contained. There is reason to believe that if the two committee reports had found their way into Dissanayake’s hands while he was an Opposition firebrand, he would not have hesitated to gain maximum possible political mileage by releasing them. So, why is the JVP/NPP government making a brouhaha over what Gammanpila has done?

Instead of countering the findings and recommendations of the Alwis committee, and Gammanpila’s interpretation thereof, Public Security Minister Vijitha Herath has carried out personal attacks on Alwis and Gammanpila; he and other government leaders have also imputed motives to Gammanpila and Alwis. In doing so, they have committed ad hominem, a fallacious attack, which has taken its toll on the credibility and validity of their arguments.

Instead of presenting evidence in support of their arguments, the JVP/NPP heavyweights are making emotional appeals to the public—argumentum ad passiones, which has no place in logical reasoning; they keep claiming, at public rallies, that there is a sinister campaign against their efforts to probe the Easter Sunday carnage properly! Herath has said Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security, Ravi Seneviratne, and Director of the Criminal Intelligence Analysis Division of the CID, Shani Abeysekera, are good officers and therefore what the Alwis committee says about them is false. Reflected in this argument is petitio principii, or the fallacy of using one’s own conclusion in the premises of one’s argument. It is doubtful whether this kind of circular logic will help sell Herath’s argument to the discerning public.

Minister Herath has alleged that Sagala Ratnayake, as President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s National Security Advisor, appointed the Alwis committee to discredit Seneviratne and Abeysekera as they had refused to back Wickremesinghe’s presidential election campaign. If so, why did the JVP/NPP demand the release of committee reports at issue while it was in the Opposition? Why didn’t it question the integrity of Alwis, in Parliament, before the committee report was submitted?

The crux of what Gammanpila has said, quoting from the Alwis committee report, is that Senviratne and the CID under him failed to take prompt action to prevent the Easter Sunday tragedy despite a warning from a foreign intelligence outfit. This is the point the government and the Catholic priests who are critical of the Alwis committee report should try to counter. It is surprising that the State Intelligence Service conveyed actionable intelligence in a letter to the head of the CID, Seneviratne, without promptly alerting the government leaders to the danger itself. Seneviratne also did not care to take swift action in response to the warning; he merely passed the letter in question with a minute thereon directing the DIG (CID) to conduct a probe and report its progress in a couple of weeks. This, he did although the CID was already aware of the possibility of terror attacks following the detection of a haul of explosives and detonators in a Jihadist training camp in Wanathawilluwa in January 2019, as he himself told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCOI), which probed the Easter Sunday carnage.

Interestingly, Minister Herath has argued that neither the PCoI, which investigated the Easter Sunday attacks, nor the Supreme Court faulted Seneviratne or Abeyesekera and therefore others cannot blame them. If so, how come the JVP/NPP leaders keep calling Ranil Wickremesinghe the mastermind behind the Treasury bond scams? Neither the Committee on Public Enterprises, headed by the then JVP MP Sunil Handunetti nor the PCoI, which probed the bond rackets, held Wickremesinghe accountable. He has not been found guilty by any court either, but the JVP/NPP has promised to conduct a fresh probe into the Treasury bond scams and press charges against him (Wickremesinghe). In 2022, it insisted that Wickremesinghe was not fit to be the Prime Minister in view of the Treasury bond rackets. This kind of selectivity smacks of duplicity.

A visibly exasperated Minister Herath declared, at Tuesday’s post-Cabinet press conference, that under no circumstances will the government remove Seneviratne and Abeysekera from their posts. This kind of imperviousness to reasoning is symptomatic of the arrogance of power, which became President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s undoing. Wickremesinghe shielded the Sri Lanka cricket administrators under a cloud, in a similar fashion.

Seneviratne and Abeysekera are beholden to the JVP/NPP leaders, who brought them out of retirement and catapulted them to their current positions, and therefore neither they nor the officers under them can be expected to act independently and impartially in handling cases where the interests of the JVP/NPP and/or its allies are at stake. This kind of conflict of interest as well as serious allegations against Seneviratne and Abeysekera will undermine the integrity of the probe, which is said to be underway, into the Easter Sunday attacks, and leave room for a future government to reject the outcome of that investigation. The Dissanayake government has a choice between defending two of its supporters and ensuring the integrity of probes into the Easter Sunday carnage and other crimes.

Meanwhile, the US yesterday issued a warning of possible terror attacks on popular tourist locations in the Eastern Province. The UK and Russia followed suit. It is believed that a special security plan currently underway in the Eastern Province to ensure the safety of the Israeli tourists and other foreign nationals, in view of the conflict in West Asia, led to the issuance of the US travel advisory. The question is why actionable intelligence about the impending Easter Sunday attacks did not jolt the police, especially the CID, into action in a similar manner, in 2019.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Thriving corruption and delayed probes

Published

on

Past several months have seen some former ministers and ex-state officials being remanded and denied bail ‘to prevent interference with evidence-gathering processes and the intimidation of witnesses. Some of the offences they are charged with were allegedly committed years ago during previous governments. It is while in power that transgressors can cover their tracks by suppressing or eliminating evidence and influencing or intimidating witnesses. Those who are facing legal action for corruption must have resorted to such tactics while their parties were in power. The venal state officials accused of having aided and abetted such alleged transgressions for personal gain, too, must have done likewise. It is therefore doubtful whether holding them on remand for extended periods at present serves the intended purpose.

Politicians and officials should be arrested and remanded immediately after their transgressions come to light if interference with evidence and the intimidation of witnesses are to be prevented. If investigations had been launched into numerous corrupt deals exposed during the Mahinda Rajapaksa government, it would have been possible to bring those responsible for them to justice. Most members of that administration have got away with their corrupt deals.

Various international organisations campaigning against corruption, money laundering, etc., particularly Transparency International, the National Anti-Corruption Commission of Australia, and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, have stressed the importance of swift probes. They have pointed out that investigating corruption immediately after instances thereof come to light is essential for multiple reasons. Early investigations help preserve evidence and deter concealment, which is very common in Sri Lanka. Corrupt politicians are known to hide documents, destroy records or influence witnesses, especially when they are in power. Evidence can be made to disappear making it harder for investigators to get at the truth if investigations are delayed. Equally, prompt investigations are a prerequisite for maintaining public trust in institutions, such as the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption, and the rule of law. Protracted delays in conducting investigations invariably create the impression that the system is corrupt, ineffective and biased. Early action increases the chances of successful prosecution and deterrence.

It is against this backdrop that several damning allegations of corruption against the incumbent government should be viewed. The JVP/NPP came to power, promising what it described as ‘a system change’ to eliminate bribery and corruption and other such social evils. But it is apparently emulating its predecessors in handling allegations against its senior members. It vilifies whistle-blowers, denies allegations and delays investigations. Worse, the CID is headed by a prominent member of the Retired Police Collective of the NPP, and its integrity is therefore compromised.

A huge stock of coal imported for power generation has been found to be substandard. The low calorific value of the coal has resulted in low power output per tonne, and engineers have warned that the use of low-quality coal could damage the machinery of the Norochchoalai power plant. Staggering losses the Ceylon Electricity Board has suffered by importing substandard coal are expected to be passed on to the public in the form of tariff hikes. The government is accused of having interfered with the tender process to facilitate the registration of the company which supplied the low-quality coal. What needs to be done immediately is to probe the allegation that the bidding process was delayed to enable the supplier concerned to be registered. A delay in launching an investigation into the alleged coal procurement racket will help the culprits cover their tracks.

A Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) probe has been launched into the green-channelling of as many as 323 red-flagged freight containers through the Colombo Port in January 2025. The uninspected cargo may have included narcotics and lethal weapons, the Opposition has claimed. It has been alleged that the high-risk containers were released at the behest of a powerful minister. So, one can argue that the government helped cover his tracks before launching a parliamentary probe. Only the naïve will expect a PSC, dominated by the NPP MPs and headed by a minister, to reveal anything that is detrimental to the interests of the NPP government.

Keheliya Rambukwella was arrested over a procurement racket in the Health Ministry while he was a minister in the previous government. True, that beleaguered administration had to throw him to the wolves for want of a better alternative. But the fact remains that his arrest and remand helped protect the evidence-gathering process, among other things. Why no arrests have been made over the release of 323 high-risk containers without Customs inspection, and the procurement of substandard coal, under the ‘clean’ NPP government, is the question.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Govt. provoking TUs

Published

on

Saturday 31st Junuary, 2026

The government has ignored the ultimatum given by the Government Medical Officers Association (GMOA). Its intransigence will only drive the protesting doctors to intensify their trade union action, causing more suffering to patients.

The government has launched a propaganda campaign to turn public opinion against the GMOA by claiming that the doctors are demanding pay hikes with no heed for the economic difficulties caused by Cyclone Ditwah. It has stretched the truth to bolster its claims, suppressing the fact that the protesting doctors have softened their stand and expressed their willingness to give up their trade union action if the government addresses the issues the resolution of which does not cost the state coffers anything. According to media reports, their demands include the establishment of a special service minute for doctors, enhancing the disturbance, availability, and transport allowance, converting the extra duty allowance into a fixed one, and the implementation of a written agreement with the Health Minister on resolving issues regarding a research allowance and transport.

What the government should do to prevent disruptions to the health sector is to bring the GMOA to the negotiating table forthwith and work out a compromise formula. But it has succumbed to the arrogance of power, which drives strong governments to bulldoze their way through. Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa has told the doctors that it’s his way or the highway.

The government is apparently cherishing the delusion that since it has a steamroller majority in Parliament, it can do as it pleases, and others have to obey its dictates. Let it be warned that it is inviting trouble. Mandates come with short lifespans, and hubris and downfall are neighbours. Its efforts to neutralise the GMOA have galvanised other health sector trade unions into joining forces; they know that if the government succeeds in flooring the GMOA, so to speak, they will have no chance whatsoever of winning their demands. It is popularly said in this country that “one who lays one’s hands on the gourd does not spare the pumpkin”. In fact, that seems to be the government’s strategy. It is dealing with protesting trade unions in such a way as to deter others from launching labour struggles. It has chosen to ignore a hunger strike by the Development Officers (DOs), attached to the state-run schools; they demanding that they be absorbed into the teacher service. The protesters campaigned hard for the JVP/NPP in the 2024 elections, expecting their fair demand to be met. These graduates have worked as teachers for about seven years, and there is no reason why the government cannot appoint them as teachers; they can be further trained, if need be, after being appointed as teachers. The DOs have received the typical karapincha (curry leaves) treatment from the government they helped elect—they have been used and discarded. The government has shown a callous disregard for not only their career prospects but also their dear lives. The DOs were informed yesterday evening that they could meet President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on Tuesday (03 Feb). But NPP MP Chandna Sooriyaarachchi revealed to the media yesterday that all arrangements had been made for a competitive examination to be held soon!

The GMOA used to give short shrift to other health sector trade unions, and go to the extent of being critical of their labour struggles. It was labouring under the misconception that the state health institutions could operate without other categories of workers. They even sought to establish what may be described as a health sector trade union hierarchy modelled on the four-varna caste system, and place themselves at the top. Now, they have realised the need to cooperate with other trade unions instead of confronting them.

If the health sector trade unions close ranks, they will stand a better chance of winning their demands, and labour unions in other sectors will follow suit to boost their bargaining power. The government continues to provide its political opponents and trade unions with rallying points. Governments intoxicated with power think no end of themselves and behave like aggressive drunkards in shebeens only to receive sobering knocks in elections.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Listen to workers

Published

on

Friday 30th January, 2026

Time was when governments inveighed against the JVP for instigating strikes in vital sectors to further its political interests. Today, a JVP-led government is accusing its political rivals of manipulating trade unions to advance their political agendas on the pretext of championing workers’ rights. Following the 2024 regime change, it was widely thought that the country would at last be free from strikes as the JVP, the main instigator of strikes, had gained state power. During the initial phase of the JVP-NPP rule, all was quiet on the trade union front, but labour disputes began to manifest themselves thereafter.

Development Officers (DOs), attached to the state-run schools, have been protesting near the Presidential Secretariat, Colombo, for four days, demanding that they be absorbed into the teacher service without being made to sit a competitive examination. Some of them were on a hunger strike at the time of writing, claiming that the government had denied them an opportunity to be heard.

The NPP administration is thought to be in a straitjacket where state sector recruitment is concerned. It has to curtail government expenditure in keeping with the IMF bailout conditions. But pressure is mounting on it to fulfil its pledges to the unemployed graduates and the DOs, who campaigned hard for the JVP/NPP in the 2024 presidential and parliamentary elections. In 2024, a few weeks after forming a government, the NPP had a DOs’ protest near the Education Ministry in Battaramulla dispersed by the police!

The state service, bursting at the seams, has become a main source of employment for ruling party supporters over the past several decades. Sri Lanka currently has about 1.5 million public sector employees, with the workforce having doubled over the past one and a half decades. Although there is one public official for every 14 citizens, the efficiency of the state service remains extremely low. Only the UNP-led UNF government (2001-2004) sought to address this issue and curtailed state sector recruitments. But the then President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga sacked that government, and the SLFP-led UPFA, which came to power by winning the 2004 general election, upended the UNF’s recruitment policy and resumed making political appointments in the state sector.

By some quirk of fate, the JVP, which pressured all previous governments to employ graduates in the state sector, is now under fire for not recruiting some graduates as teachers.

Opinion may be divided on the protesting DOs’ demand at issue. But it defies comprehension why the government wants them to sit a competitive examination, for they have worked as teachers for years. They have had hands-on experience in schools, and the question is why they are not appointed as teachers straightaway.

The government, which claims to espouse Marxism, ought to talk to protesters and strikers instead of trying to intimidate them into submission. Let it be repeated that in the past, the JVP was behind almost all strikes, demanding solutions to workers’ problems. Unfortunately, it is now riding roughshod over trade unions and workers. It is playing a game of chicken with the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA), and the protesting doctors have given Minister of Health Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa 48 hours to address their problems or face the consequences. It is hoped that he will invite the doctors on the warpath to the negotiating table and try to avert a health sector strike.

There is no way hospitals can function during a doctors’ strike, and it will be a mistake for the government to wait, expecting the GMOA to blink first. It must get protesters, including doctors and the DOs around the table, and have a serious discussion on the unresolved issues that have driven them to resort to trade union action.

Continue Reading

Trending