Connect with us

News

Presidential election: WR’s final decision pending

Published

on

Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe

… Chief Govt Whip asks Ranil to confirm his candidature without further delay

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Justice, Prisons Affairs and Constitutional Reforms Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, said that a final decision hadn’t been taken regarding his candidature at the forthcoming presidential election. Minister Rajapakshe said that he was engaged in talks with the relevant parties at the moment in this regard.

The Justice Minister said so when The Island asked him yesterday (14) when would he resign from President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Cabinet to contest the presidential election on the ticket of a political party backed by former President Maithripala Sirisena.

The President’s Counsel declined to comment further due to the ongoing dialogue with parliamentarian Sirisena’s group. MP Sirisena on May Day declared that Minister Rajapakshe would contest the presidential election.

Both Sirisena and Rajapakshe entered Parliament on the SLPP ticket at the last general election conducted in August 2020.

The former President Sirisena’s move to field Dr. Rajapakshe at the presidential election with the SLFP’s backing went awry due to Ports, Shipping and Aviation Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva receiving the chairmanship of the party, thanks to the Colombo District Court ruling in favour of his faction.

Of the 12 elected and one appointed on the SLPP National List at the last general election, the majority backed President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s candidacy though the UNP leader is yet to officially announce his intention to contest. However, Angajan Ramanathan won a seat for the SLFP in the Jaffna electoral district.

Director (Planning and Research) at the Election Commission Channda de Silva yesterday told The Island that the EC would receive the power coming Wednesday (17) to announce nomination dates. The top official said that the EC would brief the media tomorrow (16) morning at 10.30 am regarding the forthcoming election.

Responding to another query, de Silva said that the EC didn’t have to make the relevant announcement on July 17 but in terms of the Constitution the next President should be elected by Oct 16, one month before Nov 16, 2024.

The SLFP-led by Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva and the Alliance also consisting of rebel SLPP MPs yesterday held a major rally at Badulla in support of the Wickremesinghe candidature. The SLFP-New Alliance combine is represented in the Cabinet by Nimal Siripala, Mahinda Amaraweera, Leader of the House Susil Premjayantha and Nalin Fernando.

A spokesperson for the grouping said that the Badulla rally was the third since they launched the campaign recently. Earlier rallies were held in Ambalantota and Wellawaya.

Meanwhile, Chief Government Whip and Urban Development and Housing Minister Prasanna Ranatunga on Saturday (13) demanded that President Wickremesinghe declare his candidature without further delay.

Addressing a group of SLPP supporters at Udugampola, Gampaha, Minister Ranatunga emphasized that contrary to claims the SLPP lacked a suitable person to contest the presidential poll.

The declaration was made in the wake of the announcement made by SLPP National List MP Dhammika Perera that he was ready to be the ruling party’s candidate.

Minister Ranatunga disclosed that a public rally would be held in Kadawatha next Sunday (21) under the patronage of President Wickremesinghe.

Minister Ranatunga emphasized the importance and the responsibility on the part of SLPP lawmakers to campaign in the provinces as the vast majority of the electorate appreciated the Wickemesinghe-Rajapaksha handling of post-July 2022 developments.

While reiterating his support for Wickremesinghe’s candidature even if the SLPP refused to officially ensure his candidature, Minister Ranatunga said that the UNP leader was the only person among the likely candidates capable of winning the confidence of the international community.



News

INS Airavat makes port call in Colombo

Published

on

By

The Indian Naval Ship (INS) Airavat arrived at the Port of Colombo for Operational Turnaround on 01 Jun 26. The visiting ship was welcomed by the Sri Lanka Navy (SLN) in compliance with time-noured naval traditions.

INS Airavat is a Landing Ship Tank, commanded by Commander IP Patil.

During their stay in the island, the ship’s crew is scheduled to take part in a series of professionally enriching events and camaraderie-building programmes organised by the Sri Lanka Navy.

The Indian naval personnel will also tour several historic and prominent tourist attractions across the country before the ship concludes her deployment.

Continue Reading

News

BASL asks govt. to abandon plan to raise retirement ages of CA and SC judges

Published

on

… tells Prez such arbitrary change neither necessary nor desirable

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to abandon the controversial plan to increase the retirement age of the judiciary, including the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

In a statement issued by the BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and its Secretary Nalin de Silva, the BASL pointed out that the proposed increase of the retirement age of the judiciary would undermine the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential for the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.

The text of the BASL statement: “The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (hereinafter referred to as “BASL”) notes with grave concern reports in the public domain that the Government is considering the introduction of an amendment to the Constitution to increase the age of retirement of Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

It is the considered view of the BASL that the age of retirement of the judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court which has stood at 63 years and 65 years respectively from the promulgation of the 1978 Constitution, should not be changed arbitrarily and that such a change is neither necessary nor desirable.

To do so will result in the loss of public confidence in the integrity of the legal system and of the Government’s commitment to preserve and protect the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Members of the public are likely to question the motives of the Government in bringing in a Constitutional amendment solely for this purpose.

Your Excellency is no doubt aware that the cadre of the Judges of the Court of Appeal was increased from 12 to 20 Judges (including the President of the Court of Appeal) and that of the Supreme Court from 11 to 17 Judges (including the Chief Justice) by the 20th Amendment to the constitution certified on 29th of October 2020. With such enhancement, workwise, there cannot be a real requirement to extend the retirement ages of these judges.

Your Excellency is aware that altering the retirement age of judges of the apex courts would have to be done through a Constitutional amendment. For many years Sri Lanka’s Constitution has been subject to ad hoc amendments, sometimes in order to cater to the political needs of the government in power and often contrary to the interests of the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the judiciary.

Extending the retirement age of the sitting Judges of these Courts at this point of time is likely to be viewed by the public as a blatant attempt to interfere with the judiciary. We believe that to go ahead with such an ad hoc move will also be an affront to the Honourable Judges of those courts.

If the Government goes ahead with such a move it will set a dangerous precedent for future Governments too to introduce ad hoc amendments to the Constitution in respect of the functions of the Judiciary.

The independence of the Judiciary and the public confidence reposed in it, are indispensable pillars of the Rule of Law and the democratic framework of our Republic. In that regard, it is of paramount importance that the Judiciary must not only remain independent in fact, but must also be seen by the public to be wholly independent, impartial, and free from even the slightest perception of influence, favour, accommodation, or impropriety.

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka is therefore constrained, in the discharge of its duty to uphold and safeguard the Rule of Law and the independence of the Judiciary, to respectfully express its serious concern regarding any such proposed amendment, which is neither in the interests of the Judiciary and nor of the people.

In the circumstances, the BASL respectfully urges Your Excellency not to proceed with any proposed constitutional amendment seeking to increase the retirement age of the members of the Judiciary including Judges of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

We remain confident that Your Excellency will give due consideration to the importance of preserving and protecting the independence, integrity, dignity, and public confidence in the Judiciary, which is essential to the maintenance of the Rule of Law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.”

Govt. declines to respond

A member of the Cabinet yesterday declined to comment on the BASL’s letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The Minister said that he wouldn’t comment for the time being.

Continue Reading

News

New US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka

Published

on

12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Colombo

The US has proposed additional duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from 60 economies, including Sri Lanka, over their alleged failure to curb trade in ‌goods made with forced labour.

The proposal made by US Trade Representative’s (USTR) office in terms of Section 301 unfair trade practices investigation to be released, news agencies reported, pointing out that the Trump administration was seeking to rebuild its emergency tariffs, which were struck down by a US Supreme Court decision in February.

The USTR said it determined that it would impose 10% duties related to ⁠the forced labour investigation on imports from Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, Pakistan, Argentina, Bangladesh, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and Britain.

The trade agency said it would impose additional duties of 12.5% on the remaining 45 countries that were investigated.

“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labour is unacceptable,” US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement. “This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field.”

According to the trade agency, the USTR found that Sri Lanka has failed to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition.

The USTR noted that the results of its investigation indicate that the acts, policies and practices of Sri Lanka related to the failure to impose and effectively enforce a forced labour import prohibition are unreasonable and burden or restrict US commerce.

Accordingly, it has proposed to impose 12.5% additional duties on goods imported from Sri Lanka.

The USTR said it also was proposing a textile mechanism that would allow for a certain volume of apparel and textile imports ‌to ⁠enter the US at a reduced tariff rate, though the duties and volumes were not disclosed.

The announcement comes ahead of the July 24 expiration of a 10% temporary tariff imposed by the Trump administration on February 20, the day the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

On Monday, the USTR proposed ⁠a 25% duty on many Brazilian goods as a result of a Section 301 investigation into the country’s digital trade practices and preferential tariffs. The trade agency is also expected to soon unveil the findings of another major Section 301 probe into ⁠the buildup of excess industrial capacity in 16 trading partners, including China.

In the forced labour findings, the USTR said it would exempt from the tariffs a number of products, including energy, rare earths and certain ⁠other metals, beef, coffee, certain fruits and vegetables, pharmaceuticals, organic chemicals and aircraft parts.

The USTR said it would accept public comments on the proposed tariffs and other remedies through July 6, with a public hearing scheduled for July 7.

Continue Reading

Trending