News
Power tariffs can be reduced by 35%
SJB trade unionist:
… alleges current pricing formula helps fleece consumers
by Shamindra Ferdinando
Alleging that the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) had sought to put off the scheduled power tariff revision, on the basis of false data and assessment provided to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), prominent SJB trade union activist Ananda Palitha yesterday (12) said that the PUC could grant as much as 35% reduction in rates. Power and Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody told Parliament last week that electricity tariffs would not be reduced soon but the government had decided not to increase electricity tariffs further in the future.
Convener of the Samagi trade unions and consumers collective Ananda Palitha said so in response to The Island query after having made representations to the PUC, along with other interested parties, during public consultations held in respect of the impending tariff revision expected to be announced this coming Friday (17).
Taking into consideration substantial profits earned by the state enterprise, the PUC could order the CEB to implement tariff revision, Ananda Palitha said, pointing out that the CEB, in early December last year, informed the PUC of its inability to grant relief during the January-June 2025 period.
In terms of a decision taken by the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government, the PUC was to implement four tariff revisions annually, the trade union leader said. Responding to another query, the former UNPer alleged that regardless who wielded political power the CEB always tried to minimise tariff reductions. Thanks to PUC’s interventions, electricity consumers received a 21.9% decrease in rates in March 2024, though the CEB proposed only a 4% decrease, Ananda Palitha said.
In July 2024, the PUC had declared a 22.5% decrease though the CEB proposed only 3% reduction, Ananda Palitha said, adding that the next revision was to be announced in October 2024, soon after the presidential election.
President Anura Kumara Disanayake had assured the public of a substantial drop in electricity tariffs as he knew of the impending revision but the CEB implemented its usual strategy to deprive the consumers of much needed relief, Ananda Palitha said. Had President Disanayake appointed members to the PUC at the time he made appointments to the CEB, the PUC could have intervened, Ananda Palitha said. The PUC consists of Prof. K.P. Lalith Chandralal (Chairperson), Piyal Hennanayake and Dr. M. Chathuri Samanmali Fernando.
Ananda Palitha said that tariff revisions hadn’t been implemented after the July 2024 change and the CEB was making a determined bid to derail the whole process, with the backing of the new government. President Disanayake owed the public an explanation why he continued to delay the promised tariff reduction, knowing the significant decrease in costly thermal generation.
Declaring that he, along with several other concerned persons, recently made representations to the PUC regarding the responsibility on its part to provide relief to the hapless consumers, Ananda Palitha alleged the NPP government, too, seemed to be wholly disinterested in electricity consumers’ woes.
Having won both the presidential and parliamentary elections, the NPP was now playing a different tune, Ananda Palitha said, finding fault with Power Minister Kumara Jayakody for trying to mislead Parliament. The political activist said that over and over again, the CEB had been badly exposed for furnishing false information and making wrong assessments to the PUC, though no remedial measures were taken.
Ananda Palitha mentioned three specific instances when the PUC proved the CEB data and assessments utterly wrong. In August 2022, the CEB proposed a 110% increase in tariffs though the PUC permitted a 75% hike, whereas in February 2023 the CEB proposed 85% increase but the PUC brought it down to 66%.
In July 2023 when the CEB declared that the maximum downward revision that could be granted was 3%, the PUC reduced the rates by 14.2 percent, Ananda Palitha said.
The CEB’s response couldn’t be obtained as the position of spokesperson remained vacant.
Ananda Palitha said that the government should also look into the CPC earning unconscionable profits at the expense of the public by supplying diesel required for thermal generation at much higher prices. The issue at hand is that successive governments have allowed the CPC to manipulate the entire process thereby causing heavy burden on the electricity consumers, Ananda Palitha said, adding that both the CEB and CPC should be held responsible for this unfortunate situation.
The SJBer questioned the rationale in the CEB procuring its supplies from the CPC at the same prices as ordinary consumers. Electricity tariffs couldn’t be substantially reduced as long as the government allowed the high-handed manipulation involving the top management of the CPC and CEB to continue.
Latest News
70,297 persons still in safety centers
The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.
The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

News
MEPA to crack down on marine polluters
… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting
The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.
Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.
“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”
He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.
by Ifham Nizam
News
SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action
A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.
The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.
The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.
Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.
The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.
The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.
The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.
The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.
-
Features7 days agoFinally, Mahinda Yapa sets the record straight
-
Features7 days agoHandunnetti and Colonial Shackles of English in Sri Lanka
-
Business5 days agoCabinet approves establishment of two 50 MW wind power stations in Mullikulum, Mannar region
-
News6 days agoGota ordered to give court evidence of life threats
-
Features6 days agoCliff and Hank recreate golden era of ‘The Young Ones’
-
Opinion7 days agoA national post-cyclone reflection period?
-
Features6 days agoSri Lanka and Global Climate Emergency: Lessons of Cyclone Ditwah
-
Latest News6 days agoSri Lanka squad named for ACC Men’s U19 Asia Cup
