Connect with us

News

Post-war national reconciliation: Austin questions govt. strategy, lambasts doublespeak

Published

on

One-time Defence Secretary and former Secretary to President Maithripala Sirisena Austin Fernando says having repeatedly undermined previous efforts meant to reach consensus with civil society and Tamil Diaspora, the incumbent dispensation seems to be following the yahapalana strategy.

Fernando said that the current strategy should be examined against the backdrop of the Pohottuwa administration’s much touted pullout from the Geneva process several months after the last presidential election in Nov 2019.

Referring to front-page report titled ‘Prof. Peiris denies Geneva sessions influenced their Jaffna visit’, Fernando, who had also served as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in New Delhi has sent the following response: “On the basis of the report on visit to Jaffna undertaken by ministers, Prof. Peiris and Ali Sabry, PC, it appears the ministers are doing ‘needs assessments.’ According to some sections of the media, the President had not met the TNA and other Tamil parties or the Diaspora, (unless stealthily in Yugadanavi syle!!!) having promised such consultation at the UNGA and to UNSG. If the President meets them at least now he will hear the needs from one Tamil group. Therefore, the question is ‘why this ‘mighty indecent hurry’ of ministers, when the President has no hurry?’ No wonder people interpret at their will!

The OMP and RO were legalised by the Yahapalanaya. The credit goes to President Sirisena, PM Wickremesinghe, and late Minister Mangala Samaraweera. I cannot understand why the Yahapaalanaya does not react to statements by these Ministers. Piggybacking on them now by incumbent ministers looks as eyewash. I am disturbed as a team member who worked to establish these mechanisms. Now kudos are to Ministers Pieris and Sabry! Another Pieris- Saliya -Chirman of OMP- went to the people in the north and did what Prof. Pieris does now. Additionally, in 2020 Minister Dinesh Gunawardena withdrew from the UNHRC Resolution 30/1 on a Cabinet decision, and Ministers Pieris and Sabry of the same Cabinet now hang on to by-products of 30/1 – the OMP and RO, to which they cannot have allegiance after the quoted withdrawal. If they wish, they can tag all these as flowing from Mahinda Rajapaksha era 11/1 UNHRC Resolution of 26th May 2009!

We know that the Yahapalanaya wished to have a TRC. I was on a committee that worked on it. A Cabinet Memo for a TRC was submitted by PM Ranil Wickremesinghe on 18th October 2018, and the Constitutional Coup happened. Hence it was probably not considered by ‘the 52- Day, SC decided illegal government.’ and thrown away to the dustbin. For two years they slept over it, and suddenly after the deepest slumber now indicate the appropriateness of it! Are they joking or really do not know what happened in the past? One need not employ rocket science to restart the process. Ask Lalith Weeratunga and Gamini Senarath, I know for certain they have the capacity to prepare the papers for the next Cabinet. It will add more marks in Geneva too! The problem is the government needs the will only.

Non-recurrence was a separate “Pillar of reconciliation” to be achieved through constitutional means which was followed by a Parliamentary Select Committee. An Interim Report is available. There were six sub-committees. Bandula Gunawardane, Susil Premajayantha, and D Siddhaarthan did work on Finance, Public Administration, and centre-periphery relations respectively. What happened to those reports done by present Pohottuwa members, plus one TNA member? Politicians have bungled the relationships, and now they seem to be trying to repair- in technical terms ‘integrate’! That too is on a wrong footing, without continuity.

Mere eyewash! Let these people be serious about reconciliation. It matters to the total population, whole country, at a very difficult time. On top of the economic crisis, let us not be dragged into sanctions or other international crises.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Navy seizes an Indian fishing boat poaching in northern waters

Published

on

By

During an operation conducted in the dark hours of 27 Dec 25, the Sri Lanka Navy seized an Indian fishing boat and apprehended 03 Indian fishermen while they were poaching in Sri Lankan waters, south of the Delft Island in Jaffna.

The seized boat  and Indian fishermen (03) were brought to the Kreinagar Jetty and were handed over to the Fisheries Inspector of Jaffna for onward legal proceedings.

Continue Reading

News

Delay in govt. response to UK sanctions on ex-military chiefs, and others causes concern

Published

on

General Silva / Admiral Karannagoda

Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda said that he is still waiting for the government’s response to the UK sanctions imposed on three ex-military officers, including him, and a former member of the LTTE.

The former Navy Chief said so in response to The Island query whether he was aware of the position taken by a three-member ministerial committee, consisting of Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath, Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara and Deputy Defence Minister Maj. Gen (retd) Aruna Jayasekera.

The government named the committee in the wake of the UK declaration of travel bans and asset freezes in respect of Karannagoda, General Shavendra Silva, General Jagath Jayasuriya and Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan, also known as Karuna. Maj. Gen. Jayasekera said that they inquired into the issue at hand.

Karannnagoda said that he would like to know the government’s recommendations if the ministerial committee briefed the Cabinet as per a decision taken by the Cabinet of Ministers. Karannagoda said that the issue should have been taken at the highest level as various interested parties continue to humiliate the war-winning military by targeting selected individuals.

Other sources, familiar with the issues at hand, told The Island that the government was yet to announce its stand.

Sources pointed out that the Opposition has been silent on what they called a matter of utmost national importance.

Cabinet spokesman Dr. Nalinda Jayathissa is on record as having described the UK move as a unilateral move and that committee was formed to examine the developments and recommend appropriate measures to the Cabinet.

Foreign Minister Herath told The Island the government was not successful in getting the British to withdraw sanctions. Describing the UK decision as unilateral, the Miniser said that the government conveyed its concerns but the UK didn’t change its stand.

The Island raised the issue with Minister Herath and Admiral Karannagoda in the wake of British MP of Sri Lankan origin, Uma Kumaran requesting the UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper to expand on the government’s sanctions imposed on the four above-mentioned persons.

During a Foreign Affairs Committee meeting on 16 December, the MP for Stratford and Bow highlighted the lack of accountability and political will from the current Sri Lankan government to address war crimes and mass atrocities committed in Sri Lanka.

Sources said that David Lammy, who served as Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs at the time of the declaration of sanctions, had no qualms in declaring that the action taken against four Sri Lankans was in line with a commitment he made during the election campaign to ensure those responsible wouldn’t be allowed impunity. The UK government statement quoted Lammy as having said that this decision ensured that those responsible for past human rights violations and abuses were held accountable.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Sri Lanka outlines seven key vectors of international cooperation at Moscow forum

Published

on

Shobini

Sri Lankan Ambassador to the Russian Federation, Shobini Gunasekera recently presented a conceptual framework of seven key vectors that defined contemporary international relations and facilitated dialogue among States. She made the presentation at XI Moscow International Financial and Economic Forum held under the theme “Building Bridges: Partnership without Borders”.

In her address, the Ambassador emphasised that these vectors represent the channels through which ideas circulate, trade expands, and peace is strengthened, serving as guiding principles for cooperation amid global uncertainties. The seven key vectors highlighted were economic ties as a foundation for long-term stability; political choice and diplomacy through dialogue and multilateral engagement; security cooperation to address cross-border threats; cultural linkages through education, tourism, and professional exchanges; technological advancement, particularly in digital systems and artificial intelligence; environmental stewardship through collective action on renewable energy and climate change; and humanitarian obligations, including disaster relief and development cooperation.

 Drawing on Sri Lanka’s experience, the Ambassador illustrated the practical application of these principles by highlighting the country’s strategic location in the Indian Ocean, its role as a trade and logistics hub, and its active engagement in regional groupings such as BIMSTEC and the Indian Ocean Rim Association, where the Russian Federation serves as a Dialogue Partner.

 The potential for enhanced Sri Lanka–Russia bilateral cooperation was underscored, particularly through complementarities between Russia’s technological and energy expertise and Sri Lanka’s logistical capabilities and maritime infrastructure. She noted that such synergies could support joint initiatives in trade, innovation, tourism, and logistics, while cultural and scientific exchanges would further strengthen mutual understanding between the two countries.

Concluding her remarks, the Ambassador stated that sustained progress requires dialogue, mutual respect, and forward-looking partnerships capable of shaping a shared and stable future.

Continue Reading

Trending