Connect with us

News

Opp. warns of govt. bid to dilute Anti-Corruption Bill

Published

on

Justice Minister and Leader of House differ, accusations directed at BR

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Dissident SLPP MPs yesterday (17) alleged that the ruling SLPP was likely to try to dilute the Anti-Corruption Bill at the committee stage tomorrow (19). SLPP MP Gevindu Cumaratunga said so when The Island asked whether the Opposition was confident that Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC, wouldn’t permit SLPP amendments that were contrary to the Bill approved by Parliament without a division on 06 July.

Cumaratunga, the leader of Yuthukama civil society group, said that Justice Minister Rajapakse had taken a principled stand when Leader of the House and Education Minister Susil Premjayantha on behalf of the SLPP ought to prevent Parliament taking a decision on the vital Bill, which had been cleared by the Ministerial Consultative Committee on Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms, chaired by Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakse on 22 June.

Minister Premjayantha was flanked by Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena and Chief Government Whip Prasanna Ranatunga.MP Cumaratunga said that Minister Rajapakse had accommodated Committee Stage amendments to the Bill, proposed by the Opposition.

The MP said that the Sectoral Oversight Committee on Just and Law-Abiding Society, chaired by W. D. J. Seneviratne, MP, discussed the Bill at length on 05 July, on the first day of the debate on the Bill. The Committee Stage Amendments incorporated were examined by the Sectoral Oversight Committee on Just and Law-Abiding Society.

“We believed that following the Second Reading of the Anti-Corruption Bill on the following day, 06 July, it could be passed unanimously as all political parties, represented in Parliament, repeatedly assured their commitment to an all-out drive against corruption,” he said.

Against that background, the Opposition was quite distraught when the Leader of the House made an unexpected move to block the Bill, claiming the SLPP wanted to further improve it, MP Cumaratunga said.

The SLPP would probably could have stymied the Bill if not for the strong stand taken by the Opposition, with Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) leader Sajith Premadasa seeking an explanation from the Minister in charge of the subject, Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, to state his position.

Minister Rajapakse declared that having toiled for over 10 months to finalize the Bill he didn’t see as to why it should be put off again. The one-time President of the Bar Association said that he had never worked so hard to prepare a Bill. Having compared the Anti-Corruption Bill and the 21st Amendment to the Constitution, enacted in last October, Minister Rajapaksa declared that the former posed quite a challenge.

MP Cumaratunga said that following the Justice Minister’s declaration, the Leader of the House accepted the Opposition proposal to pass pending the Committee Stage on 19 July.Both Sajith Premadasa and Rajitha Senaratne questioned whether SLPP de facto Chief Basil Rajapaksa was behind this move. Referring to the now disrupted move to restore Local Government bodies at the behest of Basil Rajapaksa, through the intervention of Parliament, Opposition Leader Premadasa asked whether the former Finance Minister wanted to sabotage the Anti-Corruption Bill.

Dr. Senaratne advised Premajayantha not to take up such contracts as the Bill was the responsibility of the Justice Minister.SLPP MP Chandima Jayakody alleged that the ruling party was in the process of ‘killing’ the remaining investigations, handled by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

During a heated argument between Premjayantha and Communist Party MP Weerasumana Weerasinghe, the former said that the CP man, as a newcomer to the Parliament, was not aware of how proceedings dragged on. Lawmaker Weerasinghe hit back hard questioning the integrity of those who represented Parliament for a period of over two decades.

MP Cumaratunga questioned the need for the SLPP to propose further amendments after the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Bill. Pointing out that there were nearly 60 amendments that consensus had been reached, following deliberations, MP Cumaratunga warned of dire consequences if the SLPP sought to present amendments not vetted.



News

New Chancellor appointed to General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University

Published

on

By

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has appointed Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake (Retd.) as the new Chancellor of General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University.

The letter of appointment was presented to Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake (Retd.) by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat on Monday (05) afternoon.

Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake(Retd.) has served as Commander of the Sri Lanka Air Force and as Chief of Defence Staff.

(PMD)

Continue Reading

News

Govt. urged to halt ‘illegal’ presidential pardons

Published

on

Ven. Gnanasara Thera reacts as prison officers escort him out of the Court of Appeal, which yesterday (05) ordered the sixyear prison sentence imposed on him in 2018 to take effect.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The government is coming under pressure from civil society organisations to formulate a clear ‘mechanism’ to deal with requests for presidential pardons.

Representing civil society organisations, Gamini Viyangoda yesterday flayed the NPP government for the delay in taking action against Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera, after the Supreme Court declared the 2019 presidential pardon granted to him by President Maithripala Sirisena null and void. He said successive Presidents had abused their executive power to release convicted persons from prison.

Purawesi Balaya activist Viyangoda pointed out that the Supreme Court ruled that President Sirisena had acted arbitrarily and failed to independently consider the relevant materials before exercising his executive power.

The Court of Appeal, in August 2018, sentenced Gnanasara Thera, General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), to six years rigorous imprisonment for contempt of court over his conduct during proceedings concerning missing journalist Prageeth Ekneligoda. Viyangoda said that those who had been affected by the monk’s conduct have the right to know on what basis the President released him, in May 2019.

The Court of Appeal yesterday (05) ordered the relevant authorities to enforce the remaining period of imprisonment imposed on the Thera.

Gnanasara Thera, who had been subject to an open warrant for his arrest, was produced before the Court of Appeal, today, by prison officials.

Having considered the submissions made before it, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remaining period of the sentence imposed on Gnanasara Thera. Police on Saturday (03) apprehended the monk at a forest monastery in Kalutara. The Colombo Magistrate’s Court on Sunday (04) ordered the Thera to be remanded in custody till Monday.

Appearing for Gnanasara Thera, Attorney-at-Law Iresh Seneviratne, together with Attorney-at-Law Pasan Karunaratne, told the court yesterday that his client had been experiencing severe mental distress and had therefore gone to an ‘Aranya Senasanaya’, where he had been staying.

Viyangoda said that examination of presidential pardons, executed over the years, would reveal how successive leaders exploited the executive power to appease their own. Responding to The Island queries, Viyangoda said that Sirisena, in Sept. 2019, just two months before the presidential election, granted Jude Shramantha Jayamaha a Presidential pardon.

Jude Shramantha Jayamaha was sentenced to 12 years by the High Court, but the Court of Appeal revised that sentence to death, in July 2012, which the Supreme Court later upheld. Viyangoda said that though the Supreme Court, in June 2024, declared that the particular Presidential action was illegal and arbitrary, law enoforcement authorities were yet to take tangible measures to enforce the court directive.

Viyangoda stressed that no President should exercise the right to pardon a convicted on his or her own without following laid out procedures. According to him, Sirisena appeared to have simply ordered the monk, and the convicted murderer, released in response to appeals received by him. A comprehensive investigation could identify those who had been involved in these wrongdoings.

Continue Reading

News

GL urges cautious handling of Saudi death row case, blasts govt. over BRICS affair

Published

on

Prof. Peiris

Convenor of Janathawadi Joint Opposition, Prof. G. L. Peiris, yesterday (05) emphasised the responsibility on the part of the government and others to act cautiously when making representations in respect of Sivarasa Anojan facing death sentence in Saudi Arabia over a controversial social media post.

Addressing the media at former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Flower Road Office, Prof. Peiris emphasised that whatever representations should be made through the Foreign Ministry.

The one-time External Affairs Minister warned of dire consequences of political party leaders, members of Parliament and civil society making direct representations and trying to get in touch with various Saudi authorities over the phone.

Prof. Peiris said that those who intervened on behalf of Anojan should keep in mind that Sri Lanka should be mindful of the Saudi way of governance and sensitivities.

The former Minister questioned the circumstances Sri Lanka was left out of the recent BRICS summit held in New Delhi. He recalled how former President Wickremesinghe discussed Sri Lanka’s entry into BRICS with Russian President Putin and received an invitation for the Summit there but as a result of the change of government, in Sept. 2024, Sri Lanka ignored that invitation.

That resulted in Sri Lanka being left out from the New Delhi summit, Prof. Peris said.

Prof. Peiris pointed out the absurdity in sending the Foreign Secretary to the BRICS Summit in Russia instead of the President, PM or the Foreign Minister to represent the country.

Referring to the forthcoming conclusion of the current IMF programme, initiated during Wickremesinghe’s time, Prof. Peiris said that Sri Lanka lost a great opportunity to benefit from BRICS by failing to represent the country at a higher level at the Russian summit.

The BRICS nations established the New Development Bank (NDB), originally called the BRICS Development Bank, Prof. Peiris said.

Dismissing NPP government’s explanation regarding Iranian ships awaiting necessary supplies but deprived by US imposed restrictions, the former Minister strongly criticised the administration’s response. According to him, this government responded in a similar manner when the US sank an unarmed Iranian frigate just outside Sri Lankan territorial waters in March this year.

Prof. Peiris declared that the government’s assertion that the US restrictions weren’t only directed at Sri Lanka but all Iranian vessels in other regions as well was not acceptable (SF)

Continue Reading

Trending