Connect with us

News

NJC flays SJB leader for his pledge to implement 13A fully

Published

on

The National Joint Committee (NJC) has condemned SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa’s recent declaration in New Delhi that he would fully implement the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Lieutenant General Jagath Dias (Retd) and Dr. Anula Wijesundera Co-Presidents of the NJC issued the following statement: The NJC is “shocked, dismayed, disappointed and disgusted” over the recent statement made by the Hon Leader of the Opposition during a private visit to India where he has said that he endorses and would fully implement the controversial 13th Amendment – to the Sri Lanka Constitution when he is elected to power.

NJC views this undertaking with a sense of betrayal and lookdown of the nation and as highly uncalled for and unbecoming of a sitting Member of Parliament representing the main opposition party.

The NJC views the 13th Amendment as obsolete as not only had the Indo-Lanka agreement been signed under duress but also India failed to honour their part of the agreement (to disarm the LTTE). As a result, the conflict dragged on for three decades and the thousands of Sri Lankan security forces personnel sacrificed of their lives, a vast number of Civilian Live’s were also lost.

NJC considers that it is pertinent to clarify the awareness of Hon Opposition Leader Sajith Premadas on following key concerns with regards to the 13th Amendment:

The 13th Amendment was imposed under foreign duress in 1987 under threat of military intervention. 

Nationally critical amendment signed without the consent of the Sri Lankan people (absence of sovereign consent) 

Persistence of separatist ideology overseas pursued by the separatist lobby groups with the support of Western governments. 

That it is a threat to national unity and the unitary nature of the state (Article 2 of the constitution) If land, Police and administrative powers are devolved. 

NE province Chief Minister at that time made a unilateral declaration of independence UDI in 1990.

That it would make the state all the more difficult to ensure the duty of the state to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana (Article 9) if devolved or subjected to regional authority. 

Awareness on successive supreme court rulings that sovereignty is indivisible and compromising core powers of the state to peripheral units directly threatens constitutional supremacy of the Parliament and National Security.

When the constitutionality of the 13th Amendment was challenged in the supreme court 5 out of 9 judges on the bench held it will not affect the unitary character of the constitution because so much power is vested in the executive president. However subsequent amendments to the constitution diluted the power of the executive president. Therefore, the 13th Amendment cannot be implemented as it would adversely affect the constitution.

N J C in the meantime would also wish to clarify if what was stated by the Hon leader of the opposition in India is his personal opinion / SJB’s opinion or his collective party memberships opinion please.

N.J.C’ upholds and categorically re-affirms its learned position that, “The divisive, un-constitutional 13th Amendment must be comprehensively reviewed followed by a referendum for public approval”

N.J.C urge all political leaders to act in the best interest of the nation, conduct with responsibility, patriotism and love for the nation and its people without succumbing to any sort of external pressure and manipulation that threaten the sovereignty of our motherland when representing the country locally or over-seas.

N.J.C calls all patriotic citizens to observe well before pledging allegiance with political parties and politicians who undertake to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Sri Lanka not be agents for foreign nations.”



Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending