Connect with us

News

Newspaper reports on Parliament canteen draws ire of some MPs

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

SLPP national list MP Jayantha Ketagoda yesterday said that newspapers had damaged the reputation of the MPs by claiming that they had found fault with the parliament canteen staff for a shortage of milk- based food items. He requested the Speaker to summon the editors concerned and reprimand them.

Raising a privilege issue, MP Ketagoda said that publishing such news was part of a conspiracy to tarnish the reputation of MPs and denigrate Parliament. “When such news items are published public opinion turns against all of us. A special investigation should be held. The editors of newspapers that published such stories should be summoned and the Speaker should talk to them. This news has gone viral on social media. I made inquiries and could not find any evidence to prove this allegation. I spoke to officials and they told me that there was no complaint by anyone.

The news reports have also claimed that MILCO has failed to supply enough liquid milk to the parliament canteen. Renuka Perera was recently appointed the Chairman of MILCO. The newspaper have placed the blame on him. We must take stern action against this,” MP Ketagoda said.

Kurunegala District SJB MP Nalin Bandara said that he too had seen the news item and requested the Speaker to conduct an investigation.

Badulla District SJB MP Chaminda Wijesiri: “People know the cost of maintaining this parliament. Those people in rural areas as well as in cities are languishing in queues now are questioning the luxurious and comfy living style of MPs and the way we spend their monies here. There is a gas shortage in the country, but there is no gas shortage in parliament. Parliament has enough gas to cook food for 225 MPs, but there is no gas in the market for people to buy. There is a huge pressure because of people’s suffering. We must try to find solutions to these problems.”

MP Ketagoda: What is he talking about? He tries to have his face shown on TV. What I raised is an issue concerning all of us. These news reports are false. We do not come here for eating. We could shut down the canteen and bring food from home if the speaker permits such action.

The Speaker: I am saddened by this news item. This is an abuse of freedom of speech. I will call a report on this and will take action on the basis of that report.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PSTA worse than PTA: FSP

Published

on

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.

He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.

Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.

He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.

The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.

Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.

Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.

“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.

He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.

“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.

Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.

He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.

Continue Reading

News

Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.

Published

on

Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.

According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.

The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.

CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.

She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.

Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail

Published

on

Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.

The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.

Continue Reading

Trending