Connect with us

Sports

Namal’s faux pas

Published

on

Namal

by Rex Clementine

Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa has taken to social media to criticise the government over Sri Lanka supposedly missing out on hosting the inaugural Women’s Champions Trophy, scheduled for next year. The former Sports Minister has been shedding crocodile tears, bemoaning the politicisation of sport in Sri Lanka.

Coming from Namal, that is quite something.

Namal is a lawyer by profession. Those who practise law are generally expected to do their homework before presenting a case. When MP Rajapaksa shoots from the hip like this, however, one is entitled to wonder about that much celebrated law degree. This, after all, is a man who reportedly passed his law examinations with flying colours. A little fact checking, therefore, should hardly be beyond him.

The ICC does not recognise government appointed interim committees and does not permit countries operating under such arrangements to host ICC events. But to claim that Sri Lanka has already been stripped of the Women’s Champions Trophy is both premature and inaccurate. If the host nation is to be changed, that decision is expected at the next ICC Board meeting in November. By that time, SLC should be ready for fresh elections.

Nor is it correct to suggest that Sri Lanka will miss out on participating in the tournament. Ranked sixth in the world, Sri Lanka remain very much in contention to play, with the qualification criteria comprising the top five ranked teams plus the hosts. So, even if India were to host the tournament, Sri Lanka would still be part of the competition.

It appears politician Rajapaksa is fishing in troubled waters. Unfortunately, he seems to have forgotten to check whether there are any fish.

The less said about the disasters that befell Sri Lankan sports when the Rajapaksas were running the country, the kinder we would be to Namal.

Sri Lanka were the designated hosts of the Men’s Asia Cup in 2022. Back to back India versus Pakistan games in Colombo would have been a tremendous shot in the arm for the economy, with supporters from around the world descending on the island for one of cricket’s greatest spectacles.

There was one small problem: Namal’s uncles had helped run the country’s petrol pumps dry.

With fuel not freely available and the country engulfed in an economic crisis, the Asian Cricket Council shifted the tournament to the UAE. Curiously, there were no crocodile tears then. Namal’s social media account appeared to have misplaced its outrage.

Now he lectures the country about politicising sport.

To this government’s credit, it has largely refrained from interfering with the affairs of the cricket administration or team selection. Take the recent selection of Niroshan Dickwella. Many Sri Lankan supporters disagreed with it, including people sympathetic to the government. Yet there was no ministerial intervention. During Namal’s father’s regime, Sports Ministers could change selection committees almost overnight.

It is also worth recalling that when President Chandrika Kumaratunga appointed the first three Interim Committees, she turned to respected figures such as Rienzie Wijetilleke, Hemaka Amarasuriya and Vijaya Malalasekara.

Mahinda Rajapaksa did not spare cricket from political patronage either. His appointees to Cricket Interim Committees included family members, individuals who had lost cricket elections and others close to the political establishment.

Namal may point out that his father also appointed a reputed former cricketer to head an Interim Committee in 2010. Quite correct. But Mahinda Rajapaksa, the shrewd politician that he was, usually had another card up his sleeve. His dream of an international cricket stadium in his electorate soon became reality.

Sport became so politicised during the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration that even club elections were not immune. Those who doubt it can ask what happened at Colts Cricket Club, where respected officials stepped aside amid fears of crossing uncle Gota.

Sports officials were not alone. The media had their share too. Photographers covering the Rajapaksa boys playing at the Welisara Navy camp were harassed. On one occasion, a reporter was assaulted by Navy personnel.

Then there was television.

A television station linked to the Rajapaksa family telecast international cricket after a Cabinet decision concerning broadcasting rights was altered. Cricket was a cash cow. While state television struggled financially, the Rajapaksa boys were hardly complaining about political interference in sport.

And now Namal cries foul, accusing this government of politicising cricket.

His father appointed more Interim Committees than any other President. Even when elections were held, allegations of manipulation and political interference were rife. For years, Sri Lankan cricket suffered under administrators whose greatest qualification was often not what they knew about cricket, but whom they knew in politics.

That is why Namal Rajapaksa lecturing anyone about political interference in sport is rather like an arsonist complaining about the smell of smoke.

This government took on a cricket establishment that many had feared touching. There were warnings from the outset that reform would bring turbulence. So far, the authorities have managed to minimise those jolts. They should now be allowed to finish what they started. More strength to NPP and comrade AKD.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Kusal, Wellalage star as Sri Lanka defend 322 in Headingley thriller

Published

on

Kusal Mendis' 82-ball hundred set Sri Lanka up for victory [Cricinfo]

Seven years on from their last away ODI victory against England. – also at Headingley – Sri Lanka repeated the trick, and kept the series alive, ahead of the decider at The Oval on Sunday with a hard fought 16-run win.

On a true surface that offered plenty of runs, Sri Lanka executed their plan A with the kind of gusto that has been sorely lacking across this tour. Kusal Mendis’ seventh ODI ton led the way, and he was sufficiently backed up by the likes of Pathum Nissanka (25), Kamindu Mendis (54), Pavan Rathnayake (48) and Janith Liyanage (32).

Then with the ball, Sri Lanka survived a potentially game-breaking opening stand, a Jos Buttler onslaught, and a Will Jacks rearguard salvo to snag what seemed at times a rather improbable win. Dunith Wellalage took many of the plaudits, with his 3 for 49 paving the way for Sri Lanka’s fightback with the ball, as did Asitha Fernando for a spell of exemplary death bowling.

Arguably the defining moment of the chase, however, came when Buttler had to retire hurt on 67 from 45 balls with what the ECB described as a hamstring “twinge”. Though he later limped back out to resume his innings, he was visibly hampered as he lasted just four more balls. In between whiles, a chase that had been cruising at 253 for 4 skidded off course. England had needed 68 off 75 at the moment of Buttler’s injury. They managed just 52 for 5 in the remainder of their innings.

The common consensus at the halfway point was that Sri Lanka’s 321 for 6 was par for the course, but considering it was their highest first-innings total against England in ODIs since 2018 – and just their third score of 320 or more since the start of 2024 – it was still cause for minor celebration.

The broadcaster’s win predictor at the start of the England chase – 70-30 in favour of the hosts – highlighted just what they thought of this type of surface, and the type of batting England possessed. That England had never actually chased a total this high against Sri Lanka mattered less so.

And once Ben Duckett and Tom Banton had blitzed 82 runs inside the opening powerplay – two fewer, incidentally, than Sri Lanka managed in their final 10 – on the way to a substantial opening stand of 143 off 119, the result all but seemed a formality.

The breakthrough came utterly against the run of play too, as Wellalage found a foothole outside the left-hander’s off stump and ripped one through bat and pad, as Duckett reached out in vain for the flashy drive.

Then, at the end of Wellalage’s next over, Banton waltzed right past another one that gripped on the surface as Kusal swiftly dislodged the bails. And just like that both openers were back in the pavilion.

Even so, Sri Lanka might not have dared believe, given how far ahead of the game England were at this point. But when Wellalage struck a third time in three overs, this time trapping their serial tormentor, Harry Brook, leg before – a decision upheld on review – the old muscle memory of spin-strangled chases under lights at the Khettarama in Colombo perhaps began to stir. Particularly with the pitch also beginning to exude some hallmarks of those dry Colombo pitches.

But, just as swiftly as Sri Lanka had thought about clawing their way back in, England reclaimed control of the chase. And they were led unerringly by Buttler. Across partnerships of 46 from 28 with Joe Root, and 51 from 56 with Will Jacks, Buttler was in utter command of the contest. But then, in the 38th over, his hamstring went, and after battling on for two more balls, he limped off.

At that point, the required rate was less than a run-a-ball with six wickets in hand. By the time he was forced to return to the middle, the equation had flipped to 27 needed off 14. In between whiles, Sri Lanka throttled like they’ve never throttled before, giving up just one boundary in the 60 deliveries between Buttler walking off and walking back on.

With England seven-down by this point, the odds had firmly shifted in favour of Sri Lanka, but with Jacks and Buttler both capable of knocking off the required runs with just a few swings, the game was still in the balance. A six to the end the 48th over proved as much. But that would be the last boundary of the game as Eshan Malinga and Dilshan Madushanka squeezed through the final two overs to complete a famous victory.

What the result showed more than anything else is that, while Sri Lanka might be quite a way off the pinnacle of T20 cricket, in ODIs – as they have shown over recent years – they certainly have the capacity to kick it with the best, albeit not on as consistent a basis as they would like. Most of their best performances however have come at home, and on that front Thursday’s performance might be particularly heartening.

Sri Lanka’s best white-ball batting efforts in recent times have invariably coincided with significant input from either Nissanka or Kusal, and that trend wasn’t about to change here. Nissanka had looked promising during 33-ball 25, but his time in the middle was cut short by a fuller one from Atkinson that nipped back and trapped him lbw – a tight call that was held up upon review after replays showed umpire’s call on wickets hitting.

This brought Kusal to the crease, and he along with his namesake, Kamindu, proceeded to put on a 137-run stand from 120 deliveries, an innings-defining partnership that set the platform for Sri Lanka’s highest first-innings total against England in ODIs since 2018.

But it was one that might have been snuffed out before it had ever found its legs had Atkinson held on to a skier off Kusal when the Lankan skipper was on 18. Sri Lanka ensured they would exact the full toll for that drop, as Kusal proceeded to dine on a much more welcoming surface than the one at Chester-le-Street in the first ODI.

In the 20 overs between the 10th over – when Kusal entered – and the start of the 30th over – when Kamindu was caught at long-on – 11 of them saw Sri Lanka manage at least one boundary. And it meant that Sri Lanka’s 200 came up in the 32nd over, at which point a score in the region of 340 was on the cards.

The near seven-an-over scoring between the two Mendises owed much to one particularly expensive over taken off Josh Tongue, in which Kusal banished him for three fours and a six. Nineteen came off it – it was Sri Lanka’s most fruitful of the entire tour, such has been the dour nature of their batting efforts.

It was also a boundary that brought up Kusal’s century, a sumptuous drive through the covers off a luckless Jamie Overton, off whose bowling it was that Kusal had been dropped.

Following Kamindu’s dismissal there was a run-a-ball stand of 40 between Kusal and Pavan Rathnayake, but the former was unable to see the game through to the death overs, finding deep midwicket instead with an attempted slog sweep off Rehan. This brought about Sri Lanka’s first real lull in scoring, as they trudged to 237 for 4 by the end of the 40th over.

The innings seemed at a crossroads at this point, but Rathnayake and then Liyanage ensured that Sri Lanka would not completely squander the platform their skipper had helped set. Better sides might have managed to push for maybe 20-30 runs more, but that is a problem for another day; for now, Sri Lanka will savour a rare perfect evening.

Scores:

Sri Lanka 321 for 6 in 50 overs

(Kamindu Mendis 54, Kusal Mendis 121, Pavan Rathnayake 48; Gus Atkinson 2-55, Rehan Ahmed 2-48 ) beat England 305 for 9 in 50 overs (Tom Banton 73, Ben Duckett 67, Jos Buttler 69, Will Jacks 52; Dilshan Madushanka 2-54, Eshan Malinga 2-50, Dunith Wellalage 3-49) by 16 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Lalit Rajbanshi, Kushal Bhurtel set up Nepal’s opening win

Published

on

By

File photo: Kushal Bhurtel ripped through Afghanistan's middle order[Cricinfo]

Spinners Kushal Bhurtel and Lalit Rajbanshi shared seven wickets between them to give Nepal a winning start to their cricket campaign in the Asian Games, in Nishin. They restricted Afghanistan to 102 for 7 in 20 overs, after which Nepal chased the target with five wickets and 16 balls to spare.

This was Afghanistan’s first defeat in the competition after they had also started with a win against Japan on Thursday.

After opting to bat, Afghanistan were reduced to 16 for 3 in the fifth over, with left-arm fingerspinner Rajbanshi accounting for all three wickets in his three overs in the powerplay. Faisal Ahmadzai, who was making his T20I debut for Afghanistan, scored 30 off 33 balls and Najibullah Zadran chalked up an identical score to help their team recover briefly.

Bhurtel, the legspinner, though ran through the middle order, bagging figures of 4 for 21 in his four overs. Apart from Najibullah and Ahmadzai, no other Afghanistan batter passed 20.

Bhurtel then fell for a duck in the first over of Nepal’s chase and by the seventh over, they were wobbling at 31 for 3. Sundeep Jora (34) and former captain Rohit Paudel (33 not out) then stabilised the chase and put Nepal back on the path to victory. Paul remained unbeaten, along with Gulsan Jha, to get the job done for Nepal in the 18th over.

Scores:  Nepal 103 for 5 in 17.2 overs  (Sundeep Jora 34, Rohit Paudel 33*, Dipendra Singh Airee 15; Fairdoon  Dawoodzai 1-10, Abdollah Ahmadzai 1-15, Arab Gull 1-13) beat Afghanistan 102 for 7  in 20 overs (Faisal Khan Ahmadzai 30, Najibullah  Zadran 30,  Nangeyahlia Khan 17*; Kushal Bhurtel 4-21, Lalit Rajbanshi 3-13) by five wickets

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Clash of the Sisters set for October 4

Published

on

Past students of eight schools will come together in the inaugural 'Clash of the Sisters.'

The St. Lawrence’s Convent Past Pupils Association will bring together former students from several leading schools for a day of cricket and camaraderie when the ‘Clash of the Sisters ’26’ takes place at the Wesley College Grounds, Campbell Park, on Sunday, October 4.

The tournament will feature a series of fast-paced 10-over softball cricket matches, with past pupils renewing old friendships while representing their respective schools in a spirit of friendly rivalry.

The women’s competition will feature teams representing St. Lawrence’s Convent, St. Bridget’s Convent, Holy Family Convent, St. Anne’s BMV Wattala, Ave Maria Convent Negombo, Ladies’ College, Musaeus College and Methodist College.

A men’s invitational exhibition match will also be staged, with the Old Wesleyites Sports Club taking on the S. Thomas’ College OBA.

Organisers are also planning a carnival atmosphere away from the cricket, with food stalls, games, entertainment and other activities lined up for alumni, families and visitors.

The event is being organised by the St. Lawrence’s Convent Past Pupils Association 2026/27 with the aim of bringing together different alumni communities and strengthening ties between past pupils through sport.

With eight schools involved in the women’s competition and an exhibition fixture adding further interest, organisers expect the event to provide a lively mix of cricket, fellowship and school spirit.

Continue Reading

Trending