Connect with us

News

Nagananda seeks SC intervention, bribery probe

Published

on

2019 presidential election:

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Attorney-at-law Nagananda Kodituwakku, in his capacity as General Secretary of Vinivida Peramuna, has moved the Supreme Court against the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC), current members of the CIABOC, former members of the Election Commission (EC), SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam, MP, and Chamal Rajapaksa, MP against the EC’s failure to disqualify SLPP presidential candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa on the basis that he had not renounced his US citizenship at the time the EC accepted nominations.

The application in this regard has been made under Article 140 of the Constitution considered with Section 24 of the CIABOC Act No 19 of 1994.

Kodituwakku has alleged that Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s nomination as the SLPP presidential candidate, was accepted whereas the EC rejected him though he renounced his British citizenship. Kodituwakku was to join the fray as the candidate of Okkoma Rajavaru Okkama Vasiyo, a registered political party though the party withdrew support at the last moment.

Public interest litigation activist Kodituwakku named former EC Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya, who is now the Chairman of the Delimitation Commission as the sixth respondent. The petitioner held Deshapriya accountable for the EC’s conduct in that regard.

The petitioner requested the appointment of a Special Bench in terms of Article 132 (3) (iii) to hear and determine his application, direct the CIABOC and /or members of the Commission, Eva Wanasundera, Deepali Wijesundera, Chandra Nimal Wakista (2,3 and 4 respondents, respectively) and its Director General Kanishka Wijerathna (5th respondent) to initiate a credible and independent inquiry into complaints made by the petitioner on the corruption charges levelled against the 6th respondent, as expeditiously as possible and direct the current CIABOC to instruct the 5th respondent to initiate criminal proceedings against the 6th respondent.

Kodituwakku stated that before the enactment of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution in Oct 2020, dual citizens had been disqualified from contesting the presidential election in terms of the Article 91(1) (d) (xiii) of the Constitution.

Kodituwakku, however acknowledged in his petition that the Secretary of Okkoma Rajavaru Okkama Vasiyo, blocked his candidature by withdrawing backing of his party at the last moment.  Kodituwakku has charged the said official in the Nugegoda Magistrate court over what he called a criminal breach of trust and the case is pending.

The law prohibits anyone other than a person nominated by a registered political party, a member of Parliament or a former member of the Parliament from contesting the presidential election.

Kodituwakku has referred to a sworn statement dated May 18, 2021 made available to him by former EC member Prof. Ratnajeevan Hoole (7th respondent) to confirm the discussion he had with the 6th respondent also on May 18, 2021.

The EC accepted Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s nomination after the Court of Appeal dismissed a high profile case in which two civil society activists asked the court to withdraw Rajapaksa’s citizenship, on the basis he renounced it in 2003 to become a citizen of the United States and regained it two years later in an irregular manner.

The three-judge panel on Friday unanimously rejected the case. The Court of Appeal declared that it had no merit.

In his petition, Kodituwakku made reference to a dispute between Deshapriya and Prof. Hoole over the SLPP presidential candidate’s credentials, the former getting in touch with what he called Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s camp and the academic being accused of being an LTTE sympathiser  by a section of the media.

According to the petition, the bone of contention is the failure on the part of the SLPP candidate to produce a certificate of renunciation of his US citizenship.

In the run-up to the presidential election, SLPP Chairman Prof. G.L. Peiris refuted accusations against the party candidate. Prof. Peiris explained the circumstances their candidate had renounced his US citizenship to pave the way for him to join the fray.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PM meets UN Resident Coordinator

Published

on

By

A meeting between Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and the United Nations Resident Coordinator in Sri Lanka,  Marc-Andreé Franche, was held on the 20th of December 2025 at the Prime Minister’s Office.

During the meeting, Mr. Marc-Andreé Franche commended the swift coordination in which the Government acted to rescue affected communities and provide relief following the recent natural disaster situation faced by Sri Lanka.

Comparing experiences from other countries around the world, he noted that the level of international support Sri Lanka has received during such a disaster is exceptionally high. He further emphasized that he would utilize both his professional capacity and personal commitment to the fullest extent to ensure that Sri Lanka receives the necessary assistance.

Expressing appreciation for the continuous support extended by the United Nations to Sri Lanka, the Prime Minister stated that the role played by both the political authority and public officials in the field during this disaster management effort was exemplary. She highlighted that the collective and coordinated efforts of all parties from district leadership to the ground-level officials have become part in this success.

The Prime Minister also affirmed that the Government remains committed to properly managing the international assistance received and to rapidly restoring normalcy to the lives of people in the affected areas.

The meeting was attended by the secretary to the Prime Minister Pradeep Saputhanthri and Secretary to the Ministry of Education  Nalaka Kaluwewa

[Prime Minister’s Media Division]

Continue Reading

News

Suspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals

Published

on

Kumudesh

President, Academy of Health Professionals, Ravi Kumudesh, yesterday (22), alleged that the National Medicines Regulatory Authority’s (NMRA) decision to suspend several batches of Ondansetron Injection USP 8 mg/4 mL (Batch Nos: OD24021E, OD25009E, OD25024E, OD25023E), following suspicions of patient complications, and a few reported deaths, seemed to be a bid to cover-up the latest public health sector crisis.

Kumudesh said so responding to The Island queries.

Kumudesh pointed out that the Chief Executive Officer of the NMRA, and other responsible officials of the Ministry of Health, were on record as having said that the alleged bacterial contamination in the medicine in question was based on laboratory test results generated at the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy.

He, however, emphasised that the Kandy facility lacked legally mandated facilities, validated systems, or regulatory accreditation required to conduct pharmaceutical sterility testing in accordance with internationally accepted regulatory standards.

“The Academy of Health Professionals is aware that the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy, does not possess the required facilities,” Kumudesh said, urging the government to come clean in this matter.

Kumudesh said the regulatory action taken by the political authority was aimed at deceiving the public, and theAcademy of Health Professionals had raised the issues with Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa, Health Secretary Dr. Anil Jasinghe, NMRA head Dr. Ananda Wijewickrama and Director General Health Services (DGHS) Dr. Asela Gunawardena.

Kumudesh pointed out that the Kandy facility was meant to meet requirements within the Kandy National Hospital and not a world standard testing lab. Kumedesh sought an explanation as to how the suspended Ondansetron Injection had been administered on 13 December to a person warded at the hospital where NMRA head is based, a day after the NMRA decided to suspend it.

Public health sector trade union activist Kumudesh said that the Health Ministry couldn’t turn a blind eye to the disclosure that post-mortem reports of two persons, who allegedly died after being given the same medicine by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, did not identify the medicine as the cause of death. According to him, the National Institute of Infectious Diseases administered the same medicine to patients, on multiple occasions, in the wake of the controversy.

Kumudesh said that it would be the responsibility of the government to ensure a comprehensive technical, legal, and administrative investigation into, what he called, Ondansetron affair. Having lambasted all previous governments of waste, corruption and irregularities, at the expense of the hapless public, the NPP couldn’t, under any circumstances, side-step the issue. “In the interest of transparency, regulatory credibility, and the protection of public health, this should be properly investigated,” Kumudesh said.

The crux of the matter was that the very basis of NMRA’s suspension of Ondansetron batches seemed to be irregular and questionable, Kumudesh said.

The Academy of Health Professionals, in its letter to Dr. Jayatissa, sought the Health Ministry’s response to the following questions: 1. Who requested the Microbiology Laboratory of the National Hospital, Kandy, to conduct sterility testing on this medicinal product?

2. Under what legal provisions was such a request made, and on what basis was the laboratory authorised to accept and perform such testing?

3. Who conducted the test, and who issued the report? Did those individuals possess the requisite professional qualifications, regulatory authorisation, and legal mandate to do so?

4. Did the laboratory possess the required infrastructure, validated testing systems, quality assurance mechanisms, and specialised training necessary to perform pharmaceutical sterility testing in compliance with regulatory standards?

5. If patient complications were attributed to microbial contamination, were all related materials—including syringes, IV lines, infusion fluids, and other associated devices—systematically tested? If not, on what scientific basis was it concluded that the contamination originated exclusively from the medicine?

6. Given that the NMRA is legally empowered to suspend a medicine as a precautionary measure, even without laboratory confirmation, when serious safety concerns arise, what was the justification for relying on an irregular and non-regulatory laboratory test instead?

Kumudesh stressed that Ondansetron, and nine other injectable medicines that had been suspended, were all ordered by the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC) from an Indian manufacturer, Maan Pharmaceuticals.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Dr. Jayatissa visits India amidst Ondansetron controversy

Published

on

Minister Jayatissa meets Anupriya Patel, Minister of State for Health & Family Welfare

Amidst the ongoing controversy over the suspension of several batches of Indian manufactured Ondansetron Injection USP 8 mg/4 mL (Batch Nos: OD24021E, OD25009E, OD25024E, OD25023E) over safety fears, Health Minister Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa undertook a visit to New Delhi.

The Indian HC in Colombo said: ‘Dr. Jayatissa, the Minister of Health and Mass Media of the Government of Sri Lanka led a delegation to India from 17–19 December 2025 to participate in the 2nd WHO Traditional Medicine Global Summit held at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. The Summit was jointly organized by the World Health Organization and the Ministry of Ayush, Government of India.

The Summit was held under the theme “Restoring Balance: The Science and Practice of Health and Well-Being” and aimed to advance a global movement focused on restoring balance for individuals and the planet through the scientific understanding and practice of traditional medicine.

During the Summit, the Minister participated in the Ministerial Roundtable and delivered his remarks, highlighting Sri Lanka’s perspectives and rich traditions in Ayurveda and traditional healing.

During the visit, the Minister held bilateral meetings with Anupriya Patel, Minister of State for Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, and Prataprao Ganpatrao Jadhav, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. Discussions focused on strengthening cooperation in healthcare and traditional medicine, including regulatory collaboration, research linkages, and capacity-building initiatives.

On the sidelines of the programme, Minister Jayatissa also visited Apollo Hospitals to gain insights into the implementation of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models and to explore best practices.

The visit reaffirmed the shared commitment of India and Sri Lanka to deepen collaboration in the fields of health and traditional medicine and to explore new avenues of partnership for the benefit of the people of both countries.’

Continue Reading

Trending