Connect with us

News

Morbid musings of an octogenarian

Published

on

Royal College

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

When most human beings pass the Best By date, when they overstay their welcome on this planet, when their miserable lives, with all the aches, pains and near-unbearable conditions are kept tolerable with the miracles of modern medications, they generally fantasize about the lives they have led.

We have all heard of the old theory that, at the moment of your death, your whole life flashes before your eyes. Many of us cynical non-believers have dismissed this theory as just another fantasy, like all those creations of imagination surrounding near and after death experiences. But I was surprised the other day while reading an article on a paper called “Time, Story, and Wisdom: Emerging Themes in Narrative Gerontology”, published in 2006, by William Randall and Gary Kenyon, which gives a fresh insight into “the inside” of aging. A central perception that human beings are “narrative beings”.

This omnipresent “narratization”, even post mortem, was discovered when an 87-year-old epileptic was rushed to an emergency room after a fall in 2016, bleeding in his skull. During an EEG (Electroencephalogram), the man had a heart attack and died. “What happened next is what’s eye-popping. The scan found that the man’s brain seemed to replay memories in the 30 seconds before and after his heart stopped beating”.

Some scientists believe that the brain might continue to be subliminally active for some time – even up to seven minutes – after death, which may be the time when you relive your memories, and find a way to bid a final farewell to the world you knew and to those you loved – and perhaps even give a final middle finger to those you hated. “Or maybe it’s a process of the brain rewinding itself, revisiting the information it has accumulated in a lifetime”.

The study concludes with the importance of creating a unifying narrative of your existence, as “it may be the last thing we do when we’re alive – and even the first thing we do after we are dead”.

At my age, I tend to read up on such morbid studies, knowing full well that my Best By time is long past. In fact, I was kept alive by the aforementioned miracles of modern medication, and more importantly, by filial intervention, when I should have cashed in my chips a couple of years ago. I have since forgiven my son for prolonging this miserable existence with his constant care and attention. I believe I reached rock bottom of humiliation the other day when I visited the clinic at the local hospital. The clinic was, as usual, full, standing room only. A kindly old lady, 70-years-old if a day, grey haired, toothless, saw me, got up and said, “Aiyo, Uncle, you look very tired, please take my seat”! it sounded infinitely more pathetic in Sinhala.

Instead of such suffering such constant and shameful blows to my ancient but still vibrant ego, I could have been enjoying at least one of those glorious after-death experiences offered by the many great religions, be it savoring a single malt manna in a variety of heavens in the skies, being reborn as a scion of one of the great modern political dynasties like the Trumps or the Rajapaksas – anywhere but the paradise offering a “reward” of 72 virgins; that is my idea of the other place.

I am, of course, assuming that I will be duly rewarded for the exemplary life I have led in my long existence on this planet. This version may be questioned, even laughed at in disbelief by many, but I am sticking to my story. As I said, many of those who know the real truth are safely dead. Dead men – and women – tell no tales.

As recommended by the above study, I have been putting some order and embellishments into my past experiences, so that when my time comes and my life flashes before my eyes, and in the seven minutes after I die, they will flash in some organized structure; in a manner that is entirely my version and complimentary to me. After all, it is my brain, and no one else should have any control of my version of my past in the last moments of my life.

I had a pretty normal childhood, being fortunate enough to be born into an elite Sri Lankan family. My father was a Civil Servant, and after he completed his stint of duties in the outstations and qualified for an administrative job in Colombo, we settled in the environs of Royal College, where my mother owned a house. My father was an old boy of many Colombo schools (Wesley, Nalanda and Ananda) after his excellent primary education in the village school in Hikkaduwa.

He would have preferred that his sons attend his final alma mater, Ananda College, where he had been an outstanding student. However my mother, ever the snob, gave the excuse of proximity and persuaded my father to send us to Royal. As usual, she got her way, but with the grace that made my father believe that the decision was his, a subtly domineering quality that many Sri Lankan ladies possess.

I loved my years at Royal, enjoying wisdom of its secular system of education and the dedication of an array of brilliant teachers who equipped us with an academic background in the English medium that was second to none – globally.

In fact, I would like to share a story about my younger brother to prove this point. His schooling at Royal was interrupted at a very young age, when my father was on assignment with his employers in London. He spent a few months in a primary school in Highgate, North London. When it was time for him to return to Ceylon (as our nation was then known), the headmaster of the Highgate school visited our home, and tried to prevail upon my father to let him continue his studies in England, rather than return to the primitive backwoods of the colonies. He said my brother had showed great academic promise in the few months he spent in the Highgate school, and his potential would be best served if he continued his academic career in England.

I guess his idea of a school in Ceylon was a mud hut with students seated on the ground and the teachers chattering native gibberish. My father politely refused this kind offer with a smile of sardonic condescension, the expression he constantly wore throughout his long life, the expression that is permanently etched in my memory.

My brother returned to Ceylon and had an outstanding academic career at Royal and at the Colombo Medical College. After teaching Pathology at the Medical College for a couple of years, he went on to emigrate to the United States of America, where he has been, for decades, the Professor of the Faculty of Medical Pathology at the University of Southern California, one of the finest private universities in the nation, if not the world. All this was the “icing on the cake, baked at home” at Royal, as referred to by the late, great Lakshman Kadirgamar.

My brother was also a non-smoker, teetotaler, never gambled in his life (except, on one occasion, when he, a lifelong Republican, backed Mitt Romney for the US presidency in 2012, to defeat incumbent President Barack Obama, against my advice) and married the first attractive woman he met. My father used to introduce him to his friends as the black sheep of the family.

My career at Royal was above average at best, though I had my moments. I was reasonably proficient in schoolwork, and went through a truncated academic career with some success. I tried my hand at every sport available in College, except for Rugby, because I have a terrible fear of physical abuse. I showed more enthusiasm than skill in the other sports I played, cricket, tennis, rowing, athletics. I think the only way to describe my prowess in sports was that I was mediocre in my versatility – or perhaps a better description would be that I was versatile in my mediocrity.

Apart from a world-class education that Royal provided, I made many lifelong friends, many of whom remain my closest friends today. A vast majority of my schoolmates have sadly left this mortal coil, hopefully to greener pastures. Many in my group made outstanding achievements in politics, commerce, academia and other careers of their choosing, which added to the already distinguished reputation of the Old School.

I was only a part of this illustrious group by association, having achieved no distinctions of my own in any sphere. However, I hope to out-achieve them by outliving them all – out of the 100 boys who gained admittance to Royal in 1952, I believe only about 20 are still alive. The odds are getting better by the month. I’m joking, of course. I wish all my schoolmates long, happy and healthy lives. Just not longer, happier and healthier than mine.

My school career at Royal was cut short, when my father accepted the aforementioned assignment with his employers in England. Space and discretion prevent me from listing the extraordinary means – the demon drink, slow horses and fast women would be the favored trifecta – which prevented me from reaching my full potential in every aspect of my life, be it my university, marriage or career. Suffice to say that I couldn’t have disappointed my parents, and myself, more.

So I will conclude this rather narcissistic narrative, which is the one I hope will flash before my eyes when the time comes, with the consolation of an ancient adage of the sport which has given me great pleasure over the years – horse racing:

“The test of a true thoroughbred is not to run fast, but to transmit the genes”. I may not have run fast, and may have run in hedonistic circles, but I have successfully transmitted my genes, in no small measure. Dumb luck and coincidence, maybe, but isn’t that what life really is all about?



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending