Connect with us

News

Medical Specialists lambast govt.’s attempt to restructure NMRA

Published

on

The Association of Medical Specialists (AMS) has written to Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesingh, expressing its grave concern over recent media reports of intended ‘administrative restructuring’ of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) for ‘establishing a system to import medicine, bypassing the NMRA’. These attempts are being pushed by unscrupulous elements with vested interests trying to blame the NMRA for the shortage of drugs in the country, the AMS has said in its letter signed by Dr LakKumar Fernando President-AMS, and Dr R Gnanasekeram General Secretary-AMS

The AMS has pointed out that NMRA was established through an Act of Parliament (NMRA Act No 5 of

2015) in 2015 to provide regulatory oversight for medicinal products. It was established as an apex body independent of the Department of Health with the sole objective of improving availability of quality assured medicines and medical devices to our people. By engaging in such NMRA ensures professionalism and transparency in the regulatory process. This is in line with global good regulatory practices and good governance, strongly encouraged, endorsed and supported by the World Health Organization.

The AMS letter to the PM further says: “It should be noted that the NMRA as a regulatory body have absolutely no role to play in the procurement of medicines to state or other agencies. As all of us are very well aware, the present drug shortage in the country is due to lack of foreign currency where main purchasing arm (SPC together with MSD) could not place necessary orders on time and NMRA has no responsibility in this matter.

“Therefore, we feel that these allegations are baseless and unfounded. Such allegations are fabricated intentionally to destabilize the well-established regulatory system of medicines in our country. In our opinion, blaming the medicines regulator on the current shortage of certain medicines and medical devices is baseless, irrational and totally unacceptable.

“Further, we are aware that the NMRA acted promptly and proactively in establishing a mechanism to accept donations of medicines in the present crisis. Unfortunately, the support received from some of the directorates of the ministry of health in this endeavor was not encouraging.

“It is very important to note that interfering with the independence of the National medicines regulator is a retrogressive step, which will only pave the way to undesirables to profiteer at the expense of general public who have already been hit hard by the spiraling economic downturn. Many attempts have been made to meddle with the independence of the NMRA in the recent past at the behest of politicians and businesses with vested interests. Continuing to do so will ultimately destroy the NMRA, compromising the safety and efficacy of medicines available to the public.

“Therefore, we urge the Hon. Prime Minister and the Hon. Minister of Health not to be misled by poor advice of various elements with vested interest. Instead, we urge you to take meaningful steps to solve the issue of dearth of medicines whilst strengthening the independence of the NMRA. At the same time, the Association of Medical specialists will not hesitate to take appropriate action if the independence and the autonomy of the NMRA is interfered with.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PSTA worse than PTA: FSP

Published

on

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.

He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.

Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.

He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.

The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.

Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.

Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.

“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.

He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.

“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.

Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.

He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.

Continue Reading

News

Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.

Published

on

Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.

According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.

The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.

CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.

She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.

Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail

Published

on

Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.

The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.

Continue Reading

Trending