Connect with us

News

JVP terror cannot be left out in debate on Batalanda detention centre: SJB

Published

on

Mujibur Rahuman

The SJB yesterday (09) said that what had happened at the Batalanda detention centre (Batalanda Housing Scheme of the State Fertiliser Corporation) couldn’t be debated leaving out the JVP terrorism in the late ’80s.

The top SJB spokesman Mujibur Rahuman said that the JVP, that made an abortive bid to assassinate the then President J.R. Jayewardene, inside Parliament, on 18 August, 1987, as they opposed the signing of the Indo-Lanka peace accord on 29 July, 1987, couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for the atrocities it perpetrated at that time.

The Colombo district MP said that the SJB intended to use today’s debate on the Batalanda detention centre to remind the country of the JVP’s brutal conduct at that time.

Responding to another query, the former UNPer said that this debate couldn’t have been held at a better day. Declaring that the UNP had no option but to fight back in the face of JVP terror, the outspoken lawmaker said that the attack on President JRJ claimed the life of Deniyaya MP Keerthi Abeywickrema and wounded several others, including then National Security Minister Lalith Athulathmudali, who was later assassinated by an LTTE gunman.

Reminding that the first lawmaker killed by the JVP, after the signing of the Indo-Lanka accord, was Tangalle MP Jinadasa Weerasinghe, MP Rahuman said that the Parliament having to debate Batalanda in the very Parliament where JVPer Ajith Kumara threw two hand grenades at the UNP parliamentary group meeting was nothing but a twist of fate.

The majority of the JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) may not know that the JVP later recognised the grenade attacker by accommodating him in their decision-making politburo. At the 1999 Provincial Council election, the JVP fielded Ajith Kumara as their chief ministerial candidate, the SJBer said.

Referring to the seven MoUs/Agreements signed by Sri Lanka and India recently, MP Rahuman said that the JVP declared a ban on Indian goods at the onset of its second insurrection. The JVP found fault with the then Chairperson of State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC), Dr. Mrs. Gladys Jayawardena, for importing medicine from India. The JVP assassinated her in early September, 1989, at the height of the insurgency, lawmaker Rahuman said. Having killed people to enforce the boycott of Indian goods ordered by them, President Dissanayake last week entered into a slew of agreements with India, the Opposition lawmaker said.

The MoU on medicine may compel Sri Lanka to procure as much as 80 percent of supplies from Modi’s India, MP Rahuman said.

The MoU on Defence Cooperation may cause catastrophe and place the country in an extremely risky situation, MP Rahuman added.

The Colombo District MP said that the breakaway faction of the UNP would have to take the responsibility of defending the party as it was not represented in the current Parliament.

During that period, the government adopted counter-insurgency strategies. The armed forces and police acted on the orders of the political leadership, he said, challenging the NPP government to reveal the exact number of persons detained under JRJ’s Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) of 1979. “We believe at least 15 people have been taken into custody since the last presidential election. If I’m wrong, the Public Security Ministry can set the record straight. Recently a youth was detained under PTA for pasting a sticker against Israel,” MP Rahuman said.

Rahuman mentioned that the JVP killed several thousand people and destroyed may be billions worth of public property. “We intend to ask the relevant authorities to disclose the total number of law enforcement and armed forces officers and men killed by the JVP during that period,” Rahuman said. Those who felt the debate could be used to tarnish the image of the UNP may end up with egg on their face, Rahuman said.

The MP said that Batalanda had never been an issue for the JVP. Had that been an issue, how could they have joined the UNP at the time I was with that party to support retired General Sarath Fonseka’s candidature at the 2010 presidential election, MP Rahuman asked.

By Shamindra Ferdinando



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fuel crunch looms

Published

on

Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies

by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane

The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).

Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.

The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.

The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.

“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.

Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.

The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.

The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.

“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.

He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,

along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.

He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.

The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.

The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.

Continue Reading

News

Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials

Published

on

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court. He appeared before the court in layman’s clothes. Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha.

by Norman Palihawadane

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.

The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.

He appeared before the court in civilian attire.

Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.

The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.

He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.

The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.

The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.

Continue Reading

News

Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.

The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.

Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.

He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.

In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.

He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.

Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.

Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

Continue Reading

Trending