Latest News
India vs Pakistan match is a godsend for T20 World Cup hosts Sri Lanka
Almost 30 years ago today, India and Pakistan formed a combined cricket team to take on Sri Lanka ahead of the 1996 Cricket World Cup in an unprecedented moment of unity in the sport’s history.
The two age-old rivals put aside their differences and came together in an act of solidarity to support a fellow South Asian team, who faced the threat of match boycotts in a tournament they had battled hard to host.
India versus Pakistan is the most highly marketed fixture at every multination tournament – the World Cup, Asia Cup or Asian Games – whether it’s a men’s, women’s or Under-19 event.
Few sporting events globally carry the weight and anticipation of an India-Pakistan cricket match. So, when Pakistan’s government ordered its team not to face India at the ongoing T20 World Cup, the tournament was briefly pushed into a state of chaos.
It also left Sri Lanka, the designated host of the fixture, holding its collective breath.
A week of negotiations led to a dramatic late U-turn by the Pakistani government and the match will now take place as scheduled on Sunday at the R Premadasa International Cricket Stadium in Colombo.
But what if the boycott had gone ahead? The impact could have been catastrophic, not just for Pakistan, but also for the International Cricket Council (ICC), as well as Sri Lanka.
With the crisis seemingly averted, the island nation stands poised to reap the benefits in its financial landscape, diplomatic standing and community.
The tourism and hospitality industry was one of the hardest hit during Sri Lanka’s financial meltdown and this match will see an enormous influx of fans from India and Pakistan coming into the country.
Hotels in and around Colombo were fully booked out well ahead of the tournament but the industry braced itself for heavy losses after Pakistan threatened a boycott.
“There’s been a massive impact since the boycott was announced,” Sudarshana Pieris, who works in Sri Lanka’s hospitality sector, told Al Jazeera.
“All major hotels in Colombo were fully booked by Indian travel agencies well ahead of the match and once the boycott was announced, we lost almost all of those bookings,” he said.
“But after Pakistan reversed their decision, hotel room rates shot up by about 300-400 percent at five-star establishments in Colombo.”
It’s not just hotels but several other local businesses – from street vendors to high-end restaurants – who are hoping for an increased footfall and spending over the weekend.
These short trips and the experiences they offer could influence visitors to extend their stay or return to Sri Lanka on holiday, long after the game has ended, in a potential long-term benefit to the industry.
Another relatively underestimated impact of the game would be the employment opportunities it creates, albeit temporarily, in the media, event management, security and transportation industries.
Asanka Hadirampela, a freelance journalist and broadcaster currently working as a Sinhala language commentator for the World Cup, recognises the marquee match as a great opportunity from a personal standpoint.
“This is my first World Cup as a broadcaster,” Hadirampela said.
“The India-Pakistan fixture is the biggest and most-watched game of the tournament. So to get to work on such a match is exciting and I consider it a special achievement.”
The lines are always blurred between sport and politics in South Asia.
So while the financial gains are expected to be significant, the fixture’s impact on the region’s geopolitical environment cannot go amiss.
Pakistan’s boycott, too, was explicitly political, as confirmed by the country’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif when he said that they were offering support to Bangladesh after the Tigers were kicked out of the tournament by the ICC.
The reversal of Pakistan’s decision, which they said came after requests to reconsider the boycott by several regional “friends”, was steeped in politics, too.
Sri Lanka’s President Anura Kumara Dissanayake reportedly had a phone conversation with PM Sharif, urging his government to rethink their decision to boycott the game as the successful staging of this encounter would not only position Sri Lanka as a capable host of global sporting events but also reinforce its standing as a neutral mediator in a region fraught with geopolitical complexities.
Sri Lanka and Pakistan have always maintained strong diplomatic relations, which have extended to the cricket field as well.
Sri Lanka were one of the first teams to travel to Pakistan following their 10-year ostracisation from international cricket, which came as a result of a terrorist attack targeting the Sri Lankan team in March 2009.
When Al Jazeera reached out to Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), its vice president Ravin Wickramaratne confirmed that SLC did, indeed, reach out to the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) after the boycott was announced.
“We asked them to reconsider the decision,” Wickramaratne said.
“It [boycott] would have impacted Sri Lanka economically, whether directly or indirectly.
“We have always had a good relationship with the PCB and we have always supported them, so we’re happy with their decision.”
A little over 24 hours ahead of the match in Colombo, there is a sense of palpable excitement and a growing buzz around the fixture as it returns from the brink of cancellation.
As of Saturday morning, 28,000 tickets had been sold for the game but local organisers expect a capacity crowd of 40,000 to make it into the stands.
Come Sunday, thousands more will line the streets in and around Maligawatte, the bustling Colombo suburb that houses the famous Premadasa Stadium.

Latest News
India in final after clinching high-scoring thriller
On a night of pulsating drama, studded with 499 runs in 40 overs, including 34 sixes, India sealed their progression to Sunday’s T20 World Cup final, thanks to Sanju Samson’s second defining knock in as many matches, and a display of targeted magnificence from the inevitable Jasprit Bumrah. But to do so, they had to withstand an innings from the ages from the precocious Jacob Bethell, whose 105 from 48 balls kept England swinging for the fences in a heroically thwarted chase in Mumbai.
Set an unearthly 254 to win, after Samson had backed up his crucial 97 not out against West Indies with another mighty innings of 89 from 42, England lost three wickets in the powerplay, and eventually drifted out of contention as India’s seamers held their nerves in the death overs to leave an improbable requirement of 30 from the final over.
In the final analysis, however, it was the fine margin of fielding that made the key difference. Where Harry Brook dropped an utter clanger in the third over of the match, to reprieve Samson on 15 and leave his hapless bowler, Jofra Archer, winded and mojo-less, India’s defence turned on two stunning pieces of work from Axar Patel in the deep.
The first, at deep cover, showed Brook how it’s done, as England’s likeliest matchwinner was extracted for just 7 from 6; the second, at deep backward point, was an incredible running relay effort to intercept an uppercut from England’s player of the tournament, Will Jacks, whose 77-run stand for the fifth wicket with Bethell had given England a strong chance as they approached the final six overs.
Suryakumar Yadav said he would have batted first had he won the toss, which sounded like a bluff, given how compellingly the stats warned against it. No team had batted first and won a floodlight knockout at the T20 World Cup for 13 consecutive matches, since Sri Lanka’s victory over West Indies in their 2014 semi-final.
By the end of a 67-run powerplay, however, the inevitable was already charging into view. Sanju Samson had come into the contest with an unfavourable match-up against Archer – three dismissals for 23 in 25 previous deliveries in T20Is – but he also had the momentum of his match-winning knock at the weekend. He scarcely needed a helping hand to send his innings into overdrive.
Brook offered it nonetheless. It is hard to conceive of a more costly drop than the one England’s captain put down at mid-on in Archer’s second over. Samson had already cashed in on his shorter length, with two fours and a six in his first six balls, when Archer aimed a yard fuller and induced a scuffed drive at throat height. It was a dolly by any measure, and Brook’s face was a picture of guilt – first as the ball burst through his fingers, and then when Samson bludgeoned Archer high over the leg side two balls later.
At least Abhishek Sharma’s fallow campaign had been extended by that point – with Will Jacks trading two thumped fours for a miscue to deep midwicket in his opening over. It meant that England were spared a direct re-run of their previous bowl-first ordeal at the Wankhede, 13 months earlier, though the lessons of that night scarcely seemed to have been heeded.
Archer retreated with figures of 0 for 26 in two overs, to be replaced by Jamie Overton, who strayed far too full throughout his night’s work, and then by Sam Curran, whose change-ups could not stem the tide either. Samson was too well set to be suckered by the moon-ball, which he duly plonked over the head of mid-off.
The second most culpable moment of England’s fielding effort, however, was still to come. With two run-hungry batters itching to hit the spin, Liam Dawson’s introduction for the eighth over felt like a plan with too many drawbacks. Ishan Kishan and Samson duly traded a six apiece in a 19-run demolition, and for the first time in his T20I career, Dawson was effectively rendered unusable.
The gloves were off from that point on. Curran returned for a change of ends but was subjected to a 20-run tag-teaming, and at 112 for 1 after nine overs, jeopardy had left the building for India’s batters. Kishan flogged one last boundary before miscuing Rashid to long-off for 39 from 18, but out strode Shivam Dube to exact revenge with two huge strikes over long-on in the legspinner’s third over.
Archer’s return for a rare mid-innings foray telegraphed England’s desperation. But Samson, similarly, had eyes only for the boundary, and none on impending milestones. He continued to accelerate into his night, marching into the 80s with two more sixes to take his personal haul to seven, before that man Jacks lobbed a wide length ball across his bows to induce a miscue to deep cover. Since the start of India’s must-win in Kolkata on Sunday night, Samson had battered the small matter of 186 runs from 92 balls.
The only moment of genuine traction for England came in the 18th over, as Curran closed out his tough night with an excellent array of yorkers. And yet, he still went for 12, as Dube clubbed his fourth six before being sold a dummy by Hardik Pandya… who then lost control of his bat in a slog through the line, only for Tom Banton to spill the resultant chance at long-on.
Archer’s final over wasn’t anything like the same quality. He retreated with gruesome figures of 1 for 61, as Tilak Varma slotted three sixes in four balls before inside-edging onto his stumps for the most pyrrhic wicket of the night. Thereafter, Hardik was able to farm the strike for his favourable match-up with Jacks, belting two last sixes over the leg side to romp India past 250.
The good news for England was that Phil Salt flicked their first ball of the chase through fine leg for four, and that Jos Buttler also found the boundary for the first time in six innings, with an emphatic thump over the covers two balls later.
The bad news for England was that the bowler on the receiving end was not Jasprit Bumrah, but Arshdeep Singh. India had given themselves license to keep their most deadly weapon in reserve, and see what lumps they could extract before his deployment. Pandya duly obliged with a first-ball outswinger that Salt could only skew to cover, to end his fallow campaign with 5 from three balls.
Bumrah’s eventual entry, for the fifth over, produced a moment of poetry. A first-ball cutter suckered Brook straight out of the hand as he skied the ball high out to extra cover, but if that was good, then the snapping of the trap was even better, as Axar tracked back from the edge of the ring and clung on with a full-length dive, looking over his shoulder.
Back he went, up Suryakumar’s sleeve, not to be seen again until the 11th over, and then hidden again until the 16th, by which point an eight-run over was gold-dust. His pinpoint dot-ball yorker to Sam Curran was greeted with one of the loudest cheers of an already raucous night.
Such was England’s refusal to buckle, however, that with 45 still needed from 18, Bumrah had to go again immediately. A barrage of perfect yorkers offered up just four singles and a two, to leave England needing back-to-back 20-run overs. That was the game, there and then.
Bumrah’s extraction of Brook for 7 from six had been a perfectly targeted strike, but Bethell strode out with a refusal to be overawed. He silenced the Wankhede’s “Boom Boom” chants with a second-ball swivel-pull for six over fine leg, then greeted Varun Chakravarthy with three more in a row, over long-on, long-off and deep third, as if to plant his 360-degree versatility like a flag.
In the same over, however, England lost their third powerplay wicket, and another of their kingpins. Buttler’s ugly campaign had flirted with resuscitation even as he kept losing his shape on a succession of heaves across the line. However, for the third Wankhede innings in a row, he reached the 20s at a 150 strike rate and then immediately gave it away, this time to a flat-footed waft across Varun’s googly.
Astonishingly, England still emerged from the powerplay one run to the good – 68 to 67 – but at three wickets down, it was already a clear race between runs required and wickets standing. Banton got the memo by drilling Axar’s first two deliveries down the ground for six before ruining the moment by slogging over the top of a more flighted follow-up, but Bethell took further lumps out of Varun’s figures with back-to-back fours to bring up England’s hundred in the ninth over.
His maiden Test century in Sydney had been an astonishing display of precocity and shot selection; this awesome effort was everything that he had forsaken to produce that innings and more. The self-sacrifice he had shown in his judgement outside off in January was translated into a full repertoire of 360-degree strokeplay. Until his ODI hundred against South Africa last summer, he had never previously made a professional century. Now, he has joined an exclusive club with three figures in all three formats. One thing is for sure, this won’t be the last the Wankhede crowd will see of him.
Brief scores:
India 253 for 7 in 20 overs (Sanju Samson 89, Ishan Kishan 39, Shivam Dube 43, Suryakumar Yadav 11, Hardik Pandya 27, Tilak Varma 21; Jofra Archer 1-61, Will Jacks 2-40, Adil Rashid 2-41) beat England 246 for 7 in 20 overs (Jos Buttler 25, Jacob Bethell 105, Tom Benton 17, Will Jacks 35, Sam Curran 18, Jofra Archer 19*; Arshdeep Singh 1-51, Hardik Pandya 2-38, Jasprit Bumrah 1-33, Varun Chakravarthy 1-64, Axar Patel 1-35) by seven runs
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
England elect to field first at Wankhede
England won the toss and chose to field first in the 2nd semi-final of the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup
India XI: Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson (wk), Ishan Kishan, Suryakumar Yadav (capt), Tilak Varma, Hardik Pandya, Shivam Dube, Axar Patel, Arshdeep Singh, Varun Chakravarthy, Jasprit Bumrah
England XI: Phil Salt, Jos Buttler (wk), Jacob Bethell, Harry Brook (capt), Tom Banton, Sam Curran, Will Jacks, Jamie Overton, Liam Dawson, Jofra Archer, Adil Rashid.
Latest News
Iran denies its drones hit airport in Azerbaijan’s exclave as war widens
A Iranian drone attack has targeted Azerbaijan’s autonomous Nakhchivan exclave, opening yet another front in the ongoing war launched y the United States and Israel and the retaliation from Tehran, according to Azeri authorities.
Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that the incident occurred at about 12 noon (08:00 GMT) on Thursday.
“One drone struck the terminal building of the airport in the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, while another drone fell near a school building in the village of Shakarabad,” the ministry said.
“We strongly condemn these drone attacks launched from the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
It added that the attack injured two civilians and caused material damage at the airport.
The ministry demanded “a clear explanation” from Iran and said the country “reserves the right to take appropriate response measures”.
It has summoned Iranian Ambassador Mojtaba Demirchilou over the incident.
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi later denied that the country had targeted Azerbaijan.
“The Islamic Republic of Iran has not targeted the Republic of Azerbaijan,” said Gharibabadi in comments carried by Iran’s Tasnim news agency. “We do not target our neighbouring countries.”
“Iran’s policy is only to strike the military bases of its enemies” that are active in the region and used to attack Iran, including those of the US and Israel, he added.
Nakhchivan, bordering Iran and Turkiye, was part of a historic US brokered peace deal signed last year between former deadly foes Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The land corridor, dubbed the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity” (TRIPP), gave the US development rights for the proposed route connecting Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan exclave and creating a passage between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Iran has long opposed the planned transit route, also known as the Zangezur corridor, fearing it would cut the country off from Armenia and the rest of the Caucasus while bringing potentially hostile foreign forces close to its borders.
Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar said, “Iran has long been accusing the Azeri government of turning Azerbaijan into an Israeli spy base.”
“They are accusing [Azerbaijani President] Ilham Aliyev of undermining Iran’s security from its northern border,” Serdar added. “Iran said multiple times that if Azerbaijan did not stop, it would be punished.”
Serdar said Thursday’s drone strikes were sending a clear message to the Azeri government. “Iran is engaging in a conflict with neighbouring countries,” he said, adding, “the Gulf, Turkiye and now Azerbaijan.”
[Aljazeera]
-
Features4 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion7 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features7 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion4 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business7 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Business1 day agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
Features4 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
-
Features5 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
