News
Gevindu faults Prez, PM over deferred 22 A
‘House in a pathetic situation’
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The shocking postponement of a two-day debate, and the vote on the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, that was to be held on Oct. 06 and 07, would further erode public confidence in the Parliamentary system of governance, SLPP National List MP Gevindu Cumaratunga said on Thursday (06).The ruling coalition blocked the debate, regardless of the consequences, though the party leaders, at a meeting chaired by Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, earlier in the day, decided to go ahead with the debate, outspoken lawmaker Cumaratunga told the media.
The civil society activist blamed President Ranil Wickremesinghe and Premier Dinesh Gunawardena for holding up the process.President Wickremesinghe’s special statement on his recently concluded visits to the UK, Japan and the Philippines, and related matters with the focus on the economy, was meant to put off the scheduled debate, MP Cumaratunga said. The President of the Yuthukama civil society organization questioned the need to deliver a statement at the expense of a matter of utmost national importance. The irate lawmaker said that he was quite disappointed at the disgraceful way the government parliamentary group plotted to shelve the scheduled debate.
Pointing out that UNP leader Wickremesinghe, during his brief tenure as the Prime Minister (May 12, 2022-July 20,2022), consulted all political parties and was able to reach a general consensus regarding the 22nd Amendment, MP Cumaratunga asked whether President Wickremesinghe changed his priorities after receiving the presidency.The Parliament on July 20 elected Wickremesinghe as the President to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five-year term.
Lawmaker Cumaratunga said that the postponement couldn’t be justified under any circumstances as the top leadership of the government repeatedly assured the country of their intention to enact 22nd Amendment. Such broken promises should be examined against the backdrop of the ongoing unprecedented political-economic-social crisis, MP Cumaratunga. Asserting that the government caused itself immense harm, the MP alleged the powers that be missed another opportunity to strengthen parliamentary democracy.
MP Cumaratunga said that the proponents of the proposed new law were quite happy when President Wickremesinghe arrived at the parliament. “I felt the President was there to influence the government parliamentary group as well as other supporters. But, the President didn’t at least bother to mention 22nd Amendment when he addressed the parliament, the MP said. The President actually avoided the issue at hand,” MP Cumaratunga said. The first time entrant to parliament described the government strategy as well as the latest developments in parliament as tragic.Strongly condemning those who opposed 22nd Amendment on the basis of various concerns, MP Cumaratunga urged the government to conduct the two day debate and the vote on 20 Amendment at the next parliamentary session later this month.
The MP stressed that what really matters is the 22nd Amendment reduced executive powers, thereby strengthened the Parliament. Responding to The Island queries, MP Cumaratunga urged political parties and groups represented in parliament to take what he called overall national interests into consideration without seeking their petty political and personal advantages. The MP recalled how the dual citizenship issue inflicted catastrophic damages to Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government and contributed to the rapid decline of that administration leading to the ultimate collapse in July this year.
Lawmaker Cumaratunga said that even Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC, too, was a victim of the government strategy. The MP claimed that the chief mover of the 22 Amendment in parliament appeared to have been taken by surprise as a result of the government’s move. “Minister Rajapaksa seemed to have been interested in going ahead with the proceedings. But, his party’s strategy appeared to have been different,” MP Cumaratunga said.
The Yuthukama chief said the ousted President blundered by failing to place before the public the much touted draft of the new Constitution prepared by a team led by Romesh de Silva, PC. The 20 Amendment was enacted in late Oct 2020 on the basis of repeated assurances that a new Constitution would be ready by the completion of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s second year in office, the MP said.The economy was in such a precarious situation, the government couldn’t cause further political turmoil, MP Cumaratunga said. Referring to various statements made by both government and Opposition members on the 22 Amendment following President Wickremesinghe’s statement, the lawmaker described the situation as pathetic.
News
Lanka enters new phase of prosecutions as hurdles clear
MONETABRIEF –The prosecution of high-profile individuals from the former Rajapaksa administrations is set to escalate this month with the clearing of legal hurdles and administrative bottlenecks, according to officials involved in the process.
Former president Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s attempt to secure an order preventing his arrest in connection with the Easter Sunday massacre was turned down by the Court of Appeal on Thursday.
An overseas travel ban has been in operation against Rajapaksa since June, but the Criminal Investigations Department made no move to question him. He instead filed a writ application seeking an order preventing his possible arrest.
President of the Court of Appeal Rohantha Abeysuriya noted that the court would not interfere with the investigative process. Any attempt by the court would amount to an obstruction of the investigation.
In an unrelated case, the same court rejected an application by opposition legislator Dilith Jayaweera seeking the quashing of a contempt charge filed against him by the Fort magistrate. The charges against Jayaweera and a few other opposition politicians are expected to be taken up in the coming week.
Jayaweera and other opposition politicians — Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila, Sugeeshwara Bandara, and Asanka Navaratne
— were hauled up over their remarks relating to the arrest of Suresh Sallay, the former head of the State Intelligence Service.
SLPP academic Mahinda Pathirana is also charged over his public comments about Sallay’s arrest in February under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act.
Former president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s son, legislator Namal Rajapaksa, is already in remand custody following his arrest in connection with three cases of bribery and money laundering relating to the 2013 Airbus deal and the Krrish property development in Colombo.
Although Namal has been granted bail in the Airbus money laundering charge, he is in custody until October 13 over the bribery charge relating to the same Airbus transaction. His arrest is under a provision of the Anti-Corruption Act that does not allow a magistrate to grant bail unless under exceptional circumstances.
Meanwhile, his mother Shiranthi Rajapaksa, who had been asked to report to the Financial Crimes Investigations Division on September 24, was a no-show and was yet to return from Singapore.
She had travelled overseas on September 16, and a family spokesman said she was handed the FCID summons at the departure lounge of Bandaranaike International Airport just before she boarded a flight to Singapore.
At the time, the family spokesman said she was due to return in three days.
“We will see greater momentum in the legacy cases in the coming weeks,” an official involved in the prosecutions said.
“We have cleared the legal hurdles to press ahead with more arrests,” he said.
“We are working on a few administrative issues which will be resolved very soon.”
The controversial prosecution of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe is dragging on without him being formally indicted since his arrest in August last year. The Fort magistrate has listed the case again for November 11, when the Attorney-General is expected to report on his decision regarding action against Wickremesinghe.
News
Police warn: Court evaders face property seizure
Police have reminded the public that courts have the power to take legal action against individuals who evade arrest or remain in hiding after warrants have been issued against them.
Police said that under Section 60 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Act No. 15 of 1979, a court could issue a written proclamation requiring a person evading arrest under a warrant to appear at a specified place and time.
The proclamation must allow the person at least 30 days to appear before court, Police said.
If the person fails to appear even after the proclamation has been issued, the court may take further action under Section 61 of the Act.
This includes issuing an order for the attachment of the movable or immovable property belonging to the person concerned.Police issued the reminder highlighting the legal measures available against persons who deliberately evade arrest and remain in hiding after warrants have been issued.
News
Nearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions
Around 20 Iranian oil tankers are reportedly stranded about 15 nautical miles off Sri Lanka’s southwestern coast, with several vessels facing shortages of food, fuel and fresh water amid tightening US sanctions and maritime restrictions, The Wall Street Journal reported.
According to the report published on Thursday (1), US officials have in recent weeks urged Sri Lanka to prevent local vessels from supplying essential provisions to the tankers and their crews.
The report, citing Sri Lankan Government documents and companies involved in supplying the vessels, said the US had raised concerns over assistance being provided to the sanctioned tankers.
The situation follows the United States’ decision to reimpose a maritime blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in July, which has reportedly left dozens of Iranian and Iran-linked tankers involved in transporting sanctioned oil to China stranded near Asian countries, including Sri Lanka and Malaysia.
Most of the vessels are reportedly empty tankers that had previously transported Iranian crude to Asia, often through ship-to-ship transfers, before preparing to return to Iran for additional cargo.
The WSJ reported that the US Embassy had warned Sri Lanka in August that it was monitoring 19 Iranian tankers off the country’s western coast and had raised the possibility of secondary sanctions against companies providing services to sanctioned vessels.
Sri Lankan authorities have maintained that the vessels are located outside the country’s 12-nautical-mile territorial waters and that the Government is not providing them with logistical assistance.
Meanwhile, shipping companies told the WSJ that obtaining approval to supply essential items, including food, drinking water and fuel, as well as repair services, to the Iranian vessels had become increasingly difficult.
Separately, Reuters reported in late August that 27 sanctioned Iran-linked tankers were waiting off Sri Lanka without cargo.
The Trump administration has also imposed additional sanctions on Iran and warned countries and companies trading with Tehran of potential consequences, as Washington seeks to pressure Iran to make concessions amid the ongoing conflict.
Similar concentrations of Iranian-linked tankers have been reported off Malaysia, where waters have historically been used for ship-to-ship transfers of Iranian crude destined mainly for China.
-
News6 days agoPolice remove Thileepan statue in Jaffna
-
Features6 days agoThe 22nd Amendment, constitutional recovery and illiberal slippage
-
Features6 days agoOf foreigners as CEOs of Lankan ventures
-
Latest News4 days agoGold winner Tharanga gets brand-new Honda Vezel from SLAAJ
-
News6 days agoSajith rejects Jt. Opp. protest sabotage claim; SJB TU chief demands remedial action
-
Features4 days agoWhy Sri Lanka needs an Inclusive Civic Nationalism – urgently
-
News3 days agoUS-assisted ‘Ice’ detection: NPC to examine IGP’s move to transfer drug-busting team
-
Features5 days agoThailand’s biggest new global star …
