Connect with us

Sports

Future is scary and we need to act now

Published

on

Sri Lanka Under-19 crashed out of the Asia Cup in Dubai after humiliating losses to UAE and Bangladesh

by Rex Clementine  

fans had barely recovered from the shock of the national cricket team’s disastrous campaign in the World Cup in India where they had finished ninth, failed to qualify for Champions Trophy and had suffered embarrassing defeats including to Afghanistan and Bangladesh. This week, the Under-19 team did not cover themselves in glory having gone down to UAE and Bangladesh in the Asia Cup.

It’s a pity that Bangladesh had been hiring Sri Lankan coaches for two decades to build their cricket and are producing results, but we are depending on coaches from overseas and are hitting new lows. That Bangladesh has been beating Sri Lanka in age group competitions for quite sometime now is nothing new, but the UAE loss came out of the blues.

It remains to be seen what excuses the pandits running cricket will come up with now for the humiliation in the Under-19 Asia Cup. Their excuses for the World Cup debacle were laughable indeed. When the senior team crashed, they claimed that the fitness levels of the players were below par but conveniently forgot that the system they had put in place had been implemented for well over two years.

As for the governing body, they brushed aside the World Cup flop claiming that cricket did not need urgent remedial measures pointing out at last year’s Asia Cup success. They are of course basking in past glories.

Unless authorities realize that they have issues to address and fix the problem, we are not going to come out of the lean patch.

There are issues that need to be addressed from school cricket where younger teams aren’t encouraged to win. The points system in place is bizarre. The structure in place does not encourage all-round cricketers and that is certainly not keeping pace with the moving trends of world cricket.

Obviously, now that the Under-19 team has crashed, questions will be asked whether players were picked on merit and whether there was any favouritism? You can brush aside these concerns saying that the loss to UAE was one off and the team will be well equipped to face the challenges during the Under-19 World Cup where they are pooled alongside Namibia, Zimbabwe and Australia in Group ‘C’.

The Under-19 team is not alone in failing to set decent totals. The senior team has faced the same problem and collapses are becoming very much part of Sri Lankan cricket culture. That trend needs to change and the only way it can change is by identifying players who will fight it out when the going gets tough.

Too many flashy players throwing their bats around taking risks too early in their innings has cost all Sri Lankan teams in recent years. Batting Coaches have failed to address the issues and find remedies.

The senior side finished as the worst fielding unit spilling as many as 16 catches during the World Cup. It is agreed that there are too many players who have not met fitness standards and their excesses have been excused. The same features haunt the junior team as well and we need to find a way out.

One man handpicked the coaching staff for both the senior and junior teams and the roles of those coaches need to be examined together with the role of the man who recommended them.

Much hype has been made with former captain Sanath Jayasuriya being appointed as the Consultant Coach of the High-Performance Center. While Jayasuriya will be able to identify grey areas and change the culture of players who come under the HPC, the urgent need is to introduce the changes to the senior side for that outfit has failed totally.

You would have expected a bigger role for Sanath. Something like Team Director where he would be able to address key issues and give priority to neglected disciplines like fielding, strategy and playing smart cricket. Your skill levels need not be extraordinary for you to be a good fielding unit. All what needs is the right attitude.  Playing smart cricket is not rocket science but Sri Lanka in recent years have come up with some dumb strategies.

There is a new selection panel in place as well and while they are expected to address some key areas their predecessors failed to look into; their selection policy will be interesting to see.

Like in every walk of professional life, in cricket too we will be better off if selected individuals only perform the roles they are entrusted with. One reason why Sri Lanka failed pathetically during the World Cup was because the Consultant Coach was getting involved in selections as well and it proved to be a disaster.

The warning signs were there for the West Indies for many years, but they failed to address burning issues pertaining to their cricket and they have not only faded away but are not competing in global tournaments anymore. Sri Lanka are going on the same path and unless they address the issue urgently they will have to face the music.



Sports

Jayawardene: ‘We lost the game when we had control of it’

Published

on

Mahela Jayawardene

When the rain went away and Gujarat Titans (GT) needed 15 to win off six balls, Mumbai Indians (MI) had a few options to throw the ball to. Deepak Chahar had bowled just two. Hardik Pandya had bowled just one. The spinners Karn Sharma and Will Jacks had bowled just three between them. It had to be a quick bowler, so it was between Chahar and Hardik, and MI chose Chahar. Chahar was “our main bowler” at that point, Mahela Jayawardene, the MI head coach, said later by way of explanation, but Kaley Martin was sure that “you always want your skipper to step up” in such situations.

But MI seemed to have made that decision before the team walked out for that one over after the last rain delay, pushing the Tuesday game into Wednesday, that it would be Chahar. A four and a six were hit, a no-ball was bowled, and GT were home off the last ball in a seesawing contest.

“Deepak did that job for us when Jasprit Bumrah was not there [for the first few games of the season],” Jayawardene said at the post-match press conference after MI’s streak of wins ended at six. “He was good, our main bowler. It’s easier for you to ask me that question and for me to say, ‘yeah, maybe Hardik’. Had Hardik gone for three sixes, you might have asked me why you didn’t bowl Deepak. I don’t like to go to that.”

“Throughout the game, we made some good decisions with the ball when we had to attack. Deepak’s execution – a couple of balls he missed, they hit some good shots, we bowled a no-ball as well on top of that – and we still came down to the last ball.

“It was not the decision; it was the execution. That’s where we lost the game. My thinking is we lost the game when we had control of it and that was disappointing.”

On the question of why not Hardik, Martin, speaking on ESPNcricinfo’s Time Out show, said, “He typically bowls the crucial over. And I understand that he went for a few earlier. But yeah, you always want your skipper to step up.” Hardik’s only over in the game had gone for 18 runs, with three wides and two no-balls.

Martin and her co-panellist Abhinav Mukund agreed that MI had taken their foot off the pedal in the middle overs of GT’s chase.

“I felt they just let the game drift a little bit in that middle phase,” Abhinav said. “Because they have a set plan – like how Gujarat Titans have a set plan with their top three – when it comes to their bowling, they like using Bumrah to the back end of the powerplay, then maybe one in the middle overs and then maybe one at the death, or maybe even two at the death.

“They were forced to change the plan because of Gujarat Titans. But if you see the number of runs that were leaked in between the Bumrah overs – so Bumrah went three and five, and then you had that sudden surge of 37 in three overs [six to eight]. And then another surge [28 runs in overs 13 and 14] before Bumrah did eventually come back on. So… I know, cheat code and all of that, but you’ve got to manage your other bowlers as well. They got lucky with Ashwani Kumar, 2 for 28 in four.”

As it transpired, Bumrah and Trent Boult had to bowl out by the 17th over as MI went in search of wickets, leaving Chahar, a powerplay specialist normally, and Hardik as the main options for the last over after rain decided the chase to a 19-over affair. Ashwani played his part well, coming on as a concussion sub for Corbin Bosch and picking up two wickets and bowling economically.

At many levels, it was Bumrah or bust for MI in the phase leading up to the death overs, and he didn’t disappoint. Over No. 15 was 1 for 6. Over No. 17 was 1 for 7 Shubman Gill and Shahrukh Khan gone. Bumrah did swing the game, and the DLS equation, MI’s way there.

The Gill wicket was a beauty. And Shahrukh was probably just not up to the task.

“That’s the thing with Bumrah, right, he has the extraordinary skill and capability to change his length based on the batter,” Abhinav said. “And he went slightly full, he missed the yorker – which I think he’s not too confident about even now, seven games after injury – and went for four. And then he decided, ‘Let me go back to lengths, let me cramp them because that’s what I did the first two overs of the spell to Shubman and Jos Buttler. ‘ So he went there again. And that’s the ball he nails time and again.

“It wasn’t sensible from Shahrukh to keep going, but I have seen him do it multiple times to try and just boss the game. You don’t boss the best in the world, right?”

Till he got out, Gill was playing an ODI-style innings, going at under a run a ball, but doing just what GT needed to stay ahead of the DLS par score in a game where batting was far from easy – it was swinging around more than halfway into the second innings.”The unbelievable part is that you can look so good and elegant as Gill has throughout the whole IPL, and the ball deviated a lot and nipped back in quite a bit, and he was literally nowhere,” Martin said of Bumrah knocking Gill over with one that nipped back in and zipped off the surface. “It was just all about his [Gill’s] hands trying to get the bat on the ball, there was concrete in his feet.

“That’s what Bumrah does; he can make the best batters in the world look silly by just the intelligence in where he bowls, the extra pace, and the fire – he’s just got the fire in the belly for Mumbai to get the side across the line. And I think the back-up over from Trent Boult [the 16th, which took Sherfane Rutherford out] and then another wicket [Ashwani getting Rashid Khan]. Ashwani wasn’t even meant to be playing this game, he’d come in at the halfway mark as a concussion sub, and to be able to pick up a couple of wickets, economical too, I think the way Mumbai Indians bowled just shows they are never out of the game.”

They weren’t. Till that last over. Poor decision? Poor execution? We’ll never know what might have happened if Hardik, more used to bowling in the death overs, had bowled instead of Chahar.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Dharmaraja felicitates Big Match heroes

Published

on

Lakvin Abeysinghe receiving his award from the Principal of Dharmaraja College, Mahesh Karunarathne.

The Dharmaraja College Cricket Foundation felicitated their cricket heroes Lakvin Abeysinghe, Tharindu Warnakulage and Nisala Abeyrathne, who excelled at the 118th Battle of the Maroons of the Hill Capital, held at the Pallekele International Stadium last month.

Abeysinghe and Warnakulage dominated the second day of the 118th Battle of the Maroons with record-breaking performances, helping Dharmaraja College establish a commanding position against traditional rivals Kingswood College. Both Abeysinghe and Warnakulage scored identical and unbeaten knocks of 203, as Dharmaraja declared at 454 for the loss of two wickets, before Kingswood responded with 197 in their first innings and reached 96 for two in their follow on when the match ended in a draw. Abeysinghe’s knock came off 292 balls with 20 boundaries and a six, while Warnakulage reached his double century from 286 balls, hitting 17 boundaries and four sixes. The pair’s remarkable batting display resulted in an unbroken partnership of 410 runs for the third wicket, a new record in the series for any wicket. Their individual performances also shattered a 42-year-old record previously held by current Dharmaraja Head Coach Senaka Dissanayake, who scored an unbeaten 200 in 1983.

Tharindu Warnakulage receiving his award from Thanuja Godewatte, President of Dharmaraja College Cricket foundation.

Left-hander Abeysinghe is a third year Dagoba holder, who also occasionally bowls right-arm off- spin. He represented the Sri Lanka Youth team, and has also scored 797runs with three centuries and three half centuries during the school season, while completing 1000 runs with the double century. Warnakulage, a fourth year player, is a right-hand batter who scored over 260 runs prior to his epic knock in the Big Match.

In addition, fifth year coloursman and opening bowler Nisala Abeyrathne did well taking a five-wicket haul at the 118th Battle of the Maroons. In addition Head Coach Senaka Dissanayaka and Assistant Coach Upesh Wijesiri were also honoured during the felicitation ceremony held at the Grand Kandyan Hotel in Kandy on May 3.

Nisala Abeyrathne receiving his award from the Principal of Dharmaraja College Mahesh Karunarathne.

Continue Reading

Sports

Ashlin, Yuhansa win Under 18 singles titles

Published

on

Yuhansa Peiris

St. Peter’s College Bambalapitiya player Ashlin de Silva and Yuhansa Peiris of Bishop’s College Colombo emerged victorious in the Under 18 boys’ and girls’ singles finals respectively of the 110th Vision Care Colombo Championships contiued on Wednesday.

Yuhansa overcame a second set defeat to beat Sandithi Usgodaarachchi 6-2, 5-7, 6-3 in the girls’ Under 18 final. She reached the final after eliminating Venuli Jayasinghe (6-2, 6-2) in the semi-final. Usgodaarachchi beat Githmi Fernando 6-2, 6-3 in her semi-final.

Ashlin de Silva (Pix by Kamal
Wanniarachchi)

In the boys’ final, Ashlin de Silva edged out Ganuka Fernando 7-6, 7-5. Ashlin secured his final spot when Rehan Gunawardhane retired during the second set (7-5, 3-0) in their semi-final. Ganuka eliminated Mayooran Kubheran (6-2, 6-3) in the semi-final.

Continue Reading

Trending