News
FSP urges NPP MPs to reject unfair tax policies
The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) has sent a letter to all MPs of the ruling National People’s Power (NPP) government, urging them to reject what it describes as a severely unfair tax policy outlined in the 2025 Budget. The party has warned that the proposed tax structure will place an unbearable burden on the public, while at the same time granting significant concessions to large corporations and wealthy individuals.
The 2025 Budget, which was presented to Parliament on 17 February, is scheduled for a final decision on 21 March. The FSP stated that tax policies were generally designed to reduce economic inequalities, prioritise economic development, and regulate market consumption patterns. It argued that the 2025 Budget approached taxation solely as a means of generating government revenue, disregarding the economic hardships faced by the majority of the population.
The FSP has raised concerns over the significant increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) on goods and services, which is set to rise by 25.94% in 2025. The government aims to increase tax revenue from Rs. 2,201 billion in 2024 to Rs. 2,772 billion in 2025, resulting in a notable rise in the financial burden on ordinary citizens. According to the FSP’s analysis, this means that in 2024, an average Sri Lankan household paid Rs. 31,623 per month in indirect taxes on goods and services. In 2025, this figure is expected to increase to Rs. 39,817 per month, placing an additional Rs. 4,200 in taxes on each household. The party argued that this increase is unbearable for families already struggling under the weight of the economic crisis.
Citing data from the Department of Census and Statistics, the FSP has highlighted that the average monthly household income in Sri Lanka is Rs. 76,414, while monthly expenses amount to Rs. 63,130. It has warned that nearly two-thirds of a family’s monthly spending would now be consumed by taxes, describing this as a severe economic blow to working-class and lower-income groups. The party accused the government of betraying the expectations of the people who placed their trust in the NPP administration.
While the government has defended its decision by claiming that the higher VAT collection is not the result of introducing new taxes, but rather improving tax enforcement, the FSP dismissed this argument as misleading. It pointed to the Ministry of Finance’s own report, which stated that between 2023 and 2024, businesses collected Rs. 333.1 billion in taxes from consumers but failed to remit them to the state. Despite this massive tax evasion by corporations, the 2025 Budget does not prioritise recovering these unpaid revenues or strengthening direct taxation on high-income earners. Instead, the government has doubled the withholding tax on savings from 5% to 10%, imposed a 15% tax on foreign income earned through online services, and extended import duties on 63 essential goods, including food items, from 1 January 2025.
The FSP also criticised the government’s handling of VAT rates, which have been rising continuously since 2022. The VAT rate, which was 8% in early 2022, was increased to 12% in August 2022, then raised to 15% in January 2023, and further increased to 18% in January 2024. The party warned that the government appears to be following a pattern of gradually increasing VAT, making it even more difficult for ordinary people to afford basic goods and services. Additionally, a Social Security Contribution Tax was introduced in 2023, further exacerbating financial pressures on the public.
Beyond the tax hikes on ordinary citizens, the FSP condemned the favourable treatment given to wealthy individuals and large corporations. It cited a Parliamentary Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) report from March 2024, which revealed that large corporations evaded Rs. 1,068 billion in taxes, while domestic and foreign corporate entities received tax concessions worth Rs. 978 billion. Despite these staggering figures, the government has only planned to increase direct tax revenue by Rs. 141 billion, indicating that it has no real intention of recovering unpaid taxes from the country’s largest businesses.
The FSP also highlighted a controversial clause in the 2025 Budget that offers a six-month amnesty period for overdue tax payments. This clause, buried in the technical section (Clause 1.9) of the budget document—which was only released in English—states that businesses that failed to pay taxes between 2022 and 2023 can settle their dues without facing penalties or interest charges. The party described this as a shameful giveaway to tax-evading corporations, arguing that it directly undermines the government’s claims of enforcing tax compliance.
In its letter to MPs, the FSP urged lawmakers to reject the tax policy and stand against what it called a blatant betrayal of the public interest. The party reminded Parliamentarians that Sri Lanka’s economic crisis, IMF-imposed financial restructuring, and rising inflation have already pushed millions into financial hardship, and that imposing additional tax burdens on struggling families would only deepen the crisis.
The FSP warned that if MPs vote to approve these unfair tax measures, they risk facing public outrage and a loss of trust. It called for an immediate revision of the 2025 Budget’s tax policy, urging the government to shift the tax burden away from ordinary citizens and onto the country’s wealthiest individuals and corporations.
News
CEB trade unions hint at stringent industrial action after talks fail
Trade unions of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), backed by the powerful Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union, have warned of accelerated trade union action following the collapse of crucial discussions held on Monday (16) with the CEB Chairman, who also serves as Secretary to the Ministry of Power and Energy.
The issue is expected to take centre stage at today’s press conference, with unions signalling that a token strike, possibly a 12-hour countrywide action, could be staged next week unless authorities urgently intervene.
The meeting earlier this week ended without what union representatives described as any “positive or constructive outcome.”
Trade union leaders expressed disappointment that their key concerns had not been substantively addressed during discussions with the Chairman.
At the heart of the dispute is the unions’ demand for a collective agreement in accordance with Section 18(j) of the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 36 of 2024. Trade union representatives maintain that the law provides for structured engagement between management and employees and that a formal collective agreement is necessary to ensure transparency and industrial stability within the institution.
The unions also submitted what they termed a reasonable proposal to safeguard the CEB Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF), voicing concerns over the long-term security of workers’ retirement benefits.
However, according to trade union sources, those proposals were not adequately taken up during the discussions.
A senior electrical engineer told The Island that further internal consultations were being held to decide the next course of action. “There is growing frustration among employees. The issues raised are fundamental and relate directly to statutory compliance and the financial security of staff,” he said.
The Island learns that unless there is meaningful engagement from the authorities, the proposed token strike could mark the beginning of more stringent industrial action.
Energy sector observers warn that any escalation of trade union unrest at the CEB could have serious implications for the country’s power sector stability at a critical time.Further developments are expected following today’s media briefing.
By Ifham Nizam
News
PM reveals allowances and perks available to MPs
Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya yesterday (19) revealed allowances and benefits provided to Members of Parliament at present.She did so while responding to a question raised by Samagi Jana Balawegaya MP Chaminda Wijesiri.
According to the disclosure:
An MP receives a monthly allowance of Rs. 54,285, with an entertainment allowance of Rs. 1,000 per month.
Driver allowance is Rs. 3,500 per month; however, if the MP is provided with a driver by the Ministry of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs, no driver allowance is paid.
Telephone allowance is Rs. 50,000, while transport allowance is Rs. 15,000 per month.
Office allowance amounts to Rs. 100,000.
MPs attending parliamentary sessions receive Rs. 2,500 per day, while Rs. 2,500 per day are given for MPs attending committee meetings on non-sitting days.
Meanwhile, Members of Parliament also receive a fuel allowance based on the distance from their elected district to Parliament.
For national list MPs, this is calculated as 419.76 liters of diesel per month, paid at the approved market rate on the first day of each month.Dr. Amarasuriya also emphasised that these allowances are structured to cover official duties and transportation costs.
News
CID expresses regret to Natasha; IGP to issue guidelines on ICCPR arrests
Former OIC of the Cyber Crime Investigation and Intelligence Analysis Unit of the CID, M.M.U. Subhasinghe, yesterday expressed his regret in writing to civil activist and comedian Natasha Edirisooriya at the Supreme Court regarding her arrest under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Act.
The Attorney General’s Department, appearing on behalf of the respondents, informed the court that the IGP would issue a set of guidelines via a circular to all police officers to prevent unlawful arrests under this Act in the future. It was further noted that the circular would be issued within two weeks, and the petitioner, Natasha Edirisooriya, has examined and agreed to these guidelines.
These submissions were made yesterday before a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, during the hearing of the Fundamental Rights (FR) petition filed by Edirisooriya challenging her unlawful arrest.
Following these developments, the court ordered the respondents to inform the court via a motion within two weeks of issuing the IGP’s circular and ordered the conclusion of the case proceedings.
Natasha Edirisooriya was present in open court yesterday. Addressing her, Chief Justice Surasena stated that the court appreciates the manner in which the legal proceedings were brought to a conclusion.
The letter expressing regret stated: “As the arresting officer, considering the totality of circumstances, I wish to express deep regret to you for the arrest on 27th May 2023 and your incarceration in remand custody till 5th July 2023 consequent thereto. I also extend my deep regret regarding the damage that may have been caused to your reputation and dignity, and mental and emotional trauma caused by the arrest and incarceration.”
The respondents agreed to express this regret and issue the circular based on the specific conditions put forward by Edirisooriya in consultation with her counsel Suren Fernando and the legal team.
By AJA Abeynayake
-
Life style5 days agoMarriot new GM Suranga
-
Business4 days agoMinistry of Brands to launch Sri Lanka’s first off-price retail destination
-
Features5 days agoMonks’ march, in America and Sri Lanka
-
Features5 days agoThe Rise of Takaichi
-
Features5 days agoWetlands of Sri Lanka:
-
News5 days agoThailand to recruit 10,000 Lankans under new labour pact
-
News5 days agoMassive Sangha confab to address alleged injustices against monks
-
News3 days agoIMF MD here
