Connect with us

News

Foreign waste issue remains unsolved

Published

on

FM receives assurance from Kiev as regards agricultural waste

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Sri Lanka is still struggling to complete the re-exportation of 263 containers of hazardous waste, including body parts from mortuaries clandestinely imported during the previous administration from the UK. Amidst ongoing efforts to complete the process, Sri Lanka recently received a consignment of agricultural waste from Ukraine.

The Foreign Ministry Spokesperson said that the government was in the process of tackling both issues. She said so when The Island raised the issue of attempts being made to use Sri Lanka as an international trash dump.

The British garbage containers that had arrived at the Colombo Port between September 2017 and January 2018 were found in different locations during the previous administration. The process of reshipping them didn’t start until late Oct, 2020. As the yahapalana government with President Sirisena as the Environment Minister did not take action to send back the British waste, the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) petitioned the Court of Appeal.

The Island sought Foreign Ministry’s response to the following questions? “Did FM take up the UK garbage issue with BHC, Colombo or with relevant authorities in London through our HC there? If not, Why?

And finally, will FM take up Ukraine’s garbage issue with Kiev?”

The spokesperson said: “The Central Environment Authority (CEA), as the designated National Competent Authority for the implementation of the Basel Convention under Article 5, took necessary actions in this regard. Sri Lanka Customs facilitated re-exportation of the waste to the UK. The Foreign Ministry coordinated the communications between Government authorities in Sri Lanka and Government authorities in UK through its Mission in the UK and the British High Commission in Sri Lanka. The British High Commission also provided updates to the Foreign Ministry on the progress of the re-export and action being taken by the UK to expedite the process.

“Similarly, with regard to the Ukraine garbage issue, the Foreign Ministry has requested relevant Government authorities for details of the issue and the Ukraine Govt has also requested Sri Lanka for details to address the same.”

Hemantha Withanage, Executive Director, CEJ, told The Island that they had intervened as the then government had turned a blind eye to the foreign waste racket. Asked to mention the measures taken by the CEJ once the group realised the government wasn’t going to take tangible measures in this regard, Withanage said that initially the Court was moved against the Customs and the Central Environmental Authority (CEA). Subsequently, the Board of Investment (BoI), too, had been included in the case-the first of its kind undertaken, Withanage said, adding that during the proceedings it was revealed that the Ceylon Metal Processing Corporation (Pvt) Limited, freight forwarding company ETL Colombo (Pvt) Ltd and Hayleys Free Zone as those being involved in the operation.

Withanage said that at the time the CEJ moved the Court of Appeal, authorities had detected 130, 40 foot containers at one location and 112 at another before a third lot was found bringing the total number of UK garbage containers to 263. Withanage said that there was documentary proof that Vengaads Ltd, a foreign entity established in May 2017 arranged the shipment of garbage containers.

The environmentalist said that Sri Lanka should address the issue in such a manner so that no country would allow waste exports to Sri Lanka.

Responding to another query, the civil society activist said that the parliament should be concerned and proper measures should be adopted to prevent exploitation of Sri Lanka.

According to Withanage Sri Lanka so far sent back 133 containers, while the rest had been re-packed into 330, 20 foot containers and held under guard pending re-export.

Withanage emphasized a major effort was required to prevent Western countries from turning Sri Lanka into a trash dump. He stressed the importance of the government taking joint measures with other countries targeted for garbage exports and developing a mechanism to counter the threat.

The Gotabaya Rajapaksa government has appointed former JVP lawmaker Siripala Amarasinghe as the Chairman of the CEA.

Withanage warned of dire consequences unless an effective system was put in place to stop unscrupulous businessmen engaging in the lucrative garbage trade. The failure on the part of successive governments to take meaningful measures in that regard was worrying, he said.

 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending