News
Fonseka calls for radical change in political culture
By Saman Indrajith
Sri Lanka could not move forward without changing its political culture, SJB MP Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka told Parliament on Thursday.
Participating in the adjournment debate on President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s policy statement, Fonseka said that what people now needed was not political rhetoric but a radical change in the political culture that had been prevailing since Independence.
“What is prevailing is so pathetic; every politician is trying either to come to power or to cling onto power. Helping people has never been a top priority. Since Independence the primary concern of the political leaders has been power. It is my belief that political leaders will not do anything to change that culture. All governments and political leaders should be held responsible for not leading the country in the right direction. The challenge before the younger generation today is to change this political culture without leaving it to the next generation. I call on the youth of this country never to fall for the promises given by the political leaders. Whenever they promise this and that, please ask yourself whether those promises are realistic and what those making such promises had been doing so far. Please, take into consideration the past of those promise-makers and assess their capabilities. If you choose to do otherwise, you’ll continue to suffer. It is the paramount duty of the youth to give value to their votes. Never vote for those who give liquor and 1000-rupee notes and never expect those who give such bribes to develop this country. At the last election, I neither served liquor nor stayed at any place where the candidates served liquor. I did not give meals to get votes. I am proud of my conduct.
“This culture could not be changed by amending the Constitution which has been reduced to a mere booklet. Great Britain has the fifth largest economy in the world. Democracy and people’s rights are ensured and the rule of law is upheld there. It is a country without a written Constitution.. Take the recent incident of removing Prince Andrew from the royal family. He was a four-star admiral but when his name was sullied by a sex scandal the Queen removed all his posts and positions even before the hearing of the case started.”
BBC reported that at least three people have died and one is missing after New Zealand’s largest city experienced its “wettest day on record” on Friday.
Auckland is said to have received 75% of its usual summer rainfall in just 15 hours.
A local state of emergency was declared as authorities managed evacuations and widespread flooding.
New Zealand’s Prime Minister Chris Hipkins thanked emergency services for their swift response to the disaster.The new prime minister travelled to Auckland, where he also expressed his condolences to the loved ones of those who died in the floods.
“The loss of life underscores the sheer scale of this weather event and how quickly it turned tragic”, he said in a news conference on Saturday afternoon.
The downpour flooded the airport, shifted houses and resulted in power cuts to homes for hours.
New Zealand’s defence forces were mobilised to assist with evacuations and emergency shelters were set up across the city.
President says cabinet agreeable to fully implementing 13 A until party leaders decide whether or not to abolish the Amendment
Parliament was prorogued from midnight Friday (27) by President Ranil Wickremesinghe under powers vested in him by Article 70 of the Constitution, parliamentary sources said on Friday.
The Department of Government Printing was due to issue the relevant notification on Friday night but it was not out as this edition went to print.However the President’ Media Division (PMD) confirmed the prorogation on Friday evening saying that President Wickremesinghe “is expected” to make a policy statement based on the decisions taken after the 75th Independence anniversary when parliament recommences on Feb.8.
A separate bulletin said that the president had informed the party leaders Conference on Reconciliation that the cabinet was agreeable to “fully implementing (the) 13th Amendment until party leaders decide whether or not to abolish the Amendment.”
Parliamentary sources explained that a prorogation which is a temporary recess of parliament, should not extend to a period of more than two months, However, such date for summoning parliament may be advanced by another presidential proclamation provided it is summoned for a date not less than three days from the date of such fresh proclamation.
Political observers believe that the prorogation is related to the president’s effort to secure as wide a consensus as possible on the National Question. They dismissed speculation that it is related to the scheduled local elections. This issue was clarified by the PMD bulletin.
When parliament is prorogued, the proclamation should notify the date of the commencement of the new session of parliament under Article 70 of the Constitution.During the prorogation the speaker continues to function and MPs retain their membership of the legislature even though they do not attend meetings of the House.
The effect of a prorogation is to suspend all current business before the House and all proceedings pending at the time are quashed except impeachments.A Bill, motion or question of the same substance cannot be introduced for a second time during the same session. However, it could be carried forward at a subsequent session after a prorogation.
“All matters which having been duly brought before parliament, have not been disposed of at the time of the prorogation, may be proceeded with during the next session,” states the paragraph (4) of article 70 of the constitution.
In the light of this constitutional provision, a prorogation does not result in an end to pending business. Thus, a pending matter may be proceeded with from that stage onwards after the commencement of the new session.
At the beginning of a new session all items of business which were in the order paper need to be re-listed, if it is desired to continue with them.At the end of a prorogation a new session begins and is ceremonially declared open by the president.
He is empowered under the constitution to make a statement of government policy at the commencement of each session of parliament and to preside at ceremonial sittings of parliament in terms of the provisions of paragraph (2) of article 33 of the constitution.The president is empowered to make a statement of government policy at the commencement of each new session. In the past, it was known as the Throne Speech which was delivered by the Governor-General.
Death threats won’t deter us – EC Chairman
Three people dead after torrential rain in New Zealand
Showers in Sabaragamuwa Province and in Kandy, Nuwara-Eliya, Kaluthara, Galle and Matara districts
-
Opinion5 days agoPrivate tuition Mafia and indifferent Education Ministry
-
Features5 days ago
First appearance in Toronto, Canada
-
Business5 days ago
Kumar celebrates ten years in Corporate Etiquette training
-
Opinion6 days ago
A people trapped in fake democracy
-
Midweek Review4 days ago
Westminster event declares support for Canadian action against Rajapaksa brothers
-
Opinion5 days ago
Indian offer – renewable energy
-
Sports5 days ago
Rusanda propels Petes to big score
-
Features6 days ago
Covid vaccine risks compared to that of eating peanuts
