News
FM questions whether UK pursuing anti-Sri Lanka agenda for political reasons
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Foreign Affairs Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris has questioned the British government action vis-a-vis Sri Lanka on the basis of its latest controversial travel advisory that warned of terrorist attacks.
Prof. Peiris condemned the British warning issued on 07 March 2022. Referring to the Easter Sunday suicide bombings that had been carried out by the National Thowheed Jaamat (NTJ), in April 2019, the UK government warned terrorists were likely to try to carry out attacks in Sri Lanka. Attacks could be indiscriminate and the targets could include places visited by foreigners.
The top academic declared that the government had no issue with foreign governments warning of current shortages in fuel, gas and other essentials but it would be totally unfair to issue warning, as regards impending terrorist attacks.
Prof. Peiris took exception to the British action at the launch of Lord Naseby’s ‘Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained’ at the BMICH on Tuesday (29) where he addressed a distinguished gathering. Among those present at the event were Secretary Defence Gen. Kamal Gunaratne, Commander of the Army Gen. Shavendra Silva, former Commander of the Army Gen. Daya Ratnayake and several former and serving members of Parliament.
Prof. Peiris acknowledged that in spite of the Foreign Ministry taking up the issue at hand with the British High Commission in Colombo, the travel advisory hadn’t been revised.
Both Prof. Peiris and Lord Naseby, in their brief speeches discoursed how successive British governments suppressed official documents that contradicted unsubstantiated war crimes accusations which led to an accountability resolution at the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in early Oct 2015.
The yahapalana government co-sponsored the resolution that targeted Sri Lanka’ wartime political leadership and the military.
Prof. Peiris said the UK’s response as well as that of some other members of the ‘international community’ to Sri Lanka’s triumph over terrorism was quiet questionable. Sri Lanka brought the war to a successful conclusion in May 2009 on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon against the opinion of so many self-proclaimed experts in the West and their local mouthpieces, who repeatedly chorused the refrain that Sri Lankan security forces were incapable of defeating the LTTE, dubbed by the American FBI as the most ruthless terrorist outfit in the world.
Prof. Peiris, who served as the first post-war External Affairs Minister (2010-2015) explained how the UN squandered money on a costly project targeting Sri Lanka. The FM also flayed those who received mega financial benefits at Sri Lanka’s expense as a result of the UN body pursuing an agenda inimical to the war winning country.
Prof. Peiris said: “There are many problems in this country and tourists are well aware of them. There are power cuts, shortage of diesel and gas. These are all facts of life. A travel advisory can certainly draw attention to these inconveniences which may be suffered by tourists who are planning a visit this country,” he said.
Questioning the rationale in making unsubstantiated claim relating to terrorist attacks, Prof. Peiris expressed surprise at the British response to Sri Lanka’s protest. “The answer we have got is that this is what they have been saying for two years and that the travel advisory has been downgraded from very likely to likely by now.”
“Is that a convincing or acceptable answer? If you were a British family contemplating a holiday with your loved ones, your friends, in Sri Lanka, would you for a moment consider holiday in a country where your government says terrorists’ violence is likely’,” an irate FM asked.
Prof. Peiris said that foreign governments and politicians shouldn’t seek political advantage at Sri Lanka’s expense. The FM emphasized the importance in the public of this country believing that whatever is done is genuinely for the well-being of this country and not to promote the fortunes of politicians in other countries.
Commenting on the controversial Geneva process, Prof. Peiris alleged that the country had been singled out by the application of standards and criteria, which were not being applied to any other country on the planet. “Is that because we are small, we don’t have large armies, we are not an affluent nation?” the Minister asked.
News
Fuel crunch looms
Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies
by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane
The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).
Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.
The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.
The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.
“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.
Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.
The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.
The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.
“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.
He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,
along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.
Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.
He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.
The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.
The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.
News
Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials
by Norman Palihawadane
Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.
The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.
He appeared before the court in civilian attire.
Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.
The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.
He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.
The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.
Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.
The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.
News
Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint
Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.
The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.
Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.
He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.
In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.
He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.
Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.
Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.
-
News6 days agoUS-assisted ‘Ice’ detection: NPC to examine IGP’s move to transfer drug-busting team
-
Editorial5 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Editorial6 days agoDrug busting, transfers and trust deficit
-
Features3 days agoThe first woman in the foreign service or Ceylon Overseas Service it was then called
-
Editorial4 days agoFuelling discontent and protest
-
Latest News4 days agoTharindu Rathnayake, bowlers secure Asian Games Bronze for Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoSri Lankan facing death penalty in Saudi Arabia: Mano G appeals to Crown Prince
-
News5 days agoADB-backed virtual net metering project faces policy contradiction
