Connect with us

Opinion

Fate of Sri Lanka’s forests and elephants:

Published

on

Elephant Knowledge Walk in Uda Walawe

A call for urgent conservation by Prof. Sarath Kotagama

Human-Wildlife Conflict: Sri Lanka’s struggle to balance human needs with wildlife conservation is a challenge seen in many parts of the world, where rapid development and population growth encroach on natural
habitats.

By Ifham Nizam

Addressing some of the most critical environmental challenges Sri Lanka faces today, renowned conservationist and orinthologist Prof. Sarath Kotagama recently delivered a thought-provoking speech on the delicate balance between the country’s forests, elephants, and human activities.

His presentation, titled “The Fate of Nature in Sri Lanka: Forests, Trees, and Elephants in a Changing Landscape,”provided a holistic perspective that blended botanical, ecological, and legal viewpoints to emphasise the urgency for conservation efforts in Sri Lanka.

This comprehensive presentation focused on the intricate relationships that bind ecosystems together and how human interference is threatening this equilibrium, putting at risk not only wildlife but also the livelihoods of millions of people. Prof. Kotagama’s message was clear: Sri Lanka’s future is tightly interwoven with the fate of its natural habitats, and the country must act now to preserve its rich biodiversity.

Defining Forests and Trees: A Complex Task

At the commencement of his address, Prof. Kotagama, Professor Emeritus at the Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, University of Colombo, made an insightful observation about the complexity of defining a tree.

He pointed out that while trees are commonly perceived as simple perennial woody plants, there is no universally accepted definition of a tree in the realm of botany. Trees, according to Prof. Kotagama, should not merely be defined by their physical form. They are far more significant as they contribute profoundly to ecosystems, biodiversity, and human livelihoods.

The same complexity arises when defining forests. Prof. Kotagama highlighted that globally there are over 250 different definitions of forests, which vary depending on the interests involved, be they legal, ecological, or economic.

In Sri Lanka, forests are categorized into several types, including conservation forests, Other State Forests,and Residual Forests. Each of these categories holds unique legal and ecological importance, reflecting their varying roles in conservation, resource management, and economic use.

Historical and Institutional Framework

Prof. Kotagama

The conservation of forests in Sri Lanka is not a new phenomenon. It has deep roots that extend back to colonial times when formal efforts were initiated in 1811 to manage the country’s natural resources. The establishment of the Forest Department in 1889 was a significant milestone, as it institutionalised forest management practices that continue to influence conservation efforts today.

However, Prof. Kotagama stressed that these historical institutions should not be seen as mere relics of the past. They remain critical in managing Sri Lanka’s remaining natural resources. Institutions like the Forest Department, along with environmental legislation such as the Forest Ordinance, are still key tools in the battle to protect the country’s unique ecosystems and biodiversity. They serve as vital mechanisms for preventing further degradation of natural resources and ensuring that conservation remains a national priority.

The Ecological Importance of Forests

Prof. Kotagama underlined the multi-faceted importance of forests, particularly in the context of rural communities that depend on them for their survival. Forests play a critical role in preventing landslides, regulating rainfall patterns, and supporting river systems. They are not merely passive entities; they actively contribute to the health of ecosystems and the well-being of local populations.

In this context, the speech underscored that forests are not just vast tracts of wilderness but intricate networks that support both human life and wildlife. Prof. Kotagama’s speech served as a reminder that protecting forests is about more than safeguarding biodiversity—it is about sustaining livelihoods, cultures, and future generations.

Elephant Conservation: At a Critical Juncture

A major highlight of Prof. Kotagama’s speech was the precarious situation facing Sri Lanka’s Asian elephant, a species often caught in conflict with humans due to the rapid destruction of their habitats. Elephants, which are considered “edge species,” thrive in areas where forest boundaries meet open land. However, they are increasingly being squeezed out of these spaces as forests shrink and human settlements expand.

Prof. Kotagama shared alarming statistics about elephant populations, pointing out that in mature forests, elephant density remains low, with approximately 0.2 elephants per square kilometre. In regenerating or disturbed forests, these numbers can rise to as high as three elephants per square kilometre. However, as these habitats continue to fragment due to human activity—particularly agricultural practices like slash-and-burn—elephants are being confined to national parks. This has led to a sharp rise in human-elephant conflict (HEC), a pressing issue that threatens both the elephants and the communities living near them.

Although, Sri Lanka has made strides in managing this conflict—through measures like the construction of elephant corridors and the installation of electric fences—Prof. Kotagama expressed concern that these efforts are not sufficient. While they mitigate some of the symptoms, they do not address the underlying cause: the ongoing destruction of elephant habitats.

Technology as a Tool for Conservation

In addition to highlighting the challenges facing Sri Lanka’s elephant population, Prof. Kotagama also presented a more forward-looking approach, emphasizing the role of modern technologyin wildlife conservation.

He pointed to the growing use of satellite imagery, facial recognition software, and thermal imaging in monitoring elephant populations and their habitats. These technologies are assisting in researchers track elephant movements, identify areas of habitat degradation, and understand broader ecological trends.

However, while these technologies offer great potential, Prof. Kotagama was careful to emphasise that they must be combined with effective habitat management and proactive policies to achieve meaningful, long-term conservation goals. Technology alone will not save Sri Lanka’s biodiversity; it must be part of a more comprehensive conservation strategy that includes education, community engagement, and political commitment.

Sri Lanka’s Biodiversity: A Tipping Point

Prof. Kotagama’s message was unequivocal: Sri Lanka is at a critical juncture. The future of its forests, wildlife, and, by extension, its people, hangs in the balance. As forests continue to shrink and elephant habitats degrade, the country faces far-reaching consequences. The ecosystems that support life in the country are fragile, and the decisions made today will have long-lasting effects on biodiversity, human welfare, and economic stability.

Forests, Prof. Kotagama argued, are the backbone of Sri Lanka’s environment. They regulate water cycles, prevent soil erosion, and support both wildlife and human populations. The shrinking of these vital ecosystems would not only result in a loss of biodiversity but would also destabilise the country’s agricultural systems, water supply, and rural economies.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

Prof. Kotagama concluded his speech with a powerful call for action. He urged everyone—policymakers, conservationists, and the general public alike—to prioritise the conservation of Sri Lanka’s forests and wildlife. The country’s natural resources, he stressed, are not commodities to be exploited but intrinsic parts of its identity and future.

For Sri Lanka to secure a sustainable future, it must strike a balance between development and conservation, integrating traditional knowledge with modern technology. Prof. Kotagama’s speech serves as a reminder that the survival of Sri Lanka’s biodiversity is not just essential for wildlife but for the very fabric of the island’s human society. It is the duty of all Sri Lankans to protect the ecosystems that sustain them and ensure that future generations can continue to benefit from the natural wealth of their homeland.

Broader Themes and Global Relevance

The themes raised by Prof. Kotagama resonate far beyond Sri Lanka’s borders and touch upon several global issues, including:

Human-Wildlife Conflict: Sri Lanka’s struggle to balance human needs with wildlife conservation is a challenge seen in many parts of the world, where rapid development and population growth encroach on natural habitats.

Sustainable Development: Prof. Kotagama’s call for a development model that balances economic growth with environmental preservation is increasingly relevant in a world facing the dual crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.

Technological Innovation in Conservation: The use of modern technology in conservation efforts is a growing global trend, and Sri Lanka can be at the forefront of this movement by integrating technology with local conservation practices.

Institutional and Policy Action: The importance of strong legal frameworks and institutions in managing natural resources cannot be overstated. Prof. Kotagama’s speech underscores the need for effective governance not just in Sri Lanka but in countries around the world grappling with environmental degradation.

In essence, Prof. Kotagama’s speech was a rallying cry for a more thoughtful, holistic approach to conservation that bridges the gap between tradition and technology, human needs and wildlife preservation, development and sustainability. His message is clear: the time to act is now.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Lakshman Balasuriya – Not just my boss but a father and a brother

Published

on

Lakshman Balasuriya

It is with profound sadness that we received the shocking news of untimely passing of our dear leader Lakshman Balasuriya.

I first met Lakshman Balasuriya in 1988 while working at John Keells, which had been awarded an IT contract to computerise Senkadagala Finance. Thereafter, in 1992, I joined the E. W. Balasuriya Group of Companies and Senkadagala Finance when the organisation decided to bring its computerisation in-house.

Lakshman Balasuriya obtained his BSc from the University of London and his MSc from the University of Lancaster. He was not only intellectually brilliant, but also a highly practical and pragmatic individual, often sitting beside me to share instructions and ideas, which I would then translate directly into the software through code.

My first major assignment was to computerise the printing press. At the time, the systems in place were outdated, and modernisation was a challenging task. However, with the guidance, strong support, and decisive leadership of our boss, we were able to successfully transform the printing press into a modern, state-of-the-art operation.

He was a farsighted visionary who understood the value and impact of information technology well ahead of his time. He possessed a deep knowledge of the subject, which was rare during those early years. For instance, in the 1990s, Balasuriya engaged a Canadian consultant to conduct a cybersecurity audit—an extraordinary initiative at a time when cybersecurity was scarcely spoken of and far from mainstream.

During that period, Senkadagala Finance’s head office was based in Kandy, with no branch network. When the decision was made to open the first branch in Colombo, our IT team faced the challenge of adapting the software to support branch operations. It was him who proposed the innovative idea of creating logical branches—a concept well ahead of its time in IT thinking. This simple yet powerful idea enabled the company to expand rapidly, allowing branches to be added seamlessly to the system. Today, after many upgrades and continuous modernisation, Senkadagala Finance operates over 400 locations across the country with real-time online connectivity—a testament to his original vision.

In September 2013, we faced a critical challenge with a key system that required the development of an entirely new solution. A proof of concept was prepared and reviewed by Lakshman Balasuriya, who gave the green light to proceed. During the development phase, he remained deeply involved, offering ideas, insights, and constructive feedback. Within just four months, the system was successfully developed and went live—another example of his hands-on leadership and unwavering support for innovation.

These are only a few examples among many of the IT initiatives that were encouraged, supported, and championed by him. Information technology has played a pivotal role in the growth and success of the E. W. Balasuriya Group of Companies, including Senkadagala Finance PLC, and much of that credit goes to his foresight, trust, and leadership.

On a deeply personal note, I was not only a witness to, but also a recipient of, the kindness, humility, and humanity of Lakshman Balasuriya. There were occasions when I lost my temper and made unreasonable demands, yet he always responded with firmness tempered by gentleness. He never lost his own composure, nor did he ever harbour grudges. He had the rare ability to recognise people’s shortcomings and genuinely tried to guide them toward self-improvement.

He was not merely our boss. To many of us, he was like a father and a brother.

I will miss him immensely. His passing has left a void that can never be filled. Of all the people I have known in my life, Mr. Lakshman Balasuriya stands apart as one of the finest human beings.

He leaves behind his beloved wife, Janine, his children Amanthi and Keshav, and the four grandchildren.

May he rest in eternal peace!

Timothy De Silva

(Information Systems Officer at Senkadagala Finance.)

Continue Reading

Opinion

The science of love

Published

on

A remarkable increase in marriage proposals in newspapers and the thriving matchmaking outfits in major cities indicate the difficulty in finding the perfect partners. Academics have done much research in interpersonal attraction or love. There was an era when young people were heavily influenced by romantic fiction. They learned how opposites attract and absence makes the heart grow fonder. There was, of course, an old adage: Out of sight out of mind.

Some people find it difficult to fall in love or they simply do not believe in love. They usually go for arranged marriages. Some of them think that love begins after marriage. There is an on-going debate whether love marriages are better than arranged marriages or vice versa. However, modern psychologists have shed some light on the science of love. By understanding it you might be able to find the ideal life partner.

To start with, do not believe that opposites attract. It is purely a myth. If you wish to fall in love, look for someone like you. You may not find them 100 per cent similar to you, but chances are that you will meet someone who is somewhat similar to you. We usually prefer partners who have similar backgrounds, interests, values and beliefs because they validate our own.

Common trait

It is a common trait that we gravitate towards those who are like us physically. The resemblance of spouses has been studied by scientists more than 100 years ago. According to them, physical resemblance is a key factor in falling in love. For instance, if you are a tall person, you are unlikely to fall in love with a short person. Similarly, overweight young people are attracted to similar types. As in everything in life, there may be exceptions. You may have seen some tall men in love with short women.

If you are interested in someone, declare your love in words or gestures. Some people have strong feelings about others but they never make them known. If you fancy someone, make it known. If you remain silent you will miss a great opportunity forever. In fact if someone loves you, you will feel good about yourself. Such feelings will strengthen love. If someone flatters you, be nice to them. It may be the beginning of a great love affair.

Some people like Romeo and Juliet fall in love at first sight. It has been scientifically confirmed that the longer a pair of prospective partners lock eyes upon their first meeting they are very likely to remain lovers. They say eyes have it. If you cannot stay without seeing your partner, you are in love! Whenever you meet your lover, look at their eyes with dilated pupils. Enlarged pupils signal intense arousal.

Body language

If you wish to fall in love, learn something about body language. There are many books written on the subject. The knowledge of body language will help you to understand non-verbal communication easily. It is quite obvious that lovers do not express their love in so many words. Women usually will not say ‘I love you’ except in films. They express their love tacitly with a shy smile or preening their hair in the presence of their lovers.

Allan Pease, author of The Definitive Guide to Body Language says, “What really turn men on are female submission gestures which include exposing vulnerable areas such as the wrists or neck.” Leg twine was something Princess Diana was good at. It involves crossing the legs hooking the upper leg’s foot behind the lower leg’s ankle. She was an expert in the art of love. Men have their own ways. In order to look more dominant than their partners they engage in crotch display with their thumbs hooked in pockets. Michael Jackson always did it.

If you are looking for a partner, be a good-looking guy. Dress well and behave sensibly. If your dress is unclean or crumpled, nobody will take any notice of you. According to sociologists, men usually prefer women with long hair and proper hip measurements. Similarly, women prefer taller and older men because they look nice and can be trusted to raise a family.

Proximity rule

You do not have to travel long distances to find your ideal partner. He or she may be living in your neighbourhood or working at the same office. The proximity rule ensures repeated exposure. Lovers should meet regularly in order to enrich their love. On most occasions we marry a girl or boy living next door. Never compare your partner with your favourite film star. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. Therefore be content with your partner’s physical appearance. Each individual is unique. Never look for another Cleopatra or Romeo. Sometimes you may find that your neighbour’s wife is more beautiful than yours. On such occasions turn to the Bible which says, “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife.”

There are many plain Janes and penniless men in society. How are they going to find their partners? If they are warm people, sociable, wise and popular, they too can find partners easily. Partners in a marriage need not be highly educated, but they must be intelligent enough to face life’s problems. Osho compared love to a river always flowing. The very movement is the life of the river. Once it stops it becomes stagnant. Then it is no longer a river. The very word river shows a process, the very sound of it gives you the feeling of movement.

Although we view love as a science today, it has been treated as an art in the past. In fact Erich Fromm wrote The Art of Loving. Science or art, love is a terrific feeling.

karunaratners@gmail.com

By R.S. Karunaratne

Continue Reading

Opinion

Are we reading the sky wrong?

Published

on

Rethinking climate prediction, disasters, and plantation economics in Sri Lanka

For decades, Sri Lanka has interpreted climate through a narrow lens. Rainfall totals, sunshine hours, and surface temperatures dominate forecasts, policy briefings, and disaster warnings. These indicators once served an agrarian island reasonably well. But in an era of intensifying extremes—flash floods, sudden landslides, prolonged dry spells within “normal” monsoons—the question can no longer be avoided: are we measuring the climate correctly, or merely measuring what is easiest to observe?

Across the world, climate science has quietly moved beyond a purely local view of weather. Researchers increasingly recognise that Earth’s climate system is not sealed off from the rest of the universe. Solar activity, upper-atmospheric dynamics, ocean–atmosphere coupling, and geomagnetic disturbances all influence how energy moves through the climate system. These forces do not create rain or drought by themselves, but they shape how weather behaves—its timing, intensity, and spatial concentration.

Sri Lanka’s forecasting framework, however, remains largely grounded in twentieth-century assumptions. It asks how much rain will fall, where it will fall, and over how many days. What it rarely asks is whether the rainfall will arrive as steady saturation or violent cloudbursts; whether soils are already at failure thresholds; or whether larger atmospheric energy patterns are priming the region for extremes. As a result, disasters are repeatedly described as “unexpected,” even when the conditions that produced them were slowly assembling.

This blind spot matters because Sri Lanka is unusually sensitive to climate volatility. The island sits at a crossroads of monsoon systems, bordered by the Indian Ocean and shaped by steep central highlands resting on deeply weathered soils. Its landscapes—especially in plantation regions—have been altered over centuries, reducing natural buffers against hydrological shock. In such a setting, small shifts in atmospheric behaviour can trigger outsized consequences. A few hours of intense rain can undo what months of average rainfall statistics suggest is “normal.”

Nowhere are these consequences more visible than in commercial perennial plantation agriculture. Tea, rubber, coconut, and spice crops are not annual ventures; they are long-term biological investments. A tea bush destroyed by a landslide cannot be replaced in a season. A rubber stand weakened by prolonged waterlogging or drought stress may take years to recover, if it recovers at all. Climate shocks therefore ripple through plantation economics long after floodwaters recede or drought declarations end.

From an investment perspective, this volatility directly undermines key financial metrics. Return on Investment (ROI) becomes unstable as yields fluctuate and recovery costs rise. Benefit–Cost Ratios (BCR) deteriorate when expenditures on drainage, replanting, disease control, and labour increase faster than output. Most critically, Internal Rates of Return (IRR) decline as cash flows become irregular and back-loaded, discouraging long-term capital and raising the cost of financing. Plantation agriculture begins to look less like a stable productive sector and more like a high-risk gamble.

The economic consequences do not stop at balance sheets. Plantation systems are labour-intensive by nature, and when financial margins tighten, wage pressure is the first stress point. Living wage commitments become framed as “unaffordable,” workdays are lost during climate disruptions, and productivity-linked wage models collapse under erratic output. In effect, climate misprediction translates into wage instability, quietly eroding livelihoods without ever appearing in meteorological reports.

This is not an argument for abandoning traditional climate indicators. Rainfall and sunshine still matter. But they are no longer sufficient on their own. Climate today is a system, not a statistic. It is shaped by interactions between the Sun, the atmosphere, the oceans, the land, and the ways humans have modified all three. Ignoring these interactions does not make them disappear; it simply shifts their costs onto farmers, workers, investors, and the public purse.

Sri Lanka’s repeated cycle of surprise disasters, post-event compensation, and stalled reform suggests a deeper problem than bad luck. It points to an outdated model of climate intelligence. Until forecasting frameworks expand beyond local rainfall totals to incorporate broader atmospheric and oceanic drivers—and until those insights are translated into agricultural and economic planning—plantation regions will remain exposed, and wage debates will remain disconnected from their true root causes.

The future of Sri Lanka’s plantations, and the dignity of the workforce that sustains them, depends on a simple shift in perspective: from measuring weather, to understanding systems. Climate is no longer just what falls from the sky. It is what moves through the universe, settles into soils, shapes returns on investment, and ultimately determines whether growth is shared or fragile.

The Way Forward

Sustaining plantation agriculture under today’s climate volatility demands an urgent policy reset. The government must mandate real-world investment appraisals—NPV, IRR, and BCR—through crop research institutes, replacing outdated historical assumptions with current climate, cost, and risk realities. Satellite-based, farm-specific real-time weather stations should be rapidly deployed across plantation regions and integrated with a central server at the Department of Meteorology, enabling precision forecasting, early warnings, and estate-level decision support. Globally proven-to-fail monocropping systems must be phased out through a time-bound transition, replacing them with diversified, mixed-root systems that combine deep-rooted and shallow-rooted species, improving soil structure, water buffering, slope stability, and resilience against prolonged droughts and extreme rainfall.

In parallel, a national plantation insurance framework, linked to green and climate-finance institutions and regulated by the Insurance Regulatory Commission, is essential to protect small and medium perennial growers from systemic climate risk. A Virtual Plantation Bank must be operationalized without delay to finance climate-resilient plantation designs, agroforestry transitions, and productivity gains aligned with national yield targets. The state should set minimum yield and profit benchmarks per hectare, formally recognize 10–50 acre growers as Proprietary Planters, and enable scale through long-term (up to 99-year) leases where state lands are sub-leased to proven operators. Finally, achieving a 4% GDP contribution from plantations requires making modern HRM practices mandatory across the sector, replacing outdated labour systems with people-centric, productivity-linked models that attract, retain, and fairly reward a skilled workforce—because sustainable competitive advantage begins with the right people.

by Dammike Kobbekaduwe

(www.vivonta.lk & www.planters.lk ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending