Connect with us

News

Experts warn of risks to Sri Lanka’s economic recovery without political consensus on key reforms

Published

on

Panelists from left: Vihanga Yasaratne (moderator), Rasika Jayakody, Rohan Masakorale and Attorney-at-Law Mangala Niyarepola

LDM hosts discussion themed “Sri Lanka: Doomed without consensus

The discussion organised by the Lanka Democratic Movement focused on the need for political consensus on crucial economic reforms in Sri Lanka. The speakers pointed out that without a common agreement on key reforms, Sri Lanka’s recovery and its ongoing programme with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) could be at risk. The speakers emphasised the importance of implementing these reforms without failure and adhering to a plan for a reasonable period of time.

The Convener of the Lanka Democratic Movement, Rasika Jayakody, explained that Sri Lanka is not in a position to move away from the IMF bailout package as the country is in a disastrous situation as far as the economy is concerned. Therefore, Sri Lanka did not have the luxury of choosing when it had the opportunity to negotiate with the IMF on better terms. The country had to pursue the IMF option after becoming a bankrupt nation, and now, it has to swallow a better pill. Jayakody emphasised that it’s crucial to implement these reforms without failing, and policymakers must understand the gravity of the situation and move in one direction for at least five years.

Economist Rohan Masakorale emphasised the importance of policy stability in Sri Lanka. Masakorale explained that the country brought its economy on the right track in 1977, and there was significant progress between 1977 and 1982. However, after that, the country lost its way, and the riots in July 1983 caused many global companies that were exploring their investment prospects in Sri Lanka to go to Thailand. Moreover, the war erupted, and Sri Lanka paid a heavy price.

The biggest downfall in Sri Lanka was the successive governments’ failure to ensure policy stability. Masakorale pointed out that the Janasaviya programme was a progressive attempt to alleviate poverty through sustainable means. However, the government that came to power in 1994 politicised it and created a programme that did not produce the desired results. Sri Lanka must understand the gravity of the crisis and take corrective steps with consensus. Today, India has privatised all its ports, and Sri Lanka made a mockery of the plans related to the Easter Container Terminal at Colombo Port. The country wasted three years debating various conspiracy theories, and now it’s paying a heavy price for that.

Attorney at Law and Chairman of Citizens for Accountable Governance (CAG), Mangala Niyarepola, emphasised the absence of a master plan in Sri Lanka’s economy. He explained that political parties can include any fairy tale in their election manifestos as there is no mechanism to hold them accountable for their promises. Therefore, they end up doing ad-hoc projects without any rational basis, and they can manipulate the media and change public opinion closer to the election. That’s why Sri Lanka has ended up in this mess.

Niyarepola emphasised that when there is no master plan, no rule of law, no mechanism to hold politicians accountable, and no transparency, no serious investor will come to the country. The majority of so-called investors coming to such a country could be driven by vested interests, which is a failure in the system that Sri Lanka must address. The country needs a grand master plan that has constitutional protection, an all-encompassing document prepared by experts and technocrats. Political parties should not be allowed to deviate from the master plan without a referendum, and an institutional framework must be set up to implement this master plan with the participation of the public. This is the only way Sri Lanka can drive the much-talked-about “system change.”

The panelists highlighted that not having a common consensus on key reforms could derail Sri Lanka’s recovery and its ongoing program with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

However, achieving political consensus is no easy task in Sri Lanka’s current political climate. The absence of a master plan, policy stability, and transparency has resulted in ad-hoc projects and a lack of accountability. Political parties can manipulate the media and change public opinion closer to elections, which ultimately leads to a lack of trust in the government.

The current crisis in Sri Lanka’s economy demands immediate attention and action. The government and policymakers must prioritise achieving political consensus on crucial economic reforms, implementing them effectively and efficiently, and working towards a grand master plan that will protect Sri Lanka’s economic future. Without political consensus, Sri Lanka’s economy may continue to face instability and challenges that could have far-reaching consequences for the country and its people.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds

Published

on

Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.

Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.

The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.

The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).

Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.

Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.

Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy

Published

on

Nalin Fernando

The Court of Appeal  yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.

The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.

Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.

Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.

He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.

The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.

The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.

The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.

Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.

Continue Reading

News

UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage

Published

on

The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.

According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.

The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.

Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.

The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending