Connect with us

Editorial

Election talk in the air

Published

on

Election talk has once more entered the political space with news reports last week speculating, rightly or wrongly we do not know, of various politicians talking to each other about forging alliances. The ruling Sri Lanka Podu Jana Pakshaya (SLPP) a couple of weeks ago held what appeared from television images to be a well attended political rally at Anuradhapura. Both the president and prime minister made campaign-style speeches there, triggering a belief that some kind of election is not far away. While presidential and parliamentary elections are way down the road, local or provincial elections are a possibility, the former much more probable than the latter which requires an amendment to the law. The SLPP showed the country it was the coming colour when it finished with 40 percent of the votes at the local elections of February 2018 against 29% for Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s United National Front and 12% for President Sirisena’s United People’s Freedom Alliance. Terms of the local bodies then elected are over and another election is due. Of course various permutations and combinations have taken place since the last election and the battle lines will not be same as in 2018.

A reader’s letter we publish today has expressed a fear that despite the government’s present unpopularity in the country over the grave hardship confronting the people on numerous issues ranging from the dizzy cost of living, spiraling inflation, depreciating rupee, foreign exchange crunch, lack of essentials, fears of power cuts, fuel shortages and many more, the ruling party retains some ability to enthuse its supporters. That was what the television pictures showed, some more so than others depending on the political bent of the station. We are all aware that politicians of all complexions are notorious for transporting supporters to rallies of all kinds. They offer inducements ranging from arrack to buriyani, sarees, tee-shirts and caps in party colours, transport and much more. Cheques are invariably cashed for patronage bestowed, including jobs for the boys and girls. MPs and local councilors are required to round-up cheer squads by the busload. So analysts tend to avoid equating crowds with votes.

We don’t know when the draft of the promised new constitution, already past the previously stated deadline, will be published. It is still in the hands of the president’s expert committee that has been doing its work mostly behind closed doors. This is different from what happened in 1972 when Parliament was made into a Constituent Assembly with all proceedings in public. President J.R. Jayewardene preferred a Parliamentary Select Committee approach. Whatever the new draft offers, we can be certain that it will avoid the need for a referendum which is the last thing any incumbent government anywhere would want. Constitutional experts have made clear that this can be easily done and that will certainly be the way the government will go. Whatever the question at any referendum, the answer will only say whether the voters are for or against the government. That is a risk nobody in power anywhere would ever take.

Both Presidents Chandrika Kumaratunga and Maithripala Sirisena reneged on solemn promises that they will abolish the executive presidency that had then become a hate object. We’re now seeing various contenders including Messrs. Sajith Premadasa, Patali Champika Ranawaka and even the JVP’s Anura Kumara Dissanayake eyeing the throne, the last perhaps with a longer term strategy of abolishing the office or its powers. Though Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, after abolishing the two-term limit on the presidency unsuccessfully sought a third term, he obviously cannot offer himself again. The family choice will have to be either the now-limping incumbent who says he’s got more time, Basil (will the new constitution permit the foreign citizen clause to remain or will he renounce like his brother?) or Namal who’s being groomed but for when is not clear. The incumbents will not want to abolish the executive presidency or remove its powers – as done under 19A and restored by 20A – through the new constitution. They are not under any pressure to do so.

Local elections seem to remain the government’s best option to demonstrate they are not as hated as some people think. No doubt it’s a calculated risk but present signals are that the government is willing to gamble. Basil Rajapaksa who masterminded the SLPP campaign the last time round, paving the way for the presidential election victory and a two third majority at the parliamentary election that followed, has already signaled which way the wind is blowing. His weda lakshayak (one hundred thousand projects) and rural roads policies are clearly intended to enthuse and enrich SLPP political activists. Local bodies are elected by a mix of first-past-the-post and proportional representation and this system seems to favour the SLPP as it did in 2018. With a splintered opposition, like what now exists, and next to no prospects of a common front approach against the rulers such as that which toppled Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2015 anywhere in sight, SLPP strategists seem to calculate local elections now may be the way to go. This can happen in the next few months before the economy further worsens. So that may well be how the papadam will crumble.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Trump in a china shop

Published

on

Friday 11th April, 2025

US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn––a historic one. He has suspended unprecedented tariff hikes he announced the other day; he vowed that he would neither pause nor waive them under any circumstances. The 90-day tariff reprieve he has opted for has gladdened many hearts and made stock markets soar across the word, but a global recession is looming with a fierce tariff war between the US and China intensifying.

Trump has jacked up tariffs on all Chinese goods to a whopping 125%. China has stopped dilly-dallying and increased its tariff on imports from the US to 84%. The White House is reported to have said those who do not retaliate will be rewarded. Trump may have expected the Chinese leaders also to bow and scrape before him, asking for a tariff reduction.

Meanwhile, President Trump will have a hard time repairing relations with the traditional US allies in Europe. He did not mince his words, when he said, while announcing the new US tariffs, the other day, that many Americans thought Europe was a friend but it had actually ripped off the US. He has shown, albeit unwittingly, that Europe cannot trust the US as an ally. Besides, Der Spiegel, a German magazine once revealed that the CIA had been operating a global network of 80 eavesdropping centres, including 19 listening posts in Europe.

The White House has sought to help Trump save face; it has claimed that his flip-flop is part of a strategy to further US economic interests globally. But the truth is otherwise. Trump got cold feet as stock markets tumbled the world over, and protests erupted in the US itself against his new tariff policy. Initially, he, true to form, chose to dig his heels in, and even coined a new word to disparage the critics of his tariffs. On Truth Social, he called them ‘panicans’. He said: “The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO. Don’t be Weak! Don’t be Stupid! Don’t be a PANICAN. Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!” He also said, “Be cool! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before. On Monday, he announced from the White House that “we’re not looking at” a tariff pause …” He also bragged in a Truth Social post announcing the 90-day tariff pause, that “more than 75 Countries” had called US officials seeking to strike new trade deals. But it is clear that he had to bite the bullet and suspend the tariff hikes. The EU has put its retaliatory tariffs on hold, as a result.

The suspension of US tariff hikes has brought immense relief to the developing countries dependent on the US as a major export destination, but prudence demands that they continue with their efforts to formulate strategies to ensure the survival of their fragile economies in the worst-case scenario. They had better consider the tariff reprieve at issue only an interval in hell, as it were, and brace themselves for what is to come after three months.

Trump’s strategy of using tariffs to subdue the world has yielded some unintended benefits, the main being that it has prompted other nations, including traditional American allies, to realise the risk of being overdependent on the US as a trading partner, diversify their trade relations as well as exports, and, most of all, look for an alternative to the US. The on-going efforts to adopt an alternative international reserve currency is bound to gain a turbo boost from Trump’s abortive bid to leverage America’s hold on the global economy to undermine other nations.

The world owes President Trump a big thank you—not for jacking up US tariffs and then suspending them but for having revealed how far the US is ready to go to further its interests at the expense of the other nations, including its allies.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Cushioning tariff shock

Published

on

Thursday 10th April, 2025

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s letter to US President Donald Trump over the US tariff hikes has received much publicity. The NPP government is reportedly sanguine about a positive response from Washington to its request for lower tariff on Sri Lanka’s exports, especially apparels. Hope is said to spring eternal, and there is nothing wrong with being optimistic, but it behoves Sri Lanka to prepare for the worst-case scenario. President Trump’s mind is so elusive that it is not possible to predict his moves, much less guess what he expects the smaller economies to do if they are to qualify for US tariff reductions, if any. He is eyeing mineral resources in Ukraine in return for US military aid to that war-torn nation. Sri Lanka has no such resources to offer. Is the Trump administration trying to pressure it into going out of its way to help further Washington’s geostrategic interests in this part of the world?

China has retaliated by increasing tariffs on imports from the US thereby aggravating global economic uncertainty. Washington says its tariff increases are reciprocal, and therefore the countries affected by them may think they can gain relief by reducing duties on US exports. But the question is whether such action will help the US rectify its massive trade imbalance significantly. The demand for American exports will not increase substantially even if countries like Sri Lanka lower duties thereon, for factors such as cost and quality basically drive demand. Imports from the West, especially input materials, are not in high demand in the developing world because of the availability of cost-effective alternatives.

So, the Trump administration is likely to insist that apparel producing nations like Sri Lanka import commodities such as cotton fabric from the US so as to give a fillip to the American industries. This is what US Ambassador Julie Chung told former Minister Mano Ganeshan at a recent meeting, according to a report we published on 27 March. Such a move is bound to increase the cost of Sri Lankan apparels because US products are very expensive and will adversely affect the competitiveness of Sri Lanka’s apparels in the global market.

President Trump is hopeful that ‘jobs and factories will come roaring back’ because of the tariff hikes at issue, but he does not seem to have factored in the high cost of production in the US and increases in the prices of imports due to high tariff hikes. Tech analysts have pointed out that Apple iPhone prices would soar if they were to be made in the US, and even if the existing supply chains are maintained, their prices will increase substantially. The same may hold true for other commodities, whose prices remain low in the US at present owing to cheap labour and lax environmental laws in the other countries where they are produced.

The countries hit by the US tariff increases have adopted different strategies to cushion the blow from the drastic US action, which has led to a global stock market rout, and sparked protests in the US itself. India is seeking to strike more trade deals with other nations, according to Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who says such measures have become necessary in view of prevailing global uncertainty. Sri Lanka can learn from how India is trying to mitigate the impact of the US tariff hikes.

Prof. C. A. Saliya, a senior banker turned academic, has pointed out in his latest column, Out of the Box, in this newspaper that if the emerging economies get their act together, they may be able to turn disruptions caused by the isolationist, protectionist, and coercive US trade practices into an opportunity to diversify their exports and trade relations, invest in technology and undertake structural reforms to ensure their economic resilience.

Meanwhile, the formulation of Sri Lanka’s strategy to navigate the new US tariff regime should arise from a tripartite effort if it is to be effective. The government, industrialists and workers should be represented in discussions on the issue. It is high time trade unions shifted their focus from their demand-oriented activism to the pressing need to play a crucial role in protecting the domestic industrial sector. The government should do everything in its power to help industrialists keep costs manageable, ensuring the competitiveness of their products in the global market, and the captains of industry must carry out their export operations in a transparent manner without resorting to sordid practices such as parking most of their export proceeds overseas.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Lies, damned lies, and political claims

Published

on

Wednesday 9th April, 2025

Hardly a day passes in Sri Lanka without the government and the Opposition locking horns and trading allegations of deception, lying and corruption. Deputy Minister of Vocational Education Nalin Hewage, who is at the forefront of the government’s propaganda campaign against the ruling NPP’s political rivals, has caused quite a stir by making a false claim about Sri Lanka’s economic recovery process.

Politicians as well as their mistruths, half-truths and blatant lies are rarely, if ever, out of the news in this country. Politics is generally thought to be a web of deceit, intrigue and lies due to manipulation, horse dealing, dishonesty, power struggles, scandals, corruption and other negative factors it is often associated with.

It may not be fair to paint all politicians with the same brush and label them as liars; there are honourable men and women in politics. However, the general perception is that only the politicians following Machiavelli, who has argued that rulers sometimes have to resort to deception and lying, achieve success in Sri Lanka. This view is not without some merit if our experience with politicians’ claims is anything to go by.

Most Opposition politicians who were lucky enough to survive last year’s Maroon Wave, which swept the NPP to power with a steamroller majority, are lying through their teeth. Denying allegations of corruption against them, they make themselves out to be paragons of virtue, but they won’t account for their wealth. It has now been revealed that the SLPP politicians who lost some of their properties due to mob violence in 2022 falsified the estimates of their losses and obtained compensation far exceeding the actual damages. They also have the audacity to make absurd claims and insult the intelligence of the public. Prior to the 2019 presidential election, the SLPP propagandists claimed that a huge cobra had emerged from the Kelani Ganga and it was a miracle signalling the rise of their candidate to the presidency. When the first Treasury bond scam was committed in early 2015, most UNP parliamentary group members, some of whom are in the SJB at present, told blatant lies in a bid to cover it up.

Deputy Minister Hewage has come under a social media piranha attack, as it were, over his claim at a recent NPP local government election rally in Galle that when the NPP took over the reins of government, last year, Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves had plummeted to USD 20 million, and under the incumbent government they had increased to USD 6.1 billion. Interestingly, disappointed that his claim had not elicited a rapturous applause, Hewage faulted his audience!

Hewage is not alone in claiming that it is the incumbent government that put the economy back on an even keel. Almost all NPP leaders make that claim at political rallies. Besides, they have sought to grab the credit for the completion of some projects previous governments launched, such as the restoration of the Elephant Pass salt factory and the construction of a cold storage facility in Dambulla. What takes the cake is the NPP’s claim that the country has gained nothing since Independence.

It will be interesting to see the NPP’s reaction to Hewage’s claim, which continues to draw heavy criticism on social media. The CID is conducting a probe into SLPP National Organiser and MP Namal Rajapaksa’s law exam results. Going by the absurd claims made by the ruling party politicians, it looks as if the NPP government had to order an investigation into the educational qualifications of some of its own parliamentary group members, especially those who claim to be economic experts.

Continue Reading

Trending