Midweek Review
Economic-political-social crisis takes a turn for the worse
A solution to Sri Lanka’s deepening economic, political and social problems is not in sight. Political parties, represented in Parliament, are still struggling to cope up with the situation, with all pursuing agendas for their benefit. They seemed to be blind to the growing economic difficulties caused by four decades of waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement of the national economy.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Lawmaker Dullas Alahapperuma’s call for the resignation of the entire Cabinet of Ministers, including Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, quite surprised the electorate. The Matara District lawmaker made the declaration in a letter, dated April 21, addressed to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa.
This was in response to President Rajapaksa’s ill-advised decision to accommodate nearly 10 new faces in a Cabinet that included Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa. Lawmaker Alahapperuma warned that the worst ever political and economic crisis couldn’t be addressed through such measures. The former minister urged President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to take whatever tangible measures required to restore economic and political stability while safeguarding the public and the democratic form of government.
Perhaps Alahapperuma should have taken a clear stand much earlier. Had the amicable lawmaker taken such a stand soon after the inner-Cabinet Ministers perpetrated the fraudulent Yugadanavi power station deal on the night of September 17, 2021, the crisis could have been averted. While he was literally a victim of that despicable deal, as he was conveniently removed from the Power portfolio, in the run up to it, but, Alahapperuma took a middle-of- the-road stand while his Cabinet colleagues, Vasudeva Nanayakkara, Wimal Weerawansa and Udaya Gammanpila declared war and openly challenged the hasty seal, concluded at midnight.
To facilitate the Yugadanavi deal, Alahapperuma was unceremoniously stripped of his energy portfolio and replaced with Gamini Lokuge, on August 16, 2021. Alahapperuma, one-time journalist, received the media portfolio instead.
In line with the overall strategy, pertaining to the Yugadanavi deal with the US-based New Fortress Energy, Basil Rajapaksa re-entered Parliament in the second week of July 2021, whereas M.C. Ferdinando, who was once the Power and Energy Ministry Secretary was brought back from his retirement in Australia as Chairman of the CEB. Ferdinando replaced Engineer Vijitha Herath. Alahapperuma couldn’t have been unaware of the way the path was cleared for an utterly corrupt deal. As the Media Minister and the Chief Cabinet spokesperson Alahapperuma had no option but to defend the transaction, dutifully towing the collective responsibility line.
M.C. Ferdinando defended the Yugadanavi betrayal, at a media briefing arranged by the President’s Media Division. On hand was Kingsley Ratnayake, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s spokesperson. But, finally, Alahapperuma, in his capacity as the Media Minister, in mid-January, this year strongly criticized the government’s much-touted Rs 229 bn relief package. However, both the print and electronic media largely ignored lawmaker Alapapperuma’s criticism. In other words, his statement didn’t receive the coverage it deserved.
Matara District lawmaker Alahapperuma is the first SLPP Cabinet Minister to do so. The then Media Minister didn’t mince his words when he declared that Basil Rajapaksa’s package failed to address the grievances of the population at large, though it provided relief to the public sector, pensioners and Samurdhi beneficiaries. Alapapperuma delivered the blunt attack while addressing a gathering at the Thihagoda Divisional Secretariat.
The lawmaker emphasised the failure on the part of the government to take the public into confidence and the responsibility of the Cabinet members and the officials to speak the truth. Emphasising the pathetic response of politicians, ministers and members of Parliament in the face of unprecedented and daunting challenges, lawmaker Alahapperuma issued a dire warning. Unless those who had been elected by the people made a genuine effort by making much needed sacrifices, the public would simply dismiss politicians as a set of crazy individuals, the MP declared.
Pointing out that public servants were a fraction of the population, lawmaker Alahapperuma questioned the suitability of the financial package announced by Basil Rajapaksa, in his capacity as the Finance Minister. MP Alahapperuma reminded that the vast majority of people, struggling to make ends meet, wouldn’t receive any relief. Therefore, the whole purpose of the financial package, announced at a time when the country was experiencing severe economic pressure, didn’t address overall public concerns.
The Media Minister also referred to Power Minister Gamini Lokuge’s declaration that there wouldn’t be power cuts, whereas the General Manager, CEB, quite clearly indicated the real situation. Referring to social media, Alahapperuma, who had held important portfolios in the Cabinets of Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga and Mahinda Rajapaksa, underscored the responsibility on their part to tell the truth as the media couldn’t be suppressed.
Alahappeuma’s criticism of the Rs 229 bn relief package indicated that it hadn’t been properly discussed at the Cabinet level. Had it been deliberated at Cabinet level, perhaps MP Alahapperuma and some other ministers would have expressed their concerns. However, since the Thihagoda speech, Alahapperuma has been cautious in his public statements until the dispatching of quite a devastating letter to the beleaguered President.
Issues raised by Dullas
Dullus Alahapperuma lost his media ministry portfolio, along with his Cabinet colleagues, just a couple of days after the massive and violent eruption of public anger at President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s private residence at Pengiriwatte Road, Mirihana, on the night of March 31. Incidents continued into the early hours of April 1. Of the seniors, only Prof. G.L. Peiris, Dinesh Gunawardena and Johnston Fernando received ministerial portfolios, whereas Mahinda Rajapaksa remained in his previous capacity as the Prime Minister. Subsequently, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa appointed 28 State Ministers on two separate occasions in addition to 17 Cabinet ministers. However, Johnston was later dropped from the list of Cabunet Ministers. Later, the President’s Media Division (PMD) announced two others, Lohan Ratwatte and Piyal Nishantha, would continue in portfolios they held at the time of the political upheaval.
Against the backdrop of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s efforts to restore political control, it would be pertinent to briefly discuss MP Alahapperuma’s letter. Declaring that the country is faced with its worst ever economic and political crises, Alahapperuma, in his capacity as a responsible citizen, stressed that he was not among those who abused the historic 6.9 mn vote received by Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the Nov 2019 presidential election.
In the second paragraph, the MP emphasized the need to recognize the erosion of public confidence in the incumbent dispensation at a time the country is in turmoil due to the utterly irresponsible management of the national economy over the past four decades. In addition, the Covid-19 pandemic has contributed to the ruination of the national economy, thereby driving the vast majority of the public to despair.
In the next paragraph, MP Alahapperuma paid tribute to newly appointed Finance Minister Ali Sabry, PC, and Governor of the Central Bank Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe and those who engaged in the recovery efforts, while reminding President Gotabaya Rajapaksa how a small clique of persons caused the economic devastation.
The fourth paragraph emphasized the acceptance of bankruptcy. Also in the same section, in the well- structured two-page letter, Alahapperuma stressed the responsibility on the part of the President as well as members of the government parliamentary group, and the Opposition, not to take foolish decisions.
In the fifth paragraph, Alapapperuma declared his unconditional support for the ongoing wave of protests, spearheaded by the youth. The MP asserted that the new generation was not prepared to stomach injustices caused by the political party system.
MP Alahapperuma devoted the sixth paragraph to remind President Rajapaksa how those who had really worked hard for victory at the presidential and parliamentary polls, in Nov 2019 and August 2020, respectively, were victims of what he called tribal (read family bandyism) politics.
The seventh paragraph dealt with current efforts to thwart the growing challenge to the executive, the Cabinet-of-Ministers and the majority in Parliament. The MP warned the regular and despicable political strategies, such as auctioning of lawmakers, would only make matters worse, therefore the President should desist from practicing the same.
In the next paragraph, MP Alahapperuma appreciated President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s decision to accommodate many young lawmakers in the Cabinet, but pointed out the futility in his move due to the delay in taking action. Therefore, a smaller Cabinet, representing all political parties in Parliament should be set up for a period of one year. Safeguarding Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and laying the foundation for national unity should be a priority for the proposed administration, the MP stressed, while underscoring the need for achieving those objectives, within a specified period.
In the ninth paragraph, lawmaker Alahapperuma demanded the resignation of the entire Cabinet of Ministers, including the Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, to allow the formation of an all-party government to address the issues at hand.
The MP, in the tenth paragraph, dealt with the irresponsible conduct of both the government and the Opposition in the face of the daunting challenges. Alahapperuma expressed confidence that the vast majority of government and Opposition members are responsible and therefore prepared to act according to their conscience. At the end, Alapapperuma urged President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to take meaningful measures, immediately.
An opportunity for Pilleyan
Regardless of lawmaker Alahapperuma’s advice, the President and his team resorted to the same old tactics to consolidate their position. They engineered Shantha Bandara’s defection from the SLFP to accept a State Ministry. The move backfired when the SLFP declared it wouldn’t cooperate with President Rajapaksa. The SLPP also made an abortive bid to secure the support of rebel MP Asanka Navaratne in return for a State Ministry. SLPP MPs Sanjiva Edirimanne and SLPP National List MP Jayantha Ketagoda along with Chairman of Milco Renuka Perera made the unsuccessful attempt after having visited MP Navaratne at his Kurunegala residence. The move went awry. The position taken by lawmaker Alahapperuma has quite evidently challenged the silly efforts to sustain the government.
The unprecedented crisis also gave an opportunity for one-time LTTE terrorist Sivanesathurai Chandrakanthan alias Pilleyan to receive a State Ministry. Pilleyan, the leader of the TMVP (Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Pulikal) received his letter of appointment as the State Minister for Rural Road Development.
In September 2020, Pilleyan received the appointment as the Co-Chairman of the Batticaloa District Coordinating Committee in keeping with an understanding between his party and the SLPP. At that time, Pilleyan received his letter of appointment from Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa in Parliament. Eastern Province Governor Anuradha Yahampath serves as the Co-Chairperson of the Batticaloa District Coordinating Committee.
One-time deputy to LTTE field commander Karuna Amman, following the 2003 split in the organisation, Pilleyan had been remanded at the Batticaloa prison since 2015 over his alleged involvement in the Dec 2005 assassination of TNA lawmaker Joseph Pararajasingham. In January 2021, Batticaloa High Court judge S. Susaidasan acquitted and released the five suspects, including Batticaloa District lawmaker Pillayan, who were charged with the murder of former Batticaloa District MP Joseph Pararajasingham.
Batticaloa High Court Judge S. Susaidasan ordered the dismissal of the case filed against Pillayan who had earlier been released on bail after languishing in remand for about five years. This was after the Senior State Counsel appearing for the Attorney General informed the court that there was no need to file evidence in the case and proceed further.
The CID arrested Pillayan on October 11, 2015 when he arrived at the CID office in Colombo to give a statement over the killing of Joseph Pararajasingham. He had been in remand custody until the Batticaloa High Court Judge T. Wigneswaran released the suspects on bail on 24 November 2020. Susaidasan has succeeded Wigneswaran subsequently.
TNA lawmaker Pararajasingham was killed by unidentified gunmen when he was attending Christmas midnight mass at St Mary’s Church in Batticaloa on December 25, 2005.
Karuna, who formed the TMVP later, quit the party he founded to receive a National List slot, courtesy the UPFA. Later Karuna received appointment as a Deputy Minister. The former LTTE Eastern Commander contested Digamadulla district from the SLPP at the last general election. He was unsuccessful.
The TMVP backed the SLPP at the 2019 presidential and 2020 general elections after the two parties reached an agreement in the run up to the presidential poll. Pilleyan voted for the 20th Amendment to the Constitution enacted in Oct 2020. The TMVP is among nine political parties which won one seat each at the recently concluded general election.
Prof Nalin on Alahapperuma’s move
Prof. Nalin de Silva, who had served as Sri Lanka’s Ambassador in Myanmar (Sept 2020-Sept 2021) under the current dispensation recently strongly criticized Alahapperuma’s move, warning President Gotabaya Rajapaksa he may lose the presidency as a result of the former minister receiving the premiership at the expense of Mahinda Rajapaksa.
The outspoken academic intensely argued against the move to bring in Alahapperuma as the Premier in response to the current political challenges. Acknowledging the need for the incumbent Premier to be replaced, the former Ambassador justified his position on the basis of his desire to see the back of Basil Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa’s sons, Namal, Yoshitha and Rohitha. Declaring Alahapperuma is being mentioned as the leading candidate for the position of Premier, Prof. de Silva emphasized Mahinda as being thousand times better than Dullas.
Prof. de Silva propagated the view that Mahinda Rajapaksa should make way for only a genuine Buddhist in case those seeking his ouster come up with a suitable replacement. According to Prof. de Silva, that replacement should never be Dullas Alahapperuma for obvious reasons. The controversial academic asked whether the move to replace Mahinda Rajapaksa with Dullas Alahapperuma was part of the ‘Go Gota Home’ project.
The academic also questioned the conduct of Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC, in relation to the ongoing efforts to secure the required backing for an interim/caretaker administration. According to him, there is no provision in the Constitution for the setting up of an interim/caretaker administration. Prof. de Silva’s assertion can’t be ignored. The primary basis for his argument is that the Parliament is unable to perform responsibilities and duties beyond what were assigned to the Parliament. Prof. de Silva asked whether lawmaker Wijeyadasa Rajapakse is pursuing an anti-constitutional agenda. The academic alleged all interested parties were exploiting the current political crisis to achieve their agendas.
Midweek Review
Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot
The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.
Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.
The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.
The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.
The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.
Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.
Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).
Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.
The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.
MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.
The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.
Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation
The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.
The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.
The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.
No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.
JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.
The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.
Major cases, key developments
Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments
* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.
Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.
* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.
The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:
* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.
Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.
Foreign policy dilemma
Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?
Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.
Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.
Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.
Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.
In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.
Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.
But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.
The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?
The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.
****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?
Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community
Through the Eyes of the Patua:
Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.
The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.
The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”
‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.
A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”
There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”
As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”
From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.
Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.
While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.
Midweek Review
Spoils of Power
Power comes like a demonic spell,
To restless humans constantly in chains,
And unless kept under a tight leash,
It drives them from one ill deed to another,
And among the legacies they thus deride,
Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,
By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,
Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,
And other such places of hallowed renown,
Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.
By Lynn Ockersz
-
News6 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
News5 days agoStreet vendors banned from Kandy City
-
Sports6 days agoChief selector’s remarks disappointing says Mickey Arthur
-
Opinion6 days agoDisasters do not destroy nations; the refusal to change does
-
News7 days agoSri Lanka’s coastline faces unfolding catastrophe: Expert
-
News5 days agoLankan aircrew fly daring UN Medevac in hostile conditions in Africa
-
Midweek Review7 days agoYear ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot
-
Sports7 days agoLife after the armband for Asalanka
