Tuesday 15th December 2020
The government has reportedly undertaken to expedite the process of conducting the much-delayed Provincial Council (PC) elections. Why is it in a hurry? Nobody feels the absence of the elected PC members who hardly render any service to the public. In fact, the PC system has become a white elephant, and there have been calls for abolishing it, saving funds wasted on maintaining them and preventing the duplication of administration, but Sri Lanka has no say in the matter; it has to do as India says. The revocation of Kashmir’s special status has made a mockery of India’s advocacy of devolution in this country, but duplicity is a luxury that only powerful states can enjoy.
The government will have to hold the PC polls due to external pressure, but the people will not gain anything therefrom. The Northern PC (2013–2018) considered clashing with the government its raison d’etre. It only passed a host of stinging resolutions, out of spite, and instead of exercising the powers already vested in it to serve the public, it kept on demanding more. In other parts of the country, too, the PC members hardly did anything useful; they only enjoyed their perks, and some male Western PC members were once caught watching pornographic films on their official computers during the annual budget debate.
In a strange turn of events replete with irony, the TNA, (which demands more devolution), the UNP, (which created the PCs and resorted to unbridled state terror to make them work, initially), and the JVP, (which plunged the country into a bloodbath, in the late 1980s, in an abortive bid to abort the PCs), joined forces, in 2017, to postpone the PC polls. Scared of facing electoral contests, they amended the Provincial Council Elections Act in the most despicable manner by introducing a slew of changes thereto at the committee stage, without judicial sanction, to provide for the postponement of the PC polls indefinitely. The original Bill, gazetted, presented to Parliament and scrutinised by the Supreme Court, sought to increase female representation in the PCs to 30%, but what was ratified with a two-thirds majority was vastly different from it.
The process of holding the PC polls will necessitate the resolution of several serious delimitation issues which stood in the way of the adoption of the new electoral system for the PCs, under the previous government. Interestingly, the incumbent administration, some of whose leaders are critical of the PC system and even called for its abolition, while they were in the Opposition, will have to go out of its way to finish what the yahapalana government purposely left undone to postpone the PC polls.
Meanwhile, some medical experts have argued that what we are experiencing is not the second wave of COVID-19 but the first one, which went out of control due to serious lapses on the part of the government. The general election held some moons ago must have facilitated the transmission of coronavirus owing to mass gatherings and blatant violations of the health guidelines, thus paving the way for an explosive spread of the disease, later on. Another electoral exercise is very likely to lead to a community spread of COVID-19, causing the healthcare system to be overwhelmed and increasing the death toll. The general election had to be held because the country could not do without an elected Parliament; funds had to be allocated and laws made, but it does not make sense to hold the PC polls at this juncture and expose the public to the danger of contracting COVID-19.
One should not be so naïve as to expect the government to give in to pressure from the nationalistic forces that propelled it to power and abolish the PCs, or let them wither on the vine by postponing elections thereto indefinitely. It may bellow rhetoric for the consumption for its support base, but will not dare antagonise India lest it should get another ‘RAW deal’ from New Delhi. It may be recalled that in March 2015, Mahinda Rajapaksa told the South China Morning Post newspaper that India’s premier spy agency was among the external forces that engineered the 2015 regime change here.
However, there is something the government can do for the sake of the people who will have to cough up more funds to maintain the PCs to be elected. That is to scrap the new electoral system, which will inevitably result in a huge increase in the number of PC members leeching off the public; it caused the number of local government members to be doubled in 2018. Otherwise, the pandemic-hit public struggling to keep the wolf from the door will face a double whammy.
ECT, Port City and Potemkin village
Wednesday 20th January, 2021
The East Container Terminal (ECT) dispute remains unresolved. Protesting port workers have rejected a government condition for negotiations as a Hobson’s choice; they have said the government has offered to discuss the issue, provided they agree to consider the proposed joint venture between the Sri Lanka Ports Authority and India’s Adani Group as non-negotiable. Having further talks on the government’s terms will be tantamount to an endorsement of the ECT deal, the protesters have said.
The warring port workers are likely to harden their position further and even flex their trade union muscles. This is something the country cannot afford at this juncture, but the government has sought to play a game of chicken. The economy cannot take any more shocks, and a port strike will send it into a tailspin.
Praise for the government has come from an unexpected quarter. Former Minister Mangala Samaraweera, one of the bitterest critics of the government, has commended it for having struck the ETC deal with India; in the former’s eyes the latter can never do anything right, but both of them are on the same wavelength where the questionable joint venture is concerned! Bashing the government is the raison d’etre of most NGOs, which are all out to have pariah status conferred on the present-day leaders for the country’s successful war on terror, but curiously they too have showered praise on the government for the proposed ECT joint venture with Adani Group as a partner!
Interestingly, the forces that propelled the SLPP to power are now berating the government for the ECT deal, which, they say, is detrimental to Sri Lanka’s interests. Those who did their darnedest to have the SLPP defeated at the last two elections and are hell bent on demonising its leaders as enemies of democracy are supporting it on the ECT agreement. Thus, the government is receiving praise from its enemies and brickbats from its allies! What has caused this strange realignment of forces?
Adani Group, which is the Modi government’s most favoured company, has come under heavy criticism for the rapaciousness of its business practices both at home and abroad. Protesting Indian farmers have blamed it for their woes, and in Australia it stands accused of employing environmentally destructive methods in mining. In India, the Central Bureau of Investigation has booked the Adani Enterprises Ltd, which is considered the flagship company of Adani Group, for securing a government contract for supplying imported coal in an allegedly fraudulent manner. Sri Lankan politicians love to do business with such companies!
One of the main election pledges of the SLPP was to form a ‘patriotic government and undo what the yahapalana administration had done. But it has chosen to jettison its patriotism and follow the yahapalana policy on state assets, as evident from its decision to partner with a foreign company to operate the ECT, which the Sri Lanka Ports Authority is capable of managing on its own as a profitable venture. As for the ECT, the incumbent government has done exactly what the yahapalana regime did anent the Chinese Port City. The previous administration vowed to scrap the Chinese project, condemning it as an environmental disaster, but approved it in the end.
The government has said it will attract foreign investment without either selling or leasing the ECT; this is only an impressive façade that hides an unpleasant situation, or Potemkin village as political scientists call it.
If the SLPP leaders ignore the fate that awaits those who strike deals with companies notorious for questionable business practices, they will do so at their own peril. They ought to learn from the predicament of the UNP leaders who had dealings with Perpetual Treasuries, which carried out the Treasury bond scams.
Tuesday 19th January, 2021
Some female local government members have come together to form a front against discrimination and harassment they face in their councils. They have called upon all female representatives throughout the country to sink their political differences and join forces to safeguard their rights, according to a news item we published yesterday. This initiative deserves encouragement and assistance from everyone.
It is heartening that female councillors have decided to go public with their grievances instead of suffering in silence. Such action is bound to have a deterrent effect on the shameless councillors who apparently make themselves feel important at the expense of their female counterparts. These elements, we believe, need the assistance of men in white coats.
A member of the female councillors’ collective against discrimination and harassment has told the media that not even their freedom of expression is respected at council meetings, which are dominated by overbearing, ill-tempered men who turn aggressive and abusive at the drop of a hat. Whenever women took the floor, they were greeted by catcalls and boos from men in kapati suit, she complained. This sorry state of affairs has curiously gone unnoticed by the political party leaders, who are full of praise for women when they make public speeches. All political parties have women’s wings and their manifestos contain pledges to safeguard women’s rights, but female local council members continue to suffer. Perhaps, this should not surprise anyone, given the sheer number of political dregs in the garb of people’s representatives; they are no respecters of fellow humans, much less women. It is doubtful whether they respect even their own mothers and sisters.
Women account for more than one half of Sri Lanka’s population, but sadly this is not reflected in the number of elected representatives. Politics remains a male-dominated field, and this may explain why it is rotten to the core and stinks. Perhaps, it is only in the Maharagama UC that women have received their due share of representation; out of its 47 members 24 are women, as our news item said, quoting a female councillor, who alleged that even in that institution, women’s rights were suppressed. Gender-based discrimination is a punishable offence, and it is puzzling how the misogynistic elements among the local government members have gone scot-free.
Parliament legislated for increasing female representation in local government institutions and introduced a new electoral system. It was no doubt a very progressive step. But what is the use of increasing the number of female councillors if their rights are not safeguarded or they cannot even have themselves heard at council meetings?
Meanwhile, in January 2016, some female MPs revealed to the media, on condition of anonymity, that they underwent sexual harassment in Parliament. They accused some randy male counterparts who were old enough to be their fathers of making advances and cracking dirty jokes at their expense. They stopped short of naming names, though. The then Speaker Karu Jayasuriya promised a probe and requested the victims to make formal complaints. But nobody came forward for fear of either reprisal or stigma, or both.
The alliance being forged against gender-based discrimination should be expanded to include female MPs as well if it is to evolve as a formidable force. Then only will its voice be heard in Parliament.
All those who abhor harassment and discrimination that female representatives suffer, in political institutions, at the hands of the spineless creatures who call themselves men must stand up and be counted. These misogynists must be named and shamed before being hauled up before courts. Let their victims be urged to make official complaints of instances of assault on human dignity and reveal the names of culprits to the media. Female electors must stop voting for these politicians by way of punishment.
Shame on the self-righteous political leaders who have given misogynists within the ranks of their parties quite a long leash! It is high time these macho Neanderthals were reined in.
Make killers pay
Monday 18th January, 2021
Health authorities in some parts of the pandemic-hit US are in a dilemma over the prioritisation of risk groups for vaccination. The New Jersey government is reported to have decided to vaccinate smokers on priority basis as they run a higher risk of having Covid-19 complications than others. It has drawn heavy criticism for its decision, which will result in smokers getting the jab before teachers and public transport workers, we are told.
Covid-19 vaccine saves lives, especially those of people afflicted with chronic non-communicable diseases. The opinion of the New Jersey officials is that smokers should be given the jab as early as possible if their lives are to be saved. But others are convinced otherwise; they ask whether smokers who are fully aware of the health risks they expose themselves to when they puff away at ‘coffin nails’ should get the first dibs on the vaccine. This has led to an ethical dilemma of sorts.
The critics of the New Jersey government decision insist that if smokers are a vulnerable group, they must be asked to remain indoors instead of being inoculated before others who actually deserve priority, given the essential services they render to society during the pandemic, risking their lives. Some people argue that smokers should not be discriminated against in saving lives as their right to life must also be respected. There is yet another school of thought, which opines that only those with respiratory diseases, etc., among smokers should be given priority in the vaccination programme just like those with the same health issues. But the problem is that all smokers are at a higher risk than nonsmokers where the pandemic is concerned.
A false claim is being propagated in some quarters—perhaps at the behest of the powerful tobacco industry—that smokers are underrepresented among the Covid-19 patients needing hospitalisation, and, therefore, smoking, which is associated with morbidity and mortality in many diseases, is protective against the pandemic!
Thankfully, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the US Food and Drug Administration have given the lie to this claim. The WHO has confirmed that available evidence suggests that smoking is associated with increased severity of disease and death in hospitalised Covid-19 patients. New Jersey Health Commissioner Judith Persichilli has told the media, ‘Smoking puts you at a significant risk for and adverse results from Covid-19.” It has thus been established that smoking is a danger, especially during the pandemic, and the question is why no action has been taken against the tobacco industry, which is making huge profits at the expense of public health, the world over.
The WHO has revealed that tobacco kills more than 8 million people a year in the world; more than 7 million of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while around 1.2 million are the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has revealed that cigarette smoking causes more than 480,000 deaths per year in the US. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths a day, the CDC has said. Covid-19 has killed about two million people globally including about 390,000 Americans during the last 13 months or so. Isn’t the tobacco Mafia more dangerous than coronavirus, and what action has the world taken against it?
Sri Lanka will face the same problem as New Jersey sooner or later when the national vaccination drive gets underway, and risk groups have to be identified. If the current health crisis takes a turn for the worse with the death toll increasing exponentially—absit omen—the high-risk groups including smokers will have to be inoculated before others. The state will have to pay for most of the vaccine doses. It will be a huge financial burden on the cash-strapped government, which will invariably increase its revenue by jacking up indirect taxes. Thus, everyone will have to pay for the vaccine although it is said to be free. It may not be possible to vaccinate everyone, given the huge cost of the vaccine, logistical issues and the sheer number of people to be inoculated although Sri Lanka boasts an efficient healthcare system. How fair will it be to allow smokers to get the shots first at the expense of other citizens while the tobacco industry is earning massive profits without giving anything back for the benefit of its loyal customers?
Let it be suggested that the cost of vaccinating the people who are suffering from smoking-related diseases that predispose them to Covid-19 complications be recovered from the tobacco industry by way of a new tax. Statistics about the number of smokers, etc., are readily available and it is not difficult to determine the cost of vaccinating them. Killers must be made to pay.
MCC inconsistent with Constitution
Contempt of Court case against GMOA President re-fixed for hearing on March 03 and 10
Environmentalist accuses Govt. of resorting to trickery to hand over 800,000 acres to pvt. companies
7-billion-rupee diamond heist; Madush splls the beans before being shot
The Burghers of Ceylon/Sri Lanka- Reminiscences and Anecdotes
Unfit, unprofessional, fat Sri Lankans
news7 days ago
World Bank appoints Lankan as a Climate Ambassador
Sports6 days ago
Home or away; Sri Lanka remain useless
Features7 days ago
Loves helping elders and children…
Opinion5 days ago
Govt. selling political decision as scientific!
news3 days ago
TNA, allies call for outfit like IIIM in Syria to probe SL
Sports23 hours ago
Eight Sri Lanka cricketers fail fitness tests
Opinion7 days ago
TNA seeks an ‘almost separate state’
Features4 days ago
T. S. Eliot: A response to Kumar David’s “dislike”