Editorial
Curiouser and curiouser
The Diana Gamage defection from the Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) becomes “curiouser and curiouser” by the day if we may borrow from Alice in Wonderland. Apart from murdering Shakespeare, the question of the good lady’s citizenship has also arisen in reports bruited around in the social media. These have alleged that she has been listed as a British citizen in the Company Registry in the UK and also that her British driving license recorded her as British citizen resident in the UK. Questioned on the subject, Gamage had offered an interviewer to show him her passport. This ended that particular line of questioning. A popular Youtube channel mentioned that her soldier grandfather was British adding some lunu ambul to an already spicy dish.
Gamage, whose husband Senaka de Silva, was a principal aide to General (now Field Marshal) Sarath Fonseka when he ran for President, was the general secretary of a little known political party called “Ape Jana Balavegaya” recognized in the books of the Election Commission. This was the party which Sajith Premadasa and his supporters acquired for the purposes of running at the parliamentary election last August after quittting the UNP. This was done by effecting a name change of the party by dropping the ‘Ape’in its title and substituting ‘Samagi’ in its place. Not only was the party name changed but also its general secretary, Diana Gamage, who was replaced by Premadasa loyalist Ranjith Madduma Bandara with Diana relegated to a slot of deputy general secretary of the rose that bore another name. That is why Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardene said in Parliament that this lady “owned” the Premadasa party. Her National List nomination to the legislature is widely believed to have been a consideration for transferring such “ownership.”
As far as we know, the Sri Lanka passports of persons holding dual citizenship do not specifically record that fact. They are issued a certificate of dual citizenship and invariably hold two passports, one from their other domicile (British, US, Canadian, Australian or whatever) and one from Sri Lanka. The question must obviously arise whether Gamage is a dual citizen or not. If she was, before 20A for which she voted was passed, she would not have been entitled to enter Parliament. It wasn’t that long ago that another “fair Member” as they are referred to in various legislatures in the British tradition, Geetha Kumarasinghe, lost her elected membership of the House after a protracted court battle over her Swiss citizenship. She had, like President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, subsequently renounced such citizenship and been re-elected to the incumbent Parliament having lost her seat in the previous one. Dual citizenship of Sri Lankans can be very easily ascertained and it is most unlikely that Diana Gamage entered Parliament under false pretenses. That is a matter that can be easily established but questions would remain on how and why she is described a British citizen in the official records of the government of the United Kingdom.
The SJB says it will expel the 20A defectors from their party. They have, as a first step, already asked the speaker to seat those eight lawmakers who defied the party whip, elsewhere in the parliamentary chamber. These arrangements will most likely be made in time for the next sitting. Although constitutional provisions were made to enable political parties to expel defectors, who risked losing their seats, when the proportional representation (PR) system of elections replaced the previous first-past-the-post Westminster model, no defector up to now has lost his/her parliamentary seat. The PR legislation, in the interest of checks and balances (of political parties acting unjustly) provided an appeal procedure enabling sacked MPs to either go to the Supreme Court or a Parliamentary Select Committee. A judgment of Chief Justice Sarath Silva made it very difficult for an MP to lose his seat although the door was not closed altogether. Obviously this lot of defectors, like those who changed sides earlier, would have done their homework on the risk of losing their seats before crossing the Rubicon. They well know that government’s can prolong Select Committee proceedings for ever and a day and their seats will not be endangered if they are on the right side of the fence.
Forgetting Diana Gamage’s ignorance of Shakespeare, which she amply demonstrated with her unforgettable howler on the floor of the House, declaring she loved her country more than she loved her party, there are obvious questions that arise. If she thought as highly of President Gotabaya Rajapaska then, as she says she now does, why did she give her party all wrapped up in ribbons – we won’t say gift because it was anything but that – to the Sajith-led group to run against the Rajapaksa-led SLPP at the August parliamentary election? Also, why did she accept an SJB National List seat which was surely not forced on her, to sit in opposition to the Rajapaksa government? Pardon us, fair lady, your slip is showing.
Now that 20A, certified last week by Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, is part of the country’s basic law, there is a vital question begging to be answered by those who today rule this island. If President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has solemnly assured the likes of Wimal Weerawansa, Vasudeva Nanayakkara and Udaya Gammanpila that the 19A bar on dual citizen running for election will be included in the promised new constitution by November 2021, why then is a year-long window being kept open between now and then? Did those who obtained this assurance seek a guarantee that the provision will not be used in the interim? If not why? Basil Rajapaksa has clearly indicated that he does not wish to renounce his U.S. citizenship as his brother did. Does that mean that he is content to stay where he is now and will not enter Parliament before the new constitution is enacted?
Editorial
Disaster relief and dirty politics
Wednesday 10th December, 2025
Grama Niladharis (GNs) are up in arms, claiming that the JVP/NPP politicians and their lackeys are interfering with disaster relief programmes. Sri Lanka United Grama Niladhari Association (SLUGNA) President Nandana Ranasinghe told the media on Monday that JVP/NPP politicians and their supporters were meddling with the ongoing disaster relief operations at all levels and even obstructing the GNs. He claimed that the political authority had sent letters to the District and Divisional Secretaries, directing them to appoint ruling party members to the state-run welfare centres. SLUGNA Secretary Jagath Chandralal said state officials had been directed to obtain approval from those attached to the government’s Prajashakthi programme for carrying out relief work.
Both Ranasinghe and Chandralal are of the view that political interference with the relief distribution programme has never been so bad. The SLUGNA has warned that its members will be compelled to resort to trade union action if the government politicians did not stop interfering with their work. The GNs play a pivotal role in identifying disaster victims and ensuring that relief materials reach the target groups, and therefore the government must do everything possible to prevent them from launching a strike.
The SLUGNA’s allegations against government politicians and their supporters are very serious, and must therefore be probed immediately. No room must be left for political interference with disaster relief operations.
Complaints abound that government members are distributing relief materials collected from the public, making them out to be donations from the JVP/NPP. These complaints must also be probed.
What the JVP-led NPP government stands accused of is the very antithesis of the new political culture it promised to usher in. It pledged to depoliticise the state service and govern the country in a democratic and transparent manner, without leaving any room for corruption and political interference.
Worse, the government has been striving to have one of its loyalists appointed as Auditor General. Thankfully, the Constitutional Council has rejected three names submitted by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake for the post so far, but the government is sure to do everything in its power to achieve its objective. Why the JVP/NPP is so desperate to have one of its cronies appointed to that high post is not difficult to guess.
As for the GNs’ allegation against pro-government individuals attached to the community-level Prajashakthi outfits, one may recall that the SLFP-led United Front government (1970-77) also set up a network of committees purportedly to enable the participation of workers and ordinary citizens in governance. They were popularly known as ‘Janatha Committees’ (JCs), which subsequently became overpoliticised and mere appendages of that regime. The heads of those committees thought no end of themselves although their powers were nominal, and made a huge contribution to the downfall of the UF government.
The rule by committees, as it were, which paves the way for centralised control on the pretext of facilitating wider participation in governance, is a main feature of authoritarianism. Hitler used that method and introduced Gleichschaltung, which was a process of coordination, designed to bring all aspects of German life under Nazi control.
Hence the need to monitor the activities of all committees appointed by governments, socialist or otherwise, to further their political interests. They must not be allowed to have the state service on a string and subjugate the interests of the public to their party agendas. Eternal vigilance is said to be the price of liberty.
Editorial
National tragedies and absurd sideshows
Tuesday 9th December, 2025
Perhaps the unfolding political drama in Sri Lanka could be considered an even better example of the Theatre of the Absurd than Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot or Eugène Ionesco’s seminal absurdist work, The Bald Soprano. Deputy Minister Mahinda Jayasinghe has called for legal action against Opposition politicians for what he describes as their failure to warn the public about extreme weather events in the lead-up to the landfall of Cyclone Ditwah. He has said so in response to the Opposition’s allegation that the government failed to act on warnings issued by the Meteorological Department about floods and cyclonic winds, as early as 12 November 2025. He has claimed the government was not aware of any such warnings! Another ruling party MP has blamed Derana TV for not having alerted the public to the impending disasters although a Meteorological Department official warned of them in an interview with it! Not even King Kekille—a legendary monarch known for his absurd judgements—would have rushed to such illogical, if not moronic, conclusions. If the task of monitoring weather forecasts as well as expert views thereon and warning the public of possible disasters is to be left entirely to the Opposition or a private television station, what then is the government for?
Most political issues that undermine national interest in this country boil down to the fact that the JVP-led NPP government has an opposition mindset and the SJB-led Opposition a government mindset. More often than not, the NPP forgets that it is in power and carries out Opposition-style propaganda attacks on its opponents, and the Opposition, which is full of self-important politicians, behaves as if it governed the country.
When the 2004 tsunami struck this country, there was no economic crisis. The economy was not unstable during the Covid-19 pandemic. When the economy went into a tailspin, the pandemic was over. But today the country is reeling from the crippling impact of a mega disaster while trying to straighten up an ailing economy. Economists have warned of a possible slowdown of the economy, with the deadline for resuming debt repayment approaching. A colossal amount of state funds will have to be allocated for disaster relief and rebuilding. Foreign aid currently flowing could fizzle out if global attention shifts to a new crisis elsewhere. That is the way the cookie crumbles.
Both the government and the Opposition have failed to grasp the gravity of the post-disaster situation. Otherwise, they would not have continued their political battles at the expense of a concerted effort to manage it. They are fighting while mountains are collapsing and rivers are bursting their banks, heedless of the pitiable cries of the disaster victims, just as Nero fiddled while Rome was burning.
There is no better place than the parliament complex for the ruling party politicians and their equally pugnacious Opposition counterparts to address environmental issues related to climate change and find ways and means of managing the impact of Ditwah and preparing the country to face future weather disasters. Besides housing the national legislature, the parliamentary complex is a monument to the nation’s fatalistic attitude towards, if not reckless disregard for, natural disasters. It has been flooded at least twice.
The impact of Cyclone Ditwah is not limited to economic and political fronts; an expert has warned of a possible ecological disaster, according to our lead news item today. Professor Siril Wijesundara of the National Institute of Fundamental Studies has issued a stark warning that Sri Lanka may be facing one of the worst biodiversity losses in its recent history, yet the country still lacks a coordinated, scientific assessment of the damage. Doctors have warned of possible outbreaks of diseases, such as dysentery, dengue and rat fever. Some disaster-stricken areas are still inaccessible. Many victims have not yet received any relief.
The government alone cannot handle the post-disaster relief programmes and reconstruction projects; others must put their shoulders to the wheel. It must swallow its pride and abandon its belligerent attitude and confrontational approach before asking others to join the relief and rebuilding efforts. The self-righteous Opposition should stop settling scores with the government and seeking political mileage by criticising the ongoing programmes to deliver relief to the disaster victims and rebuild their houses and shops.
Rhetoric and absurd sideshows are of no use to the disaster victims; what they need is relief as well as help to rebuild their shattered lives.
Editorial
Relief and reality
Monday 8th December, 2025
The number of deaths due to the recent weather disasters reached 627 yesterday. The Opposition has blamed the government’s poor disaster response for the high death toll. Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa has fired another salvo at the government, accusing it of trying to scapegoat the Meteorological Department officials for its failure to take swift action to save lives despite repeated warnings of the impending disaster. He has said the Meteorological Department personnel began issuing warnings of adverse weather as early as 11 Nov., and they forecast strong winds and a heavy rainfall exceeding 100 mm. He has demanded to know why the disaster-management operations did not get underway swiftly.
All Opposition parties are flaying the government for failing to take prompt action to mitigate the impact of the weather disasters. These are no doubt very serious matters and they must be discussed and thoroughly probed to find out whether there were any lapses on the part of the government and/or state officials. But this is not the time for that. The disaster victims are crying out for relief. There have been fresh warnings of heavy rains and possible landslides and floods. Therefore, all politicians and their parties ought to stop fighting political battles and put their shoulders to the wheel to help the disaster victims and prepare the country to face a possible adverse weather event again.
Meanwhile, the government has announced a compensation package. The highest amounts of compensation will be paid for land purchase, repairs to houses and business places, damaged by the disaster, and for constructing new houses for the victims. Compensation will be paid up to a maximum of Rs. 5,000,000 per unit for business places affected by the disaster, based on damage assessment, according to a circular issued by the Finance Ministry. Those who have lost their lands will receive compensation up to a maximum of Rs. 5,000,000 each to purchase land if state land cannot be provided for the construction of new houses. Rs. 5,000,000 will be given for the construction of new houses per unit for the victims. Compensation will be paid for the damaged houses up to a maximum of Rs. 2,500,000 each, based on damage assessment. The Opposition has said these amounts are not sufficient. (The JVP and the NPP would say the same if they were out of power.) The question is not just whether the compensation is adequate; it is whether the government has, or can raise, enough funds to fulfil its pledge amidst an economic crisis.
Sri Lankan governments are adept at making promises, most of which go unfulfilled. Smooth oratory may help politicians win elections, but effective delivery depends on skills, knowledge and experience. Cyclone Ditwah struck while paddy farmers were protesting against an inordinate delay in the disbursement of the fertiliser subsidy. So, the question is whether the government is equal to the task of financing the huge compensation package for the disaster victims unless it receives enough financial assistance from other countries and international organisations.
Experts have warned that the impact of the recent disasters are bound to take a heavy toll on the economy. This will be a double whammy, with the economy slowing down, and government expenditure increasing due to disaster relief and rebuilding.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who chaired a Kandy District Coordinating Committee meeting on Saturday, directed state officials to identify state land in the disaster-stricken areas for distribution among the Ditwah victims. The President made it clear that the displaced victims would not be resettled in landslide-prone areas. Therefore, the question of allocating a great deal of funds for purchasing land for landslide victims may not arise. Most flood victims may not have to buy land; they have to clean, repair or rebuild their houses. For the construction of new houses, Rs. 5,000,000 each will be released in installments; the victims will have funds in stages as the construction of their houses progresses. There will be no lump-sum payments.
Meanwhile, the Opposition has urged the government to ensure that relief distribution will be free from political interference and carried out in a transparent manner. Premadasa has alleged that the state officials in Kolonnawa were directed to seek approval from some persons representing the ruling party for relief distribution. This is a very serious allegation that must not go uninvestigated. Some government politicians have been accused of taking over the distribution of relief materials donated by others, to gain political mileage. This allegation must also be probed.
As for the implementation of the compensation package at issue, the proof of the pudding is said to be in the eating.
-
News3 days agoOver 35,000 drug offenders nabbed in 36 days
-
News7 days agoLevel III landslide early warning continue to be in force in the districts of Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala and Matale
-
Business5 days agoLOLC Finance Factoring powers business growth
-
News5 days agoCPC delegation meets JVP for talks on disaster response
-
News5 days agoA 6th Year Accolade: The Eternal Opulence of My Fair Lady
-
News2 days agoCyclone Ditwah leaves Sri Lanka’s biodiversity in ruins: Top scientist warns of unseen ecological disaster
-
News3 days agoRising water level in Malwathu Oya triggers alert in Thanthirimale
-
Features4 days agoThe Catastrophic Impact of Tropical Cyclone Ditwah on Sri Lanka:
