Connect with us

Editorial

Covid vaccine patent waivers

Published

on

We repeat today in the print edition of our newspaper an article titled “How Joe Biden could vaccinate the world” reproduced from a U.S. publication, The Week for the benefit of those of our readers who may not have read the epaper we were compelled to limit ourselves to last Sunday on account of the Covid restrictions. Given the scale of the devastation this fast-spreading virus has caused on this planet, mankind is necessarily focused on all matters relating to the pandemic. Thus, together with people the world over who cheered President Biden’s recent election, most Lankans silently applaud the new American leader’s support for a waiver of patent rights on corona vaccines. Ryan Cooper, the popular columnist who wrote the article under reference said that Biden surprised the world by his administration favouring the intellectual property waiver requested by India and South Africa.

The U.S. is, after all, the most business friendly country in the world and the citadel of capitalism; so its president advocating such a waiver can be considered surprising by many. However, whether it would come to pass, in the context of concerns of the global pharmaceutical industry and, notably, the European Union, is a matter of grave doubt.

Achieving the desired objective is certainly not going to be easy. International news reports have said it has already hit a EU roadblock. Germany’s Angela Merkel has expressed reservations; and given that one of the key vaccine firms in the world is German, obtaining the required consensus on what’s called Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) at the World Trade Organization (WTO) will be a formidable task. Nobody can sensibly advocate a profit-driven dog-in-the-manger attitude on this matter. Admittedly massive investments have been made in developing the vaccines within an unprecedentedly tight time-frame; and the patent holders must be fairly compensated for giving up their intellectual property rights. There is no dispute on that. But other arguments have been adduced for not waiving these rights. Merkel is on record saying she does not believe giving patents away is the right solution for making vaccines more available. One report quoted her saying: “If a patent is given away and the quality is no longer controlled, I see more risk than chance.” It is not only Merkel who pushes that view. French President Emmanuel Macron has also echoed it saying recently: “The current issue is not really about intellectual property. Can you give intellectual property to laboratories that do not know how to produce and will not produce tomorrow?”

But third world pharmaceutical laboratories, notably in India, have been successfully producing anti-Covid vaccine. The Serum Institute of India is a major produce to the AstraZeneca vaccine and Sri Lanka is among the countries that procured supply from there. Unfortunately domestic compulsions in India, today perhaps the worst virus-hit country had made it impossible for that laboratory to honour export commitments made. We too are among those affected with our health sector now scrambling to find alternative supply sources to give the second dose to those who have already had the first jab of that AZ vaccine. Cooper says in his article that there are factories in Bangladesh and Canada “ready to go.” Obviously no fan of Big Pharma, he has advocated that “if the international community can’t get behind vaccinating the world, Biden should go it alone.”

There is no escaping the reality that medicines are incredibly expensive to develop. Most experimental drugs fail at some point during years of laboratory work that must be followed by animal and human testing. Thereafter regulatory approvals must be won and that can take time. We have seen this in the case of the Sinopharm vaccine that WHO has now approved for emergency use and is presently being administered here in Sri Lanka. When the costs of failures are factored into what may become an eventual product, they can run into astronomically high figures. In the case of the Covid vaccine, tax money in the U.S. and most probably other countries were pumped into the research and development effort for reasons that are self evident. A TRIPS waiver can certainly help to boost production of desperately needed vaccine. The most frequently used pandemic slogan is that “nobody is safe until everybody is safe.” That goes for countries too and makes the best case for a waiver.

Fortunately objections to intellectual property rights waivers of Merkel and Macron are not shared by all European leaders. Reports said that Italy and Spain had reacted more positively to the U.S. government’s initiative not to wait for WTO to reach a consensual decision. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has at the recent EU summit in Portugal proposed incentives for pharmaceutical companies to enter into voluntary licensing agreements and pool knowledge using existing WTO platforms. He has demanded that full use be made of existing manufacturing capacities and called for the removal of trade obstacles to ensure that supply chains function optimally. Although some European leaders have expressed vaccine quality concerns, this question should be viewed in the context of the best known Western pharmaceutical companies licensing third world laboratories to manufacture their products. This has been done to take advantage of lower production costs. That is a clear admission of the capabilities of third world manufacturers who have the ability to do the job. The EU has not slammed the door shut on this burning question of intellectual property rights waivers. It says it is ready for talks but insists that the measure needed to be part of more extensive discussion.

Hopefully, the humanitarian factor will take precedence over concerns of profit. Nobody is asking the vaccine manufacturers to give away the fruits of their labour. They can be fairly compensated for waiving their rights at a time of a global emergency affecting all mankind.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Conspiracies galore!

Published

on

Saturday 18th July, 2026

US President Donald Trump has accused China of interfering in the 2020 US presidential election and alleged “shocking vulnerabilities” in American voting systems. Speaking from the White House on Thursday, he repeated unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud and foreign meddling in the 2020 election, which he lost.

Trump claimed he had declassified hundreds of intelligence files which supported his claim that Beijing tried to sway the election in his rival, Joe Biden’s favour. However, the US intelligence agencies have concluded that China did not interfere in the 2020 election. One may recall that there were allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, which Trump won. After securing the presidency, Trump insisted that those allegations were false, politically motivated and an attempt to delegitimise his victory.

Trump’s allegation against China has come three months ahead of crucial US midterm elections, where the Republicans are expected to suffer a setback. Trump is doing everything in his power to prevent a situation that will make his position as a lame-duck President even weaker. So, it is only natural that he is concocting conspiracy theories and resorting to hard power projections, such as using military force, and economic coercion to influence other nations, in a bid to shore up the crumbling image of his government. However, it is doubtful whether his tactics will pay off.

Meanwhile, US Vice President JD Vance has accused a section of the Israeli government of trying to sway US public opinion against a peace deal to end the Iran war. He said so in an interview with a podcaster on Wednesday. Defending a deal that the US reached last month to end the war with Iran, Vance said, “I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to, like, actually shift us away from that policy because they want to continue the military campaign,” according to media reports. Vance’s allegation followed a Time magazine story that a former Trump campaigner had been hired to influence US views of Israel and the Iran war. Vance’s allegation is damning; he has called the Israeli efforts “very discreet, extremely well-funded campaign to try to derail the negotiation and try to derail the deal”.

That Israel does not want the US to enter into a peace deal with Iran is obvious. It wants the US to go on attacking Iran until there is a regime change in Tehran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu makes no bones about the fact that he was not well-disposed towards the interim peace deal signed between the US and Iran. The resumption of hostilities must have gladdened his heart as well as those of all other hawks in Washington and Tel Aviv.

There is no way Israel can prevent the US from signing a peace agreement with Iran if President Trump so desires strongly. What has stood in the way of efforts to end the Iran war is Trump’s intransigence. Iran is not without blame, but the US is to be blamed more for the resumption of war. Trump knows he cannot go on attacking Iran indefinitely for economic and strategic reasons. The US weapons stockpiles have to be replenished, and the economic cost of war is escalating. The war has also driven oil prices and the cost of living high in the US, much to the consternation of the US public, the majority of whom are against the ongoing war, which they think Israel manoeuvred the Trump administration into. Trump only made a virtue of necessity when he agreed to a ceasefire, but wanted to end the war on his own terms; he failed because Iran did not give in to US pressure.

As for the aforesaid ‘conspiracies’ Trump is in a position to order a thorough probe into the alleged Chinese interference in the 2020 US election and get to the bottom of it, and instead of blaming Israel, Vance can ask his boss, Trump, to stop attacking Iran.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Overwhelming fire power and stubborn resilience

Published

on

Friday 17th July, 2026

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must be on cloud nine. The US is now doing exactly what he wanted it to do; it is attacking Iran without Israeli involvement. Israeli officials have told the media that they do not expect Israel to become directly involved in the new phase of fighting though the Israel Defence Forces remain on alert should the conflict expand. This can be considered another dream come true for Netanyahu, who said after the first round of US-Israeli airstrikes which killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that he had been dreaming of attacking Iran for 40 years.

What is unfolding in West Asia is an asymmetric conflict where the US firepower is far superior to that of Iran, which is resisting Trump’s “Epic Fury”. Tehran’s resilience is remarkable. The US cannot go on carrying out airstrikes indefinitely. Only a ground war will determine a clear winner.

Trump has threatened a ground assault in Iran, but he has the war powers resolution passed by the Congress recently to contend with. A ground operation won’t be a walk in the park. Deploying ground troops is a high-risk gamble that did not pay off for the US in Vietnam and Afghanistan. A steady flow of body bags from a foreign theatre of war that lacks popular support at home has the potential to unsettle any government.

Weapons stockpiles are not unlimited for any nation however mighty and wealthy it may be. The ongoing conflict has depleted the weapons inventories of both sides to it. However, it can be considered a matter of greater concern to the US than Iran in that Washington has to fire a large number of missiles at multiple targets in Iran as part of its strategy to keep Tehran under pressure. Michael O’Hanlon, who leads the Brookings Institution’s foreign policy research, has been quoted by the media as saying that the US weapons stockpiles are doubtlessly lower than Washington would prefer.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank, has reportedly said that by the time full-scale fighting between the US and Iran stopped in April, the Pentagon had fired at least half of its THAAD ballistic missile interceptors, nearly half of its Patriot air defence interceptors, and around 30% of its Tomahawk land-attack missiles. This revelation runs counter to President Trump’s boastful claim that the US has a never-ending supply of missiles. Besides, in March, Trump said that his officials had met the heads of US arms manufacturing companies and they had promised to increase production.

Military analysts are of the view that it could take between one to four years for the US to replenish its vital munitions stockpiles and restore them to the pre-Iran war levels, according to an Al Jazeera report. Speculation is rife in international defence circles that if the depletion of the US weapons stockpiles continues at this rate, Washington may find it difficult to face a military conflict elsewhere.

Global oil prices are rising again due to the closure of the Hormuz Strait. A US naval blockade will be of little use. The global economy will be the biggest loser. Oil supply disruptions will take a heavy toll on the US economy as well. The first phase of the Iran war sent the US fuel prices up, and the closure of the Hormuz chokepoint will make the situation far worse. Trump is fighting a war that a vast majority of Americans are opposed to, according to opinion survey results. US farmers have been complaining of production cost escalations due to the knock-on economic effects of the West Asia conflict, according to media reports. US midterm elections are due in a few months and the Republicans are not doing well on the political front.

The White House will have to justify the colossal amounts of funds being spent on the current war. The financial cost of the conflict is still being calculated, but according to some estimates the direct military cost ranges from about USD 40 billion to more than USD 100 billion, with equipment losses, base repairs and weapons replenishment being taken into account. The cost continues to escalate. These politico-economic factors will also have a bearing on Trump’s military campaign.

 

Continue Reading

Editorial

The strange case of Kanjipani Imran

Published

on

Thursday 16th July, 2026

Occasions are not rare when absurd twists and turns in Sri Lanka’s legal system remind us of Mr. Bumble, the famous Dickensian character, who declared, “The law is an ass”. The police arrest criminals, after months of meticulous planning, risking their life and limb, but the latter obtain bail, go into hiding, either here or overseas, and continue to run their illegal operations. The police have to launch fresh operations to arrest the criminals on the run.

The police have sought information about Mohommad Najim Mohommad Imran alias Kanjipani Imran, who is wanted under an INTERPOL Red Notice. He is running his criminal operations from overseas, according to a report published in this newspaper yesterday. It defies comprehension why he was released on bail in 2021 though it was patently clear that he would flee the country.

Quoting the police, our news item has said intelligence reports point to links between Imran and international terrorist organisations as well as major mafia syndicates, which enable him to use transnational networks and technology to manage drug trafficking and other criminal operations.

Much is being spoken these days about the need to strengthen public confidence in the judiciary. There is no gainsaying that everything possible must be done to preserve the integrity and dignity of the judiciary. Worryingly, some issues crop up, making one wonder whether a section of the law enforcement authorities and some members of the legal fraternity bend the law to safeguard the interests of wealthy underworld figures at the expense of the judicial process and public security.

The police and the state prosecutor take great pains to prevent some suspects, especially the political opponents of governments in power, from obtaining bail. They invoke all laws and come out with various arguments to have such suspects held on remand for extended periods. Instances abound where their investigations get underway in earnest only after suspects are arrested and remanded for weeks, if not months, while ruling party politicians conduct social media trials, as it were, and declare the suspects guilty, with no heed for the presumption of innocence or the fact that public speculation is prohibited when cases are sub judice.

When Imran was arrested in Dubai and extradited in 2019, it was widely thought that he would have his work cut out to secure bail because Sri Lanka police and their UAE counterparts had worked tirelessly for months to arrest him and Makandure Madush, known as Sri Lanka’s Napoleon of Crime, and bring them here. Madush was shot dead while in custody, and the then government claimed that he had been caught in the crossfire between police and an underworld gang while being taken to a place where a haul of narcotics was believed to have been buried. It is doubtful whether the discerning public bought into that claim.

The news of Imran being released on bail raised many an eyebrow. We said in an editorial comment dated 02 January 2023 that having secured bail he would flee the country and carry out his illegal operation from overseas as other criminals did.

However, Imran is not the only criminal to have jumped bail and fled the country. Janith Madushanka de Silva alias Podi Lasi, a dangerous underworld character, fled to India after being released on bail in 2024. He even claimed that his life was in danger and asked for police protection. It was obvious that he would flee the country, and he did so soon afterwards. One may recall that in 2020, while being detained at the Boossa high-security prison, he and two other criminals, known as Kosgoda Tharaka and Pitigala Keuma, threatened to kill the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Defence Secretary General Kamal Gunaratne and several senior prison officers. Podi Lasi bragged that their private armies were capable of striking anywhere at will. He was arrested in India and brought back in 2026. Thus, criminals are caught, released and caught again. Now, the police are trying to arrest Imran.

Only a thorough probe into the circumstances that led to the release of Imran on bail will reveal how he managed to manipulate the legal process and flee the country.

Continue Reading

Trending