Connect with us

News

Counsel won’t be allowed to visit Sallay daily – CID

Published

on

Shani

… detainee’s wife challenges Shani’s decision

Director CID SSP Shani Abeysekera has declined to grant permission for Asith Siriwardena, Counsel for Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay, detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and now warded at the National Hospital, to visit him five days of the week, from Monday to Friday.

Responding to a letter received from Manori, wife of the detainee, SSP Abeysekera has emphasised that the Counsel could meet Sallay on Wednesdays, as arranged previously.

Abeysekera has pointed out that as Sallay had been moved from the CID and warded at the National Hospital, he didn’t require legal advice at the moment. Sources said that the Director CID had asserted that such visits could be detrimental to Sallay as he required rest. SSP Abeysekera has said that, as agreed, Manori and her son, as well as daughter, could visit the detainee daily.

Manori Sallay, has written again requesting that the Counsel be allowed to visit her husband daily. The text of her letter: I refer to your letter dated 13 June 2026 regarding my husband, Retd. Maj. Gen. Tuan Suresh Sallay.

Whilst your letter attempts to justify the refusal of legal access to my husband on the basis of his present medical condition, it conspicuously fails to address the circumstances that led to his hospitalisation in the first place.

I wish to place on record that my husband’s hunger strike did not arise in a vacuum. It was a direct consequence of the physical, psychological, and emotional suffering he has endured whilst under the custody and control of officers attached to the Criminal Investigation Department. As Director of the CID, you exercise authority, supervision, and command over the officers responsible for his detention and treatment. Consequently, the responsibility for ensuring his safety, dignity, and well-being rests squarely upon your office.

Your assertion that hospitalisation eliminates the need for legal consultation is both legally unsustainable and deeply troubling. Access to legal counsel is not a privilege to be granted or withheld at the discretion of the detaining authority. It is a fundamental legal right afforded to every detainee and a safeguard against abuse, coercion, and arbitrary action. Neither you nor any officer under your command possesses the authority to determine whether my husband requires legal advice.

Equally concerning is your suggestion that consultations with his lawyers would somehow interfere with his “psychological freedom” or recovery. Such a position is extraordinary given that the very institution responsible for his detention is also the institution whose conduct has contributed to his present condition. It is difficult to reconcile your stated concern for his psychological well-being with the fact that he has felt compelled to embark upon a hunger strike whilst under the exclusive control of the CID.

The chronology of events further raises serious concerns. Prior to his hospitalisation, my husband was questioned only on a limited number of occasions over a period of nearly two months. This fact alone undermines any suggestion that his prolonged detention is genuinely required for investigative purposes. Instead, it creates the appearance that detention has become a mechanism of pressure rather than a legitimate tool of investigation.

Your attempt to portray the denial of legal access as an act undertaken for my husband’s benefit is wholly unacceptable. Decisions regarding his legal representation are matters for him, his lawyers, and his family. They are not matters to be determined unilaterally by the very authority whose conduct is under scrutiny.

Accordingly, I hold the CID, and in particular its leadership, responsible for the circumstances that have resulted in my husband’s deterioration in health and subsequent hospitalization. Any continued obstruction of his access to legal counsel will only reinforce concerns regarding the fairness, legality, and propriety of his treatment whilst in custody.

I therefore demand that immediate and unrestricted access be granted to his legal representatives in accordance with the law and that no further attempts be made to interfere with or curtail this fundamental right.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Easter Sunday carnage: WR asks AG to question Dappula on ‘grand conspiracy’ claim

Published

on

Former Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, yesterday urged the Department (CID) to question former Attorney General Dappula de Livera, PC, regarding his claim that the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage was a grand conspiracy.

Dr. Rajapakshe, a former President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, pointed out that the former Director of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the ex-head of State Intelligence Service (SIS) had been arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations levelled by a fugitive from the Sri Lankan law that Gen. Sallay masterminded the Easter Sunday carnage.

The CID arrested Sallay on February 25, 2026, at Peliyagoda.

Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe, (Jnr), PC, could not under any circumstances further delay seeking an opportunity for the CID to question de Livera. The ex-Minister said so yesterday (15) when The Island sought his explanation regarding the claim he made in Kandy on Sunday that de Livera alleged a grand conspiracy after the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declined to grant him a one-year extension.

Ex-parliamentarian Rajapakshe quoted President Rajapaksa as having told him that de Livera was told of his inability to grant the outgoing AG’s request. However, the then government offered him the opportunity to serve as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in Canada. He declined that offer.

Responding to The Island queries, Rajapakshe said that though de Livera succeeded in thwarting the Terrorist Investigation Department (TID) from questioning him over his claim made on the eve of his retirement, in May, 2021. According to him, when a major controversy erupted over De Livera’s claim, the TID had been sent to record his statement.

Having evaded the police and successfully moved the Court of Appeal against the TID, the former AG sent a lawyer to the TID on his behalf. That lawyer declared that a seven-paged legal objection to the matter in question has been submitted to the TID.

“Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith and all those who had been demanding justice for Easter Sunday victims should urge AG Parinda Ranasinghe (Junior), PC to record de Livera’s statement. The ex-Minister said that the Leader of the House, Minister Bimal Ratnayake, disclosed that SSP Shanie Abeysekera and Senior DIG Ravi Seneviratne had been appointed Director, CID and Secretary to the Public Security Ministry, respectively, on the Cardinal’s advice. Therefore, the Cardinal should stress the urgent need to record the former AG’s statement.

Dappula de Livera received his appointment on 10 May, 2019, just weeks after the Easter Sunday carnage, and retired on 25 May, 2025.

On the eve of his retirement, alleging that there had been a grand conspiracy, de Livera said that the information by the SIS with times, targets, places, method of attacks and other information proved the conspiracy. He said that the identities of those involved in the grand conspiracy must come by the way of evidence.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe said that investigations into the Easter Sunday carnage couldn’t be brought to a successful conclusion until de Livera revealed what he knew about the grand conspiracy, mastermind or whatever various interested parties chose to call the attacks.

The government sent a CID team to Paris to record a statement of Azad Moulana, a fugitive seeking asylum in Switzerland and who implicated Sallay in the Easter Sunday attacks. “This matter is so serious de Livera must consider volunteering to assist the investigation,” ex-lawmaker Rajapakshe said, challenging all those genuinely concerned about the inordinate delay in bringing the high profile investigation into a conclusion to push for immediate questioning of de Livera.

Having spearheaded the Easter Sunday investigation at the onset of the probe, de Livera could shed light on the alleged conspiracy if he really meant his declaration on the eve of his retirement, Dr. Rajapakshe said.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Beijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism

Published

on

Beijing Capital Airlines to resume direct flights between Beijing and Colombo in September this year, restoring an important air link and strengthening tourism, business, and people-to-people connectivity. This service will complement the existing 23 weekly flights between Mainland China and Colombo.

This was announced at Sri Lanka tourism briefing and networking reception held recently in Beijing. Sri Lanka embassy in Beijing with the support of the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau (SLTPB) held the event that brought together over 120 representatives from China’s travel trade, media organizations, tourism-related investment sector, airlines, content creation industry, and Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions (MICE) sector.

Among the participants were representatives of leading Chinese travel companies and media organisations, including China Tourism Group Travel Services Corporation Limited, China International Travel Service (CITS), China Youth Travel Service (CYTS), Spring Tour, Mafengwo, Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, Global Times, Guangming Online, and China Times, together with representatives of SriLankan Airlines and Beijing Capital Airlines.

The event, led by Deputy Chief of Mission (DCM), Poornima Gunasekera marked the resumption of the Embassy’s direct engagement with China’s travel trade and media community after a considerable period and provided a platform to outline new initiatives aimed at strengthening tourism cooperation between Sri Lanka and China ahead of the 70th Anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries in 2027.

In her keynote address, the DCM highlighted the longstanding historical ties between Sri Lanka and China, dating back more than 2,000 years through the ancient Maritime Silk Route, and stressed tourism as a key channel for deepening people-to-people exchanges. She noted Sri Lanka’s strong tourism recovery, with over two million international arrivals in 2025, and reaffirmed the country’s image as a safe, peaceful, and welcoming destination. She also highlighted the Government’s expanded visa-free entry programme covering 40 countries, including China, designed to make travel easier and more convenient.

She emphasised Sri Lanka’s unique tourism offering, which combines exceptional diversity within a compact geographical area. Within just 65,610 square kilometres—about four times the size of Beijing—visitors can experience beaches, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, wildlife safaris, tea country, wellness tourism, adventure activities, cultural heritage, gemstones, and authentic Sri Lankan hospitality. She also underlined improved connectivity, noting that a direct flight from Beijing to Colombo takes around seven hours, making Sri Lanka a convenient option for Chinese travellers within broader Asian travel itineraries.

Continue Reading

News

Delegation of UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture here amidst protests against new anti-terrorism law

Published

on

Aisha Shujune

A delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) is in Colombo. The SPT’s second visit, from 15 to 24 June 2026, takes place amidst the ongoing debate over the NPP government’s decision to bring in a new anti-terrorism law in place of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) enacted in 1979.

Some political parties, and civil society groups, have criticised the NPP move as the ruling party, during the presidential and parliamentary polls campaigns, promised to abolish the PTA.

The SPT conducted its first visit to Sri Lanka in April 2019, following Sri Lanka’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT) in December 2017. Upon accession, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) was designated as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM), under OPCAT, by the Government of Sri Lanka.

The Foreign Ministry said that the four-member SPT delegation was scheduled to hold meetings at ministerial level, and engage with senior officials of relevant ministries, departments and institutions. The delegation would also meet representatives of the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka and members of civil society, the ministry said.

“The Government of Sri Lanka will engage with the Subcommittee in an open, constructive, and transparent manner, consistent with its policy of continued engagement with the United Nations, and in fulfilment of its Treaty Body obligations undertaken voluntarily and enshrined in relevant international instruments, in accordance with the Constitution.

The delegation will comprise Ms. Aisha Shujune Muhammad (Maldives) (Head of delegation); Jakub Julian Czepek (Poland); Ms. Anica Tomsic (Croatia); and Nika Kvaratskhelia (Georgia). They will be accompanied by officials of the SPT Secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland.”

Continue Reading

Trending