News
Counsel won’t be allowed to visit Sallay daily – CID
… detainee’s wife challenges Shani’s decision
Director CID SSP Shani Abeysekera has declined to grant permission for Asith Siriwardena, Counsel for Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay, detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and now warded at the National Hospital, to visit him five days of the week, from Monday to Friday.
Responding to a letter received from Manori, wife of the detainee, SSP Abeysekera has emphasised that the Counsel could meet Sallay on Wednesdays, as arranged previously.
Abeysekera has pointed out that as Sallay had been moved from the CID and warded at the National Hospital, he didn’t require legal advice at the moment. Sources said that the Director CID had asserted that such visits could be detrimental to Sallay as he required rest. SSP Abeysekera has said that, as agreed, Manori and her son, as well as daughter, could visit the detainee daily.
Manori Sallay, has written again requesting that the Counsel be allowed to visit her husband daily. The text of her letter: I refer to your letter dated 13 June 2026 regarding my husband, Retd. Maj. Gen. Tuan Suresh Sallay.
Whilst your letter attempts to justify the refusal of legal access to my husband on the basis of his present medical condition, it conspicuously fails to address the circumstances that led to his hospitalisation in the first place.
I wish to place on record that my husband’s hunger strike did not arise in a vacuum. It was a direct consequence of the physical, psychological, and emotional suffering he has endured whilst under the custody and control of officers attached to the Criminal Investigation Department. As Director of the CID, you exercise authority, supervision, and command over the officers responsible for his detention and treatment. Consequently, the responsibility for ensuring his safety, dignity, and well-being rests squarely upon your office.
Your assertion that hospitalisation eliminates the need for legal consultation is both legally unsustainable and deeply troubling. Access to legal counsel is not a privilege to be granted or withheld at the discretion of the detaining authority. It is a fundamental legal right afforded to every detainee and a safeguard against abuse, coercion, and arbitrary action. Neither you nor any officer under your command possesses the authority to determine whether my husband requires legal advice.
Equally concerning is your suggestion that consultations with his lawyers would somehow interfere with his “psychological freedom” or recovery. Such a position is extraordinary given that the very institution responsible for his detention is also the institution whose conduct has contributed to his present condition. It is difficult to reconcile your stated concern for his psychological well-being with the fact that he has felt compelled to embark upon a hunger strike whilst under the exclusive control of the CID.
The chronology of events further raises serious concerns. Prior to his hospitalisation, my husband was questioned only on a limited number of occasions over a period of nearly two months. This fact alone undermines any suggestion that his prolonged detention is genuinely required for investigative purposes. Instead, it creates the appearance that detention has become a mechanism of pressure rather than a legitimate tool of investigation.
Your attempt to portray the denial of legal access as an act undertaken for my husband’s benefit is wholly unacceptable. Decisions regarding his legal representation are matters for him, his lawyers, and his family. They are not matters to be determined unilaterally by the very authority whose conduct is under scrutiny.
Accordingly, I hold the CID, and in particular its leadership, responsible for the circumstances that have resulted in my husband’s deterioration in health and subsequent hospitalization. Any continued obstruction of his access to legal counsel will only reinforce concerns regarding the fairness, legality, and propriety of his treatment whilst in custody.
I therefore demand that immediate and unrestricted access be granted to his legal representatives in accordance with the law and that no further attempts be made to interfere with or curtail this fundamental right.”
News
Fast Attack Craft P 4447 recovered in successful salvage operation
The Sri Lanka Navy successfully recovered its Fast Attack Craft P 4447 following a successful salvage operation, bringing a multi-stage emergency response to a close.
The craft, which ran into distress during a routine patrol on 15th August 2026 off Angulana, was brought to the surface on 11th September, from a depth of approximately 80 feet. It was
subsequently towed to the Colombo Dockyard premises.
The initial phase of the operation immediately following the incident focused on search and rescue. A joint effort involving the Navy, Air Force, Police, and local fishermen from Angulana
resulted in the rescue of 11 crew members. The search and rescue phase drew to a close with the recovery of the remains of the Second in Command of the craft, on 4th September.
Following the search and rescue phase, specialized Navy diving and salvage teams launched a dedicated recovery phase against rough sea conditions and underwater challenges, adhering to
strict safety protocols. The Navy’s marine, hull, electrical, and electronic engineering teams utilized specialized technical know-how and equipment to raise the vessel in stages.
Thus, the salvage operation marked an outstanding achievement attained through the professionalism, technical expertise of Navy divers, and coordinated contribution of all
engineering and technical branches of the Sri Lanka Navy. Technical support and specialized expertise were also extended by the Sri Lanka Ports Authority and Colombo Dockyard PLC.
News
CIABOC member’s appointment: Controversy over Speaker under probe heading selection process
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The Opposition should intensity its focus on the forthcoming selection of a member of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) and remain vigilant as Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, MP, the head of the Constitutional Council (CC) tasked with making the relevant recommendation, is under investigation by the CIABOC, sources familiar with the ongoing inquiry told The Island.
Chethiya Goonasekara, PC, is expected to complete his three-year term on Dec 31, 2026. Sources pointed out that CIABOC Commissioners are appointed by the President on the recommendation made by the 10-member Constitutional Council.
The CIABOC initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged by suspended Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne in early February this year. Sources said that as Goonasekera is scheduled to complete his term toward the end of 2026, the CC would have to call applications soon to choose the successor.
Goonasekara received his appointment from President Ranil Wickremesinghe in January 2024. A Justice W. M. N. P. Iddawala was appointed Chairman of the CIABOC. The other commissioner is K. Bernard Rajapakse.
Asked whether Iddawala and Rajapakse, too, would complete their terms soon, sources said that in terms of the Anti-Corruption Act No 09 of 2023, the Chairman of CIABOC would hold office for a period of five years, second commissioner (K. Bernard Rajapakse) for four years and the third commissioner (Chethiya Goonasekara) for a period of three years.
Sources said that the Opposition as well as civil society representatives in the CC should take up the issue of Speaker facing an investigation by the CIABOC taking part in the forthcoming selection process. Responding to queries, sources emphasized that the issue was whether in terms of Section 107 of the Anti-Corruption Act the participation of the Speaker in the selection process amounted to a violation of the Act itself.
The current members of the CC are Dr Jagath Wickramaratne, Speaker and Chairman of the Constitutional Council, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Prime Minister, Sajith Premadasa, Leader of the Opposition, Bimal Rathnayake, MP, Aboobucker Athambawa, MP, Ajith P. Perera, MP, Sivagnanam Shritharan, MP, Austin Fernando, Civil society representative, Prof. Wasantha Seneviratne, Civil society representative and Ranjith Ariyaratne, Civil society representative.
Sources pointed out that in spite of the sensitivity of the case, the CIABOC recorded Kularatne’s statement in the second week of August, six months after he lodged the complaint.
The CIABOC on 3, 8 and 10 Sept recorded the statements from the Transport Officer, Deputy Director, Administration and Assistant Director, Finance regarding the use of facilities by the Speaker, those assigned to his staff and other relevant matters.
The NPP named Dr. Wickramaratne as the Speaker after Asoka Ranwala resigned over controversy regarding his higher education qualifications.
SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayaskera has repeatedly raised the issues concerning the Speaker with the focus also on the Speaker using two government-managed residences, relevant staff in addition to expenditure on food, transport and fuel provided to the Speaker’s private secretary.
Political sources said that trouble erupted after the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Council in late January sacked Kularatne accusing him of providing false information to secure his appointment. Before being appointed as the Deputy Secretary-General of Parliament in 2023, Kularatne held several high-ranking positions, including Secretary to the Chief Government Whip, Additional Secretary to the President, Additional Secretary to the Prime Minister, and Additional Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition.
The SJB declared in Parliament that Ranwala should be brought back as the Speaker as they have no faith in Wickramaratne. MP Mujibur Rahuman jokingly told parliament that the Opposition wouldn’t raise Ranwala’s educational qualifications.
News
GMOA: Countrywide cadre revision not done since 2015
The Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) has stressed the need to conduct a comprehensive countrywide cadre revision urgently.
GMOA spokesman Dr. Lasitha Dhammika told The Island that the failure on the part of successive governments to conduct cadre revision caused the deterioration of the public sector health services. Due to the absence of required statistics, they hadn’t been able to fully comprehend the situation on the ground and to ascertain the requirements of the public.
Dr. Dhammika pointed out the expansion of the services without supporting statistics and the need to initiate an immediate cadre revision. According to him, the GMOA had raised this issue with successive governments without success. The GMOA spokesman said that they also sought relevant information from the Health Ministry in terms of the Right to Information (RTI) Act two weeks ago but was yet to receive response.
(SF)
-
Sports3 days agoDDS set to lose Test captaincy
-
News6 days agoThailand shuts door on undesirables from Sri Lanka
-
News3 days agoSri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM
-
Business6 days agoCEB successor company breaks into top three in competitive BESS tender
-
Latest News3 days agoShafali, Deepti power India into sixth T20 Asia Cup final
-
Opinion5 days agoNavigating Sri Lanka’s Israeli Dilemma
-
Latest News2 days agoSri Lanka thwart Fatima Sana challenge to secure Asia Cup final spot
-
Features4 days agoLost for 90 years: Rare Goby resurfaces in Jaffna
