Connect with us

News

Counsel won’t be allowed to visit Sallay daily – CID

Published

on

Shani

… detainee’s wife challenges Shani’s decision

Director CID SSP Shani Abeysekera has declined to grant permission for Asith Siriwardena, Counsel for Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay, detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and now warded at the National Hospital, to visit him five days of the week, from Monday to Friday.

Responding to a letter received from Manori, wife of the detainee, SSP Abeysekera has emphasised that the Counsel could meet Sallay on Wednesdays, as arranged previously.

Abeysekera has pointed out that as Sallay had been moved from the CID and warded at the National Hospital, he didn’t require legal advice at the moment. Sources said that the Director CID had asserted that such visits could be detrimental to Sallay as he required rest. SSP Abeysekera has said that, as agreed, Manori and her son, as well as daughter, could visit the detainee daily.

Manori Sallay, has written again requesting that the Counsel be allowed to visit her husband daily. The text of her letter: I refer to your letter dated 13 June 2026 regarding my husband, Retd. Maj. Gen. Tuan Suresh Sallay.

Whilst your letter attempts to justify the refusal of legal access to my husband on the basis of his present medical condition, it conspicuously fails to address the circumstances that led to his hospitalisation in the first place.

I wish to place on record that my husband’s hunger strike did not arise in a vacuum. It was a direct consequence of the physical, psychological, and emotional suffering he has endured whilst under the custody and control of officers attached to the Criminal Investigation Department. As Director of the CID, you exercise authority, supervision, and command over the officers responsible for his detention and treatment. Consequently, the responsibility for ensuring his safety, dignity, and well-being rests squarely upon your office.

Your assertion that hospitalisation eliminates the need for legal consultation is both legally unsustainable and deeply troubling. Access to legal counsel is not a privilege to be granted or withheld at the discretion of the detaining authority. It is a fundamental legal right afforded to every detainee and a safeguard against abuse, coercion, and arbitrary action. Neither you nor any officer under your command possesses the authority to determine whether my husband requires legal advice.

Equally concerning is your suggestion that consultations with his lawyers would somehow interfere with his “psychological freedom” or recovery. Such a position is extraordinary given that the very institution responsible for his detention is also the institution whose conduct has contributed to his present condition. It is difficult to reconcile your stated concern for his psychological well-being with the fact that he has felt compelled to embark upon a hunger strike whilst under the exclusive control of the CID.

The chronology of events further raises serious concerns. Prior to his hospitalisation, my husband was questioned only on a limited number of occasions over a period of nearly two months. This fact alone undermines any suggestion that his prolonged detention is genuinely required for investigative purposes. Instead, it creates the appearance that detention has become a mechanism of pressure rather than a legitimate tool of investigation.

Your attempt to portray the denial of legal access as an act undertaken for my husband’s benefit is wholly unacceptable. Decisions regarding his legal representation are matters for him, his lawyers, and his family. They are not matters to be determined unilaterally by the very authority whose conduct is under scrutiny.

Accordingly, I hold the CID, and in particular its leadership, responsible for the circumstances that have resulted in my husband’s deterioration in health and subsequent hospitalization. Any continued obstruction of his access to legal counsel will only reinforce concerns regarding the fairness, legality, and propriety of his treatment whilst in custody.

I therefore demand that immediate and unrestricted access be granted to his legal representatives in accordance with the law and that no further attempts be made to interfere with or curtail this fundamental right.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fuel crunch looms

Published

on

Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies

by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane

The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).

Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.

The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.

The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.

“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.

Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.

The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.

The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.

“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.

He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,

along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.

He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.

The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.

The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.

Continue Reading

News

Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials

Published

on

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court. He appeared before the court in layman’s clothes. Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha.

by Norman Palihawadane

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.

The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.

He appeared before the court in civilian attire.

Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.

The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.

He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.

The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.

The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.

Continue Reading

News

Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.

The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.

Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.

He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.

In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.

He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.

Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.

Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

Continue Reading

Trending