Monday 26th October, 2020
The Opposition MPs who voted for the 20th Amendment (20A) in Parliament, the other day, are making a vain attempt to justify their action. They would have us believe that they did so without expecting anything in return. There is no such thing as a free vote in the Sri Lankan Parliament. What took the cake was SJB National List (NL) MP Diana Gamage’s excuse. She said she had acted like (Mark) Antony, who, she said, had stabbed Caesar for the love of Rome.
Diana’s version of history has left us baffled. If Antony had stabbed Caesar, Brutus would not have had to flee and run on his sword in the end. Most of all, the question is why Caesar said, “Et tu, Brute?”, and not “Et tu, Antony?” (Diana is fully qualified to head the Office of the United National High Commissioner for Human Rights, for she has the knack for levelling baseless allegations.)
What one gathers from Diana’s statement at issue is that she thinks what she wrongly attributed to Antony—stabbing Caesar—was justifiable because, she thinks, he acted out of his love of Rome. She is apparently given to confusing wrong for right in making decisions. No wonder she voted for 20A!
The NL mechanism was introduced to bring in eminent persons as MPs. But thanks to our political party leaders who act out of expediency rather than principle, we have had some political dregs in the garb of NL MPs. One may recall that the Kumaratunga administration opened a new low in parliamentary politics by creating an NL vacancy and bringing in Mervyn Silva, of all people, to Parliament. The yahapalana government abused the NL to appoint a bunch of defeated candidates to Parliament and even made most of them Ministers. In so doing, it made a mockery of people’s franchise and sovereignty because the people had deemed them unfit to enter Parliament. One of the main arguments that the SLPP government put forth in support of its decision to abolish the Constitutional Council was that it had unelected members, making vital decisions. It remains to be seen whether the government will cause one of its NL slots to fall vacant so that it can appoint to Parliament an outsider who neither contested the last general election nor was an NL nominee, to Parliament, and make him a minister.
It is high time a constitutional amendment was introduced to prevent anyone whose name does not appear on the NL submitted to the people by recognised political parties or independent groups before a general election from being appointed an MP. The deplorable practice of catapulting outsiders to Parliament via the NL is antithetical to democracy and must be brought to an end urgently. True, it was the late President J. R. Jayewardene who surreptitiously inserted a provision into the Constitution to enable outsiders to be appointed MPs via the NL, but those who claim to be ready to lay down their lives to protect democracy can easily amend that provision, can’t they?
Meanwhile, Diana’s reference to ancient Rome reminds us of the danger a country faces when its leaders are torn by divided loyalty, which the present-day dual citizens in politics and key government positions are accused of. After Julius Caesar’s assassination, General Antony neglected his duties much to the consternation of Octavius (or Octavian) Caesar, betrayed his citizenship and forged an alliance with a foreign queen. Finally, he turned against the empire as he loved Cleopatra and Egypt more than Rome. He had this to say melodramatically when Rome summoned him while he was leading a decadent life with Cleopatra: “Let Rome in Tiber melt, and the wide arch/Of the ranged empire fall! Here is my space/Kingdoms are clay …” – (Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra).
When MP Diana Gamage said in Parliament that she had emulated Antony in voting for 20A, the irony of her utterance may not have been lost on the students of world history and literature, for Antony was a member of the Roman Triumvirate upon which autocratic powers were legally conferred. The Triumvirate, according to some historians, had its opponents destroyed and their properties seized.
Defeat bid to protect the corrupt
Wednesday 5th October, 2022
The Rajapaksa-Wickremesinghe government has proved once again that probity is anathema to it. Its leaders have engineered the exclusion of dissident SLPP MPs Prof. Charitha Herath and Prof. Tissa Vitharana from the COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises), and the COPA (Committee on Public Accounts), respectively. Never do they baulk at anything to cover up their corrupt deals, safeguard their interests, and protect crooks.
When President Ranil Wickremesinghe prorogued Parliament in July, causing the COPE, the COPA, and other parliamentary committees to be dissolved, it was clear that the government would get rid of Prof. Herath and Prof. Vitharana; they had got under the skins of the SLPP leaders by carrying out their duties and functions conscientiously and taking on the corrupt who had caused huge losses to the state coffers. They are among the few legislators who have striven to fight corruption and restore public faith in the national legislature. They were able to kindle some hope in the resentful people, who have turned against Parliament. Dissident SLPP MP Dullas Alahapperuma was spot on when he told Parliament yesterday that the people were so angry that they cursed all 225 MPs.
SJB MP Dr. Harsha de Silva deserves credit for having resigned from the COPE and asked the government to appoint Prof. Herath to the committee. This is a clever move on the part of the Opposition, and how the SLPP will seek to counter it remains to be seen. The SLPP has so much to cover up that it may not soften its stand.
President Wickremesinghe, in response to anti-government protesters’ demand for a system change, promised to usher in a new political culture, and introduce consensual governance. He also undertook to establish an all-party government to make the political parties represented in Parliament partners in governance. Maybe he was genuinely desirous of doing so, but what we are witnessing today is the very antithesis of his solemn pledge; perhaps, he has not been able to make good on his promise because the SLPP, on whose parliamentary majority he is dependent, does not allow him to do so. The SLPP wants the President to do as it says, and not the other way around. But this does not mean that the President can absolve himself of the blame for the exclusion of Prof. Herath and Prof. Vitharana from the parliamentary watchdog committees they headed in an exemplary manner.
SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam has, in a recent television interview, declared that the SLPP has retained its hold on power; it has a parliamentary majority and had the current President elected. He has told the truth. What he has left unsaid is that Basil Rajapaksa controls the SLPP and the government like ‘Big Brother.’
If the SLPP is allowed to appoint its MPs or its proxies as the Chairmen of the COPE and the COPA, Basil will be able to manipulate the two committees much to the benefit of the crooked elements responsible for ruining public institutions. The Rajapaksas may have expected to do so when they had SLPP MPs, Prof. Hearth and Prof. Vitharana, appointed as COPE and COPA heads, but the latter refused to give in to pressure from the Family, and exposed many corrupt deals. This is not something we can expect of other SLPP MPs who have chosen to shore up the Family rule under a new President, and continue to lick sandals. Hence the need for the reappointment of Prof. Herath and Prof. Vitharana as the Chairmen of the COPE and the COPA, respectively.
The Opposition should be thanked for condemning the government’s shameful action at issue, taking up the cudgels on behalf of the public and doing its utmost to prevent the Rajapaksa family from keeping the COPE and the COPA under its thumb. One hopes and prays that it will succeed in its endeavour. If the government manages to bulldoze its way through and install its stooges as COPE and COPA heads then the Opposition’s representation on the two committees will only help legitimise the SLPP’s sinister efforts to cover up corruption and safeguard the interests of the Family.
Hell and heaven
Tuesday 4th October, 2022
Piteous appeals of the victims of last week’s fire that destroyed more than 80 shanties at Thotalanga are still heard. The government has promised relief and alternative accommodation for the poor families in distress. One can only hope that it will not renege on its pledge. Politicians’ promises are said to be like the piecrust; they are made to be broken.
The media is losing interest in the Thotalanga fire and its victims. The same is true for the ordinary people, who take refuge in escapism, unable to face the harsh politico-economic reality. No wonder the Lotus Tower (LT) continues to draw large crowds. Some poor people are said to be pinching and scraping to pay for elevator rides to the tower top and enjoy the panoramic view of the city and the hinterland, therefrom. One of them, a woman from Kurunegala, has said she dipped into her child’s piggybank savings to visit the LT, and got her money’s worth! Another person who visited the tower was so thrilled that he said it was like a trip to heaven! Many others are also in seventh heaven, having seen Sri Pada from the LT. Everybody seems to have missed hell (read urban squalor) for the holy mountain peak, high-rises and other such attractions visible from the LT’s observation deck.
Ironically, it is while people are queuing up to visit the Lotus heaven, as it were, that the Thotalanga fire has shed light on the seamy side of urban life in Colombo, where opulence and abject poverty exist cheek by jowl. But it does not seem to have aroused the public conscience at least briefly.
The gutted houses at Thotalanga were unauthorised structures, according to government officials. Successive governments have been blamed for the glaring urban bias in resources allocation for development. The JVP even coined a pithy slogan to highlight this fact and mobilise the rural youth, in the late 1980s—kolombata kiri, gamata kekiri (‘milk for Colombo and melon for the village’). But the majority of city dwellers are in the same predicament as their rural counterparts; slum and shanty dwellers are said to account for about one half of Colombo’s population. This shows that the majority of urban people have not benefited from the much-publicised development programmes.
There have been only half-hearted attempts by governments to arrest the rapid spread of urban poverty. We have seen some densification schemes, which however have not been effective enough to help arrest the expansion of slums and shanty areas. The yuppification of some parts of the city, frequented by the rich, has taken precedence over plans to solve the urban housing problem.
Politicians do not seem keen to tackle urban poverty and the attendant problems, for it is easy for them to manipulate the poor and muster votes. Instead of making a serious effort to alleviate poverty, they have learnt to benefit therefrom electorally.
The problem of urban poverty, which manifests itself in the expansion of slum and shanty areas cannot be solved, once and for all, without structural transformations and a high economy growth, which will not be possible here in the foreseeable future.
The provision of liveable space for the populace is possible only when a city expands outward, inward and upward in a sustainable manner, according to urban planners. This means horizontal spread, infill development (building on spaces among existing structures), and vertical layering or densification. These are occurring in the wrong way, where Colombo and other urban centres in this country are concerned.
The horizontal spread has been haphazard, and the sprawl has been mainly due to an increase in unauthorised structures on river and canal banks, wetlands, railway lands, etc. The expansion of shanties within the city has apparently passed for infill development. As for vertical layering, there has been little progress.
It is high time a proper urban development plan was worked out for Colombo with the help of real experts in the field. Otherwise, far worse fires than the recent one are bound to happen.
Need for Bureau of Rehabilitation
Monday 3rd October, 2022
Political leaders in this country seldom look before they leap; they do it the other way around, reminding us of the proverbial tippler who plunged head first into a swimming pool, at night, only to realise that it had been emptied for repairs. President Ranil Wickremesinghe has revoked a controversial Gazette he issued recently, designating some areas in the Colombo city and its outskirts as high security zones (HSZs) and imposing restrictions on certain rights and freedoms of the public therein. If only he had cared to examine his order critically before having it implemented.
What possessed the government to invoke the Official Secrets Act No. 32 of 1955, of all archaic laws, to designate the ill-conceived HSZs? Did it seek legal advice before the issuance of the Gazette in question? If so, who vetted it? The lawyer/s who perused and approved it should be sent back to the law school!
One of the main reasons for President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s abject failure was his rashness as well as cavalier attitude. He laboured under the delusion that his word had to take precedence over even government circulars. Cynics say the gazettes he issued as the President far outnumbered the audio cassettes released by popular singer H. R. Jothipala. He revoked most of them and cut a pathetic figure in the process. He acted whimsically in making vital decisions and ruined the economy as a result. President Wickremesinghe, a political veteran, was expected to make a difference, but he seems to be following in the footsteps of his immediate predecessor.
President Wickremesinghe is now under pressure to withdraw the Bureau of Rehabilitation Bill, which has drawn heavy flak from the Opposition, the media and human rights activists. The opponents of the Bill have warned that the SLPP will use it to harass its political rivals. The government has sought to allay their doubts and suspicions, but a regime that has used laws governing official secrets to designate HSZs is capable of anything.
The administration, management, and control of the affairs of the proposed Rehabilitation Bureau are to be vested in a governing council consisting of the Secretaries or Additional Secretaries of Defence, Health, Education, and Rehabilitation, the IGP or a DIG, and a representative of the National Dangerous Drugs Control Board.
It is feared that the proposed law, if passed, will be used to send anti-government protesters to rehabilitation centres. The SLPP government has a history of using even quarantine laws to crush protests against it; it had Ceylon Teachers’ Union leader Joseph Stalin and several other key trade unionists bundled off to a faraway quarantine centre on the grounds that they had violated health regulations during the Covid-19 pandemic, last year. It made a mockery of its claim shortly afterwards by releasing all of them as pressure mounted on it to refrain from harassing them. In the late 1980s, we witnessed thousands of anti-government activists being rounded up and trucked to rehabilitation centres, most of which doubled as torture chambers. Thus, the Opposition’s fear that the rehabilitation bureau to be formed will be used as an instrument to suppress democratic dissent is not groundless.
We, however, do not join those who are calling for the withdrawal of the Rehabilitation Bureau Bill. Instead, we wish to suggest an amendment thereto. We believe that there is a pressing need for a rehabilitation bureau not for the members of the public but for the aggressive politicians who are a danger to society. What we beheld at the Galle Face Green on 09 May is a case in point. Hordes of SLPP politicians who set upon the anti-government protesters looked like zombies thirsting for blood. They were drunk and stoned, and hell-bent on destroying anything in their path. Such dangerous elements need to be rehabilitated while those who retaliated by killing an SLPP MP and burning government politicians’ properties must be arrested and prosecuted. Ugly scenes of violence we witnessed in Parliament during the 52-day government, in 2018, can also be adduced to bolster the argument that most politicians need rehabilitation. The SLPP MPs wreaked havoc in the Chamber of Parliament, and even tried to assault the then Speaker Karu Jayasuriya.
So, let President Wickremesinghe be urged to amend the Bill at issue to provide for the establishment of a bureau to rehabilitate politicians, especially the SLPP MPs, local councillors and their goons. After all, no less a person than Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has said all MPs have to be tested for drugs because some of them are allegedly addicted to narcotics. Shouldn’t the government put its house in order first before trying to rehabilitate others?
22A: Jayasumana asks govt. to stick to SC ruling, warns against moves detrimental to unitary status
Defeat bid to protect the corrupt
Deteriorating rural economy, and food security
‘Dates have the highest sugar content to fight Coronavirus’
U.S. Congress to probe assets fleecing by US citizens of Sri Lankan origin
Sunday Island 27 December – Headlines
News5 days ago
UK considers imposing sanctions on Gen. Silva, others over ‘war crimes’
News4 days ago
Wigneswaran wants SL taken to International Criminal Court
News4 days ago
Lanka girls from ‘unimaginable’ backgrounds driven to sex trade by currency crisis: ex-President
News7 days ago
Corruption: Ex-top House official alleges negligence of successive Speakers
News3 days ago
Ex-HRCSL head challenges ‘Bureau of Rehabilitation Bill’
Features4 days ago
THIS AND THAT
News7 days ago
PMB declines to release Rs 1.2 bn FD for paddy purchasing
News2 days ago
SJB fears for life of IUSF convener taken out of prison at night