Connect with us


Back to school anxiety



Adverse effect of diving headlong into schooling

After a year and a half of being cooped up in homes, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, children are set to go back to school, if they are not already. While some kids will be excited about meeting their peers and teachers, others, particularly the younger children, may feel overwhelmed in a new social environment. In some, forced out of their comfort zone, this may create separation anxiety. The anxiety about being separated from families, after being together for so long will only be compounded by fears of loved ones falling prey to the virus. To top it all off these kids have drilled into them various health precautions such as to not get too close to other people, to keep their masks on, use sanitizer and to wash their hands repeatedly. Anxiety is in the air and kids cannot help but feel it. Hopefully, the excitement of going back will outweigh the potential anxiety. In any case, it is bound to be a tough re-entry.

by Sajitha Prematunge

Ferdinando was apprehensive about the reopening of schools, and the fear of contracting COVID-19 had little to do with it. Her school is due to reopen next week and for teachers like her, student social anxiety is very real. The previous lockdowns set many of her students at the S. Mahinda Vidyalaya, Kalutara, several steps back in terms of education, as well as social interaction.

“Most of these kids are eager to come back to school since they are not well provided for at home,” said Nadee Ferdinando. It is heartbreaking to see kids turn up at school, after a year and a half long lockdown, emaciated. “When they are at school their friends share their food with them.” She observed that this is most pronounced in remote schools. Emotional and nutritional needs of students’ of such schools, are often neglected by parents who are low income earners. She observed a general lethargy and lack of concentration, immediately after the reopening of schools, after previous lockdowns. “It set them back several steps. They find it difficult to concentrate, they don’t answer questions and can’t absorb anything in the first few days. Some of them just sat there stupefied. It took time for them to come back to normal, after the previous lockdowns,” said Ferdinando.

From her experience of previous lockdowns, she knows better than to dive headlong into academic activities. “So, we just stick to activities, like singing and dancing.” Ferdinando observed that it is not only the younger kids who are affected. After a stifling lockdown, cooped in their homes, kids as old as 13 require to be coaxed out of their shells with mundane gossip. “Above all they need to socialise and interact,” said Ferdinando.

Psychological perspective

Karapitiya Teaching Hospital, Consultant Psychiatrist, Dr. Rumi Ruben pointed out that children are the group most adversely affected by the pandemic. “Being homebound, due to various regulations, lockdowns, restrictions in movement and health concerns, has been most stressful for children,” said Ruben. He pointed out that lockdowns have both pros and cons, pros being, being able to spend a lot of time with other family members, and cons also being, having to spend a lot of time with other family members, cooped up in a small house. “Kids of all ages, in the same house, can lead to fighting over resources,” said Ruben. Add to the mix sibling rivalry and it would be enough to drive any sane kid slowly mad.

He explained that during the past one and half years since school was out, apart from being deprived of education in the conventional sense, kids have been starved of recreation and time with peers. This is detrimental to kids’ personal development. Social interaction, reduced due to lockdowns, has blunted kids’ social and communication skills, which in turn has hampered their ability to express emotions. In this context, Ruben emphasises the significance of student-teacher interactive communication.

Online education

Online education cannot compare with the physical proximity afforded by a classroom. “Neither can teachers monitor the progress of students nor can students, counter question teachers,” Ruben pointed out. Besides, at school kids play with others their age and even fight. They also missed out on all the extracurricular activities, such as dancing and singing. “The deprivation of all this hampers social learning, which is vital for personal development.”


The pandemic provided an ideal opportunity to gauge the inequality in our so-called free education. Laptops, tabs or mobile phones and internet access to take part in online classes did not come free and was beyond the capacity of most daily wage earners, the worst affected, economically, by the pandemic. The same extends to provision of basic needs such as food and nutritional needs as well as keeping children happy in general by meeting their emotional needs, such as by buying them toys and other trinkets. “Such circumstances invariably affect children’s psychology,” said Ruben.

“Another adverse effect of online education was the exposure to sexual material and addiction to gaming, now recognised by the WHO as a mental illness. “Gaming addiction entails withdrawal symptoms such as lack of concentration, anger management issues and withdrawal from other social activities.” Ruben pointed out that all these affect children’s communication.

Illness phobia

According to him, illness phobia, the fear of falling sick and dying or losing loved ones to an illness, in the current context, exacerbated by media coverage of the pandemic, and harping on the death toll, could lead to emotional neediness in children. “Clinginess in such children could lead to reluctance to separate from parents; separation anxiety. Children may refuse to go to school outright,” said Ruben. Such conditions could manifest in the form of social anxiety as well, characterised by irritability, loss of appetite and quarrelling with siblings.

In turn, social anxiety can manifest in the form of depressive symptoms. “Kids may refuse to study, may be irritable and may have difficulty falling asleep or have nightmares. These can exacerbate into medically unexplainable physical symptoms, such as stomach aches or headaches.” So the usual excuse for not wanting to go to school cannot be idly brushed aside. Ruben indicated that they could get physical if forced to conform to the new norm. “They could turn physically violent if parents force them to study or go to school. They may start to consider parents as enemies,” said Ruben. He suggested that phobic symptoms towards COVID-19 should be alleviated by reassurance and providing accurate information.

Adjustment period

Ruben reiterated the importance of allocating an adjustment period so that students could be afforded adequate time to adjust to the new environment. He warned against overburdening kids too early. “What all parties concerned; parents, teachers, education authorities, must understand is that covering the syllabus, should not be the priority. During this adjustment period students must not be overloaded.” Lest it turns into a sort of ‘school phobia’. Ruben recommended that education authorities formulate a revised syllabus to include only vital aspects.

“This adjustment period must be used to monitor students and identify those who display troubling symptoms, so that through parental mediation, they could be referred to a doctor for psychological support.”

Changes to a child’s environment, and stress, are risk factors for developing anxiety and going back to school after a long hiatus have all the right ingredients for anxiety. Some kids are too young to grasp the concept of acceptable risk. In this context it is also the parents’ responsibility to placate any lingering misgivings children may have about going back to school.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Rising farce of Family Power



Former President Maithripala Sirisena has struck hard on warnings of being deprived of Civil Rights by President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa.

In his recent statement, President Gotabaya was clear on observing the policies laid down in his Saubhagya Dekma manifesto. He recalled how the Yahapalana government had given no importance to the war heroes, intelligence services, and national security, which led to the Easter Carnage.

He was very clear that having a two-thirds majority in Parliament, this government is ready to respond to the false propaganda of the Opposition, and provide a meal free of poison to the people.

He said the Presidential Commission appointed by Yahapalana has stated very clearly who was responsible for the Easter Carnage. This included the then President, Prime Minister and the entire Cabinet of that time.

“We leave all legal action on this to be taken by the judiciary. We have trust in the judiciary and will allow justice to take place, All the PCoI reports have been submitted to Parliament. We will not poke our fingers into the judicial system. While maintaining the freedom of the judiciary, it is not possible to ask that some persons be brought to justice, and others punished,

 “If they want this action to be taken very soon, we can bring a Bill to Parliament (as done before) and remove all the rights of those responsible, so that they will not do such faults again.  If they want this, we are ready for it, as we have a two-thirds majority power. When asking for various things, they should do it with care. We are ready for this too. The people should not be fooled.

“If I am not good, and we are not good, is the alternative to this the Opposition? We have seen how they ruled for five years. That is why I was elected, although it was told that I would not get the votes of the minorities. But we won. Will they be able to reduce the Cabinet to 25?”

Mr. Sirisena’s response in parliament was to this claim of two-thirds strength.  In the midst of a major clash with government ministers, he made it clear that the government’s two-thirds power was due to the presence of the SLFP in the ruling coalition.

It certainly was a shake up to the show of two-thirds strength and power by President Gotabaya.

While President Gotabaya was clear on his following the findings of the PCoI, and stressed the call for action against Mr. Sirisena, there was total silence on the other recommendations of the Commission. The supporters who cheered him, raised no question about what the PCoI had recommended on Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero and the Bodu Bala Sena led by him.

Was it in keeping with the PCoI that Gnanasara Thero has been appointed to head a Task Force on One Country, One Law?  Is this One Law part of the new Gotabaya thinking on Green Agriculture?

What has emerged with the Sirisena response to the Gotabhaya challenge is the emerging reality of the Podujana Peramuna – SLPP politics. The New Kelani Bridge, which was opened, when Gotabaya made his strong speech, had to be kept closed the very next day, showing the rising confusion in Podujana Governance,

The warning given by experts about the situation relating to the LP gas cylinders, is driving a huge new scare among the public. If there are a few more gas cylinder explosions, there could be mass gas protests, even angrier that the farmer protests on the fertilizer disaster.

The Podujana government is certainly in a crisis of governance.  There are turn-arounds on many of its policies from Neo-Nitrogen fertiliser –  from cost to its benefit for Sri Lankan cultivation, and the payment to contaminated Chinese fertiliser. The turn back on the use of chemical fertilisers will also bring a huge new price to the cultivators, leading to another round of protests?

The Gotabaya Keliya is fast doing turns and twists on policies of the government. The Rajapaksas are being surrounded by faults and failures. It will certainly not be easy him to

use two-thirds power, when the reality is the rising farce of family power.

Continue Reading


A tribute to vajira



By Uditha Devapriya

The female dancer’s form figures prominently in Sinhalese art and sculpture. Among the ruins of the Lankatilake Viharaya in Polonnaruwa is a series of carvings of dwarves, beasts, and performers. They surround a decapitated image of a standing Buddha, secular figures dotting a sacred space. Similar figures of dancing women adorn the entrance at the Varaka Valandu Viharaya in Ridigama, adjoining the Ridi Vihare. Offering a contrast with carvings of men sporting swords and spears, they entrance the eye immediately.

A motif of medieval Sinhalese art, these were influenced by hordes of dancers that adorned the walls of South Indian temples. They attest to the role that Sinhala society gave women, a role that diminished with time, so much so that by the 20th century, Sinhalese women had been banned from wearing the ves thattuwa. Held back for long, many of these women now began to rebel. They would soon pave the way for the transformation of an art.

In January 2020 the government of India chose to award the Padma Shri to two Sri Lankan women. This was done in recognition not just of their contribution to their fields, but also their efforts at strengthening ties between the two countries. A few weeks ago, in the midst of a raging pandemic, these awards were finally conferred on their recipients.

One of them, Professor Indra Dissanayake, had passed away in 2019. Her daughter received the honour in her name in India. The other, Vajira Chitrasena, remains very much alive, and as active. She received her award at a ceremony at the Indian High Commission in Colombo. Modest as it may have been, the conferment seals her place in the country, situating her in its cultural landscape as one of our finest exponents of dance.

Vajira Chitrasena was far from the first woman to take up traditional dance in Sri Lanka. But she was the first to turn it into a full time, lifelong profession, absorbing the wellsprings of its past, transcending gender and class barriers, and taking it to the young. Dancing did not really come to her; it was the other way around. Immersing herself in the art, she entered it at a time when the medium had been, and was being, transformed the world over: by 1921, the year her husband was born, Isadora Duncan and Ruth St Denis had pioneered and laid the foundation for the modernisation of the medium. Their project would be continued by Martha Graham, for whom Vajira would perform decades later.

In Sri Lanka traditional dance had long turned away from its ritualistic past, moving into the stage and later the school and the university. Standing in the midst of these developments, Vajira Chitrasena found herself questioning and reshaping tradition. It was a role for which history had ordained her, a role she threw herself into only too willingly.

In dance as in other art forms, the balance between tradition and modernity is hard, if not impossible, to maintain. Associated initially with an agrarian society, traditional dance in Sri Lanka evolved into an object of secular performance. Under colonial rule, the patronage of officials, indeed even of governors themselves, helped free it from the stranglehold of the past, giving it a new lease of life that would later enable what Susan Reed in her account of dance in Sri Lanka calls the bureaucratisation of the arts. This is a phenomenon that Sarath Amunugama explores in his work on the kohomba kankariya as well.

Yet this did not entail a complete break from the past: then as now, in Sri Lanka as in India, dancing calls for the revival of conventions: the namaskaraya, the adherence to Buddhist tenets, and the contemplation of mystical beauty. It was in such a twilight world that Vajira Chitrasena and her colleagues found themselves in. Faced with the task of salvaging a dying art, they breathed new life to it by learning it, preserving it, and reforming it.

Though neither Vajira nor her husband belonged to the colonial elite, it was the colonial elite who began approaching traditional art forms with a zest and vigour that determined their trajectory after independence. Bringing together patrons, teachers, students, and scholars of dance, the elite forged friendships with tutors and performers, often becoming their students and sometimes becoming teachers themselves.

Newton Gunasinghe has observed how British officials found it expedient to patronise feudal elites, after a series of rebellions that threatened to bring down the colonial order. Yet even before this, such officials had patronised cultural practices that had once been the preserve of those elites. It was through this tenuous relationship between colonialism and cultural revival that Westernised low country elites moved away from conventional careers, like law and medicine, into the arduous task of reviving the past.

At first running into opposition from their paterfamilias, the scions of the elite eventually found their calling. “[I]n spite of their disappointment at my smashing their hopes of a brilliant legal and political career,” Charles Jacob Peiris, later to be known as Devar Surya Sena, wrote in his recollection of his parents’ reaction to a concert he had organised at the Royal College Hall in 1929, “they were proud of me that night.”

If the sons had to incur the wrath of their fathers, the daughters had to pay the bigger price. Yet, as with the sons, the daughters too possessed an agency that emboldened them to not just dance, but participate in rituals that had been restricted to males.

Both Miriam Pieris and Chandralekha Perera displeased traditional society when they donned the ves thattuwa, the sacred headdress that had for centuries been reserved for men. But for every critic, there were those who welcomed such developments, considering them essential to the flowering of the arts; none less than Martin Wickramasinghe, to give one example, viewed Chandralekha’s act positively, and commended her.

These developments sparked off a pivotal cultural renaissance across the country. Although up country women remain debarred from those developments, there is no doubt that the shattering of taboos in the low country helped keep the art of the dance alive, for tutors, students, and scholars. As Mirak Raheem has written in a piece to Groundviews, we are yet to appreciate the role female dancers of the early 20th century played in all this.

Vajira Chitrasena’s contribution went beyond that of the daughters of the colonial elite who dared to dance. While it would be wrong to consider their interest as a passing fad, a quirk, these women did not turn dance into a lifelong profession. Vajira did not just commit herself to the medium in a way they had not, she made it her goal to teach and reinterpret it, in line with methods and practices she developed for the Chitrasena Kala Ayathanaya.

As Mirak Raheem has pointed out in his tribute to her, she drew from her limited exposure to dance forms like classical ballet to design a curriculum that broke down the medium to “a series of exercises… that could be used to train dancers.” In doing so, she conceived some highly original works, including a set of children’s ballets, or lama mudra natya, a genre she pioneered in 1952 with Kumudini. Along the way she crisscrossed several roles, from dancer to choreographer to tutor, becoming more than just a performer.

As the head of the Chitrasena Dance Company, Vajira enjoys a reputation that history has not accorded to most other women of her standing. Perhaps her greatest contribution in this regard has been her ability to adapt masculine forms of dance to feminine sequences. She has been able to do this without radically altering their essence; that has arguably been felt the most in the realm of Kandyan dance, which caters to masculine (“tandava“) rather than feminine (“lasya“) moods. The lasya has been described by Marianne Nürnberger as a feminine form of up country dance. It was in productions like Nala Damayanthi that Vajira mastered this form; it epitomised a radical transformation of the art.

Sudesh Mantillake in an essay on the subject (“Masculinity in Kandyan Dance”) suggests that by treating them as impure, traditional artistes kept women away from udarata natum. That is why Algama Kiriganitha, who taught Chandralekha, taught her very little, since she was a woman. This is not to say that the gurunannses kept their knowledge back from those who came to learn from them, only that they taught them under strictures and conditions which revealed their reluctance to impart their knowledge to females.

That Vajira Chitrasena made her mark in these fields despite all obstructions is a tribute to her mettle and perseverance. Yet would we, as Mirak Raheem suggests in his very excellent essay, be doing her a disservice by just valorising her? Shouldn’t the object of a tribute be, not merely to praise her for transcending gender barriers, but more importantly to examine how she transcended them, and how difficult she found it to transcend them? We eulogise our women for breaking through the glass ceiling, without questioning how high that ceiling was in the first place. A more sober evaluation of Vajira Chitrasena would ask that question. But such an evaluation is yet to come out. One can only hope that it will, soon.

The writer can be reached at

Continue Reading


It’s all about France in Kandy !



Sarah Toucas, Director Alliance Francaise de Kandy

This month’s edition of Rendez-Vous with Yasmin and Kumar, on Tuesday 30 November at 7.00 pm on the YouTube channel of the Embassy of France in Sri Lanka and the Maldives, makes a journey to the hill capital Kandy to the Alliance Française de Kandy.

A venue of historical significance in central Sri Lanka which celebrates its 55th anniversary next year, the AF Kandy was once even located on the upper storey of the ancient Queen’s bath or the Ulpangé, just outside the Dalada Maligawa.

All about France and the French in Kandy, on the show will be the newly appointed director of the AF Kandy, Sara Toucas, who will talk about plans to further popularise the French language in Kandy.

Joining the show is also Dr. Kush Herat, former Director AF Kandy and visiting Senior Lecturer in French at University of Peradeniya, who talks about motivating undergraduates and inducting them to the French language and culture.

Frenchman Dr Jacques Soulié, a former Director of the AF Kandy who has contributed immensely to the propagation of the French language and culture in Kandy then takes viewers on a tour of his brainchild and a major cultural venue – The Suriyakantha Centre for Art and Culture – which has been visited by hundreds of Sri Lankans and foreign visitors.

To close the show is Ravana Wijeyeratne, the Honorary Consul for France in Kandy whose links with France go back to his childhood when his father Tissa Wijeyeratne was Ambassador for Sri Lanka in France in the early 1970s.

Rendez-Vous with Yasmin and Kumar

comes to you on Tuesday 30th November at 7.00 pm on the YouTube channel of the Embassy of France in Sri Lanka and the Maldives

Continue Reading