News
AJBP NL: Disqualification of Ven. Gnanasara thera explained
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara thera couldn’t have received the National List slot secured by Ape Jana Bala Pakshaya (AJBP) at the Aug.5 general election though he was on its Kurunegala District List, Election Commission (EC) Chairman Nimal Punchihewa told The Island yesterday (23).
Attorney-at-law Punchihewa said that Ven Gnanasara thera wasn’t eligible to receive NL appointment under any circumstances. Such an appointment would have been contrary to both the Constitution and the Parliamentary Election Act No 01 of 1981, the EC Chairman said.
Punchihewa said so in the wake of the EC’s acceptance of Ven. Athureliya Rathana as the AJBP NL member.
Ven. Rathana thera failed in his bid to enter Parliament from the Gampaha district.
The five-member EC consists of N.Punchihewa, S.B. Divaratne, M.M. Mohamed, K.P.P. Pathirana and Jeewan Thyagarajah. In terms of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution enacted in October, the EC now comprises five persons instead of three under the 19th Amendment.
A public battle between former lawmaker Ven. Rathana and Ven. Gnanasara for the NL slot divided the party, with a section quitting the movement.
EC Chairman Punchihewa explained that only those who had been included in the original NL submitted by a particular political party to the EC or a contestant could be considered for NL.
In Ven. Gnanasara thera’s case, the General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) hadn’t actually contested the last general election as the AJBP list that contained him was rejected by the Chief Returning Officer, Punchihewa said. The Court of Appeal rejected Ven. Gnanasara thera’s writ application filed in respect of the Chief Returning Officer’s decision.
In addition to the Kurunegala list, AJBP nomination lists for Colombo, Moneragala and Kalutara were rejected on technical grounds. Altogether, AJBP fielded about 30 monks.
Responding to another query, the EC Chairman explained in terms of the applicable laws Ven. Gnanasara hadn’t contested the last general election and therefore he was not eligible to receive the NL appointment. Contrary to criticism, the appointment of defeated candidates is within the law, according to EC Chairman.
Asked whether the law prohibited designation of anyone outside the district list and NL of a particular political party, Punchihewa said in case the person who received the original appointment, the party could accommodate outsiders.
The EC could accept Ven. Rathana’s appointment as the warring AJBP factions had settled their differences with a court case filed in respect of the NL vacancy withdrawn. The AJBP managed to secure 67,758 votes from countrywide.
Punchihewa said that soon after the allocation of NL slots, the then AJBP Secretary Vedinigama Wimalasara thera nominated himself as their member of Parliament. Wimalasara thera, in a letter dated Aug 7 addressed to the EC, asserted that he appointed himself pending resolution of the crisis caused by both Gnanasara and Rathana theras demanding the NL slot.
Punchihewa said that there had been other developments relating to the AJBP’s NL issue, however they finally agreed on Ven. Rathana thera’s appointment.
Asked whether the EC felt that there should be a stipulated period to finalize NL designations, lawyer Punchihewa explained in the absence of specific provision in respect of such appointments, political parties could hold up the process. “In other words, political parties can refrain from making NL appointments. EC cannot intervene at all,” the EC Chairman said, acknowledging the need for remedial measures.
Punchihewa assured that the EC was in the process of examining the entire gamut of issues in relation to electoral process. “We will certainly take up these issues with relevant authorities,” lawyer Punchihewa said.
The EC Chief said that representations would also be also made to those in the process of formulating a new Constitution.
Punchihewa pointed out that the EC couldn’t do anything about the UNP holding up the appointment of its solitary NL member. The lawyer said that the issue hadn’t received sufficient attention, hence the current law being silent on a crisis situation such as a party not being able to decide on its NL nominee. Punchihewa pointed out that law could be amended to pave the way for the EC to name the first person on NL submitted by a particular party in case agreement couldn’t be reached within a given period.
The Parliament remained one short of stipulated 225 at the time 2020 sessions ended with the passage of 2021 Budget on Dec 10.
The Parliament is scheduled to meet on January 5.
News
Switzerland to vote on plan to cap population at 10 million
Can a country put a fixed limit on its population? That is the question Switzerland will be answering on Sunday when voters go the polls to decide on a proposal to cap their population at 10 million, a move that has exposed divisions about immigration in the Alpine nation.
The move is backed by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party, which describes it as a “sustainability initiative” aimed at easing pressure on housing, public services and the environment. However some voters see this as the party’s latest anti-immigration move.
Dubbing it a “chaos initiative”, the government, other political parties, business leaders and trade unions argue it will deprive hospitals and hotels of much needed staff, and damage hard-won relations with the European Union, leaving non-EU member Switzerland isolated in a very risky world.
Switzerland’s population has grown rapidly since 2002, when it stood at 7.3 million. Now it is 9.1 million, 27% of whom are Swiss residents who were born abroad.
Switzerland’s system of direct democracy means all major decisions are taken via the ballot box. Campaigners simply have to gather 100,000 signatures to ensure a nationwide vote.
Many voters are concerned by overcrowded trains, expensive apartments and rising health costs.
The latest opinion polls indicate this could be a very close vote.
They suggest voters are inching towards a no vote by a wafer thin margin, with 52% opposed – but polls remain divided, with 45% saying they are in favour of the proposal and a significant number of voters still undecided.
[BBC]
News
Court orders former Atamasthanadhipathi to provide blood sample for DNA testing
Anuradhapura Chief Magistrate, Siyapath Sasindu Wickramaratne, on Friday (12) ordered former Atamasthanadhipathi Pallegama Hemarathana Thera, who stands accused in a case involving the alleged serious sexual abuse of a minor girl, to provide a blood sample for DNA testing.
Accordingly, the court directed the suspect monk to appear before the Government Analyst’s Department on June 16 and provide a blood sample to the Government Analyst.
The order was issued after considering a further report submitted to court by the Nittambuwa Police.
Police informed the court that, pursuant to an earlier court order, certain case material had been forwarded to the Government Analyst on May 4, 2026, for DNA examination.
According to police, the material consisted of clothing allegedly stained with blood, which had been buried and concealed by the girl and later recovered during investigations.
Police further informed the court that the Government Analyst’s report had confirmed the presence of DNA evidence on the clothing.
Investigators told court that it was necessary to obtain a biological sample from the suspect monk in order to compare it with the DNA evidence recovered from the garments.
Police therefore requested an order compelling the suspect to provide a blood sample so that it could be determined whether the DNA evidence found on the girl’s clothing matched that of the suspect.
Having considered the submissions, the Magistrate ordered the suspect monk to provide the blood sample. The court also directed the Government Analyst to submit the report of the subsequent DNA examination.Pallegama Hemarathana Thera was previously remanded in connection with the case and was later released on stringent bail conditions.
News
High fuel prices spark outrage in transport sector, services halved
(Asiatimes) From this week, those using private buses in Sri Lanka may face severe transport disruption, as operators in the sector have decided to cut services by 50%. Among the reasons for the protest are mounting losses, rising fuel costs and the government’s failure to grant fare concessions. At a press conference held on 7 June, Gemunu Wijeratne, president of the Sri Lanka Private Bus Owners’ Association, explained that “the authorities have not responded positively to requests for a review of bus fares and support measures regarding fuel”.
Meanwhile, around 25% of private transport vehicles have already voluntarily ceased operations due to financial difficulties. According to the majority of owners, “the decision comes after ongoing disputes with the authorities regarding fare adjustments and financial relief, which have not been met to date, despite numerous requests made over a long period”. Commuters, especially in Colombo and the surrounding areas, risk facing delays and overcrowding as the reduced fleet operates under the new directive.
According to Wijeratne, “the association will continue to provide a reduced service until the government approves a revised bus fare, in line with the rise in fuel prices”. The alternative for the government, he continues, is to provide “a direct subsidy to operators, as recent fuel price increases have placed considerable pressure on daily transport operators”.
During peak hours such as the morning, school finishing times and the evening rush hour, only essential services will be guaranteed. During these times, instead of four journeys, only three will be made. Overall, operations will be reduced to around 50%. “The government,” the chairman clarifies, “must take responsibility for this situation, as the majority of students and employees use private buses for their daily commutes, particularly to and from Colombo to various parts of the country.”
Operators in the sector point out that although they requested a temporary exemption to guarantee bus services for one month, neither the National Transport Commission nor the Minister of Transport responded positively. The annual fare review is due to be implemented during the first week of July, adding that they have the “legal authority” to “apply the revised fares”. On 5 June, Wijeratne continues, “we held discussions that were unsuccessful. Diesel prices are expected to rise by the end of this month. In view of all this, we are proceeding with the fare review. This year’s fare adjustment will be difficult for the public to bear, as all costs have risen by around 20–25%”.
The president of the Association of Private Bus Owners concludes by noting that “we cannot continue to operate at a loss. For this reason, we have asked the authorities for some concessions on diesel within the regulatory framework, but these measures have not been implemented. We have therefore decided to step up our industrial action. This week we will intensify our action by changing timetables and limiting operations. The decision was taken – he notes – due to the lack of a positive response to the request for a fare review following the recent rise in fuel prices”.
Recently, the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) increased fuel prices in accordance with its monthly pricing formula. Among the changes, the price of a litre of petrol was increased by 15 rupees, rendering the current tariff structures unsustainable. To grasp the scale of the emergency and understand the impact on the population, AsiaNews spoke to Akalanka Punchihewa, Senuli Amrasekara and Dunesh Mayadunne, commuters from various parts of the country who travel to the capital every day for work. “We struggle,” they confirm, “to get to work from Kandy, Kurunegala and Galle. The recent decision by private bus operators is a severe blow, as we have to spend several hours in long queues just to get on a bus. The service provided by buses run by the Sri Lanka Transport Board (SLTB) is inferior to that of private buses. And we cannot,” the commuters conclude, “afford to travel to work by car or motorbike, as we are unable to bear the increased cost of fuel.”
by Arundathie Abeysinghe
-
News7 days agoWomen’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
-
Editorial6 days agoProbe Sallay’s complaint
-
News4 days agoLocal firms move millions of dollars overseas for phantom imports: Govt.
-
News2 days agoCIABOC summons Yoshitha over his participation in British Navy training programme
-
Midweek Review4 days agoJuly 09: An inexcusable overall security failure and exceptional contingency plan
-
Opinion5 days agoCould Sri Lanka once again face an economic crisis similar to 2022?
-
News4 days agoAI raises concerns over arrest of Sallay and rapper under PTA
-
News5 days agoSallay refuses to end hunger strike unless probe is taken out of CID led by Shani
