Connect with us

Features

Aitken Spence breaks into hotels

Published

on

by Charitha. P. de Silva

At about this time (1972) Mrs B’s government introduced tax incentives to encourage the building of hotels. I had already indicated to the directors and executives that our expansion would be confined to activities that gave employment and earned foreign exchange. This was based on my belief that all governments regardless of their political hue would support such activities. I had also made it clear that we would not go into a particularly lucrative source of income, construction, and other government tenders. This was because I was well aware that tenders involved bribery.

One thing I had repeatedly stressed to my staff was that we had to be scrupulously honest in all our dealings, even if it meant loss of business opportunities. This attitude became particularly relevant when the head of Printing, Stanley Wickramaratne, told us that we were losing business because it was customary in the printing trade that kickbacks had to be given to the purchasing departments of our clients. He claimed that we would not be able to survive if we did not do what every other Printer was doing.

I was totally against it because I realized that giving kickbacks would inevitably lead to the corruption of our own employees as kickbacks were cash transactions and receipts were never given for them; and in the course of time some or all of the kickbacks would find their way into the pockets of those of our employees that had to make the payments. It is because of principles such as this that Aitken Spence soon gained a reputation for honesty that was to be a source of protection for me throughout my career.

It also clearly established that Honesty was a guiding principle in our company. It is my view after a career of over 50 years in the private sector that the integrity of a company is determined by the integrity of the top man. If the top man is bent the whole organization will gradually become corrupt.

Michael (Mack), who was a man full of ideas, came up with the proposal that we should build a seaside hotel. Even though we had no experience in this area we studied the feasibility of diversifying in this direction. The tax incentives given by the government made it a very attractive proposition. When we decided to go ahead with it, Michael came up with the idea that we should build our first hotel on his land in Uswetakeiyawa. Browns already had a hotel in that area, so that the proposition seemed reasonable.

However, I was aware that water was not readily available there. In fact, the Rasaratnams (Susheela’s cousins) were selling water on a regular basis in bowsers from a well they had on their property in Hendala. I insisted that we get reports on the availability of water before we embarked on the project. I also wrote a cautionary memorandum on the pros and cons of a hotel project, pointing out that some factors outside our control such as an outbreak of disease could keep tourists away. At that stage nobody anticipated the disastrous effects of terrorism that later affected tourism for many years from 1983 onwards.

On the grounds that lack of water was an insurmountable drawback we decided that Hendala was not where we should site our first hotel. Michael would have been bitterly disappointed but should have realized that there was a serious conflict of interest in promoting the use of his own land. It was significant (and unfortunate) that his close friend Norman (Gunawardene) supported his proposal despite its drawbacks. Fortunately, the others went along with me.

I instructed (Ratna) Sivaratnam who was Michael’s lieutenant in the hotel project to scour the Southern beaches up to 50 miles from Colombo looking for suitable sites. Within a few weeks he came back with about four possible locations from Wadduwa down to Beruwela. All the directors piled into two cars and drove down one Saturday to examine all the sites. When we got to Beruwala, the tide was out and the beach looked gorgeous. We picked on that site and at Michael’s urging chose Geoffrey Bawa to be the architect. I suggested that the name of the hotel should be Neptune (Roman God of the Sea) to which all agreed.

We built Neptune over a period of three years starting from 1974. We built it in stages, first the central block, then the one on the right and finally that on the left. This was in order not to put too great a strain on our cash flow. The first two blocks had been two storied but when it came to the third, Bawa decided to make it three stories. However, when I visited it in its early stages I could not see it, lacking visual imagination. I sent for him, sat him opposite me and told him with some concern that I could not see signs of his brilliance.

Being very much a layman I protested to him saying that it would look odd, being asymmetric. He smiled gently and told me not to worry, and assured me that nobody would notice it because you could not look at both blocks together! He was absolutely right. Bawa’s brilliance was easily discernible. One feature of the design was the swimming pool was right alongside the dining area. He had originally designed a separate kiddy’s pool some distance away from the main pool. I prevailed on him to design the main pool so that kids could swim in shallow water under the eyes of their parents.

He did so with a maximum depth of four feet. The four-foot depth suited me too (I could never swim in deep water). It was a great success. When it came to furnishing the suite at the corner of the right wing, I was so happy with the project that I told Bawa to do whatever he wanted. He was delighted to be given a free hand and went to town putting in a four-poster bed and antique furniture. It was later my favourite room even though I resisted the temptation to take advantage of the tradition in many hotels that the Chairman had the best room reserved for himself.

The whole project, our first venture into hotels was a total success. We made profits from day one,

more or less. Our German tour operators were delighted with it and wanted us to build another seaside hotel. We first had to find another site. Once again we piled into two cars and visited the three or four sites that Sivaratnam had identified. When we got as far as Ahungalla we found a wide beach of golden sand. There was no doubt about its beauty. However, when it came to purchasing the land we were faced with a great difficulty. The land had to be purchased in small blocks and the title was what was called ‘Village Title”, in other words no real title.

The entire fifteen acres that we wanted were purchased over a number of years, and we signed about 150 deeds! This eventually created a problem when it came to the valuation of the land. Aitken Spence had bought the land after painful negotiations with a large number of individuals. As was to be expected we had to pay premium prices for the last few blocks that we purchased.

For the Ahungalla project we floated a separate company, Ahungalla Hotels Ltd. and we transferred the land to that company. The project was being financed by the National Development Bank whose Chairman was my cousin, C.A. Coorey. (Chanda Coorey was a brilliant [First in Chemistry] former Civil Servant who had been the Secretary to the Treasury and a director of the Asian Development Bank in his time. He and the legendary Baku Mahadeva had vied with each other for first place in class throughout their school careers at Royal College.)

According to the agreement with the NDB the price at which the land would be transferred by Aitken Spence to Ahugalla Hotels Ltd. was to be based on a valuation done by the best-known Valuer at that time. This was all a part of our agreement with the NDB. When his valuation was eventually given to the NDB Chairman, Chanda Coorey, he refused to accept it. What had happened was that the General Manager of the NDB, V.K. Wickremesinghe had advised him that the price was too high. VKW was not a Valuer, and I can only surmise that he was advised by his brother S.K. Wickremesinghe who was the Chairman of Chemical Industries Co. Ltd. and Chemanex. S.K. was buying land further down South for a hotel project and must have known something about land prices in those regions. However, he probably bought the land for his project in one transaction with one seller, which was vastly different to what we were compelled to do with over 150 sellers over a number of years with the price escalating with each purchase.

Be that as it may, here was I confronted by a refusal on the part of the NDB to honour their agreement with us. I tried to speak on the telephone to Chanda, with whom I was on very good terms, but he was not prepared to discuss the matter. I thereupon wrote a very strong letter to the Chairman (Chanda) with open copies to the other directors, who included strong men like Dr H.N.S. Karunatilleke, Governor of the Central Bank. I complained that the NDB that was a Development Bank was, in the quest for greater profits, behaving in a way that not even a commercial bank would stoop to. Chanda had to eventually increase the price paid for the land though he did not accept the exact figure given by the Valuer, whose name I cannot recall.

I remember being amused when Chanda, on a tour of Triton (son of Neptune) during its construction, remarked that the corridors designed by Bawa were wider than they needed to be. Chanda was as unimaginative as I was when confronted with Bawa’s brilliance (and apparent extravagance). The Triton turned out to be an architectural tour de force. It was a truly beautiful bit of work, and I was very proud of it. One of its beautiful features was the view of the pool and the sea that you saw, as one sheet of water, when you stepped down from your car in the porch.

None of us dared to question Bawa when it came to matters of design. He was a genius and we all knew it. However, I had occasion to question one of his concepts. One day Michael Mack (who was in charge of Hotels and Tourism) came to me and told me that Geoffrey was going to construct a bronze statue of Triton on the edge of the large swimming pool. It was to be a centaur, half horse, half man. I knew that Triton was not half horse but half fish. I told him to tell that to Geoffrey. He came back to me and told me that Geoffrey had said that according to his encyclopedia it was half horse.

I was not prepared to look foolish for all posterity, and told him to bring me the encyclopedia. That was the last I heard about the centaur, but Goeffrey’s brilliance can be gauged by what he replaced it with. He placed a genuine padda boat on the edge of the pool, and how appropriate it was! The bar alongside the pool was given the same padda boat theme.

While I was very proud of both Neptune and Triton, I did not have the usual ‘Soft Opening’ for either. The reason was simple. We could have only a limited number of invitees, and for every person I invited I would probably make ten enemies – those who were not invited. What I did was to invite those whom I wanted to invite, for weekends with their children included. I think that made us more friends and fewer enemies.

On one occasion Andrew Joseph who was with the UN suggested that I should invite the Secretary-General, Dr Kurt Waldheim, down to Neptune. I did so, and it was a tremendous success. Waldheim was a charming man and so was his wife. Susheela was her serene, composed self and would have made a great impression on Kurt. Andrew was totally delighted with the arrangements. His own standing with Kurt would no doubt have had a boost, though he was such an accomplished person that he did not need it. Susheela and I had a great regard for him, and visited him in different parts of the world, such as Djakarta and New York, while he went steadily up the UN tree. He was one of the most versatile men I have known with a great sense of humour that could set a party alight (as he did on one occasion at our home)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

US’ drastic aid cut to UN poses moral challenge to world

Published

on

An UN humanitarian mission in the Gaza. [File: Ashraf Amra/Anadolu Agency]

‘Adapt, shrink or die’ – thus runs the warning issued by the Trump administration to UN humanitarian agencies with brute insensitivity in the wake of its recent decision to drastically reduce to $2bn its humanitarian aid to the UN system. This is a substantial climb down from the $17bn the US usually provided to the UN for its humanitarian operations.

Considering that the US has hitherto been the UN’s biggest aid provider, it need hardly be said that the US decision would pose a daunting challenge to the UN’s humanitarian operations around the world. This would indeed mean that, among other things, people living in poverty and stifling material hardships, in particularly the Southern hemisphere, could dramatically increase. Coming on top of the US decision to bring to an end USAID operations, the poor of the world could be said to have been left to their devices as a consequence of these morally insensitive policy rethinks of the Trump administration.

Earlier, the UN had warned that it would be compelled to reduce its aid programs in the face of ‘the deepest funding cuts ever.’ In fact the UN is on record as requesting the world for $23bn for its 2026 aid operations.

If this UN appeal happens to go unheeded, the possibilities are that the UN would not be in a position to uphold the status it has hitherto held as the world’s foremost humanitarian aid provider. It would not be incorrect to state that a substantial part of the rationale for the UN’s existence could come in for questioning if its humanitarian identity is thus eroded.

Inherent in these developments is a challenge for those sections of the international community that wish to stand up and be counted as humanists and the ‘Conscience of the World.’ A responsibility is cast on them to not only keep the UN system going but to also ensure its increased efficiency as a humanitarian aid provider to particularly the poorest of the poor.

It is unfortunate that the US is increasingly opting for a position of international isolation. Such a policy position was adopted by it in the decades leading to World War Two and the consequences for the world as a result for this policy posture were most disquieting. For instance, it opened the door to the flourishing of dictatorial regimes in the West, such as that led by Adolph Hitler in Germany, which nearly paved the way for the subjugation of a good part of Europe by the Nazis.

If the US had not intervened militarily in the war on the side of the Allies, the West would have faced the distressing prospect of coming under the sway of the Nazis and as a result earned indefinite political and military repression. By entering World War Two the US helped to ward off these bleak outcomes and indeed helped the major democracies of Western Europe to hold their own and thrive against fascism and dictatorial rule.

Republican administrations in the US in particular have not proved the greatest defenders of democratic rule the world over, but by helping to keep the international power balance in favour of democracy and fundamental human rights they could keep under a tight leash fascism and linked anti-democratic forces even in contemporary times. Russia’s invasion and continued occupation of parts of Ukraine reminds us starkly that the democracy versus fascism battle is far from over.

Right now, the US needs to remain on the side of the rest of the West very firmly, lest fascism enjoys another unfettered lease of life through the absence of countervailing and substantial military and political power.

However, by reducing its financial support for the UN and backing away from sustaining its humanitarian programs the world over the US could be laying the ground work for an aggravation of poverty in the South in particular and its accompaniments, such as, political repression, runaway social discontent and anarchy.

What should not go unnoticed by the US is the fact that peace and social stability in the South and the flourishing of the same conditions in the global North are symbiotically linked, although not so apparent at first blush. For instance, if illegal migration from the South to the US is a major problem for the US today, it is because poor countries are not receiving development assistance from the UN system to the required degree. Such deprivation on the part of the South leads to aggravating social discontent in the latter and consequences such as illegal migratory movements from South to North.

Accordingly, it will be in the North’s best interests to ensure that the South is not deprived of sustained development assistance since the latter is an essential condition for social contentment and stable governance, which factors in turn would guard against the emergence of phenomena such as illegal migration.

Meanwhile, democratic sections of the rest of the world in particular need to consider it a matter of conscience to ensure the sustenance and flourishing of the UN system. To be sure, the UN system is considerably flawed but at present it could be called the most equitable and fair among international development organizations and the most far-flung one. Without it world poverty would have proved unmanageable along with the ills that come along with it.

Dehumanizing poverty is an indictment on humanity. It stands to reason that the world community should rally round the UN and ensure its survival lest the abomination which is poverty flourishes. In this undertaking the world needs to stand united. Ambiguities on this score could be self-defeating for the world community.

For example, all groupings of countries that could demonstrate economic muscle need to figure prominently in this initiative. One such grouping is BRICS. Inasmuch as the US and the West should shrug aside Realpolitik considerations in this enterprise, the same goes for organizations such as BRICS.

The arrival at the above international consensus would be greatly facilitated by stepped up dialogue among states on the continued importance of the UN system. Fresh efforts to speed-up UN reform would prove major catalysts in bringing about these positive changes as well. Also requiring to be shunned is the blind pursuit of narrow national interests.

Continue Reading

Features

Egg white scene …

Published

on

Hi! Great to be back after my Christmas break.

Thought of starting this week with egg white.

Yes, eggs are brimming with nutrients beneficial for your overall health and wellness, but did you know that eggs, especially the whites, are excellent for your complexion?

OK, if you have no idea about how to use egg whites for your face, read on.

Egg White, Lemon, Honey:

Separate the yolk from the egg white and add about a teaspoon of freshly squeezed lemon juice and about one and a half teaspoons of organic honey. Whisk all the ingredients together until they are mixed well.

Apply this mixture to your face and allow it to rest for about 15 minutes before cleansing your face with a gentle face wash.

Don’t forget to apply your favourite moisturiser, after using this face mask, to help seal in all the goodness.

Egg White, Avocado:

In a clean mixing bowl, start by mashing the avocado, until it turns into a soft, lump-free paste, and then add the whites of one egg, a teaspoon of yoghurt and mix everything together until it looks like a creamy paste.

Apply this mixture all over your face and neck area, and leave it on for about 20 to 30 minutes before washing it off with cold water and a gentle face wash.

Egg White, Cucumber, Yoghurt:

In a bowl, add one egg white, one teaspoon each of yoghurt, fresh cucumber juice and organic honey. Mix all the ingredients together until it forms a thick paste.

Apply this paste all over your face and neck area and leave it on for at least 20 minutes and then gently rinse off this face mask with lukewarm water and immediately follow it up with a gentle and nourishing moisturiser.

Egg White, Aloe Vera, Castor Oil:

To the egg white, add about a teaspoon each of aloe vera gel and castor oil and then mix all the ingredients together and apply it all over your face and neck area in a thin, even layer.

Leave it on for about 20 minutes and wash it off with a gentle face wash and some cold water. Follow it up with your favourite moisturiser.

Continue Reading

Features

Confusion cropping up with Ne-Yo in the spotlight

Published

on

Ne-Yo: His management should clarify the last-minute cancellation

Superlatives galore were used, especially on social media, to highlight R&B singer Ne-Yo’s trip to Sri Lanka: Global superstar Ne-Yo to perform live in Colombo this December; Ne-Yo concert puts Sri Lanka back on the global entertainment map; A global music sensation is coming to Sri Lanka … and there were lots more!

At an official press conference, held at a five-star venue, in Colombo, it was indicated that the gathering marked a defining moment for Sri Lanka’s entertainment industry as international R&B powerhouse and three-time Grammy Award winner Ne-Yo prepares to take the stage in Colombo this December.

What’s more, the occasion was graced by the presence of Sunil Kumara Gamage, Minister of Sports & Youth Affairs of Sri Lanka, and Professor Ruwan Ranasinghe, Deputy Minister of Tourism, alongside distinguished dignitaries, sponsors, and members of the media.

Shah Rukh Khan: Disappointed his fans in Sri Lanka

According to reports, the concert had received the official endorsement of the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau, recognising it as a flagship initiative in developing the country’s concert economy by attracting fans, and media, from all over South Asia.

Nick Carter: His concert, too, was cancelled due to “Unforeseen circumstances

However, I had that strange feeling that this concert would not become a reality, keeping in mind what happened to Nick Carter’s Colombo concert – cancelled at the very last moment.

Carter issued a video message announcing he had to return to the USA due to “unforeseen circumstances” and a “family emergency”.

Though “unforeseen circumstances” was the official reason provided by Carter and the local organisers, there was speculation that low ticket sales may also have been a factor in the cancellation.

Well, “Unforeseen Circumstances” has cropped up again!

In a brief statement, via social media, the organisers of the Ne-Yo concert said the decision was taken due to “unforeseen circumstances and factors beyond their control.”

Ne-Yo, too, subsequently made an announcement, citing “Unforeseen circumstances.”

The public has a right to know what these “unforeseen circumstances” are, and who is to be blamed – the organisers or Ne-Yo!

Ne-Yo’s management certainly need to come out with the truth.

However, those who are aware of some of the happenings in the setup here put it down to poor ticket sales, mentioning that the tickets for the concert, and a meet-and-greet event, were exorbitantly high, considering that Ne-Yo is not a current mega star.

We also had a cancellation coming our way from Shah Rukh Khan, who was scheduled to visit Sri Lanka for the City of Dreams resort launch, and then this was received: “Unfortunately due to unforeseen personal reasons beyond his control, Mr. Khan is no longer able to attend.”

Referring to this kind of mess up, a leading showbiz personality said that it will only make people reluctant to buy their tickets, online.

“Tickets will go mostly at the gate and it will be very bad for the industry,” he added.

Continue Reading

Trending