News
Ahead of 49 Geneva sessions: FM questions UK duplicity; UN interference in parliamentary functions
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Foreign Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris has questioned the conduct of the British government, a member of the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council, in addition to being the leader of Sri Lanka Core Group at the UNHRC, the extraordinary efforts it had made to suppress wartime dispatches from Colombo.
Prof. Peiris underscored the irrationality in the British action as they were reportedly so keen to establish the truth, pertaining to unsubstantiated war crimes allegations directed at the then political leadership and the military.
The Foreign Minister said so addressing a selected group of armed forces and police officers at the National Defence College, Kollupitiya.
Prof. Peiris addressing the officers on the invitation of Maj. Gen. Amal Karunasekara, Commandant of the NDC, Prof. Peiris explained how the British worked overtime to prevent a senior member of House of Lords Michael Wolfgang Laurence Morris from securing classified documents.
At the onset of the discourse, Prof. Peiris acknowledged that Sri Lanka was high on the Geneva agenda at the forthcoming 49th session of the UNHRC scheduled to commence just two weeks later.
The controversial dispatches authored by Lt. Colonel Anthony Gash, the then Colombo-based Defence Attaché dealt with the ground situation on the Vanni front (January to May 2009) as troops surrounded the remaining fighting cadre of the LTTE.
Sri Lanka brought the war to a successful conclusion on May 19, 2009 on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon.
Emphasising the importance of the British dispatches sent simultaneously as the fighting was taking place on the Vanni east front, Prof. Peiris asked whether the British questioned the credibility of their own employee based in Colombo.
The UK succeeded the US as the leader of Sri Lanka Core Chair in June 2018 in the wake of the then President Donald Trump quitting the UNHRC calling the UN body a cesspit of political bias. The US returned to the Geneva body in the wake of Joe Biden’s election as the President.
Prof. Peiris discussed why Lord Naseby hadn’t been able to secure the dispatches until he sought the intervention of the Information Commissioner’s Office in terms Freedom of Information Act 2000. However, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (DCO), the custodian of the classified documents pertaining to the Vanni war, released a heavily censored section of them, Prof. Peiris said, questioning the British motive. The Foreign Minister emphasized that the British documents would have helped those really concerned about accountability issues to ascertain the Vanni situation.
Declaring that he had perused the heavily detracted British diplomatic cables, Prof. Peiris explained how they helped Sri Lanka to prepare its defence. A particular cable questioned the very basis of the UN allegation pertaining to the death of over 40,000 civilians during the final phase of the ground offensive.
During the course of the one-hour lecture, Prof. Peiris assured the military that in terms of international laws applicable to wars/conflict Sri Lankan personnel couldn’t be hauled up before international war crimes court under any circumstances. Twice Foreign Minister Prof. Peiris emphasized there was absolutely no danger or risk in them being subjected to such action as the international law was very clear in this regard.
Prof. Peiris served as the foreign minister during 2010-2015 President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s presidency. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa brought him back as the FM last August in place of Dinesh Gunawardena.
Prof. Peiris also dealt with what he called critically important work undertaken by an international Advisory Council appointed to assist the Presidential Commission to Investigate Complaints Regarding Missing Persons. The Advisory Council comprises three legal luminaries namely the late Sir Desmond de Silva (chairman), Sir Geoffrey Nice, and Prof. David Crane.
Referring to current international ‘flashpoints,’ Prof. Peiris expressed shock and dismay over the way a section of the international community had responded to the Sri Lanka accountability issue. Prof. Peiris was harsh on the creation of a special mechanism to gather information on Sri Lanka against the backdrop of UN Human Rights Commissioner Michelle Bachelet declaration that they have developed an information and evidence repository with nearly 120,000 individual items already held by the UN.
A resolution adopted in March 2021 allows the UN “to collect, consolidate, analyze and preserve information and evidence, and to develop possible strategies for future accountability processes for gross violations of human rights or serious violations of international humanitarian law in Sri Lanka, to advocate for victims and survivors, and to support relevant judicial and other proceedings.”
Questioning the credibility of the Geneva process Prof. Peiris asked how evidence and individual items that hadn’t been subjected to examination whatsoever could be used against Sri Lanka.
“How could unsubstantiated claims made under the condition of anonymity be accepted without being verified?” Prof. Peiris asked, accusing Geneva of what the academic called cynical violation of the basic law.
Reiterating Sri Lanka’s commitment to the UN processes, Prof. Peiris questioned the necessity of a special mechanism at the UN’s expense in spite of the availability of UPR (Universal Periodic Review) to inquire into the conduct of all countries. Alleging that war winning Sri Lanka had been singled out and treated unfairly, Prof. Peiris said that the human rights issue was being used as a tool to interfere in domestic affairs.
Prof. Peiris pointed out that Geneva was even interfering in the functions of the Parliament. Referring to Geneva resolutions and statements from therein, Prof. Peiris said: “the devolution of power, reorganisation of the armed forces, reorganization of the police force, the balance of authority between the Central government and the Provincial Councils, the Prevention of Terrorism Act and its reforms are matters that should be decided by the Parliament and the people of Sri Lanka.
Instead of giving local mechanisms much needed support, the UNHRC was pushing to impose solutions, Prof. Peiris said, declaring such measures weren’t durable.
Prof. Peiris stressed the importance of the role played by mechanisms-namely the OMP (Office of Missing Persons), OR (Office of Reparations) and ONUR (Office of National Unity and Reconciliation) in current efforts to address accountability issues. Reference was also made by Prof. Peiris to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa while explaining the work undertaken by Commission of Inquiry (CoI) appointed under the chairmanship of sitting Supreme Court judge Abdul Hameed Dileep Nawaz to investigate, inquire into and report, or take required actions, regarding the findings of the former Commissions, or Committees, that investigated human rights violations, serious violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and other such offences.
Declaring that Sri Lanka was ready to cooperate fully with UNHRC, Prof. Peiris said that Geneva couldn’t substitute the Parliament.
News
Presidential Suite at Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital opened to the public
The special ward at Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital, which had until now been reserved exclusively for the use of the Executive President, was opened for the public for the provision of medical treatment to the general public from Tuesday (24).
This decision was taken jointly by the Ministry of Health and the hospital administration, in accordance with instructions given by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.
Constructed in 1984 with a grant from the Government of Japan, Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital was originally established with a capacity of 1,000 beds. However, in line with the initial design, an additional special unit, designated as Room No. 1001, was included exclusively for the personal use of the Executive President.
Over the 42 years since the hospital’s establishment, this facility has been utilised only on a very limited number of occasions. Nevertheless, it has been maintained over the years in anticipation of a possible visit by a sitting President, without being made available for patient use.
With effect from today, this special unit will be utilised for the benefit of general patients receiving treatment at the hospital. This step has been taken in line with the Government’s policy of ensuring the more efficient use of public assets and resources to meet the healthcare needs of the people.
News
Cabinet Sub-Committee appointed to streamline the Public Service meets for the second time
The second meeting of the Cabinet Sub-Committee appointed to ensure the orderly functioning of the public service was held on Tuesday (24) afternoon at the Presidential Secretariat, under the patronage of Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya.
Extensive discussions were held on the immediate measures required to ensure the uninterrupted delivery of government services to the public and to address the challenges faced by public servants.
Attention was also drawn to maintaining the continuous operation of services under the Ministries of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government, Health, Education, and Justice. Accordingly, it was decided to ensure that examinations are conducted as scheduled and that essential medicines are supplied to hospitals without disruption.
The challenges in passenger transport services and the railway transport system, as well as future measures, were also discussed at length. Focus was also placed on the steps to be taken regarding the transportation of essential goods.
In addition, attention was given to introducing digital service systems to facilitate working from home and to enhance the efficiency of existing services. It was also noted that these activities would be supervised under the Ministry of Digital Economy.
Instructions were further issued to review the current energy management practices across all ministries and departments and to take steps to implement necessary policy changes.
Minister of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government A. H. M. M. H. Abeyaratne, Secretary to the Prime Minister Pradeep Saputhanthri, Chief of Staff to the President Prabath Chandrakeerthi, Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government S. Aloka Bandara, Secretary to the Ministry of Health and Mass Media Dr Anil Jasinghe, Secretary to the Ministry of Energy Professor T. M. Udayanga Hemapala, Secretary to the Ministry of Digital Economy T. R. W. S. Dhanapala, Secretary to the Ministry of Justice and National Integration Ayesha Jinasena, PC, Senior Additional Secretary to the President Roshan Gamage, and Chairman of the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation D. J. A. S. S. Rajakaruna, along with other committee members, were also present at the occasion.
News
Energy Minister indicted on corruption charges ahead of no-faith motion against him
… first NPPer to face charges under Section 70 of Bribery Act
Colombo High Court has issued summons on Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody to appear in court today (27) to serve indictment in a corruption case filed by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC). Action has been taken under Section 70 of the Bribery Act. The losses suffered by the government have been estimated at Rs. 8,859,708.
National List (NL) MP Jayakody is the first NPP minister or politician at any level to be indicted for corruption. The NPP parliamentary group consists of 159 including 18 NL members.
The summons has been issued by High Court judge Rashantha Godawalage.
Although CIABOC previously in many instances arrested those who had been under investigation and produced them before Magistrate courts, Minister Jayakody has been directly summoned by the Colombo High Court.
The investigation into alleged corruption in procurement during the time Jayakody served the Ceylon Fertilizer Corporation (CFC) started after the change of government in 2015.
According to the CIABOC investigation, the alleged instance of corruption took place in early 2014 towards the tail end of Mahinda Rajapaksa’s second term. At that time Jayakody was CFC’s Procurement Manager, and the CIABOC dragged the investigation until its current leadership under overall speeding up of the cases recently completed the inquiry.
Parliament recently announced that the debate on no-faith motion moved against Minister Jayakody over alleged irregularities in the procurement of substandard coal for the country’s only coal-fired power station at Norochcholai.
SJB MP Mujibur Rahman said that the NPP, having campaigned on an anti-corruption platform during presidential and parliamentary polls in 2025 couldn’t under any circumstances shield minister Jayakody. The indictment of Jayakody over a corruption case that had happened in 2014 and the failure on his part to fulfill obligations as Energy Minister under the current dispensation couldn’t be considered separately, the Colombo District MP said.
The issue at hand is whether the NPP would try to protect Jayakody at the expense of the government, MP Rahman said. Once the NPPer is formally charged in a corruption case the government would find it extremely difficult to keep him in the cabinet, the former UNPer said.
SJB lawmaker S.M. Marrikar recently warned Minister Jayakody that he should be prepared to serve a jail term. The warning was issued at a media briefing that primarily dealt with the alleged irregularities in the procurement of coal and their decision to move a no-faith motion against the minister. Marrikar explained how the crisis coupled with the growing diesel shortage could compel the government to increase electricity tariffs by as much as 18 percent next week. MP Marikkar said that they were eagerly waiting to see who backs Jayakody at the expense of the government during the upcoming vote on the no-faith motion.
There had been a previous case of a sitting minister being charged under the Bribery Act in respect of corruption perpetrated as a government servant. MP Rahman said that they intended to intensify the ongoing campaign against the government on the strength of the unprecedented corruption case and the outcome of the no-faith motion. “Of course, they have the numbers to defeat our no-faith motion. But, in doing so, they end up with egg on their face. That is the reality,” Rahman said, adding that those responsible for waste, corruption and irregularities whichever political parties they represented shouldn’t expect special status.
MP Rahman alleged that the CIABOC granted special status to Minister Jayakody. All those who had been indicted previously were first called to the CIABOC, recorded their statements and then arrested, handcuffed and produced in court. The media was afforded the opportunity to cover their humiliation, MP Rahman said, but in this case the powers that be paved the way for the accused to receive indictments directly from the Colombo High Court.
“Let us see whether the Bar Association of Sri Lanka responds to this development,” MP Rahman said.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
-
News3 days agoSenior citizens above 70 years to receive March allowances on Thursday (26)
-
Features5 days agoTrincomalee oil tank farm: An engineering marvel
-
News14 hours agoEnergy Minister indicted on corruption charges ahead of no-faith motion against him
-
News2 days agoUS dodges question on AKD’s claim SL denied permission for military aircraft to land
-
Features5 days agoThe scientist who was finally heard
-
Business2 days agoDialog Unveils Dialog Play Mini with Netflix and Apple TV
-
News3 days agoCEB Engineers warn public to be prepared for power cuts after New Year
-
News3 days agoJapanese boost to Sri J’pura Hospital, an outright gift from Tokyo during JRJ rule
