Connect with us

News

Wijeyadasa says all profits from Port City will flow out to China

Published

on

by Chitra Weerarathne

The Colombo Port City Economic Commission Bill would not help Sri Lanka’s economy as it seeks to allow all profits of the venture to flow out to China. The Bill was therefore disastrous, counsel Wijeyadasa Rajapakse, PC told the Supreme Court yesterday.

Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse appeared with Gamini Hettiarachchi for the petition filed by petitioners Ven. Muruththettuwe Ananda Thera and Attorney-at-Law Dasun Nanayakkara.

SLPP MP Dr. Rajapakse submitted that the Port City land had been reclaimed in keeping with an agreement between the government of Sri Lanka and a Chinese Construction Company. The original agreement had been revised followign the 2015 regime change. The Cabinet of Sri Lanka decided that the filled-up land in the Port City should be managed by Sri Lanka and vested in the UDA. The President had to obtain the approval of the UDA, to vest it in the Colombo Port City Economic Commission.

The Bill titled Colombo Port City Economic Commission should be a nullity. The Western Provincial Council had a solid hold on any transfer of this filled-up land in the Port City. In terms of Article 154/3/3 of the Constitution the Bill should be referred to the Provincial Council. It could not be placed on the Order Paper of Parliament, without referring it to the Provincial Council.

The delegation of presidential powers was unconstitutional. The state land might be disposed of by the presidential seal. The powers of the President should not be delegated to other persons, who might be Sri Lankans or Chinese or others. The powers of the President should not be delegated to the Commission to be an auctioneer of the people’s land. The sovereignty of the people, stated in Article 3, should be respected. Development should take place within the framework of the Constitution, upholding the sovereignty of the people. Investments of Sri Lanka should be protected.

The national security is very important. The Board of Investment might handle foreign investments. Article 27 and Article 28 of the Constitution would be violated by the proposed Bill. The Parliament had to protect the fundamental rights. A privilege was given to those to who would be in the new enclave. They would be given tax free benefits. They were living in a separate zone. Very likely the Chinese people would be employed in the new zone. Sri Lankans would not be employed. I

The Commission could lease or sell, the land within the Port City. They would manage the land in the new zone. The Port City would become a separate entity.

Dr. Rajapakshe said:”This Bill is inconsistent with Article 12(1) of the Constitution on equality. The business community in Colombo will have to collapse. The new land will be tax free. The new Bill will not help the economy of Sri Lanka. The profits in this region will flow out to China. The Bill is disastrous.”

“There will be money laundering in the newly proposed land which is stated in the Bill. Article 2,3, and 4 of the Constitution are violated. Article (2) states Sri Lanka is a unitary state. There cannot be another territory within it. The proposed Port City is excluded from the Customs Ordinance. Any prohibited article could be brought in here. All the foreign lands like India and USA are opposed to this Bill”, Counsel Rajapaksa stressed.

“This Bill cannot be passed without a referendum and a two third majority in Parliament.”

Counsel Krishmal Warnasuriya supported another petition. Among the petitioners were persons, from Samagi Jana Balavegaya.

On April 19, 2021, Counsel Weraduwa supported a petition against the Bill. The petitioner here was Kapila Perera.

General Secretary of the UNP, Palitha Ranga Bandara had filed a petition against the Bill. Counsel Viraj de Silva appeared for him.

S. R. Attygalla, Secretary to the Ministry of Finance had submitted an intervention supporting the Port City Economic Commission Bill. President’s Counsel Sanjeewa Jayawardena, appeared for him.

V. K. Choksy, President’s Counsel submitted another intervention supporting the Bill. He appeared with Counsel, D.S. Ratnayake, Gamini Dissanayake, Minoli Alexander for the intervenient the Secretary of the Podu Jana Eksath Peramuna Lawyers’ Association.

Romesh de Silva, PC also submitted an intervention supporting the Bill.

The Bench comprised, Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, Justice Buwaneka P. Aluwihare, Justice Priyantha Jayawardena, Justice Murdhu N. B. Fernando and Justice Janak de Silva.

Additional Solicitor General Farzarna Jameel, President’s Counsel appeared with Senior Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle for the Attorney General.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US sinks Iranian warship off Galle returning from Indian naval exercise

Published

on

IRIS Dena (F75)

Of 180 member crew, 30 rescued by Sri Lanka Navy

Iran warship IRIS Dena (F75), returning home after participating in the Indian International Fleet Review, and MILAN 2026 international naval exercises, has been sunk off Sri Lanka. The US, Russia and Iran were among 74 participants.

Speculation is rife that the US attacked the vessel in international waters as part of the continuing offensive action under Operation Epic Fury, launched on 28 February. Before the attack in the Indian ocean, President Trump declared that the Iranian Navy Headquarters and nine Navy vessels had been destroyed.

The ill-fated Moudge-class frigate participated in the Indian exercises with the US Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Pinckney (DDG-91) and the Marshal Shaposhnikov, a Udaloy-class frigate of the Russian Navy. Sri Lanka also participated in the exercises. SLNS Sagara and Israeli built Fast Missile Vessel Nandimithra represented Sri Lanka. Forty two warships and submarines and 29 aircraft had been involved.

At the time of the attack, the domestically built vessel was crewed by 180 officers and men.

The US Embassy here did not respond to The Island media query whether the US sank IRIS Dena . The Island was unable to get in touch with Iranian Ambassador in Colombo Alireza Delkhosh though he earlier indicated his availability later in the day.

Minister of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism, Vijitha Herath, told the Parliament yesterday that the Sri Lanka Navy and the Sri Lanka Air Force had acted in less than an hour of receiving the distressed signal at 5.08 am.

According to the Minister, the first naval craft was dispatched by 6 am, followed by a second vessel at 7 am, while Air Force units joined the mission, including the deployment of a surveillance aircraft to support search operations.

Approximately 180 personnel were believed to have been on board the stricken vessel. Of them, around 30 were reported to be in critical condition.

“To save the lives of those 30 persons, we intervened immediately,” Minister Herath said, adding that the rescued crew members were being transported to Karapitiya Hospital for urgent medical treatment. Some had already arrived by the time of his statement.

SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa asked whether the Iranian ship had been attacked within Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

Responding to questions raised by Opposition MPs, including NDF Badulla District MP Chamara Sampath Dassanayake, who alleged that the Iranian vessel may have been struck in Sri Lankan waters, the Minister said the ship had been outside Sri Lanka’s maritime boundary when it issued the distress call.

MP Dassanayake queried whether the frigate had been hit as part of the ongoing military escalation involving the United States and Israel against Iran. There was no immediate confirmation from the government regarding the cause of the emergency.

Minister Herath stressed that Sri Lanka’s intervention was guided solely by humanitarian considerations and international obligations.

“We are bound by the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) of 1979, which we have signed,” he told Parliament.

Under the convention, a signatory state is required to respond to maritime emergencies, regardless of nationality, the cause of the incident, or whether it occurs beyond its own territorial waters.

“According to this convention, if a vessel, or its crew, encounters danger beyond our territorial limits, we are obligated to intervene and protect those lives on humanitarian grounds,” Minister Herath said, adding Sri Lanka had acted immediately to prevent loss of life and had taken all urgent and necessary measures as a responsible state.

The Minister noted that the incident highlighted broader regional security vulnerabilities in maritime safety amid escalating tensions in the region. “A regional military situation would also have an impact on our country. The government’s position is that a negotiated solution must be pursued,” he said.

He also disclosed that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had held a telephone discussion on Tuesday night with the leadership of the United Arab Emirates regarding the evolving regional situation.

Rescue operations were continuing at the time of going to press.

By Saman Indrajith and Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Justice Kumudini complains of male domination at senior levels, absence of a woman head of BASL

Published

on

Supreme Court Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe

Judge of the Supreme Court Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe has recently presented a stark analysis of the legal profession’s gender disparity, noting that in spite of women entering the legal field in substantial numbers, their representation dwindles at senior levels. She has highlighted critical statistics and the fact that only two women currently serve in the Supreme Court, none in the Court of Appeal, and that there has never been a woman President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL).

“Inclusive leadership is not satisfied by entry-level participation,” Justice Wickramasinghe said. “It concerns who occupies the apex of institutional authority, who shapes doctrine, who speaks for the profession. These figures are not merely statistics; they are indicators of work yet unfinished.”

Justice Wickramasinghe said so at a seminar organised on the eve of International Women’s Day by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), in collaboration with the Sri Lanka Women Lawyers’ Association (SLWLA). She underscored the need to address the systemic barriers preventing women from reaching the apex of the legal profession. Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the gathering as the Chief Guest.

BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya, in his address, framed inclusivity not as charity or tokenism, but as “structural fairness.” He raised an important question being ‘who bears the responsibility of inclusivity’ and addressed the vital role of leadership in inclusivity. Furthermore, Amarasuriya challenged the profession to address the “gap between what we see coming into the profession and what we see at the top,” and clarified that such disparity did not stem from a lack of competence or commitment but from deep rooted practices and structural issues.

A dynamic panel discussion, moderated by Attorney-at-Law Tanushka Gunawardane, explored the multifaceted nature of inclusive leadership. The panel featured Justice Wickramasinghe, Constitutional Council Member Professor Wasantha Seneviratne (joining online), Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana, and corporate leader Yanina Weerasinghe.

Professor Wasantha Seneviratne distinguished between mere representation and true participation, stating that inclusion becomes meaningful only when women have the “agency and authority to make decisions.” She emphasised that inclusive leadership is both a moral obligation and a pragmatic governance strategy.

Senior Instructing Attorney Shiranthi Gunawardhana shared personal anecdotes from her 50-year career, urging senior lawyers to act as mentors rather than gatekeepers. She stressed the importance of creating space for young female lawyers by offering flexibility and support to help them balance professional and personal responsibilities.

Yanina Weerasinghe, Head of Legal at Brandix, argued that true inclusion is measured by influence, not optics. “Diversity is being present; inclusivity is being influential,” she explained, warning against tokenism and calling for “cerebral opportunities” where women are selected, based on talent, and given a genuine voice in decision-making.

Justice Wickramasinghe addressed the relationship between judicial hierarchy and inclusion, asserting that authority and accessibility can coexist. “A judge can be firm in decisions while remaining approachable,” she said, adding that power exercised with transparency and humility strengthens, rather than weakens, institutional legitimacy.

The seminar also heard from Dilani Yatawaka, Managing Director/CEO of Ideal Motors, who shared her perspective as a female leader in the male-dominated automotive sector. She reinforced the critical role of supportive superiors and societal encouragement to enable women to ascend the career ladder while managing family responsibilities.

BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee Chair Indika Nagaratne Koththagoda in her welcome address said that the distinguished gathering was honoured to have Her Ladyship Justice Kumudini Wickramasinghe, Judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, as the Chief Guest and a key panellist and also welcomed the other panellists Attorneys-at-Law Professor Wasantha Seneviratne, Ms. Shiranthi Gunawardena and Yanina Weerasinghe for agreeing to share their insights on the subject during the ensuing panel discussion to be moderated by Attorney-at-Law Ms. Tanushka Gunawardane.

In her closing remarks, Nalani Manatunga, Co-Chairperson of the BASL Women Lawyers’ Professional and Career Development Committee, challenged the audience to reflect on the true meaning of leadership. “A position gives authority, but leadership gives direction,” she said. “Inclusive leadership is not about occupying space; it’s about creating space. Let our leadership not be measured by the chairs we occupy, but by the doors we leave open.”

Continue Reading

News

No qualified printer to head Government Printing Department

Published

on

A crisis was prevailing at the Government Printing Department due to the absence of a permanent Government Printer, Parliament was told yesterday, raising concerns over confidentiality, quality control and national security.

NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake demanded to know what steps the government had taken to fill the long-standing vacancy at the department, describing the situation as a serious administrative lapse.

“The Government Printing Department is a very important and closed service category institution. However, it has been functioning without a permanent Government Printer for some time,” Karunanayake said.

The MP pointed out that the department handles highly sensitive material, including documents related to defence and national security, as well as other classified publications.

“The non-availability of a permanent Government Printer affects the quality, confidentiality and sustainability of the work there. Has the Government conducted an audit on the possible issues arising from this situation? What immediate action has been taken to resolve this crisis?” he asked.

Responding on behalf of the Government, Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya said the vacancy had been filled on a temporary basis following a Cabinet decision.

She said an experienced officer from the Sri Lanka Administrative Service had been appointed on contract as Acting Government Printer to ensure operational continuity and maintain security standards in relation to sensitive printing tasks.

The Prime Minister acknowledged that the issue reflected broader systemic weaknesses in public service recruitment and professional development that had persisted for years.

“To bridge these gaps, the Government is initiating specialised training programmes and offering international scholarships for high-performing students to build future technical capacity,” she said.

Chief Government Whip and Health and Mass Media Minister Dr Nalinda Jayatissa said that under existing service minutes, more than two decades of experience were required for an officer to qualify for the top post, and that there were currently no internal candidates eligible for appointment.

He said that the department was facing a leadership crisis and administrative instability due to the lack of a permanent, qualified Government Printer.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

Trending