Connect with us

Sports

What’s up MJ’s sleeve?

Published

on

by Rex Clementine

It’s been a tough couple of weeks for the national cricket team. They were thoroughly outplayed in Australia while the Indians have given them a  hiding in the opening encounter of the three match series in Lucknow. The manner in which young Indian players walk into the senior side and punish the bowling has stunned many. There’s nothing to be surprised as India’s domestic structure is one of the best in the world whereas we have a system where players score more triple hundreds in a year than Sir Don Bradman has done his entire career.

Sanga and MJ are big stakeholders of the sport having considerable say in how cricket is run in the country. However, under their watch instead of the number of teams engaged in domestic cricket being reduced, it has increased. When they were not in administration they were vocal critics when Thilanga Sumathipala doubled the number of First Class teams in 2015.

Sanga and MJ have argued that the number of teams will be reduced eventually thanks to the promotion and relegation system. It’s only wishful thinking. They should know better. There are enough Sumith Pereras hanging around Maitland Place to get an interim injunction stopping First Class tournaments once their team is relegated. Then, it will be all back to square one. Instead, you should have the single mindedness of Imran Khan who wasted no time in bringing down the number of domestic teams in Pakistan to put cricket back on track. Shame on our legends!

The highest paid employ of any cricket board is their captain or the senior most player. But in Sri Lanka it is not Angelo Mathews or Dimuth Karunaratne. It’s MJ. But his commitment to Sri Lankan cricket could be questioned. Tours of India and Australia are the toughest ones. But he’s not in the dressing room when players need him most. He’s supposed to be providing instructions virtually. When he pulled out after the qualifying round of the World Cup in UAE due to family reasons, people didn’t ask questions. But now you get the feeling whether he’s pulling a fast one. Surely, Ambanis are not going to allow him to take a break middle of IPL.

MJ has basically got everything that he has asked for. The Chairman of Selectors is his puppet who has little clue. All coaching appointments are made after consultation with MJ. That’s too much power given to one man. That’s not bad. But with too much power one should also be held accountable.

You also sense that with MJ being a central figure in decision making coaching positions are given to those whom he can control. Chaminda Vaas not being given an extension probably is not a coincidence. It maybe that Vaas is too tough for MJ to handle. Hence, enter Lasith Malinga, no matter how much doubt you have about him being able to fit in as a team man.

Is cricket headquarters heading back to Perera Gardens?

Rumesh Ratnayake is one of the nicest men in cricket circles but him as a head coach was no brainer. He is so outdated that one day the Aussies had announced their playing eleven the day before the match while Rumesh was playing his cards close to his chest. Maybe he was thinking that he was letting out a state secret.

Clearly Sanga and MJ have faulted in not naming a Head Coach on time. The problem with these gents is that they are fixed with certain theories. They want us to believe that a crook like Charlie Austin is in fact a paragon of virtue. They would not look beyond Tom Moody, Graham Ford and Paul Farbrace when given a chance to headhunt a coach.

It is their fault that Sri Lanka does not have a Head Coach at the moment. Having too many sharp brains is one of the best things that happened to cricket. But at the same time, having too many cooks can mess things up.

A professional organization to succeed you can’t just have yes men. There will be people who disagree with your opinions. Healthy rivalry is in fact good for an organization.

Soon Sanga and MJ  will be joining their IPL franchises. Their contribution towards Sri Lankan cricket over the next two months will be little. But there are other former captains who can make contributions. Is there any chance we can make use of their services?

Sanga and MJ stand accused of blocking the return of Sanath Jayasuriya back into the cricket fold. Let them be reminded that there’s no saint without a past and no sinner without a future.



Sports

Wrong time for musical chairs in cricket

Published

on

Moves are underway to replace former opening batter Upul Tharanga as Chairman of Selectors, the latest in a series of shake-ups that have gathered pace alarmingly close to the showpiece event.

With just six weeks to go for the World Cup that Sri Lanka will co-host, the ground appears to be shifting under the selectors’ feet. Moves are underway to replace former opening batter Upul Tharanga as Chairman of Selectors, the latest in a series of shake-ups that have gathered pace alarmingly close to the showpiece event.

First came the reshuffling of the coaching staff. Then there were strong signals that captain Charith Asalanka could be moved aside. Now the selection panel itself is set for an overhaul. One is tempted to ask whether all this chopping and changing is really necessary with the tournament looming large on the horizon.

It is true that the selectors’ term will expire by the book, a new panel must take guard. But with less than two months left before the World Cup, common sense would suggest to let the status quo remain.

Tharanga’s panel has not been flawless, but it has hardly been a basket case either. Recent weeks have produced some sobering results, including a 3-0 ODI whitewash in Pakistan and an embarrassing T20 loss to Zimbabwe. Yet the team showed resilience, regrouped and fought their way into the finals, where they eventually went down to Pakistan.

There were tangible gains too. Sri Lanka climbed to fourth in the ODI rankings and even pulled off a Test victory over England. The wheels came off mainly in the T20 format, where they failed to progress beyond the first round of the last World Cup — a shortcoming that cannot be pinned on selection alone.

If there must be a changing of the guard, logic dictates that it should wait until after the World Cup. Midstream changes at the top rarely help steady a ship already sailing in choppy waters.

What is more troubling is the prospect of a familiar face returning to the hot seat — someone under whose watch Sri Lanka endured disastrous returns. During that previous tenure, selections were muddled and knee-jerk. A poor series often meant wholesale culling, with players axed almost as soon as they were drafted in, leaving no room for continuity or confidence.

There were baffling calls too: Maheesh Theekshana fast-tracked into Test cricket on the strength of his white-ball exploits, while Dunith Wellalage was handed a Test debut before even playing a T20 International. Such horses-for-courses thinking, taken to extremes, left Sri Lanka without a clear road map.

The end result was grim. Sri Lanka finished ninth at the 2023 World Cup, failed to qualify for the Champions Trophy and for the first time in their history, missed out on an ICC event altogether.

Sri Lanka Cricket’s deeper problem is a lack of willing candidates. Few former players are keen to step into the firing line of selection, a role that guarantees brickbats regardless of results. Cornered, the board has repeatedly turned to recycled hands — men who have done the job before, with precious little to show for it.

With the World Cup just around the bend, Sri Lanka can ill afford to keep moving the goalposts. Stability, not another roll of the dice, may yet be their best play.

by Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Sports

Seneviratne five-for blows Nepal away

Published

on

Sethmika Seneviratne was the Player of the Match for bagging 5 for 25.(ACC)

It was a run-out that started it all after Sri Lanka Under-19s captain Vimath Dinsara asked Nepal Under-19s to bat first in their Group B game at the Under-19s Asia Cup. Nepal were steady at 30 without loss, but come the eighth over, Dinsara combined with wicketkeeper Aadham Hilmy to run Niraj Kumar Yadav out for 10. That started a slide, and Nepal never recovered thereafter.

Sethmika Seneviratne had Sahil Patel caught for 12 in the ninth over, bowled Vansh Chhetri for a duck in the 11th, and then had Dilsad Ali caught without scoring in the 13th. Sri Lanka reduced Nepal to 37 for 4, with the four wickets gone for the addition of just seven runs within six overs.

‎At that stage, Nepal’s captain Ashok Dhami joined Cibrin Shrestha. Just when they looked set to help Nepal find a way back, Rasith Nimsara broke the 24-run stand by having Dhami caught behind for 9 to start the 21st over. Soon, 61 for 4 became 82 all out. Vigneshwaran Akash struck next to dismiss Shrestha for 18, which was Nepal’s highest score.

No Nepal batter after Shreshta even got into double figures, while Seneviratne got two lower-order batters to complete his five-for. Seneviratne finished with 5 for 25, and left Sri Lanka’s batters with little to do.

Although Nepal had Sri Lanka at 25 for 2 in the 83 chase, that only seemed like consolation. Dimantha Mahavithana (39*) and Kavija Gamage (24*) wiped Nepal out with an unbroken stand of 59, as Sri Lanka won with eight wickets and a massive 35.1 overs to spare.

Scores

‎Sri Lanka U-19s 84 for 2 (Mahavithana 39n.o., Kavija Gamage 24n.o., Mandal 1-16)

Nepal U-19s 82 (Shrestha 18, Seneviratne 5-25, Sigera 1-3)

Continue Reading

Latest News

Arshdeep, Harshit set the tone in seam-friendly Dharamsala as India go 2-1 up

Published

on

By

Early seam and swing caused a lot of damage for South Africa (Cricinfo)

India reclaimed the series lead by bowling South Africa  out for 117 in seam-friendly conditions in Dharamsala. Arshdeep Singh and Harshit Rana, the latter playing in the absence of Jasprit Bumrah, who was on leave for personal reasons, set the tone with three early wickets, and the support bowlers never let up. Aiden Markram kept South Africa in the fight with a half-century, but they were at least 20 runs short of what could have been a fighting total, keeping in mind their strong seam attack. Once Abhishek Sharma scored 35 off 18 balls, India could afford a wobble in the rest of the chase.

Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dube cashed in on the conditions with a wicket each in their first overs, but it was Varun Chakravarth’s four overs for 11 runs and two wickets that denied South Africa any chance of creeping back into the match. One of his victims was Donovon Ferreira, the only other recognised batter to reach double digits.

Arshdeep went for 0 for 54 in the last match, bowled an unending over, and was now without Bumrah. His first over was an example of how to bowl if you get that rare pitch that helps you in T20 cricket. He bowled three balls to Reeza Hendricks, all on a similar good length on middle and leg. Two of them seamed away to beat his outside edge, and the third nipped back in to trap him in front.

Rana swung the ball late, got some seam movement as well, but his wickets were slightly inexplicable. Quinton de Kock missed a straight and full delivery, and Dewald Brevis dragged on a long wide half volley, making it 7 for 3 in 3.1 overs.

Markram and Tristan Stubbs saw through the rest of the powerplay, but Stubbs never looked at home. In his first over, Pandya drew just enough nibble to take Stubbs’ outside edge to make it 30 for 4. Corbin Bosch, one of the three batters dropped in the field, missed the first ball from Dube by a long way: a 124kph length ball that nipped back to hit the top of middle.

In the 12th over of the innings, Ferreira hit a Kuldeep wrong’un for a no-look six, the first boundary of the innings by a batter not named Markram. This was the first time India had to deal with two threatening batters. The sixth wicket added 25 runs, but Varun got rid of Ferreira with a wrong’un that he missed by a mile. Varun repeated that dismissal in his next over, this time to a defensive push from Marco Jansen.

Dube had two catches missed off his bowling. While Ferreira couldn’t cause much damage, Markram went on to punish Rana in the 18th over, thus bringing up his fifty and taking South Africa past 100. It was all on Markram’s bat now to take South Africa to 140, a total they could have been competitive with. However, he ended up edging a slot ball from Arshdeep in the 19th over, leaving Kuldeep two tailend wickets to feast on in the last over.

Swivelling inside the line of the first ball and pulling Lungi Ngidi over fine leg for a six, Abhishek set the tone for the chase. He charged at Ngidi for a four in the same over, and went one better with a six off Jansen in the next. When Abhishek hit Ottneil Baartman for a six in the fifth over, he brought up India’s fifty and went to 44 sixes in the first six overs of T20I innings, level with KL Rahul, who did so in more than twice than the matches. Rohit Sharma is the only Indian with more sixes in the first six overs.

The low target allowed Abhishek’s opening partner Shubman Gill time to play himself in, but neither he nor Tilak Varma ever looked set with plenty of seam movement available. Suryakumar Yadav hit two fours, but managed only 12 off 11 balls. When Abhishek was at the wicket, 60 runs came in 5.2 overs; the rest of the match featured 177 in 30.3 overs. Twenty more runs for South Africa, and/or an early departure for Abhishek could have made this a much closer affair.

Brief scores:

India 120 for 3 in 15.5 overs  (Abhishek  Sharma 35, Shubman Gill 28, Tilak Varma 26*,  Suryakumar Yadav 12, Shivam Dube 10*;  Lungi Ngidi  1-23, Marco Jansen  1-24, Corbin Bosch 1-18) beat South Africa 117 in 20 overs  (Aiden Markram 61, Donovan Ferreira 20, Anrich Nortje 12; Varun Chakravarthy  2-11, Kuldeep Yadav 2-12, Arshdeep Singh 2-13, Harshit Rana 2-34, Hardik Pandya 1-23, Shivam Dube1-21) by seven wickets

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

Trending