Connect with us

News

UK wants GoSL to take up flawed Travel Advisory with relevant authorities

Published

on

Naseby and David Cameron

Lord Naseby raises issue in House of Lords

British Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron has said that Sri Lankan authorities would have to follow-up with the Commonwealth and Development Office’s (FCDO’s) South Asia Department in London and the British High Commission in Colombo to see if Lord Naseby’s request for the UK’s support towards Sri Lanka actually bears fruit.

Former Prime Minister, David Cameron, who was elevated with a peerage back into the Cabinet as Foreign Secretary by Rishi Sunak, late last year, said so on Tuesday (05) at the tail end of a seven hour debate in the House of Lords on Britain’s Foreign Affairs.

UK based sources said that 63 peers from various political parties raised questions on Britain’s role in the current volatile international landscape.

Lord Naseby has pointed out serious inaccuracies in Britain’s Travel Advisory on Sri Lanka. Lord Naseby has requested that the Travel Advisory be changed. As tourism plays a major role in the Sri Lankan economy, Lord Naseby has said that more British tourists would visit the island if the FCDO, which is now led by Lord Cameron, provided accurate Travel Advisory information on Sri Lanka.

Lord Naseby has urged FCDO officials to be more positive in portraying the opportunities for tourists to visit Sri Lanka as travellers no longer have to face protests or fuel shortages as occurred in 2022 and that the last terrorist attacks on the island happened nearly five years ago, in 2019. Lord Naseby asserted that more British tourists would readily flock to Sri Lanka if a correct portrayal of the ground realities was presented by UK authorities.

Sources said that the crux of the matter is whether Sri Lanka raised the issue at hand with the British HC in Colombo.

Hansard transcript: It is the FCDO comments on that country that currently cause me concern because they refer to the fact that protests are going on when they are not. They say that there is a fuel shortage, but there is not and has not been for 18 months. They also say that there are other difficulties of a terrorist nature, which we have not had for five years. So can my noble friend look at that guidance? It helps that particular age group because, at least from surveys that have been done, 80% of it looks at that guidance. Perhaps I could bring a couple of people from the newly set-up Experience Travel Group, which is in the private sector, to perhaps talk to a junior Minister about amending that.”

In the summing up of responses to the several questions raised by Peers, Lord Cameron said that he ‘very much agreed’ with the points raised by Lord Naseby.

Lord Naseby has relentlessly supported successive Sri Lankan governments and followed the progress that the country has made in addressing human rights issues and the legacy of the conflict years. The Conservative peer, who founded the British Parliament’s All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sri Lanka nearly 50 years ago, commended Sri Lanka for progressing now towards a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. “There is the talk—and, more than talk, work being done—on a truth and reconciliation commission. In my judgment, that is to be greatly welcomed. I reflect on the late Sir Desmond de Silva, a great lawyer, as evidence that the quality of lawyers in Sri Lanka is second to none. As it is set up, it will of course be across the ethnic groups—it has to be. There are people there who are thoroughly objective.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FSP asks govt. to pull out of defence deal with India

Published

on

Pubudu Jagoda

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday demanded an immediate termination of what it called a “secretive and dangerous” defence agreement signed between Sri Lanka and India, during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 05 April visit.

Addressing a press conference at the party’s headquarters in Nugegoda, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda described the agreement as a “betrayal of the nation” and a “crime against the people,” urging the government to invoke Article 12 of the deal and exit it with the required three months’ notice.

Jagoda said the document, which surfaced on social media after being published by a news portal, appears to be the actual agreement signed between the two countries. “The government has not denied its authenticity. That silence is telling,” he said.

Jagoda added that the agreement bears the signatures of Sri Lanka’s Defence Ministry Secretary Sampath Thuiyakontha and Indian High Commissioner Santosh Jha.

“What’s most troubling,” Jagoda warned, “is that both governments attempted to keep the agreement under wraps. Unlike the 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord, which was made public with all annexures, this agreement was hidden from the people, and even now, we don’t know how many other agreements exist between India and Sri Lanka.”

Jagoda said that a Right to Information request made on 04 April was met with a reply from the President’s Office stating that it had no copies of the agreement—raising serious concerns about transparency, even at the highest level. “One could question whether the President has seen it because his office does not have it,” Jagoda said.

The 12-clause of agreement reportedly covers areas such as exchange and training of military personnel, defence industry collaboration, classified information protection, and military medical services, including battlefield healthcare and telemedicine.

Jagoda said the definition of “classified information” in Clause 7 was alarmingly broad. “It allows India to label virtually anything as secret. Even weapons or military assets transferred under this agreement cannot be revealed—not even after the agreement ends,” he said, citing Clause 7.3.

Clause 10 prohibits either country from taking disputes to international courts or involving third-party mediators. “It’s like asking a rabbit to negotiate with a tiger,” Jagoda quipped, drawing parallels to the complications of the 1987 accord, which eventually saw Indian peacekeeping troops refusing to leave until a change in the Indian government.

Jagoda accused the NPP-led government of hypocrisy, pointing out that the JVP, the main component of the current regime, had vehemently opposed Indo-Lanka Accord in 1987. “Now they’ve gone and signed an even more dangerous deal,” he said.

Citing Clause 12, which allows either party to withdraw with three months’ notice, the FSP called on the government to act immediately to exit the pact. “We urge the people to unite and defeat these underhanded, sovereignty-eroding deals. The FSP stands ready to lead that fight,” Jagoda said.

Continue Reading

News

Police crush protest, arrest student activists

Published

on

Police arresting protesters in Colombo yesterday. (Photo credit Derana)

The police yesterday arrested a group of students, including the Convener of the Inter-University Students’ Federation (IUSF), Madushan Chandradith, during a protest held by the Allied Health Science Graduates’ Union in front of the Health Ministry yesterday.

The police obtained an order from Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court, earlier in the day, to prevent protesters from invading the Colombo Hospital Square and the Health Ministry.

Continue Reading

News

Deshabandu faces misconduct probe on Monday

Published

on

Inspector General of Police T.M.W. Deshabandu Tennakoon is set to face formal questioning on Monday (19 May) over serious allegations of misconduct and abuse of power, parliamentary sources said yesterday.

A special Committee appointed to investigate the claims will commence formal proceedings next week, following several rounds of preliminary discussions held within the parliamentary complex in recent weeks.

The IGP has been officially notified to appear before the Committee and is expected to face the inquiry for the first time at 2:00 PM in Committee Room No. 8.

The Committee, which met again on Thursday (15) to finalise arrangements, is investigating allegations that Tennakoon misused his official powers in a manner deemed severe and improper.

Continue Reading

Trending