Latest News
UK missiles offer may help Ukraine – but they are not what Zelensky needs most
The UK is set to hand over blueprints for its British-French designed Storm Shadow cruise missiles to Ukraine – following a similar move from France – allowing Ukraine to produce the weapon domestically.
The move sends an important signal, showing that some Western nations are willing to share their expertise and know how to help Ukraine defend itself.
But, on its own, this won’t dramatically alter the course of the war.
Scalp and Storm Shadow missiles have already been provided to Kyiv by both Britain and France. They’ve already been used to hit military targets inside Russia.
The weapons are not new – they were developed in the 1990’s – and they are expensive – at around £1m a piece.
They also rely on complex global supply chains and have been built in peacetime at relatively low rates – in the hundreds, not the thousands.
Even with the blueprints, Ukraine may find it hard to source components. It could take months, possibly years to make the cruise missile themselves.
Copying Western weapons production in peacetime is, in fact, no way to win a war. Even Nato nations now realise that.
Britain and many of its allies have tended to produce small quantities of highly advanced, expensive missiles which would quickly run out in any protracted conflict.
In 2021, the former head of the US Army in Europe, Gen Ben Hodges, said that in a Nato wargame the UK military ran out of key weapons within a matter of days.
Proof of the recent change in mindset is the UK military is no longer buying Storm Shadow missiles for itself.

Instead, under Project Brakestop, it is developing its own long-range cruise missiles, free of foreign components, and less than half the price of a Storm Shadow.
Project Brakestop is also being done at break-neck speed. The UK hopes to have a new cruise missile ready by the end of the year. It is promising to supply the new weapon to Ukraine.
It is Ukraine which has shown the world how to produce relatively cheap, mass produced weapons, necessary for a long, protracted conflict.
Douglas Barrie, Senior Fellow for Military Aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) told the BBC: “The decision to share UK classified information on the MBDA SCALP missiles with Ukraine, as France and Ukraine work toward local assembly lines in Ukraine, is notable. Any impact, however, will in part depend on how quickly Ukrainian assembled SCALP cruise missiles can be introduced into service.
“Given that Ukraine has already operated both Storm Shadow and SCALP, familiarity with the missile may help speed the overall process, but this will also be dependent on the extent and pace at which local assembly can be established.”
At the start of the war its armed forces relied on old Cold War-era Soviet weaponry.
A slow supply of Western weapons helped it adapt. But now Ukraine produces 70% of its own weapons.
Key has been its rapid development of drone technology – from small First Person View (FPV) one-way attack drones for the front line, to larger long-range drones capable of striking deep into Russian territory, further than Storm Shadows can strike.
Kyiv is on track to build 10 million drones by the end of this year. And they can do it cheaper than the West, by using mass-produced Chinese parts.
Nato allies’ equivalent drones can be twice as expensive as they try to shun Chinese components.
However, there are still weapons that Ukraine needs and struggles to produce on its own. From fast fighter jets to the most urgent example, interceptors to take down Russian ballistic missiles
The most effective weapon to do that, by far, is the US-made Patriot interceptor. Ukraine has all but run out of them and Russian ballistic missiles now make it through Ukrainian air defences with ease.
America’s war in Iran has meant they’re in even shorter supply.
They’re also expensive – at around £3m a missile – and production rates have been slow. The US is planning to double production rates from around 600 Patriot missiles per annum to 2,000, but that will take several years.
President Donald Trump signalled last month that he would be willing to share Patriot technology with Ukraine, but has since rowed back.
Even if he had given approval, it would have taken a while for Ukraine to make Patriots themselves – some estimate at least a year. Ukraine would also be relying on the same sophisticated components that are in high demand across the globe.
Ukraine has embarked on a programme to develop its own interceptor missiles with European support – known as Project Freya.
But there are huge technological challenges in building a high-speed missile to take down another missile travelling at thousands of miles per hour. It is expensive and often time consuming.
Ukraine’s military and its weapons manufacturers have shown themselves to be fast learners.
One of its own companies, Fire Point, is developing its own ballistic missiles which it hopes will be ready to fire in anger next year.
But Russia has already ramped up its own ballistic missile production, to around 100 a month.
Developing sophisticated weapons is expensive and cannot be done quickly. Ukraine is short of both time and money.
So, the move to hand missile blueprints to Ukraine will be welcome, but it is not an immediate fix for Ukraine’s most pressing problems, and it will not dramatically alter Kyiv’s ability to strike Russia in new ways.
[BBC]
Foreign News
‘Time for Ukraine to get new president,’ says Trump after Zelensky condemns diesel deal
US President Donald Trump has said he thinks “it’s time for Ukraine to get a new president” as he responded to Volodymyr Zelensky’s criticism of the US diesel deal with Russia.
The Ukrainian president warned a new deal to release millions of tonnes of Russian diesel into the US would provide Moscow with money to continue its war against his nation, calling it a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump told reporters outside the White House on Saturday that Zelensky “wants to make problems for the world” by continuing to authorise attacks on Russian refineries.
“He’d better damn well stop,” Trump said, before suggesting Ukraine should “get a new leader who can make a deal”.
Global fuel supplies, including diesel, have been severely limited by the war against Iran launched by the US and Israel, which led to the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil products usually flows.
Russia – a major producer – and Ukraine have recently intensified their strikes on each other’s energy infrastructure and transport facilities, further straining energy markets.
“We said, ‘you can do whatever you want to Russia, don’t hit the refineries’, because that’s a world problem that’s caused,” Trump continued.
“He could have made many deals and for some reason, he never does.”
Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev described Trump’s intervention as “iconic and historic”, saying that Ukraine “needs leadership actually focused on peace”.
The US president confirmed on Friday that an agreement had been reached with Moscow to suspend sanctions on Russian diesel exports until 7 April.
Zelensky reacted by saying it would allow Moscow to raise new funds to source new military equipment to continue the war.
He also accused Moscow of taking the deal “to mean they can keep fighting, to mean they keep dropping bombs on cities” following deadly new strikes on Zaporizhzhia.
The Ukrainian president spoke to several allies on Saturday to discuss the latest developments, calling for “real decisions to protect lives in Ukraine” and to protect European security.
A Downing Street spokesperson said UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham had spoken to Zelensky and offered his “complete solidarity”.
The pair had agreed Russia should acquiesce to “an immediate energy ceasefire” and end its attacks on shipping in the Black Sea, the spokesperson said, as “this would immediately release more energy and food supplies into the global market”.
News of the US-Russia diesel deal was also met with criticism by EU’s foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, who echoed Zelensky in saying that suspending sanctions “provides Moscow with more revenues to wage war”, adding: “This is not the time to ease pressure on Russia, and Europe won’t.”
She said European foreign ministers intended to approve the biggest set of sanctions on Russia since the start of its full-scale invasion on Monday.
The deal with Russia is the latest effort from Trump to lower fuel prices in the US ahead of the midterm elections, after months spent grappling with the political consequences of the Iran war.
That conflict, which began in February, has sent the cost of petrol and in particular diesel skyrocketing, which has soured his standing with the American public who have been stung by the higher pump prices and knock-on effects that led to across-the-board inflation.
The average price of diesel is currently $6.28 (£4.74) a gallon, according to the AAA – up from last month’s $5.94 average, and $3.68 last year.
Under the deal, Russia would release an initial 300,000 tonnes of diesel “to the American and global marketplace” followed by an additional 500,000 tonnes in November.
A further million would follow, Trump wrote on Truth Social, and then another 3m tonnes “within a short period of time” – but he noted that this delivery will be “based on the condition of their diesel refineries”.
In the past 10 months, Russia experienced two waves of severe fuel shortages across the country due to Ukrainian drones strikes on its oil refineries.
Diesel production in Russia dropped by an estimated 30%, according to the International Energy Agency.
Trump had already called for new elections in Ukraine last December, saying Ukrainian voters should have the choice to replace Zelensky.
Since the war broke out in 2022 Ukraine has been under martial law, meaning elections are suspended.
[BBC]
Latest News
Renshaw 190 lifts Australia to 390 before Hazlewood strikes
Matt Renshaw produced a herculean 190 and powered Australia to an unlikely first-innings total before Josh Hazelwood dismissed South Africa opener Ryan Rickelton for a duck late on day two of the first Test in Durban. Australia had their backs to the wall at 124 for 6 in familiar batting woes but Renshaw rescued the innings with his 397-ball marathon effort.
Renshaw fell short of what would have been a maiden double ton after being dismissed two balls into the final session, caught at slip off the bowling of offspinner Simon Harmer. His only other Test century was against Pakistan at the SCG in January 2017, when he made 184.
After 137.2 overs in the field, South Africa openers Rickelton and Aiden Markram faced a tough challenge under increasingly gloomy skies. A weary Rickelton did not fare well after edging Hazlewood to third slip in the second over, having attempted a lavish drive to a full delivery.
But Markram and new No. 3 David Bedingham were unruffled, and hit several attractive boundaries before bad light ended the day’s play just 8.4 overs into South Africa’s innings.
Having been on the back foot for much of the opening day, Australia were on top after day two as Renshaw produced the fourth highest score by an Australian in South Africa. Remarkably, he scored 174 of his runs with the last four batters, the most anyone has scored in a Test innings while batting with the tail since 2002.
Renshaw received strong support from the lower order, marked by an 86-run seventh-wicket partnership with Pat Cummins and a 134-run stand with Nathan Lyon, the second-most for the ninth wicket for Australia in their Test history.
Cummins and Lyon faced a combined 190 deliveries – that was 27 more than Australia’s top four batters – although batting became easier on a surface that on day one produced steep bounce and seam movement.
It has been a tough journey for Renshaw, who might have resurrected his Test career after providing a major tonic for Australia’s reshuffled batting order. He reached his century just before the lunch break with a boundary through the leg side, and raised his arms in delight and took off his helmet, showing off a beaming smile.
Highly disciplined but also showing a knack of going through the gears, Renshaw became the first Australia batter to face 300 balls in a Test innings since Usman Khawaja scored 232 against Sri Lanka in Galle in early 2025.
Renshaw has relished moving down to No. 5 after Nic Maddinson’s surprise selection as an opener, along with Cameron Green missing the match through injury. He had only filled the position four times previously – thrice during the 2023 tour of India, and once on the 2017 tour – with modest results, although has enjoyed success with Queensland there.
Renshaw had returned to Test cricket after three-and-a-half years as an opener against Bangladesh in August. While Maddinson’s selection has initially backfired, Renshaw looked at ease in the middle order, and equally untroubled against the seamers and spinners.
Having dominated much of the shortened first day, South Africa were left frustrated with their attack blunted by Renshaw. Seamers Wiaan Mulder, Marco Jansen and Anrich Nortje took nine wickets between them but struggled to consistently threaten on day two.
Spin duo Harmer and Keshav Maharaj claimed just one wicket from 48.2 overs, with Renshaw negating their influence, although the surface is expected to spin significantly later in the match. It was a disappointment for the sparse crowd in Durban, with the atmosphere rather subdued for Australia’s first Test series in South Africa since the 2018 sandpaper scandal.
Earlier on day two, Australia resumed their first innings on 187 for 6 after just 65.2 overs were bowled on a truncated opening day due to bad light. Renshaw and Cummins aimed to build on their unbeaten 63-run partnership from overnight. It did not take Renshaw long to reach his fourth Test half-century after edging Nortje through third slip and gully as he celebrated the milestone for the first time since March 2017.
Nortje, who played a starring role on day one after a three-and-a-half year exile from Test cricket, once again unfurled vicious short deliveries but occasionally tried to outfox Cummins by pitching up. A focused Cummins was unfazed, and pounced on a rare overpitched delivery with a beautiful square drive to the boundary. He had a fourth Test half-century in his sights – and the first since January 2024 – until, on 43, he edged a good-length delivery from Mulder to second slip.
Renshaw, meanwhile, showcased his much improved play against spin, reverse sweeping Maharaj with good effect to keep the scoreboard ticking over.
Much like Cummins, Mitchell Starc was intent on solid defence, and had a slice of luck when he edged Harmer through the hands of Markram at first slip as the ball flew to the boundary. South Africa had no hesitation in taking the second new ball, and Mulder capitalised when he clean bowled Starc with a cracker of a delivery that pitched on middle before crashing into the off stump.
But Renshaw kept South Africa at bay, and put the foot down in the back end of the elongated session. He hogged the strike after lunch as South Africa skipper Temba Bavuma deployed Maharaj and Harmer in tandem. The game went through a lull until the reintroduction of Nortje, who delivered a 143kph thunderbolt that whacked Renshaw on the grill of the helmet.
But Renshaw gave an immediate thumbs up and continued with his indefatigable effort after receiving medical attention. He reached 150 with a reverse sweep off Maharaj – and quite fittingly so, given his mastery of the stroke through the innings.
Lyon appeared set to bat through the entire second session before being trapped plumb lbw by a full delivery from Jansen, who was rewarded for a hostile spell before tea. The session was extended, but Hazlewood held firm with the bat before making an impact with the ball before stumps.
Scores:
South Africa 27 for 1 in 8.4 overs (Aiden Markram 15*, David Bedingham 12*; Josh Hazlewood 1-9) trail Australia 390 in 137.2 overs (Matt Renshaw 190, Pat Cummins 43; Marco Jansen 3-68, Wiaan Mulder 4-68, Anrich Nortje 2-88 ) by 363 runs
[Cricinfo]
Foreign News
Pope says death penalty ‘inadmissible’ as US plans to livestream execution
Pope Leo XIV has declared that the death penalty is “inadmissible” while his home country, the United States, announces plans to livestream an execution by firing squad.
Marking World Day Against the Death Penalty on Saturday, the pope reiterated the Catholic Church’s teaching on capital punishment, writing on X that it was “inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”.
“The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment,” his post said.
“Effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption,” added the leader of the Catholic Church.
The American Pope’s comments come days after US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Thursday that the firing squad execution of Nidal Malik Hasan on December 3 will be livestreamed.
Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others in a shooting at the Fort Hood military base in 2009.
Pope Leo did not specifically refer to the planned execution, or last month’s botched execution attempt on Christa Pike, who survived two doses of the lethal injection in Tennessee.
But his post came hours after his top deputy, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, told Vatican News that the plan to livestream Hasan’s execution was “unacceptable”.
It was Leo’s predecessor, Pope Francis, in 2018 who first amended official Catholic teaching to declare capital punishment “inadmissible” in all circumstances.
[Aljazeera]
-
News6 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Features5 days agoPreventing grievances from becoming communal
-
Features3 days agoThe Sri Lankan who made Scottish history
-
Sports3 days agoNissanka absence opens door for Sri Lanka’s young guns
-
News4 days agoGnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials
-
Features6 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
-
News2 days agoNDB fraud Rs 60mn more than reported
-
Features3 days agoFuture of Sri Lanka’s state university system: Should it be shut down and reopened?
