News
UK assessment of Sri Lanka based on civil society and media, too – Lord Goldsmith

Minister of State for Foreign Affairs in the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Lord Zac Goldsmith has said that there was no blanket requirement for information to be independently verified before being submitted to London.
Minister Goldsmith has said so in response to Lord Naseby seeking an explanation as regards the responsibilities et al of British Defence Attaches against the backdrop of the UK government dismissing reports submitted by wartime UK defence attache here Lt. Col. Anthony Gash.
Lord Naseby has asked the following question on April 21: whether the information contained in despatches written by UK defence attachés must be independently verified before submission; if so, whether it is standard practice to ensure that such attachés are briefed to that effect; and if so, what record, if any, they hold of Lieutenant Colonel Gash, being so briefed.
Lord Goldsmith who also serves as Deputy to the Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab has provided the following answer on April 29: “Reports from UK Military attachés and diplomats take a wide variety of forms. Some report events which they have directly observed; some report the views or assertions of others; some focus on judgements or provide analysis. There is no blanket requirement for information to be independently verified before submission, which in many situations will not be possible. The context of reporting will inform the weight that is attached to it. Reports from our defence attachés, together with many other sources, contribute to the UK government’s overall understanding of events overseas.”
Lord Naseby, also on the same day has asked what sources they used to inform their assessment of the situation in Sri Lanka during the civil war in that country between 1 January and 18 May 2009.
Lord Goldsmith responded: “The UK government’s assessment of the situation in Sri Lanka during the civil war was informed by a broad range of internal and open source reporting, including from our High Commission in Colombo, international organisations, civil society and media.”
In respect of the Sri Lanka Armed Conflict, Lord Naseby has asked what criteria they used to assess the credibility of evidence reports they have received which related to the situation in Sri Lanka during the civil war in that country between 1 January and 18 May 2009; and whether it has ever been their practice to accept reports from unnamed sources.
Lord Goldsmith has responded: “Reports from UK Military attachés and diplomats take a wide variety of forms. Some report events which they have directly observed; some report the views or assertions of others; some focus on judgements or provide analysis. These, along with other sources, contribute to the UK government’s overall understanding of events overseas.
Lord Naseby has asked the Government whether further to the despatches written by Lieutenant Colonel Gash, the former defence attaché of the British High Commission in Sri Lanka about events in that country between 1 January and 18 May 2009 relating to the civil war, whether they consider all reports by UK military attachés and diplomats to be evidence based-assessments.
Lord Goldsmith has responded: “Reports from UK Military attachés and diplomats take a wide variety of forms. Some report events which they have directly observed; some report the views or assertions of others; some focus on judgements or provide analysis. These, along with other sources, contribute to the UK government’s overall understanding of events overseas.” (SF)
News
Gnanasara Thera urged to reveal masterminds behind Easter Sunday terror attacks

Religious and civil society leaders have called upon Ven. Galagodatte Gnanasara Thera to share whatever information he claims to possess with regard to the Easter Sunday terror attacks and their masterminds.
Addressing the media at the Centre for Society and Religion in Colombo, Lawyer Manoj Nanayakkara said Ven. Gnanasara Thera claimed to have information related to the terror attacks and the masterminds behind them.
“The question is why he does not go to the law enforcement agencies and share the information he claims to possess. There is no purpose in making such statements at press conferences. As a citizen, his duty is to share this information with the investigating authorities. Therefore, we believe that Gnanasara Thera is engaging in a political ploy at the behest of someone else. He should be aware that intentionally withholding information about a brutal massacre and failing to share it with the investigating authorities is an offense punishable under the Penal Code,” Nanayakkara said.
Nanayakkara mentioned that 71 months had passed since the Easter Sunday attacks, yet justice has not been served for the victims.
He called on President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to begin implementing the recommendations outlined in the Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry that investigated the Easter Sunday terror attacks, without further delay.
“We are approaching the sixth anniversary of this heinous crime, which claimed nearly 275 lives and injured twice as many others. President Dissanayake promised to conduct a fresh investigation into this crime. In the meantime, he could implement the recommendations of the Special Presidential Commission that probed the Easter Sunday terror attacks. This would demonstrate that the current government is keeping its word to deliver justice to the victims,” Nanayakkara said.
Rev. Fr. Julian Patric Perera, Rector of St. Joseph Vaz Deva Dharma Niketanaya, also addressed the press conference.
By Norman Palihawadane
News
IMF asks SL to maintain reform momentum to stabilise economy

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) says that the economic recovery is gaining momentum in Sri Lanka but it remains vulnerable, making it critical that the reform momentum be sustained to ensure that macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability are durably achieved.
Speaking during the IMF’s weekly press briefing, IMF Spokesperson Julie Kozack stated that the fourth tranche of $334 million was made available to Sri Lanka to support its economic policies and reforms, immediately after the Executive Board approved the Third Review.
“On Friday, February 28th, the IMF Executive Board approved the Third Review under the EFF (Extended Fund Facility) arrangement for Sri Lanka. And this provided the country with immediate access to $334 million of support.”
“So, yes, once the Board approved that Third Review, the $334 million was made available to Sri Lanka to support its economic policies and reforms. And with this $334 million, it brings total financial support from the IMF to Sri Lanka to $1.34 billion”, Kozack confirmed.
Furthermore, the IMF Spokesperson said that reforms in Sri Lanka are bearing fruit and that the economic recovery is gaining momentum.
She noted that inflation remains low in Sri Lanka, revenue collection on the fiscal side is improving, and international reserves are continuing to accumulate.
Economic growth reached 5 percent in 2024, and that was after two years of economic contraction, she added, highlighting that the IMF do expect the recovery to continue in 2025.
“These are all very positive developments for Sri Lanka and for the people of Sri Lanka”, Kozack expressed.
Meanwhile, the IMF Spokesperson also mentioned: “All of this said, the economy still does remain vulnerable, and, therefore, it is critical that the reform momentum be sustained to ensure that macroeconomic stability and debt sustainability are durably achieved.”
In response to a question raised by a journalist on the IMF’s take on the proposal to list Sri Lanka’s State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in the Colombo Stock Exchange given that the programme also calls for extensive reforms in SEOs, Kozack denied a comment, stating, “I don’t have anything for you on that regarding the SOEs, but we’ll come back to you bilaterally.”
News
Ravi K. accuses two individual of undermining UNP

New Democratic Front MP Ravi Karunanayake has accused two prominent members of the UNP of deliberately destabilising the party.
Speaking at a media briefing, MP Karunanayake stated that it was clear these two individuals were working to undermine the UNP.
He went on to claim that party leader Ranil Wickremesinghe had been “taken hostage,” by those individuals.
“I am currently the only member capable of presenting the UNP’s programmes in Parliament. Yet, these two members have shown us no respect, treating us like outsiders and excluding us from key decisions,” Karunanayake said.
“We are not even being informed about party meetings; this is clearly a stepmotherly treatment.”
Karunanayake further claimed that the two individuals were only focused on fighting for leadership positions within the party, such as the Chairmanship or the post of General Secretary, instead of prioritising unity and collaboration for the party’s future.
The MP also expressed concern that the actions of these individuals might be part of a larger conspiracy, questioning whether they were being orchestrated by external forces.
In response to rumours suggesting that he had approached the SJB, Karunanayake strongly denied the claims, asserting that such rumours were being spread by the two members working to undermine the UNP.
“These rumours are nothing more than attempts to discredit me, orchestrated by those who are sabotaging the party from within,” he said.
-
News6 days ago
Seniors welcome three percent increase in deposit rates
-
Features6 days ago
The US, Israel, Palestine, and Mahmoud Khalil
-
News6 days ago
Scholarships for children of estate workers now open
-
Foreign News5 days ago
Buddhism’s holiest site erupts in protests over Hindu ‘control’ of shrine
-
News6 days ago
Japanese Defence Delegation visits Pathfinder
-
Features3 days ago
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence: The Silver Jubilee of SLIIT – PART I
-
Editorial5 days ago
When tractors become cars!
-
Business1 day ago
AIA Higher Education Scholarships Programme celebrating 30-year journey