Connect with us

Sports

The need to treat legends with dignity  

Published

on

by Rex Clementine

The scathing remarks of Professor Charitha Herath during a COPE hearing pertaining to Sri Lanka Cricket exposed severe deficiencies in our cricket administration and the public could get a firsthand experience of how poorly the sport has been run as SLC took on former great Chaminda Vaas earlier this week.

Rather than sorting matters out behind closed doors, like it happens in professional environments, SLC opted to wash dirty linen in public and did not adhere to the best of corporate practices.

When the national cricket team’s Fast Bowling Coach David Saker left Colombo in January without informing his employers, SLC treated the Aussie with kid’s gloves. The board even didn’t mind going for an amicable settlement.  Saker is a proven coach and SLC needs to be commended for the way they handled matters.

However, two weeks later, they were on the war path with another fast bowler – Chaminda Vaas. Was Vaas treated in that way because he is a local? 

SLC paid Saker US$ 15,000 a month. They pay Vaas only US$ 3500. That is not correct. Vaas only asked for US$ 5000 more. But SLC made to look as if he was asking for the pound of flesh.

Interestingly, the decision that Vaas will replace Saker for the tour of West Indies was taken in the second week of February. But SLC had little communication with Vaas. Instead, they issued a media release announcing his appointment. But, the terms and conditions had not been discussed as it would happen in a professional environment.

Vaas was officially informed only on Friday, 72 hours before the team left for the Caribbean.

In previous instances when other coaches had to come in as replacements, SLC had compensated them handsomely. Nic Pothas is an example. When he replaced his former mentor Graeme Ford as Head Coach in 2017, the board paid him well. So why not Vaas? Again it’s back to square one. Is it because he was a local? Black lives do matter.

What Vaas wanted was a raise of his daily allowance from US$ 75 to US$ 200. What it meant was a raise of US$ 5000 for the entire tour of the Caribbean. But SLC chief Shammi Silva was not willing to negotiate. He would not budge an inch from his stance, which was go on the tour and come back and then we shall negotiate. Rather than taking the nation’s most successful fast bowler head on, Silva could have been better off had he handled matters diplomatically.  But he did not. It has been claimed that he refused to meet Vaas. SLC has denied.

 

SLC officials claimed that they were willing to pay Vaas a sum of Rs. 750,000 on his return from the trip. Although it is slightly less than what Vaas had asked for, the former fast bowler would have been foolish to turn down that offer. Here’s the next interesting question. There have been several e-mail exchanges between Vaas and SLC. Did in any of those exchanges SLC mention that he will be paid the said Rs. 750,000?

There have been similar crises in cricket before. There are individuals within SLC who have handled matters completely differently.

Jayantha Dharmadasa was President of SLC when suddenly the selectors decided to fly in Sanath Jayasuriya as an additional player to England in 2006.  The team and in particular Head Coach Tom Moody resisted. Dharmadasa intervened and drove home the point that having Jayasuriya in England early could turn out to be productive as he could acclimatize and be ready by the time the limited over games come. True to form Jayasuriya was in red hot form and slammed two hundreds in the ODIs and was named Player of the Series as Sri Lanka completed a 5-0 drubbing.

Mohan de Silva, another former President of SLC had to face a similar predicament after the tsunami in 2004 when players were adamant to return home but New Zealand Cricket wanted the series to go ahead. De Silva did not antagonize the players and in the meantime dealt diplomatically with hosts New Zealand and promised that the team will return the following year to complete the series. Accordingly in 2005, Sri Lanka made two trips to Kiwi land – in March to play Tests and in December to play ODIs. It was a win-win situation for all.

Such diplomacy was missing in the case of Vaas. The media release that SLC put out should have only said the board and Vaas had parted ways. Instead, it went to minute details. It should not have happened.

SLC seem to be having not many supporters these days. Their biggest supporter seems to be Sports Minister Namal Rajapaksa, who took the side of the board addressing the Parliament. Namal needs to watch his steps here. As his Parliamentary colleague Professor Herath pointed out at the COPE hearing, the public does not have a good image of SLC.

 

 



Sports

No handshakes and a delayed ceremony as India beat Pakistan at Asian Games

Published

on

By

Gold medallists India stand on the podium as they receive medals from ICC chief Jay Shah during the victory ceremony for the men's cricket in the 2026 Asian Games (Aljazeera)

India beat their fierce rivals Pakistan by 19 runs to win Asian Games cricket gold after a pulsating final in front of a small but raucous crowd in Nagoya, Japan.

World T20 champions India posted 211-6 in their 20 overs on Saturday, with Abhishek Sharma scoring 61 and Tilak Varma 51 not out, before Hasan Nawaz’s valiant 96 saw Pakistan come up just short at 192-6.

It was India’s seventh straight win over Pakistan in T20s and the fifth consecutive men’s game between the two bitter rivals where players didn’t shake hands — both before and after the game.

The neighbouring countries only meet in international tournaments and on neutral ground because of political tensions, and the captains refused the normal handshakes before the match.

The medal ceremony was also substantially delayed before ICC chairman Jay Shah appeared first to present the medals, as twice announced by the official Asian Games broadcast.

Only the Indian players were presented with medals, however, by Shah, who is the son of India’s Interior Minister Amit Shah and a former BCCI secretary.

Pakistan and bronze medallists Sri Lanka were presented with their medals by Asian Games officials.

As before the contest, no handshakes took place at the end of the match or during the medal ceremony.

No reason has been given for the delay or the apparent change to the medal ceremony plans. Al Jazeera has asked the Asian Games for comment.

The clash on a converted baseball field in Japan was new ground for even these bitter enemies and their hundreds of millions of fans who were watching back home on TV.

(Aljazeera)

Continue Reading

Sports

Big names in firing line as Sri Lanka ring the changes

Published

on

Many changes are expected to the Sri Lankan side after disappointing returns in the home series against India and in England

by Rex Clementine

The national cricket team is bracing for a major shake up, with several new faces set to be drafted into the national set up as officials begin plotting a course towards next year’s World Cup.

The national team has endured a wretched two months across all three formats and several prominent players are now in the firing line ahead of the tour of Pakistan, one of the longest assignments undertaken by a Sri Lankan side in recent memory.

The Pakistan tour will stretch across 46 days, with Sri Lanka playing three T20Is, a tri-nation ODI series involving England, followed by two Test matches.

Two former captains, in particular, are under the pump.

Former white ball skipper Wanindu Hasaranga has been left out of the T20I squad and is unlikely to be considered for the ODIs either, with concerns over his attitude understood to have ruffled feathers within the hierarchy.

Hasaranga was sent home midway through the recent tour of England after an unusual sequence of events. It is understood that the leg-spinner had gone to watch a football match and on his return, complained of back pain that ruled him out of the opening ODI. SLC subsequently decided to send him home. Although the injury was considered only a minor niggle, the selectors now appear ready to draw a line in the sand by overlooking him for the Pakistan games.

Test captain Dhananjaya de Silva is also on shaky ground. He is expected to lose the captaincy and could even struggle to retain his place in the playing XI. Kusal Mendis, who leads Sri Lanka in limited-overs cricket, is expected to take over the Test reins on an interim basis.

The Cricket Transformation Committee is also looking at clipping the wings of players who spend considerable time on the franchise circuit. One proposal would restrict a player to two overseas franchise tournaments, while players could also be required to leave their franchise commitments and report to Colombo at least a week before Sri Lanka embark on an international assignment.

The arrival of several players in England directly from franchise commitments in the Caribbean is understood to have gone down badly in some quarters.

With the old guard under scrutiny, opportunity is knocking for several youngsters who have put their hands up in domestic cricket. A number of them are expected to be blooded during the Pakistan tour as Sri Lanka begin building towards next year’s World Cup.

The winds of change are not confined to the dressing room either.

Moves are also under way to overhaul the administration of Sri Lanka Cricket. The Cricket Transformation Committee is understood to be unimpressed with the returns delivered by some of the board’s highest paid executives but has little room to manoeuvre until their contracts expire. The absence of exit clauses in some of those agreements has proved a costly administrative blunder.

Meanwhile, the proposed new constitution for SLC is gathering momentum, with its architects hoping to transform the governing body into a more professional organisation in keeping with some of the leading cricket boards around the world.

Similar reforms were proposed in 2015 when Sidath Wettimuny headed an interim administration with the backing of then Sports Minister Navin Dissanayake. A new constitution was drafted by respected legal scholar Prasanna Jayawardena, but the government of the day showed little appetite to push the reforms through and eventually handed the reins back to elected officials.

Had those reforms been implemented in 2015, SLC might have emerged as a far more robust institution. Instead, elected administrations continued to call the shots, too often with little long term vision or pragmatism.

Public criticism over the manner in which SLC has been administered has mounted over the years, leaving the government with something approaching Hobson’s choice. It eventually decided to take the bull by the horns despite the risk of suspension by the global governing body in Dubai.

In a shrewd move, the government brought respected former players Sidath Wettimuny, Roshan Mahanama and Kumar Sangakkara into the committee overseeing cricket affairs during the transition, lending considerable credibility to the reform process.

The new constitution is expected to be in place by the end of the year, although legal challenges appear inevitable.

As The Sunday Island has previously reported, several leading lawyers were beneficiaries of the previous SLC administration’s willingness to spend record sums on legal fees. With another battle looming, it would hardly raise eyebrows if some of the same legal eagles were soon singing for their supper again.

Continue Reading

Sports

Beyond Tharanga’s gold: a look back at Sri Lanka’s track and field showing

Published

on

by Reemus Fernando

‎Sri Lanka’s track and field team may have failed to match the medal haul of the previous edition at the Asian Games, but athletes from the 24-member squad finished among the top eight in at least seven events, a feat few countries managed. Those performances did not receive the recognition they deserved, as the spotlight fell on Rumesh Tharanga’s historic javelin gold.

‎At the 2023 edition in China, Sri Lanka won one gold, one silver and two bronze medals. This time, the team won only one gold.

‎Thanks to Tharanga’s victory, Sri Lanka finished 13th in the medal table. China dominated with 39 medals, including 17 golds. Hosts Japan were second with 32 medals (10 golds), followed by Bahrain (9), Thailand (3) and Uzbekistan (3) in third, fourth and fifth places respectively, each winning more than one gold.

‎Neighbours India, sixth with one gold, nine silvers and 14 bronzes, were the only other South Asian country besides Sri Lanka to win a track and field medal at this edition.

‎Every Sri Lankan athlete who competed in Japan has a remarkable story. Persevering in a sport that offers so few rewards is itself worth celebrating.

‎Take Dilhani Lekamge, who won silver in 2023. As highlighted in these columns last week, her perseverance deserves recognition. Some of her teammates were toddlers, or not yet born, when Lekamge took up javelin as a schoolgirl. At 39, she placed fifth with a throw of 59.27m, a distance that would have earned at least a bronze at three of the past six editions. Sumedha Ranasinghe, the country’s first Olympic thrower, could not produce his best, yet still finished sixth with a throw of 78.08m.

‎Tharanga explained on his return that Sri Lanka’s hurdlers felt the barriers coming at them closer than usual on the faster track, which left them short of their personal bests. Even so, Ayomal Akalanka finished fifth in the 400m hurdles final in 49.37s, the second-fastest time by a Sri Lankan in history. Akalanka has produced personal bests at crucial overseas meets since his youth and junior years, and his coach Anura Bandara, no stranger to coaching Asian Games medallists, had hoped for something special in Japan. “There was a slight problem with his hamstring over the ninth hurdle in the heats. If not for that injury, he would have done better and secured a good lane in the final,” Bandara told The Sunday Island on their return.

‎As the brightest hurdles prospect to emerge from the junior structure, Akalanka has many years ahead of him and should be earmarked for sustained investment.

‎The women’s 4x400m relay team included two members of the bronze-winning quartet from the last edition, Nadeesha Ramanayake and Lakshima Mendis. Ramanayake and Tharushi Karunaratne, who won a historic 800m gold in 2023, were in superb form then, and their contributions were key to the relay podium finish. Tharushi was absent this time, as her performances had begun to fade after she moved to the USA for training and studies. Ramanayake and Mendis were joined by Araliya Sathsarani and Jithma Wijeythunga, and the team placed seventh in the final (3:34.90), the third-fastest time in the country’s history.

‎Veteran sprinter Kalinga Kumarage reached the final and clocked 46.31 seconds.

‎The men’s 4x100m relay team (seventh in the final) and triple jumper Madushani Herath (eighth) were the other top-eight finishers.

Continue Reading

Trending