Connect with us

Opinion

The great escape

Published

on

Bogambara Prison

On 7 April 1942, four political prisoners escaped from Bogambara Prison

Ask modern Sri Lankans what 5 April signifies for them, and most will answer “the JVP uprising in 1971.” Not surprising, since the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna celebrates this event each year.

However, 5 April has greater significance for Sri Lankans than this. In 1956, the general election began on this day, resulting in the overthrow of the UNP regime of 1947, which had continued the colonialist policies of the British Empire. The new government began to put in place a new political, social and economic order, one more suited to a nation throwing off its colonial past.

Which takes us back to 1942. Sri Lanka remained a part of the British Empire, the mightiest ever seen hitherto. The country’s wealth flowed into the coffers of England, while its citizens remained immiserated, third-class citizens in their own country. But a change approached, from the East. On 8 December 1941, the Japanese invaded British Malaya. On 15 February, the myth of British invincibility lay broken as Singapore fell. My late father told me that the British in Sri Lanka went around “like whipped dogs”.

On 5 April, carrier-borne aeroplanes of the Imperial Japanese Navy attacked Colombo, causing severe damage to British military installations. The effects of the attack were electric. The British panicked, expecting further air raids (which happened) and an invasion (which did not). The British Eastern Fleet pulled back to East Africa. The population of Colombo decamped overnight. Chaos reigned. Two days later, on the night of 7 April, four socialist political prisoners escaped from Bogambara Prison.

The story of their escape really begins in 1927, when Philip Gunawardena, a young student in the USA, joined the League against Imperialism. In 1929-31 he served on the executive council of the League, which had as its avowed aim the liberation of the colonies, which included Sri Lanka.  He gathered around him a body of Sri Lankan students overseas, who shared his perspective. This political stance saw its first domestic expression at the Youth Congress in 1931, at which a resolution called for “downright unadulterated independence”.

As the students overseas returned, they joined their co-thinkers in the Youth League movement. In 1933 they established the Suriya-Mal Movement, led by an Englishwoman, Doreen Young. The following year they went to work among the victims of the Malaria epidemic, which affected a million people. They made a name for themselves by distributing quinine for malaria and Marmite for malnutrition.

In 1935 they went on to form the Lanka Sama Samaja Party, a socialist organisation with the primary aim of independence from the British Raj. The following year Philip Gunawardena and N.M. Perera gained election to the State Council, where they raised vital issues, such as the use of Sinhala and Tamil, and free education.

LSSP agitation among workers, particularly among plantation workers, rang alarm bells in the offices of the occupation power. This rose to a crescendo when Mark Bracegirdle, an Anglo-Australian planter, joined the party. Governor Stubbs’ failed attempt to deport him caused a furore which, in effect, kick-started the independence movement.

With the collapse of France in the Second World War, the British began clamping down on dissent, especially as LSSP-led strikes broke out all over Nuwara Eliya and Uva. In mid-June 1940 the government arrested Philip Gunawardena, N. M. Perera, Colvin R. de Silva, and Edmund Samarakkody.

The Police failed to capture Leslie Goonewardena: experience gained (principally by Philip’s brother Robert Gunawardena) in hiding Bracegirdle helped the LSSP to work under the noses of the authorities. Although the Party press was sealed, the party organ, the Samasamajaya continued to appear, along with leaflets in Tamil and English. The party even organised a secret conference, which adopted a new programme and constitution.

Meanwhile, the detained Party leaders at Bogambara did not waste their time. N.M. used his time to work on The Case for Free Education (a basal document in the struggle for an equitable education system), while Philip worked on the concept agricultural reform (which formed the kernel of the Paddy Lands Act, which he introduced to Parliament in 1958).

They won over Solomon, one of their jailors, and with his help they managed to leave the prison on several occasions. Now, the party planned to get them out for good. Solomon got an imprint of the key on a bar of soap and Philip’s wife Kusuma, who visited the prisoners, took it out with her. She gave it to Robert, who cut the key.

Robert had the task of guiding them once they escaped. According to Regi Siriwardena, the escape on 7 April 1942 was fairly straightforward, with Solomon simply opening their cells and leading them out. Robert escorted them to several cars which were parked outside, and they made off as fast as possible. The Party hid them in several safe houses.

Regi Siriwardena reported that Doric de Souza had set him up in one of these, two weeks before the prison break, to provide cover. Colvin and Solomon arrived on the night of 8 April. Regi served as a courier between Colvin and Philip. He also had a hand in the editorial of the Samasamajaya, and Solomon later would edit the Party’s Tamil organ, the Samadharmam.

The escape infuriated the colonial authorities, who suppressed the LSSP completely. British imperial prestige, already at an all-time low following the fall of Singapore and the Japanese raid on Sri Lanka, fell even further. A month later, on 8 May, Sri Lankan troops belonging to the Ceylon Garrison Artillery stationed in the Cocos Island mutinied. The mutiny was suppressed, but its leader, Gratien Fernando (whom the LSSP’s anti-imperialist agitation had affected) went to his execution unrepentant. Thereafter, anti-colonial agitation referred to the Cocos Islands Mutiny as resistance to British colonial rule grew.

About three months after the prison break, many of the leaders escaped to India, where they took part in the Indian struggle for independence. Their contribution to India’s independence was disproportionate to their numbers. Most of the leaders were arrested before the end of the war, and were deported to Sri Lanka.

Some stayed on: S.C.C. Anthonypillai (who married Philip’s sister Caroline) led a major trade union in Tamil Nadu. Hector Abhayavardana went on to become general secretary of the Socialist Party of India, returning to Sri Lanka and the LSSP in 1959. N.M.’s wife Selina Perera remained an activist in Kolkata. Over a half-century later, the Indian Government honoured three of the surviving LSSP cadres who had taken part in the struggle – Vivienne Goonewardena, Bernard Soysa and Hector Abhayavardana.

The LSSP continued its underground agitation in Sri Lanka. It participated in the fight for free education and successfully raised anti-imperialist feeling in the country. In 1943 the Ceylon National Congress voted in support of Independence. Eventually the State Council passed the “Free Lanka Bill”.

The proscription on the Party ended after the war, and in 1946 the Party led a strike wave. This enabled D.S. Senanayake, Oliver Ernest Goonetilleka and other “moderates” to raise the bogie of communism and persuade the British to grant Sri Lanka dominion status.

The escape of the detenus from Bogamabara on 7 April 1942 thus had a profound effect on the British Raj in both India and Sri Lanka. However, this important event  is rarely, if ever commemorated.

Vinod Moonesinghe



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Lankan hotels and price discrimination

Published

on

In planning a long trip to Sri Lanka from the UK, I was disappointed to see different hotel pricing for foreign visitors when compared to local rates. Like many travellers, I prefer to book directly with hotels, rather than international hotel consolidators, as more money goes to local businesses. But the assumption that foreigners should pay more is simply distasteful. As such, I’ve chosen another long-haul destination that does not follow such practices, and hope that Sri Lanka will change its approach to overseas visitors in the near future.

Neil Roskilly Wetherlee UK

Continue Reading

Opinion

When will this craziness end?

Published

on

Trump with his ‘FIFA Peace Medal

We are living in ‘Trump times’ characterised by never ending craziness but it is not confined to the USA alone. I will come to our part of the world later. As a large part is due to Trump, perhaps, normalcy may return when he ends his second term on 20th January 2029, at 12.00PM Eastern Standard Time. We cannot be sure of that either because the ‘Great man’ may decide to govern the world for ever, after having purchased Greenland and forcing Canada to be the 51st state of the US!

Trump had an unprecedented opportunity, being only the second to be elected to a non-consecutive second term as the US President, the other being Grover Cleveland at the tail end of the nineteenth century. If only he kept to his campaign promises, his name would have been written in history in golden letters but the complete transformation, following the election, is likely to make his name go down as one of the craziest!

It is a moot point whether even Trump knows what he is going to do that day, when he wakes up, considering the illogicality of some actions, best illustrated by the ad-hoc imposition of tariffs without any discussions or negotiations. The adverse effects of these, to the world economy, is yet to be seen compounded, of course, by the continuing war with Iran. He promised to be a ‘Peace-maker’ but turns out to be a war-monger, like many of his predecessors! His excuse was that he went to war because he was denied the Nobel Peace Prize.

Well, he got the FIFA Peace Prize from FIFA President Gianni Infantino, another shameless leader who is ruining the ‘Beautiful Game’. When a US team member was given the red-card, Trump, who claims to know better than referees, decided it was not so, with a successful appeal to Infantino. During the next World Cup match, Belgium, supercharged with this injustice, thrashed the USA team 4-1.

Even the Semiquincentennial celebration of the US was not about the country but about himself! In fact, a cynic may point out that most of what the US has left behind, over the 250 years, is death and destruction. Paradoxically, whilst fighting a war with Iran to prevent it acquiring nuclear capabilities, the US is the only country to have dropped Atom Bombs, not one but two. Even though Japan was on the verge of admitting defeat, ‘Little Boy’, a uranium-based bomb, was dropped over Hiroshima on 6th August, 1945. Not giving time for Japan even to consider surrender, the second ‘Fat Man’, a plutonium implosion bomb, was dropped over Nagasaki, just three days later. Why did the US drop two A-bombs in rapid succession? It was to test the two different types of bombs they had.

Over the past 250 years, the US has started wars in many countries and, in most instances, lost leaving behind a trail of devastation and destruction. In spite of all that, it is continuing its war with Iran, a war that was started with false intelligence supplied by the war-monger Netanyahu who predicted the instantaneous fall of the Clerical regime in Iran. This war has turned out to be a blessing in disguise for Iran, as it realised the economic value of the Strait of Hormuz. The language Trump uses in reference to Iran is despicable. What sane person, nay a world leader, refers to flattening of a country and erasure of a civilisation?

Back in Sri Lanka, we know that most of our modern-day politicians are also self-serving. They are also very good at amassing wealth, when in power, just like the Trump family had done. However, what is of concern is the rapid decline in the standards of some vital professional classes. Special reference has to be made to the Attorney-General’s Department. Perhaps, the present holder is a decent man but some of his predecessors brought the high position into disrepute.

Dappula Livera allegedly concocted a conspiracy theory about the Easter Sunday terror mastermind as President Gotabaya Rajapaksa denied him an extension in service as the Attorney General. If he has any information about such a conspiracy, it is his bounden duty to come out with facts but has not done so.

A remark recently made by Deputy Solicitor General Dileepa Pieris about gallantry medals awarded to military personnel is said to have caused an affront to the dignity of Air Force officer Shantha Jayathilleke, who has received the highest decoration awarded to a living officer and sought to represent the interests of former Director of State Intelligence Service Maj. Gen. (retd.) Suresh Sallay as permitted by the Penal Code.

When political leaders and professionals holding high office behave in this manner, is there any hope for the nation?

By Dr. Upul Wijayawardhana

Continue Reading

Opinion

Prime Minister’s contribution to education reforms

Published

on

PM Dr. Amarasuriya

Education has always been one of the strongest foundations of Sri Lanka’s social and economic development. In today’s rapidly changing world, however, education must prepare students not only for examinations but also for life, employment, innovation, and responsible citizenship. Recognising this need, the government of Sri Lanka has introduced a new programme of education reforms. As Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya has played a leading role in guiding and promoting these reforms, with the aim of creating a more inclusive, modern, and student-centered education system.

One of the Prime Minister’s most significant contributions has been providing a clear vision for transforming the education system. Rather than focusing only on examination results, the reforms seek to develop students’ creativity, critical thinking, communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and emotional well-being. This approach recognizes that success in the twenty-first century requires a broad range of skills that go beyond memorisation.

A major feature of the reforms is the introduction of a new curriculum. The Prime Minister has emphasised that revised syllabuses will be introduced in stages, beginning with Grades 1 and 6, before expanding to other grades over the following years. The updated curriculum is designed to make learning more engaging, practical, and relevant to modern society. It encourages inquiry-based learning, teamwork, creativity, and the application of knowledge to real-life situations rather than relying solely on textbook learning.

Teacher development has also been identified as a key priority. The Prime Minister has repeatedly stressed that meaningful reforms cannot succeed without well-trained and motivated teachers. As a result, the government has planned professional development programmes to help teachers understand the new curriculum, adopt modern teaching methods, and integrate digital technology into classroom instruction. Strengthening teachers’ skills ensures that students receive a higher quality education and are better prepared for future challenges.

Improving school infrastructure is another important contribution under the Prime Minister’s leadership. Many schools across Sri Lanka continue to face shortages of classrooms, laboratories, libraries, and digital learning facilities. The reform programme aims to reduce these disparities by giving priority to improving physical infrastructure, upgrading learning environments, and ensuring that children from rural and urban areas have more equal educational opportunities. These investments are expected to create safer, more effective, and more inclusive learning spaces for all students.

The reforms also place strong emphasis on digital education. As technology continues to shape every aspect of modern life, students need digital literacy to succeed in higher education and future careers. The Prime Minister has supported initiatives to expand the use of digital tools in teaching and learning while encouraging schools to make greater use of educational technology. By promoting digital learning, the reforms seek to narrow the technological gap between schools and prepare students for a knowledge-based economy.

Another noteworthy contribution is the promotion of vocational and skills-based education. Traditional education has often placed greater emphasis on academic achievement, while practical skills received less attention. The new reforms aim to change this balance by introducing vocational subjects within the school system and creating clearer pathways for students who wish to pursue technical and vocational careers. This approach helps students develop employable skills while supporting the country’s economic growth and workforce needs.

The Prime Minister has also encouraged a more balanced approach to student assessment. Instead of measuring success only through final examinations, the reforms seek to include continuous assessment, classroom activities, projects, and practical learning experiences. Such an approach recognises different learning styles and provides students with more opportunities to demonstrate their abilities. It also reduces excessive pressure associated with high-stakes examinations and supports the overall development of children.

Inclusivity is another important aspect of the Prime Minister’s contribution. The reform process has involved experts, educators, and advisory committees representing diverse communities. The government has emphasised that curriculum development should reflect fairness, inclusiveness, and respect for Sri Lanka’s multicultural society. By involving different stakeholders in the planning process, the reforms aim to build a national education system that serves all children equally.

Despite these promising initiatives, implementing large-scale education reforms is not without challenges. Teacher training, infrastructure development, adequate funding, and effective monitoring are essential for the long-term success of the programme. Public awareness and cooperation among parents, teachers, school administrators, and policymakers will also play a vital role in ensuring that the reforms achieve their intended outcomes. Sustained commitment from the government and continuous evaluation will be necessary to address emerging issues and improve implementation over time.

The Prime Minister of Sri Lanka has made a significant contribution to the country’s new education reforms by promoting a modern, inclusive, and future-oriented vision for education. Through curriculum modernization, teacher development, improved infrastructure, digital learning, vocational education, and better assessment methods, the reforms seek to prepare students not only for examinations but also for lifelong learning and responsible citizenship. If implemented successfully, these reforms have the potential to strengthen Sri Lanka’s education system, reduce inequalities, and equip future generations with the knowledge, skills, and values needed to contribute positively to national development in an increasingly competitive global environment.

Saumya Aloysius
saumyaaloysius@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Trending