Connect with us

Features

The Easter Sunday Attack:‘A Grand Political Plot’

Published

on

By Kingsley Wickremasuriya, PhD
E-mail: kingsley.wickremasuriya@gmail.com

Introduction

April this year marked the fourt anniversary of the Easter Sunday bomb attack which rocked and shocked Sri Lanka and the world. In retrospect, on the morning of that fateful Easter Sunday, April 21, 2019 suicide bombers targeted three plush hotels and three churches in Colombo, Negombo, and Batticaloa; over 260 were killed and over 500 injured in the well-coordinated near-simultaneous attacks by a group of Islamic extremists called the National Thawheek Jamaat allegedly subscribing to Islamic ideology of JIHAD associated with group with suspected foreign links, that has previously targeted and

Two of the three churches attacked were Catholic churches. One was St. Anthony’s Church in Kochchikade, Colombo, and the other was St. Sebastian’s Church in Katuwapitiya, Negombo. The third church under attack was the Protestant evangelical Zion Church in Batticaloa. The attacks affected the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka directly as many of the victims were Catholics.

The three hotels targeted were the Shangri-La, Kingsbury, and Cinnamon Grand in Colombo. Several of the victims were foreign nationals. Two other persons connected to the Islamic Jihad Movement were killed in two separate explosions in Dehiwala and Dematagoda. Most of the innocents killed, maimed, and injured were people engaged in morning worship at the churches or guests having breakfast in the hotels.

Shortly afterward, , a propaganda outlet for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), claimed that ISIL inspired the attacks. It released a photo and a video showing eight suicide bombers pledging allegiance to ISIL leader . Zahran Hashim of the NTJ was identified as their leader.

On April 6, Public Security Minister Sarath Weerasekara stated at a press conference that the Intelligence Services had identified Naufer Moulavi as the mastermind behind the attacks. The Minister also said that he was then in remand custody. Making a special statement in Parliament on April 10, he confirmed his statement to the press that Naufer Moulavi was the main person behind the Easter Sunday terror attacks. Following these disclosures, the national and international media went to town with the revelation that the Sri Lankan Government Minister had identified Naufer Moulavi as the mastermind behind the attack.

State Defense Minister , however, had said earlier, that initial investigations have revealed that Islamic extremists “carried out the attacks in retaliation for the ,’’ a place far removed from the scene of the explosion here. This has been questioned by New Zealand’s Prime Minister and by other experts, who saw the Easter attacks as planned before the Christchurch incident. Further, the New Zealand security expert Paul Buchanan stated that “Christchurch seems to be a convenient justification for something that was being planned before March 15”.

The Amaq news agency’s statements emphasized that the attacks were against Christians who were at war with the organization but none of them referenced the Christchurch incident. But Sri Lanka was not part of the anti-ISIL coalition and the overwhelming majority of those killed in the bombings were Sri Lankan citizen. Further, according to the Criminal Investigation Department, there was no evidence of ISIL’s direct involvement. It was evident that Tawheed Jamaat has been stockpiling explosives since January 2019. Even though it was claimed that the incident was inspired by ISIL, the available evidence was to the contrary.

Meanwhile, Malcolm Cardinal , the head of Sri Lanka’s Catholic Church, alleged that the massacre wasn’t purely the work of a few Islamic extremists but was part of a grand political plot, and that the attacks were conducted intentionally to win votes. He further alleged that the culprits are still holding high positions in the police and Military Intelligence and that the government has been covering up the investigations to protect the real culprits. Expressing dissatisfaction with the progress of the investigation and alleging intimidation of those who clamor for justice, the cardinal called on the UN to investigate the bombings. Even some prominent Buddhist monks contributed to this theory and alleged that “selfish politicians directed the blind rage of religious extremists to achieve political ends”.

Quoting from the report of the President’s Commission on the attack, chapter and verse, in support of his allegation, His Eminence pointed the finger at the former chief of intelligence, and other top-level officials including the Police, for their failure to prevent the attacks. ‘They knew beforehand from the information they had gathered and also from warnings given by the Indian intelligence services, but they did nothing. The Government seems to have done its best to prevent the arrest of the attackers. There are indications that the authorities wanted the attacks to be carried out, he alleged.

Quoting further excerpts from the Presidential Commission Report and other authentic sources, he said that the available evidence indicates that the Government may have been motivated by electoral gain. While Cardinal was making these allegations, Rev. Father Cyril Gamini, spokesman for the Committee of Catholics pointed out several issues regarding some serious lapses in the investigations in a telecast over ‘You Tube’. He also based his arguments on authentic sources like the proceedings of the Presidential Commission and the Parliamentary Select Committee.

These arguments were buttressed by the Opposition in the Parliament during a parliamentary debate on the appointment of a Select Committee on the attack suggesting that it was the work of a Special Operation of an Intelligence Service. Besides, the fact that the former Attorney – General is on record having said that there is a conspiracy behind the incident goes to add further weight against those who the allegations have been made against.

Call for justice

It is against this backdrop that the Cardinal has been repeatedly demanding justice for the victims and their families for a long time. In March this year, he issued what was termed by the media as an ultimatum to the government. The news story stated that the ‘Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith yesterday warned that countrywide protests would be held if the Government failed to produce before Courts by April 21, those behind the Easter Sunday attacks. “We urge the Government to investigate the attacks impartially and transparently. At least take action against those named in the Presidential Commission on Easter Sunday attacks before April 21. Otherwise, we will hold a continuous protest,” the Cardinal warned. Going by the turn of events, the Cardinal is not likely to rest until the ‘true masterminds’ behind the carnage are identified and penalized.

Conclusions

The incident reveals serious criminal offenses committed against the State putting its security in jeopardy. The offenses of this nature are punishable under the ‘offences against the state’ specified in chapter VI of the Penal Code. It covers a range of offenses relevant to the incident, including conspiracy, abetting and concealment. These offenses carry punishments from death, or imprisonment of either description, which may be extended to 20 years, and the forfeiture of the offender’s property.

But one has to admit that the offenders can be brought to justice only after a fair and impartial criminal investigation and thereafter arraignment before a court of law after a fair trial in keeping with the Rule of Law. That is what the aggrieved parties have been clamoring for. However, from the material exposed so far it appears that the criminal investigations have been obstructed at several points down the line.

Names of several high-ranking officers in the Police and State Intelligence Services have transpired during the course of the Presidential Commission, Select Committee proceedings, debates in Parliament and elsewhere in the Press and Media. Allegations have been made against them by the Church authorities and the aggrieved parties. But these accusations or allegations have not been processed through the criminal justice system. As far as the country is concerned, they have broken the sacred trust the country placed in them.

Presidential Commissions or Select Committees, will not help to clear the air. They will, whatever the picture their sponsors might try to paint to exculpate them, therefore, remain ’guilty’ in the national conscience. As such if they continue to hold those high positions without being cleared through the criminal justice system their credibility will be at stake. They will be watched by the Nation at every move they make with suspicion that will make them vulnerable in their own commands.

Moreover, the attack has all the characteristics of a Special Operation conducted by an Intelligence organization. But without a proper investigation one cannot prove, who is responsible; whether it is the work of a foreign intelligence service or our own or a combination of both.

It has been said that among the growing arsenals across the world, intelligence is an essential weapon, perhaps the most important, and that intelligence is necessary for democracies to avoid disaster and possibly destruction. In other words, ‘Intelligence Organizations are an inevitable part of modern states as armies, telephones, and postal services or a system of collecting taxes’.

Intelligence Organizations have now come to play an ever-increasingly important role. They are a part of the defense forces of a country. Their task is the defense of the realm as a whole from external and internal threats arising from attempts at espionage and sabotage or from actions of persons and organizations whether directed from within or without the country that may be considered subversive of the state’s security. They not only act as the eyes and ears of governments but also as their policy instruments.

One must therefore, accept that intelligence organizations are a reality in modern National and International life in a world that is no longer ruled by ‘negotiation between gentlemen, but rather by plots, revolutions, conspiracies, assassinations, coups d’états, and general mayhem. As such there is an inherent danger within the system itself.

Firstly, intelligence organizations can misinform their governments by providing false information, because the information has been planted on them by a hostile service through a double agent; a sycophantic Intelligence Organization believes that it should provide information that its Masters want to hear; that it has become a representative of a vested interest; and that the Service is thoroughly incompetent that it invents its information and create a non-existent source to cover up its failure. This danger is increased substantially where the Intelligence Organizations control paramilitary forces. They can be real dangers to their states because they represent or can represent conspiratorial power points

Intelligence services are specially trained to carry out covert operations while on the other hand the main task of the Police is the prevention of crimes and offenses. Therefore, it is unimaginable to find any State Intelligence Service or the Police working in concert with subversives against the grain of their basic responsibilities under the very nose of the State. This is why it is doubly important not to have any doubts left as to who was responsible for the attack and who the mastermind behind was.

The trade of intelligence, therefore, is not everyone’s cup of tea.

Intelligence Organizations, should be highly professional and their management should, be in the hands of men of first-rate ability, imagination, and integrity. In the last analysis, however, the truth is that the intelligence organizations are as competent or incompetent as the governments who control them.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Digital transformation in the Global South

Published

on

AI Summit, India

Understanding Sri Lanka through the India AI Impact Summit 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly moved from being a specialised technological field into a major social force that shapes economies, cultures, governance, and everyday human life. The India AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi, symbolised a significant moment for the Global South, especially South Asia, because it demonstrated that artificial intelligence is no longer limited to advanced Western economies but can also become a development tool for emerging societies. The summit gathered governments, researchers, technology companies, and international organisations to discuss how AI can support social welfare, public services, and economic growth. Its central message was that artificial intelligence should be human centred and socially useful. Instead of focusing only on powerful computing systems, the summit emphasised affordable technologies, open collaboration, and ethical responsibility so that ordinary citizens can benefit from digital transformation. For South Asia, where large populations live in rural areas and resources are unevenly distributed, this idea is particularly important.

People friendly AI

One of the most important concepts promoted at the summit was the idea of “people friendly AI.” This means that artificial intelligence should be accessible, understandable, and helpful in daily activities. In South Asia, language diversity and economic inequality often prevent people from using advanced technology. Therefore, systems designed for local languages, and smartphones, play a crucial role. When a farmer can speak to a digital assistant in Sinhala, Tamil, or Hindi and receive advice about weather patterns or crop diseases, technology becomes practical rather than distant. Similarly, voice based interfaces allow elderly people and individuals with limited literacy to use digital services. Affordable mobile based AI tools reduce the digital divide between urban and rural populations. As a result, artificial intelligence stops being an elite instrument and becomes a social assistant that supports ordinary life.

Transformation in education sector

The influence of this transformation is visible in education. AI based learning platforms can analyse student performance and provide personalised lessons. Instead of all students following the same pace, weaker learners receive additional practice while advanced learners explore deeper material. Teachers are able to focus on mentoring and explanation rather than repetitive instruction. In many South Asian societies, including Sri Lanka, education has long depended on memorisation and private tuition classes. AI tutoring systems could reduce educational inequality by giving rural students access to learning resources, similar to those available in cities. A student who struggles with mathematics, for example, can practice step by step exercises automatically generated according to individual mistakes. This reduces pressure, improves confidence, and gradually changes the educational culture from rote learning toward understanding and problem solving.

Healthcare is another area where AI is becoming people friendly. Many rural communities face shortages of doctors and medical facilities. AI-assisted diagnostic tools can analyse symptoms, or medical images, and provide early warnings about diseases. Patients can receive preliminary advice through mobile applications, which helps them decide whether hospital visits are necessary. This reduces overcrowding in hospitals and saves travel costs. Public health authorities can also analyse large datasets to monitor disease outbreaks and allocate resources efficiently. In this way, artificial intelligence supports not only individual patients but also the entire health system.

Agriculture, which remains a primary livelihood for millions in South Asia, is also undergoing transformation. Farmers traditionally rely on seasonal experience, but climate change has made weather patterns unpredictable. AI systems that analyse rainfall data, soil conditions, and satellite images can predict crop performance and recommend irrigation schedules. Early detection of plant diseases prevents large-scale crop losses. For a small farmer, accurate information can mean the difference between profit and debt. Thus, AI directly influences economic stability at the household level.

Employment and communication reshaped

Artificial intelligence is also reshaping employment and communication. Routine clerical and repetitive tasks are increasingly automated, while demand grows for digital skills, such as data management, programming, and online services. Many young people in South Asia are beginning to participate in remote work, freelancing, and digital entrepreneurship. AI translation tools allow communication across languages, enabling businesses to reach international customers. Knowledge becomes more accessible because information can be summarised, translated, and explained instantly. This leads to a broader sociological shift: authority moves from tradition and hierarchy toward information and analytical reasoning. Individuals rely more on data when making decisions about education, finance, and career planning.

Impact on Sri Lanka

The impact on Sri Lanka is especially significant because the country shares many social and economic conditions with India and often adopts regional technological innovations. Sri Lanka has already begun integrating artificial intelligence into education, agriculture, and public administration. In schools and universities, AI learning tools may reduce the heavy dependence on private tuition and help students in rural districts receive equal academic support. In agriculture, predictive analytics can help farmers manage climate variability, improving productivity and food security. In public administration, digital systems can speed up document processing, licensing, and public service delivery. Smart transportation systems may reduce congestion in urban areas, saving time and fuel.

Economic opportunities are also expanding. Sri Lanka’s service based economy and IT outsourcing sector can benefit from increased global demand for digital skills. AI-assisted software development, data annotation, and online service platforms can create new employment pathways, especially for educated youth. Small and medium entrepreneurs can use AI tools to design products, manage finances, and market services internationally at low cost. In tourism, personalised digital assistants and recommendation systems can improve visitor experiences and help small businesses connect with travellers directly.

Digital inequality

However, the integration of artificial intelligence also raises serious concerns. Digital inequality may widen if only educated urban populations gain access to technological skills. Some routine jobs may disappear, requiring workers to retrain. There are also risks of misinformation, surveillance, and misuse of personal data. Ethical regulation and transparency are, therefore, essential. Governments must develop policies that protect privacy, ensure accountability, and encourage responsible innovation. Public awareness and digital literacy programmes are necessary so that citizens understand both the benefits and limitations of AI systems.

Beyond economics and services, AI is gradually influencing social relationships and cultural patterns. South Asian societies have traditionally relied on hierarchy and personal authority, but data-driven decision making changes this structure. Agricultural planning may depend on predictive models rather than ancestral practice, and educational evaluation may rely on learning analytics instead of examination rankings alone. This does not eliminate human judgment, but it alters its basis. Societies increasingly value analytical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. Educational systems must, therefore, move beyond memorisation toward critical thinking and interdisciplinary learning.

AI contribution to national development

In Sri Lanka, these changes may contribute to national development if implemented carefully. AI-supported financial monitoring can improve transparency and reduce corruption. Smart infrastructure systems can help manage transportation and urban planning. Communication technologies can support interaction among Sinhala, Tamil, and English speakers, promoting social inclusion in a multilingual society. Assistive technologies can improve accessibility for persons with disabilities, enabling broader participation in education and employment. These developments show that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological innovation but a social instrument capable of strengthening equality when guided by ethical policy.

Symbolic shift

Ultimately, the India AI Impact Summit 2026 represents a symbolic shift in the global technological landscape. It indicates that developing nations are beginning to shape the future of artificial intelligence according to their own social needs rather than passively importing technology. For South Asia and Sri Lanka, the challenge is not whether AI will arrive but how it will be used. If education systems prepare citizens, if governments establish responsible regulations, and if access remains inclusive, AI can become a partner in development rather than a source of inequality. The future will likely involve close collaboration between humans and intelligent systems, where machines assist decision making while human values guide outcomes. In this sense, artificial intelligence does not replace human society, but transforms it, offering Sri Lanka an opportunity to build a more knowledge based, efficient, and equitable social order in the decades ahead.

by Milinda Mayadunna

Continue Reading

Features

Governance cannot be a postscript to economics

Published

on

Kristalina-Georgieva

The visit by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to Sri Lanka was widely described as a success for the government. She was fulsome in her praise of the country and its developmental potential. The grounds for this success and collaborative spirit go back to the inception of the agreement signed in March 2023 in the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s declaration of international bankruptcy. The IMF came in to fulfil its role as lender of last resort. The government of the day bit the bullet. It imposed unpopular policies on the people, most notably significant tax increases. At a moment when the country had run out of foreign exchange, defaulted on its debt, and faced shortages of fuel, medicine and food, the IMF programme restored a measure of confidence both within the country and internationally.

Since 1965 Sri Lanka has entered into agreements with the IMF on 16 occasions none of which were taken to their full term. The present agreement is the 17th agreement . IMF agreements have traditionally been focused on economic restructuring. Invariably the terms of agreement have been harsh on the people, with priority being given to ensure the debtor country pays its loans back to the IMF. Fiscal consolidation, tax increases, subsidy reductions and structural reforms have been the recurring features. The social and political costs have often been high. Governments have lost popularity and sometimes fallen before programmes were completed. The IMF has learned from experience across the world that macroeconomic reform without social protection can generate backlash, instability and policy reversals.

The experience of countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal in dealing with the IMF during the eurozone crisis demonstrated the political and social costs of austerity, even though those economies later stabilised and returned to growth. The evolution of IMF policies has ensured that there are two special features in the present agreement. The first is that the IMF has included a safety net of social welfare spending to mitigate the impact of the austerity measures on the poorest sections of the population. No country can hope to grow at 7 or 8 percent per annum when a third of its people are struggling to survive. Poverty alleviation measures in the Aswesuma programme, developed with the agreement of the IMF, are key to mitigating the worst impacts of the rising cost of living and limited opportunities for employment.

Governance Included

The second important feature of the IMF agreement is the inclusion of governance criteria to be implemented alongside the economic reforms. It goes to the heart of why Sri Lanka has had to return to the IMF repeatedly. Economic mismanagement did not take place in a vacuum. It was enabled by weak institutions, politicised decision making, non-transparent procurement, and the erosion of checks and balances. In its economic reform process, the IMF has included an assessment of governance related issues to accompany the economic restructuring process. At the top of this list is tackling the problem of corruption by means of publicising contracts, ensuring open solicitation of tenders, and strengthening financial accountability mechanisms.

The IMF also encouraged a civil society diagnostic study and engaged with civil society organisations regularly. The civil society analysis of governance issues which was promoted by Verite Research and facilitated by Transparency International was wider in scope than those identified in the IMF’s own diagnostic. It pointed to systemic weaknesses that go beyond narrow fiscal concerns. The civil society diagnostic study included issues of social justice such as the inequitable impact of targeting EPF and ETF funds of workers for restructuring and the need to repeal abuse prone laws such as the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Online Safety Act. When workers see their retirement savings restructured without adequate consultation, confidence in policy making erodes. When laws are perceived to be instruments of arbitrary power, social cohesion weakens.

During a meeting between the IMF Managing Director Georgeiva and civil society members last week, there was discussion on the implementation of those governance measures in which she spoke in a manner that was not alien to the civil society representatives. Significantly, the civil society diagnostic report also referred to the ethnic conflict and the breakdown of interethnic relations that led to three decades of deadly war, causing severe economic losses to the country. This was also discussed at the meeting. Governance is not only about accounting standards and procurement rules. It is about social justice, equality before the law, and political representation. On this issue the government has more to do. Ethnic and religious minorities find themselves inadequately represented in high level government committees. The provincial council system that ensured ethnic and minority representation at the provincial level continues to be in abeyance.

Beyond IMF

The significance of addressing governance issues is not only relevant to the IMF agreement. It is also important in accessing tariff concessions from the European Union. The GSP Plus tariff concession given by the EU enables Sri Lankan exports to be sold at lower prices and win markets in Europe. For an export dependent economy, this is critical. Loss of such concessions would directly affect employment in key sectors such as apparel. The government needs to address longstanding EU concerns about the protection of human rights and labour rights in the country. The EU has, for several years, linked the continuation of GSP Plus to compliance with international conventions. This includes the condition that the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) be brought into line with international standards. The government’s alternative in the form of the draft Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PTSA) is less abusive on paper but is wider in scope and retains the core features of the PTA.

Governance and social justice factors cannot be ignored or downplayed in the pursuit of economic development. If Sri Lanka is to break out of its cycle of crisis and bailout, it must internalise the fact that good governance which promotes social justice and more fairly distributes the costs and fruits of development is the foundation on which durable economic growth is built. Without it, stabilisation will remain fragile, poverty will remain high, and the promise of 7 to 8 percent growth will remain elusive. The implementation of governance reforms will also have a positive effect through the creative mechanism of governance linked bonds, an innovation of the present IMF agreement.

The Sri Lankan think tank Verité Research played an important role in the development of governance linked bonds. They reduce the rate of interest payable by the government on outstanding debt on the basis that better governance leads to a reduction in risk for those who have lent their money to Sri Lanka. This is a direct financial reward for governance reform. The present IMF programme offers an opportunity not only to stabilise the economy but to strengthen the institutions that underpin it. That opportunity needs to be taken. Without it, the country cannot attract investment, expand exports and move towards shared prosperity and to a 7-8 percent growth rate that can lift the country out of its debt trap.

by Jehan Perera

Continue Reading

Features

MISTER Band … in the spotlight

Published

on

MISTER Band: For the past four consecutive years, they have performed overseas, during New Year’s Eve

It’s a good sign, indeed, for the local scene, to see artistes, who have not been very much in the limelight, now making their presence felt, in a big way, and I’m glad to give them the publicity they deserve.

On 10th February we had Yellow Beatz in the spotlight and this week it’s MISTER Band.

This outfit is certainly not new to our scene; they have been around since 2012, under the leadership of Sithum Waidyarathne.

The seven energetic members who make up MISTER Band are:

Sithum Waidyarathne (leader/founder/saxophonist/guitarist and vocalist), Rangana Seram (bass guitarist), Vihanga Liyanage (vocalist), Ridmi Dissanayake (female vocalist), Nuwan Cristo (keyboardist/vocalist), Kasun Thennakoon (lead guitarist), and Nuwan Madushanka (drummer).

According to Sithum, their vision is to provide high quality entertainmen to those who engage their services.

“Thanks to our engaging performances and growing popularity, MISTER Band continues to be in high demand … at weddings, corporate events and dinner dances,” said Sithum.

They predominantly cover English and Sinhala music, as well as the most popular genres.

And the reviews that come their way, after a performance, are excellent, they say, and this is one of the bouquets they received:

It was a pleasure to have you at our wedding. Being avid music fans we wanted the best music, not just a big named band, and you guys acceded that expectations. Big thanks to Sithum for being very supportive, attentive and generous.

The best thing is the post feedback from all the guests. Normally we get mixed reviews but the whole crowd was impressed by you.

MISTER Band was one of our best choices for our wedding.

What is interesting is that for the past four consecutive years, this outfit has performed overseas, during New Year’s Eve, thereby taking their music to the international stage, as well.

The band has also produced a collection of original songs, with around six original tracks composed by the band leader, Sithum Waidyarathne, including ‘Suraganak Dutuwa,’ ‘Landuni,’ ‘Dili Dili Payana,’ ‘Hada Wedana,’ and ‘Nil Kandu Athare.’

Two more songs are set to be released this month: ‘Hitha Norida’ and ‘Premaye Hanguman.’

In addition to their original music, they have also created a strong online presence by performing and uploading over 50 cover songs and medleys to YouTube.

“We’re now planning to connect with an even wider audience by releasing more cover content very soon,” said Sithum, adding that they are also very active on social media, under the name Mister Band Official – on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.

Continue Reading

Trending