Features
Supporting Conservation Education: the story of March for Conservation (1980 -2000): Part II
By Ryhana Raheem
The Biodiversity Skills Enhancement Project-the Public and Private sectors
By the mid- 1990s, March for Conservation (MfC) seemed to have accomplished much, particularly in the field of education. Satisfying as this progress seemed to be, there remained a feeling that there was more, much more to be done. There seemed to be enthusiasm and interest but meaningful action seemed to be lacking where environmental protection was concerned. The conservation of Sri Lanka’s diversity of biological riches was considered the function of a few institutions such as the Forest Department, the Department of Wildlife Conservation, the Coast Conservation Department and the Botanical Gardens.
The reality however was that the island’s biodiversity was impacted upon by all activities, public and private. The organization therefore decided to broaden the scope of its activities and to include public and private agencies in its educational efforts. Working in tandem with the Ministry of Transport, Environment and Women’s Affairs, and supported by a grant from the prestigious MacArthur Foundation as well as one from the International Development Agency of the World Bank, MfC established the Biodiversity Skills Enhancement Project (BSEP) in 1995.
Booklet on biodiversity conservation produced for the BSEP Project
The objective of BSEP was to enhance not only skills related to biodiversity conservation but also institutional capacity to deal with issues in biodiversity conservation. The major activities of the project focused on training local professionals in both the public and private sectors in aspects of biodiversity conservation related work with reference to economic, social and technical themes. This training also took into consideration aspects of collecting, analyzing and presenting data related to biodiversity conservation. It was hoped that co-opting professionals from various sectors into training programmes would help to create a network of informed personnel who would work together as multidisciplinary teams in the implementation of programmes that impacted on the country’s biodiversity. It was a comprehensive and ambitious project with a long-term view.
To ensure that the project would be successful, MfC began with a workshop that was based on the concept of starting from the top. The Secretaries of all Ministries were invited to an inaugural Workshop where the project would be explained and the cooperation of the Ministries sought for. To our immense satisfaction, 17 Secretaries of the 24 Ministries then in existence not only accepted our invitation, but also enthusiastically participated in the inaugural workshop and even offered unstinted support for the project.
This cooperation was vital as the project envisaged establishing senior public officers as liaison persons within their Ministries. Those officers named by the Secretaries were then invited to the Workshop for Liaison Persons and this too was a great success with 19 senior officers (Additional Secretaries, Directors of Agencies etc.) attending the workshop to understand the nature of their responsibilities. With this very significant measure of support, the BSEP was able to carry out all the activities it had planned- the first series of Training Workshops was held in April – May 1996, and a second in August 1996. In addition Advanced Training Workshops on data collection, analysis and presentation were conducted for persons with specialized knowledge including NGO personnel and young graduates during the period August 1996 to November 1997. In all 240 officers of state agencies and departments were trained through BSEP efforts
Noting the enthusiasm and interest shown in these workshops, MfC also provided Awareness Workshops for various groups of key professionals in the public/private sector whose work impacted on the country’s biodiversity. These included 29 CEOs and senior personnel in Commerce and Tourism, 51 senior professionals in Engineering and the Construction industry, 36 senior professionals in Agriculture and Plantations and 14 exporters of aquarium organisms. Twenty five senior media professionals participated in a workshop designed especially for them in the hope they would disseminate information to the general public.
The attendee lists at these workshops is an impressive record of all those in control of these various sectors and underscored our belief that providing knowledge and information would go a long way in protecting biodiversity.
Apart from these many workshops, the project also organized public lectures throughout 1996 and 1997. The lectures were delivered by experts who had been invited as resource persons for them and included figures such as Dr J McNeely, then Chief Scientist at IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, Dr David Reid and Mr Fred Naggs of the Natural History Museum in London, Dr K Ghosh, Director of the Zoological Survey of India and Professor Shekar Singh of the Indian Institute of Public Administration in New Delhi. In April 1997, a well-attended Seminar on Biodiversity Conservation and Biotechnology: Indian and Sri Lankan Perspectives was held in conjunction with resource persons from India and Sri Lanka.
Other spin-offs of BSEP included educational material and publications related to the island’s biodiversity. 22 Training Modules were created as were 2 Field Guides, six booklets and five data Checklists. In the 18 –month period of the project, it managed to generate 11 TV programmes, 10 newspaper articles and six radio broadcasts on topics which highlighted the project’s concerns.
Another BSEP achievement was that it brought public agencies together- with 35 State Ministries, Agencies and Departments were involved in BSEP activities. Furthermore six universities worked with BSEP to provide the necessary training and other activities. BSEP thus was a collaborative initiative, the likes of which had not been achieved before by any conservation organization in Sri Lanka.
It also needs to be remembered that this project was conducted in the years 1995- 1997, years of much turmoil in Sri Lanka. The ethnic war had escalated and LTTE suicide bombers were targeting public spaces and important infrastructure locations. The Provincial Council system had just been introduced and there was public and political animosity against this. In addition, the JVP crisis of the late 1980s had resulted in an overhaul of the country’s education system and of the universities in particular. In spite of these very serious issues, it is to the credit of MfC that it was able to achieve what it did through the BSEP project.
Throughout its 20 years of volunteer work in conservation, one element that gave MfC strength was the fact that it was rooted in an academic setting. Sadly it was this element that underpinned its dismantling in the early years of the next decade. Leading members of MfC were either working on their postgraduate degrees or had moved into positions as Heads of Department or Deans- posts with greater responsibilities, leaving less time for volunteer work. A number had moved away from the University of Colombo, notably to the Open University, and the demands of academic work here impacted on their availability. Other senior members had left the island to work in their own chosen fields in other countries. With depleted leadership and in a situation where political and social conflicts tended to overshadow other national issues, it was not possible for the organization to maintain its momentum and by 2010, the organization had folded up.
In conclusion, it seems fitting that tribute is paid to those who supported and dedicated themselves to MfC and its work. Apart from the individuals mentioned at the start of this article, these included Thusitha Jayasooriya, Nirmali Pallewatte, Malcolm Jansen, Rohana Subasinghe, , PB Karunaratne, Dharmin Samarajeewa, Lalith Jayawickreme, Amodha Ratnayeke, Jinie Dela, Shironica Goonatilleke, Indrakanthi Perera, Neela de Zoysa, UKGK Padmalal, Amanda de Zoysa, Devaka Weerakoon, Martin Wijesinghe, Arjun Nadarajah, Pritihiviraj Fernando and SUK Ekaratne. Significant assistance was also provided by Professor Stanley Wijesundere, former Vice Chancellor of the University of Colombo who provided a home and office space for MfC within the University of Colombo premises; Professor KD Arudpragasam, Professor of Zoology, University of Colombo, Mr Lyn de Alwis Director of the National Zoological Gardens and of the Department of Wildlife Conservation, Shirley Perera of the Department of Wildlife Conservation, Professors Nimal and Savitri Gunatilleke , Department of Botany, University of Peradeniya , Renton de Alwis, then Head of the Coast Conservation Department and Samantha Gunasekera of the Customs Department. And of course, given MfC’s outreach, there were many others too numerous to mention, in Colombo and other parts of the island who helped MfC’s multi-faceted programmes at various times.
This article on MfC’s work is focused mainly on its major educational efforts, its contribution to EE but there are many other activities and projects that the NGO had been involved in. The story of MfC records growth from work with schoolchildren and the general public to more focused work with another sector- the teachers and finally reaching out to the upper strata – to those who implement this country’s policies. It illustrates what an organization could achieve as it grows in confidence and outreach. It is also a record of sincere dedication and professional commitment to the conservation of Sri Lanka’s natural resources
One can only hope that this account of what MfC achieved would be an inspiration to any group that wishes to follow.
Ryhana Raheem , Emeritus Professor, Open University of Sri Lanka is a Founder member of MfC and co-author of “Sinharaja- A Rain Forest in Sri Lanka”.
She was the Chief Coordinator, MfC (1980 – 1983), Project Coordinator, MfC- Naresa EE project (1989 – 1993) and Project Director, BSEP (1994- 1998)
Features
Digital transformation in the Global South
Understanding Sri Lanka through the India AI Impact Summit 2026
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly moved from being a specialised technological field into a major social force that shapes economies, cultures, governance, and everyday human life. The India AI Impact Summit 2026, held in New Delhi, symbolised a significant moment for the Global South, especially South Asia, because it demonstrated that artificial intelligence is no longer limited to advanced Western economies but can also become a development tool for emerging societies. The summit gathered governments, researchers, technology companies, and international organisations to discuss how AI can support social welfare, public services, and economic growth. Its central message was that artificial intelligence should be human centred and socially useful. Instead of focusing only on powerful computing systems, the summit emphasised affordable technologies, open collaboration, and ethical responsibility so that ordinary citizens can benefit from digital transformation. For South Asia, where large populations live in rural areas and resources are unevenly distributed, this idea is particularly important.
People friendly AI
One of the most important concepts promoted at the summit was the idea of “people friendly AI.” This means that artificial intelligence should be accessible, understandable, and helpful in daily activities. In South Asia, language diversity and economic inequality often prevent people from using advanced technology. Therefore, systems designed for local languages, and smartphones, play a crucial role. When a farmer can speak to a digital assistant in Sinhala, Tamil, or Hindi and receive advice about weather patterns or crop diseases, technology becomes practical rather than distant. Similarly, voice based interfaces allow elderly people and individuals with limited literacy to use digital services. Affordable mobile based AI tools reduce the digital divide between urban and rural populations. As a result, artificial intelligence stops being an elite instrument and becomes a social assistant that supports ordinary life.
Transformation in education sector
The influence of this transformation is visible in education. AI based learning platforms can analyse student performance and provide personalised lessons. Instead of all students following the same pace, weaker learners receive additional practice while advanced learners explore deeper material. Teachers are able to focus on mentoring and explanation rather than repetitive instruction. In many South Asian societies, including Sri Lanka, education has long depended on memorisation and private tuition classes. AI tutoring systems could reduce educational inequality by giving rural students access to learning resources, similar to those available in cities. A student who struggles with mathematics, for example, can practice step by step exercises automatically generated according to individual mistakes. This reduces pressure, improves confidence, and gradually changes the educational culture from rote learning toward understanding and problem solving.
Healthcare is another area where AI is becoming people friendly. Many rural communities face shortages of doctors and medical facilities. AI-assisted diagnostic tools can analyse symptoms, or medical images, and provide early warnings about diseases. Patients can receive preliminary advice through mobile applications, which helps them decide whether hospital visits are necessary. This reduces overcrowding in hospitals and saves travel costs. Public health authorities can also analyse large datasets to monitor disease outbreaks and allocate resources efficiently. In this way, artificial intelligence supports not only individual patients but also the entire health system.
Agriculture, which remains a primary livelihood for millions in South Asia, is also undergoing transformation. Farmers traditionally rely on seasonal experience, but climate change has made weather patterns unpredictable. AI systems that analyse rainfall data, soil conditions, and satellite images can predict crop performance and recommend irrigation schedules. Early detection of plant diseases prevents large-scale crop losses. For a small farmer, accurate information can mean the difference between profit and debt. Thus, AI directly influences economic stability at the household level.
Employment and communication reshaped
Artificial intelligence is also reshaping employment and communication. Routine clerical and repetitive tasks are increasingly automated, while demand grows for digital skills, such as data management, programming, and online services. Many young people in South Asia are beginning to participate in remote work, freelancing, and digital entrepreneurship. AI translation tools allow communication across languages, enabling businesses to reach international customers. Knowledge becomes more accessible because information can be summarised, translated, and explained instantly. This leads to a broader sociological shift: authority moves from tradition and hierarchy toward information and analytical reasoning. Individuals rely more on data when making decisions about education, finance, and career planning.
Impact on Sri Lanka
The impact on Sri Lanka is especially significant because the country shares many social and economic conditions with India and often adopts regional technological innovations. Sri Lanka has already begun integrating artificial intelligence into education, agriculture, and public administration. In schools and universities, AI learning tools may reduce the heavy dependence on private tuition and help students in rural districts receive equal academic support. In agriculture, predictive analytics can help farmers manage climate variability, improving productivity and food security. In public administration, digital systems can speed up document processing, licensing, and public service delivery. Smart transportation systems may reduce congestion in urban areas, saving time and fuel.
Economic opportunities are also expanding. Sri Lanka’s service based economy and IT outsourcing sector can benefit from increased global demand for digital skills. AI-assisted software development, data annotation, and online service platforms can create new employment pathways, especially for educated youth. Small and medium entrepreneurs can use AI tools to design products, manage finances, and market services internationally at low cost. In tourism, personalised digital assistants and recommendation systems can improve visitor experiences and help small businesses connect with travellers directly.
Digital inequality
However, the integration of artificial intelligence also raises serious concerns. Digital inequality may widen if only educated urban populations gain access to technological skills. Some routine jobs may disappear, requiring workers to retrain. There are also risks of misinformation, surveillance, and misuse of personal data. Ethical regulation and transparency are, therefore, essential. Governments must develop policies that protect privacy, ensure accountability, and encourage responsible innovation. Public awareness and digital literacy programmes are necessary so that citizens understand both the benefits and limitations of AI systems.
Beyond economics and services, AI is gradually influencing social relationships and cultural patterns. South Asian societies have traditionally relied on hierarchy and personal authority, but data-driven decision making changes this structure. Agricultural planning may depend on predictive models rather than ancestral practice, and educational evaluation may rely on learning analytics instead of examination rankings alone. This does not eliminate human judgment, but it alters its basis. Societies increasingly value analytical thinking, creativity, and adaptability. Educational systems must, therefore, move beyond memorisation toward critical thinking and interdisciplinary learning.
AI contribution to national development
In Sri Lanka, these changes may contribute to national development if implemented carefully. AI-supported financial monitoring can improve transparency and reduce corruption. Smart infrastructure systems can help manage transportation and urban planning. Communication technologies can support interaction among Sinhala, Tamil, and English speakers, promoting social inclusion in a multilingual society. Assistive technologies can improve accessibility for persons with disabilities, enabling broader participation in education and employment. These developments show that artificial intelligence is not merely a technological innovation but a social instrument capable of strengthening equality when guided by ethical policy.
Symbolic shift
Ultimately, the India AI Impact Summit 2026 represents a symbolic shift in the global technological landscape. It indicates that developing nations are beginning to shape the future of artificial intelligence according to their own social needs rather than passively importing technology. For South Asia and Sri Lanka, the challenge is not whether AI will arrive but how it will be used. If education systems prepare citizens, if governments establish responsible regulations, and if access remains inclusive, AI can become a partner in development rather than a source of inequality. The future will likely involve close collaboration between humans and intelligent systems, where machines assist decision making while human values guide outcomes. In this sense, artificial intelligence does not replace human society, but transforms it, offering Sri Lanka an opportunity to build a more knowledge based, efficient, and equitable social order in the decades ahead.
by Milinda Mayadunna
Features
Governance cannot be a postscript to economics
The visit by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva to Sri Lanka was widely described as a success for the government. She was fulsome in her praise of the country and its developmental potential. The grounds for this success and collaborative spirit go back to the inception of the agreement signed in March 2023 in the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s declaration of international bankruptcy. The IMF came in to fulfil its role as lender of last resort. The government of the day bit the bullet. It imposed unpopular policies on the people, most notably significant tax increases. At a moment when the country had run out of foreign exchange, defaulted on its debt, and faced shortages of fuel, medicine and food, the IMF programme restored a measure of confidence both within the country and internationally.
Since 1965 Sri Lanka has entered into agreements with the IMF on 16 occasions none of which were taken to their full term. The present agreement is the 17th agreement . IMF agreements have traditionally been focused on economic restructuring. Invariably the terms of agreement have been harsh on the people, with priority being given to ensure the debtor country pays its loans back to the IMF. Fiscal consolidation, tax increases, subsidy reductions and structural reforms have been the recurring features. The social and political costs have often been high. Governments have lost popularity and sometimes fallen before programmes were completed. The IMF has learned from experience across the world that macroeconomic reform without social protection can generate backlash, instability and policy reversals.
The experience of countries such as Greece, Ireland and Portugal in dealing with the IMF during the eurozone crisis demonstrated the political and social costs of austerity, even though those economies later stabilised and returned to growth. The evolution of IMF policies has ensured that there are two special features in the present agreement. The first is that the IMF has included a safety net of social welfare spending to mitigate the impact of the austerity measures on the poorest sections of the population. No country can hope to grow at 7 or 8 percent per annum when a third of its people are struggling to survive. Poverty alleviation measures in the Aswesuma programme, developed with the agreement of the IMF, are key to mitigating the worst impacts of the rising cost of living and limited opportunities for employment.
Governance Included
The second important feature of the IMF agreement is the inclusion of governance criteria to be implemented alongside the economic reforms. It goes to the heart of why Sri Lanka has had to return to the IMF repeatedly. Economic mismanagement did not take place in a vacuum. It was enabled by weak institutions, politicised decision making, non-transparent procurement, and the erosion of checks and balances. In its economic reform process, the IMF has included an assessment of governance related issues to accompany the economic restructuring process. At the top of this list is tackling the problem of corruption by means of publicising contracts, ensuring open solicitation of tenders, and strengthening financial accountability mechanisms.
The IMF also encouraged a civil society diagnostic study and engaged with civil society organisations regularly. The civil society analysis of governance issues which was promoted by Verite Research and facilitated by Transparency International was wider in scope than those identified in the IMF’s own diagnostic. It pointed to systemic weaknesses that go beyond narrow fiscal concerns. The civil society diagnostic study included issues of social justice such as the inequitable impact of targeting EPF and ETF funds of workers for restructuring and the need to repeal abuse prone laws such as the Prevention of Terrorism Act and the Online Safety Act. When workers see their retirement savings restructured without adequate consultation, confidence in policy making erodes. When laws are perceived to be instruments of arbitrary power, social cohesion weakens.
During a meeting between the IMF Managing Director Georgeiva and civil society members last week, there was discussion on the implementation of those governance measures in which she spoke in a manner that was not alien to the civil society representatives. Significantly, the civil society diagnostic report also referred to the ethnic conflict and the breakdown of interethnic relations that led to three decades of deadly war, causing severe economic losses to the country. This was also discussed at the meeting. Governance is not only about accounting standards and procurement rules. It is about social justice, equality before the law, and political representation. On this issue the government has more to do. Ethnic and religious minorities find themselves inadequately represented in high level government committees. The provincial council system that ensured ethnic and minority representation at the provincial level continues to be in abeyance.
Beyond IMF
The significance of addressing governance issues is not only relevant to the IMF agreement. It is also important in accessing tariff concessions from the European Union. The GSP Plus tariff concession given by the EU enables Sri Lankan exports to be sold at lower prices and win markets in Europe. For an export dependent economy, this is critical. Loss of such concessions would directly affect employment in key sectors such as apparel. The government needs to address longstanding EU concerns about the protection of human rights and labour rights in the country. The EU has, for several years, linked the continuation of GSP Plus to compliance with international conventions. This includes the condition that the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) be brought into line with international standards. The government’s alternative in the form of the draft Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PTSA) is less abusive on paper but is wider in scope and retains the core features of the PTA.
Governance and social justice factors cannot be ignored or downplayed in the pursuit of economic development. If Sri Lanka is to break out of its cycle of crisis and bailout, it must internalise the fact that good governance which promotes social justice and more fairly distributes the costs and fruits of development is the foundation on which durable economic growth is built. Without it, stabilisation will remain fragile, poverty will remain high, and the promise of 7 to 8 percent growth will remain elusive. The implementation of governance reforms will also have a positive effect through the creative mechanism of governance linked bonds, an innovation of the present IMF agreement.
The Sri Lankan think tank Verité Research played an important role in the development of governance linked bonds. They reduce the rate of interest payable by the government on outstanding debt on the basis that better governance leads to a reduction in risk for those who have lent their money to Sri Lanka. This is a direct financial reward for governance reform. The present IMF programme offers an opportunity not only to stabilise the economy but to strengthen the institutions that underpin it. That opportunity needs to be taken. Without it, the country cannot attract investment, expand exports and move towards shared prosperity and to a 7-8 percent growth rate that can lift the country out of its debt trap.
by Jehan Perera
Features
MISTER Band … in the spotlight
It’s a good sign, indeed, for the local scene, to see artistes, who have not been very much in the limelight, now making their presence felt, in a big way, and I’m glad to give them the publicity they deserve.
On 10th February we had Yellow Beatz in the spotlight and this week it’s MISTER Band.
This outfit is certainly not new to our scene; they have been around since 2012, under the leadership of Sithum Waidyarathne.
The seven energetic members who make up MISTER Band are:
Sithum Waidyarathne (leader/founder/saxophonist/guitarist and vocalist), Rangana Seram (bass guitarist), Vihanga Liyanage (vocalist), Ridmi Dissanayake (female vocalist), Nuwan Cristo (keyboardist/vocalist), Kasun Thennakoon (lead guitarist), and Nuwan Madushanka (drummer).
According to Sithum, their vision is to provide high quality entertainmen to those who engage their services.
“Thanks to our engaging performances and growing popularity, MISTER Band continues to be in high demand … at weddings, corporate events and dinner dances,” said Sithum.
They predominantly cover English and Sinhala music, as well as the most popular genres.
And the reviews that come their way, after a performance, are excellent, they say, and this is one of the bouquets they received:
It was a pleasure to have you at our wedding. Being avid music fans we wanted the best music, not just a big named band, and you guys acceded that expectations. Big thanks to Sithum for being very supportive, attentive and generous.
- Sithum Waidyarathne: Band leader and founder
- Ridmi Dissanayake: MISTER Band’s female vocalist
The best thing is the post feedback from all the guests. Normally we get mixed reviews but the whole crowd was impressed by you.
MISTER Band was one of our best choices for our wedding.
What is interesting is that for the past four consecutive years, this outfit has performed overseas, during New Year’s Eve, thereby taking their music to the international stage, as well.
The band has also produced a collection of original songs, with around six original tracks composed by the band leader, Sithum Waidyarathne, including ‘Suraganak Dutuwa,’ ‘Landuni,’ ‘Dili Dili Payana,’ ‘Hada Wedana,’ and ‘Nil Kandu Athare.’
Two more songs are set to be released this month: ‘Hitha Norida’ and ‘Premaye Hanguman.’
In addition to their original music, they have also created a strong online presence by performing and uploading over 50 cover songs and medleys to YouTube.
“We’re now planning to connect with an even wider audience by releasing more cover content very soon,” said Sithum, adding that they are also very active on social media, under the name Mister Band Official – on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
-
Features2 days agoWhy does the state threaten Its people with yet another anti-terror law?
-
Features2 days agoVictor Melder turns 90: Railwayman and bibliophile extraordinary
-
Features2 days agoReconciliation, Mood of the Nation and the NPP Government
-
Features1 day agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Features2 days agoVictor, the Friend of the Foreign Press
-
Latest News4 days agoNew Zealand meet familiar opponents Pakistan at spin-friendly Premadasa
-
Latest News4 days agoTariffs ruling is major blow to Trump’s second-term agenda
-
Latest News4 days agoECB push back at Pakistan ‘shadow-ban’ reports ahead of Hundred auction


