Connect with us

News

Sumanthiran blames it all on President

Published

on

Tamil National Alliance (TNA) lawmaker M.A. Sumanthiran told Parliament on Wednesday that although the Parliament should be dissolved, the MPs would vote against a motion to dissolve it, hoping that such tactics would help them outlast the people’s discontent.

Sumanthiran said that during recent Parliament sittings there had been examples of those delaying tactics.

“For almost 40 days, people have been on the road, saying “Gota Go Home”. But those who call themselves people’s representatives who come and sit here are deaf, they cannot hear that. They can’t even agree to take up for discussion a matter that people have been shouting from the streets. This is unprecedented in this country. For over a month not just in one place, but in several places.

MP Sumanthiran said that as the people’s representatives, those in Parliament should be prepared to discuss the issues and concerns raised by the people. However, those in Parliament were ignoring the people and that showed that the parliament also had lost its legitimacy, he said.

“It is not only the President who lost his legitimacy; this Parliament also has lost its legitimacy. Parliament must be dissolved, but again when it will be put to a vote here, and MPs who are holding on to their positions will vote against that motion to dissolve Parliament. The MPs think that delaying tactics will allow them to carry on. However, this is not possible and the Parliament is pushing the people of this country to seek other remedies. That is the danger of not giving the voice of the people an expression here. This danger you don’t seem to understand,” he told Parliament.

The TNA MP said that the President had declared a state of emergency. Article 155 (4) 2 of the Constitution said that ‘if the Parliament is at the date of the making of such proclamation, separated by any such adjournment or prorogation as will expire within 10 days, a proclamation shall be issued for the meeting of the Parliament within 10 days”.

However, since Emergency was declared on 06 May, 11 days had elapsed since the next Parliament meeting took place, Sumanthiran said.

“There’s a gap of over 10 days, the Constitution very specifically says that if it is separated by longer than 10 days another proclamation shall be issued summoning parliament. That wasn’t done. Article 42, which I read earlier in the day, says the President is responsible to this Parliament not only for his duties, performance, powers and functions under the constitution or written law but also for the law for the time being relating to public security. He has failed, even in the most recent exercise of his powers under the public security ordinance. Where the constitution says he shall make another proclamation summoning parliament, he hasn’t done that. He has not done that. So that is just the most recent one,” he said.

The TNA MP said that they condemn the counter violence against the politicians of whichever side. However, they also condemn the violence that started it all on the morning of 09 May, he said. The beginning of the violence lies at Temple Trees, he said.

“The Attorney General has named 22 people. Because until then the police won’t act. The Attorney general whom we have criticized as being partial, as being the person withdrawing the cases against politicians on the government side, is now trying to redeem himself. How many of them are members of this house? All on the government side. The attorney general whom you appointed who has been acting on your side, now he is naming Government members and he has said “arrest them” including the senior DIG for Colombo for allowing this to happen. But eventually the buck stops with the president. He was in-charge. He was in-charge of the security. He held the post of defence minister and that of internal security,” the TNA MP said.

Sumanthiran said some government MPs claim that the police did not intervene when their houses were attacked, that the police looked the other way and that the police did not even record the numbers of the motorcycles used by the assailants.

“Now who was in-charge of the police at that time? Your own President! Your President! And when we moved to discuss a matter – a motion of censure of the President, you protect him. You blocked that motion. How is this possible? The very person who allowed your house to be destroyed, the very person who allowed attacks by all those assailants on peaceful demonstrators at Galle Face the other day. It took more than an hour for those assailants to walk from Temple Trees to Galle Face after destroying the shelters that had been put up by the demonstrators outside Temple Trees. What was the President doing? For one full hour? He was just watching. Must have thought, jolly good, let them destroy Gotagogama also. I’ll take two for the price of one! After they did the Temple Trees he must have thought, bonus for me also let me get this also out, otherwise how do you explain? President who is functioning from the President’s house, not seeing for over an hour these assailants coming and mercilessly attacking unarmed, peaceful protestors,” he said.

Sumanthiran said that the one who allowed that attack, more importantly the one who allowed attacks on MPs’ own houses, is the President. The President destroyed the economy of this country. After carrying out a number of initiatives that the Opposition parties warned against, Gotabaya in his address to the nation said he had made wrong decisions and that he was sorry, the TNA MP said.

“When you say I made wrong decisions the next line must be “therefore I resign.” That is the democratic tradition. My decision on “chemical fertiliser was wrong” he says, my decision in delaying going to the IMF was wrong he says. So, resign! Take responsibility! Why only the Central Bank Governor and the secretary to the Treasury? The final decision was by the President. Now that is one thing, what happens about all this violence? And the government members unashamedly are standing here complaining about the violence against them without condemning the person who is responsible for that violence. Without condemning the person who allowed that violence to happen against themselves,” he said. (SI)



News

Prison rules to be revised over monks’ attire

Published

on

Harshana

Appointment of committee eyewash, says UNP

The government is considering changes to prison regulations pertaining to the treatment of Buddhist monks serving jail terms, including their right to wear monastic robes when taken outside prison.

Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara announced the proposed changes yesterday (14) following the submission of an interim report by a committee appointed to review the rules and procedures governing prisons.

The report was handed over to Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat.

One of the key recommendations is to amend Prison Standing Order 356 by introducing a new provision, 356(A). The proposed revision would require prison authorities to consult the Department of Buddhist Affairs on the removal of a monk’s robes upon admission to prison. The Commissioner of Prisons would be allowed 10 days to notify the department and take the necessary steps.

A separate amendment to Departmental Order 550 would allow Buddhist monks to wear their robes whenever they are taken outside prison, unless their respective Nikaya formally requests that the privilege be withdrawn.

The committee has also recommended extending similar arrangements, with suitable modifications, to members of other religious clergy who are imprisoned.

The proposals follow concerns raised over the treatment of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera after he was taken into custody. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake subsequently held discussions with representatives of the three main Buddhist Nikayas and appointed the committee to examine the existing legal framework.

Nanayakkara said the interim report had been forwarded to the Acting Commissioner General of Prisons, along with instructions to revise the relevant standing orders in accordance with its recommendations.

The proposed amendments have yet to be confirmed as formally implemented.

Meanwhile, the UNP yesterday criticised the government’s decision to appoint a committee to make recommendations on the attire to be worn by imprisoned Buddhist monks and other religious leaders when taken outside prison, describing the move as unnecessary.

In a statement issued yesterday (14), the UNP said the procedures governing the matter were already clearly set out in the Department of Prisons’ Standing Orders, making the appointment of a separate committee unwarranted.

The party cited remarks by Professor G.L. Peiris, Convenor of the Janathawadi Joint Opposition, who had described the committee’s appointment as a

“complete eyewash” and questioned the need for such a move.

Referring to Standing Order 550 of the Prisons Department, the UNP said convicted prisoners appearing before court for legal proceedings should not be required to wear prison uniforms.

It further stated that the regulations allowed prisoners to wear civilian clothing consistent with what they wore before imprisonment, including attire appropriate to their cultural and religious backgrounds.

The UNP accused the government of unnecessarily prolonging the issue by appointing a committee, despite the existence of regulations governing prisoners’ attire.

The party also called on the government to seek forgiveness from the Mahanayake Thera and the Sangha Council of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha of the Siyam Maha Nikaya over the decision concerning the religious attire of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera.

Continue Reading

News

AC President recuses himself from hearing prison attire case pertaining to Gnanasara Thera

Published

on

Court of Appeal President Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya yesterday withdrew from the bench hearing petitions challenging the decision by prison authorities to require Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire following his imprisonment.

The decision was announced when the petitions seeking to invalidate the prison authorities’ decision were taken up for consideration on October 14.

Following his withdrawal, a three-judge bench was appointed to hear the petitions.

The petitions relate to the prison authorities’ decision to require Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire after he was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence for contempt of court.

In September this year, the Supreme Court annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in May 2019.

Following the ruling, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remainder of the monk’s prison sentence.

Gnanasara Thera had originally been sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for contempt of court but had served only around nine months before receiving the presidential pardon in 2019.

Continue Reading

News

Court orders steps to obtain INTERPOL Red Notice against Basil

Published

on

Basil

The Fort Magistrate’s Court yesterday issued an arrest warrant for former Minister Basil Rajapaksa over the alleged misuse of funds belonging to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau during the 2014 Uva Provincial Council election.

The Magistrate also directed the CID Illegal Assets Investigation Division to take necessary steps to obtain a Red Notice through Interpol.

The orders were issued following submissions made by the CID in connection with the alleged financial irregularities.

The CID’s Illegal Assets Investigation Unit informed the court that Rs. 7.8 million allocated to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau in 2014 had allegedly not been used for the Bureau’s promotional activities.

Instead, the funds had allegedly been used to provide 12,000 T-shirts during the Uva Provincial Council election, causing a financial loss to the government, the CID told court.

Continue Reading

Trending