Connect with us

News

SJB wants real mastermind of Easter Sunday carnage traced

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

The SJB demanded in Parliament on Saturday (5) that the government shift its focus from those who had been under the command of Zahran Hashim the ringleader of those who carried out the Easter Sunday terror attacks to those who masterminded the attack.

 SJB Galle District MP Manusha Nanayakkara accused the government of not doing enough to grant relief to those who had lost their loved ones.

 Participating in the third reading stage debate on budget 2021, MP Nanayakkara said: Some 350 persons were killed and around 500 wounded. The family members of victims suffered losss. Who suffered the biggest political loss? It was the yahapalana government. It lost power. Therefore, it is obvious that the yahapalana government did not engineer the Easter Sunday attacks. Then who achieved the biggest political gain? It is the political camp now in the government. I do not say that they engineered the terror attacks either. After it was first revealed by Minister Wijayadasa Rajapakshe in this House that there were ISIS terrorists in the country, there were investigations under TID chief DIG Nalaka Silva. He investigated the matter and sought permission to arrest Zahran Hashim, who had been identified as a threat to national security. The request for the permission goes to the highest office. What happened then? A person named Namal Kumara claimed there was a conspiracy to assassinate the then President and DIG Nalaka Silva was involved in it. The person who sought permission to arrest Zahran was put behind bars and investigations into ISIS operations in Lanka came to an end. Then there was the 52-day government, which plunged the country into chaos; no UNP leader was allowed to attend the National Security Council. Only the likes of Thilanga Sumathipala, Dilan Perera and Dayasiri Jayasekera were invited to the NSC meetings. During those months prior to the Easter Sunday attacks, issues related to Zahran’s operations had been taken up several times at the NSC meetings.  Today, these facts are revealed before the Easter Sunday Commission. Why the then President did not take action as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces is not a matter for me to discuss. There had been warnings of the impending attacks. Even on the day of the attacks, the President flew from Thirupathi to Singapore despite being informed of the incidents. It has now been revealed that many had received prior information about the terror attacks. It is said that MP Harin Fernando’s father had been aware of them. There were some others. Who instructed TNA MP M. A. Sumanthiran not to go to Church on that day? It was the then Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa who instructed MP Sumanthiran not to go to church on that day. Rajapaksa had come to know about the threat from his security detail. The Ministerial Security Division had been aware of the warning. Batticaloa District TNA MP Shanakiyan Rajaputhiran Rasamanickam: It should be corrected. MP Sumanthiran was in Batticaloa. I was there with him when the then Opposition Leader Rajapaksa called him. It was not to warn against going to church because the call came after the incident.

MP Nanayakkara: This information came to MSD on April 14. The MSD officers were told that there was a letter in Colombo and asked them to come and pick it up. It was many days later after the attack we saw the letter. There is a serious issue that has surfaced now before the Easter Sunday Commission. Senior DIG Ravi Seneviratne has told the Commission that Zahran’s group was linked to ISIS by a local agent of ISIS. Who is that local agent? He is the one who controlled Zahran. He is the one who paid salaries for weapons training? He was the one who paid the salaries to the family members of those who went abroad on their absence. Why has he not been arrested yet? Why Sarah Jasmine, the wife of Muhammadu Hastun, who detonated a suicide bomb at St. Sebastian’s Church in Katuwapitiya on Easter Sunday has not been arrested, yet. She was allowed to flee to India after she made vital revelations of the names of the persons who paid for Zahran and others. Zahran’s wife’s testimony was recorded in camera, not allowing the media to know what she said. She, too, has revealed some names. Thereafter, the sittings of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry were suspended stating that it was owing to COVID-19. Now, there is a serious threat to the lives of those who have given evidence.

Public Security Minister Dr Sarath Weerasekera: There are 271 persons in custody. There were eight incidents and all the evidence and documents are with the Attorney General, who is due to file cases before courts. It is the yahapalana regime that should take the responsibility for the security failure. It neglected national security. It was during your time that the intelligence operatives and war heroes were put behind bars. Those factors led to the security failure.

MP Nanayakkara: Those in custody had been arrested during the time of the previous government. Tell the House whether your government made any arrests. We must respect war heroes. There is no doubt about it, but should we respect those who make use of the very same uniform of the war heroes to kill innocents, abduct children, take ransom and harass the media? The government’s investigations are focussed on the aftermath of the incident. We are asking the government to pay attention to the events prior to the incident and arrest those who directed the terror attacks and those who had links to the terrorists.

SJB Gampaha District MP Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka: Those in custody are just those who did menial jobs. You should arrest the masterminds and those responsible for funding the Zahran group. Arrest those who had been above the rank of Zahran not those who were below him.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Bid to include genocide allegation against Sri Lanka in Canada’s school curriculum thwarted

Published

on

Dr Hewage

Dr. Neville Hewage yesterday said that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada had determined that alleged Tamil genocide hadn’t taken place in Sri Lanka.

The academic, who successfully moved the Canadian courts, said that, therefore, the much-touted Tamil Genocide Education Week Act (TGEWA), in terms of the ruling given by the Ontario Court of Appeal and confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada, is not within provincial Jurisdiction Education under Canada’s Constitution. Dr. Hewage said so in response to The Island query.

Declaring that the Canadian ruling was a huge victory for Sri Lanka, constantly harassed by various interested parties over unsubstantiated war crimes allegations, Dr. Hewage emphasised that alleged Tamil genocide couldn’t be in the school curriculum.

The Canadian parliament in May 2022 declared May 18 as Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day, thereby recognising the massacre of Tamils during the last phase of the war.

Responding to another query, Dr. Hewage valued the legal action at approximately $350,000 while denying any backing from the Sri Lankan government. “I haven’t received any funding from the government,” Dr. Hewage said, appreciating the backing provided by the Canadian legal team.

Adjunct Professor of the Law and Justice Department Laurentian University. Sudbury, Ontario, Canada Hewage said: “I did my own legal work which cost me only time and the expenses for filing.”

Dr. Hewage dismissed attempts made by the pro-LTTE lobby to propagate the lie that the Supreme Court of Canada had dismissed the challenge to Bill 104 aka TGEWA, thereby allowing education and commemorative events/efforts.

Asked to explain, Dr. Hewage pointed out that although the Ontario Superior Court of justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada had determined that Tamil genocide did not take place in Sri Lanka, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice had ruled that TGEWA is valid under the Constitution Act, 1867, s 93 Education. Recalling that the first application had been filed against the Attorney General of Ontario on June 06, 2021, Dr. Hewage said that he had moved the Ontario Court of Appeal on July 22, 2022 and that court ruled that the TGEWA was not in line with the relevant Act.

The Appeal Court had concluded that TGEWA was not within the provincial jurisdiction as outlined in the Constitution Act, 1867, s. 93 Education, Dr. Hewage said.

The bottom line was that Tamil genocide couldn’t be included in their school curriculum, Dr. Hewage said. The Canadian verdict couldn’t have come at a better time for Sri Lanka, troubled by UK sanctions on Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda, retired Generals, Shavendra Silva and Jagath Jayasuriya as well as one-time LTTE Ampara-Batticaloa commander Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan alias Karuna over war crimes allegations.

Dr. Hewage said that he had appealed to the Supreme Court on Nov 11, 2024 as he feared that the Ontario Court of Appeal could be reversed in case some other pro-LTTE party moved court and may declare plausible Tamil genocide. The academic stressed that throughout their campaign, the Sri Lankan government had not extended any help.

At the time, Dr. Hewage initiated the legal process Gotabaya Rajapaksa was the President. By the time Dr. Hewage appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, the National People’s Power (NPP) had gained power.

The development with regard to TGEWA has taken place in the wake of Jaffna-born Gary Anandasangaree receiving appointment as Justice Minister and Attorney-General of Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Minister. He has been campaigning against alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka.

Dr. Hewage said that some media and other interested parties had been working overtime to deceive the people by misinterpreting the Canadian Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court had confirmed the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision, and no further inquiries were required, Dr. Hewage said, adding that the pro-LTTE lobby was quite upset as both the Superior Court of Justice and the Appeal Court of Ontario had determined that Tamil genocide did not take place in Sri Lanka. “Therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada will not further inquire into the Tamil genocide claim and as such the Appeal court decision will stand,” Dr. Hewage said.

by Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

UK sanctions on former military top brass biased, unjustifiable: Ex-PM

Published

on

Dinesh

Former Prime Minister and leader of the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP) Dinesh Gunawardena has alleged that the UK sanctioning retired top brass and ex-LTTE commander is biased, unjustifiable and a blatant interference in an internal affair of Sri Lanka.

The following is the text of statement issued by former parliamentarian Gunawardena: “The United Kingdom Government recently imposed sanctions on former head of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces Shavendra Silva, former Navy Commander Wasantha Karannagoda, former Commander of the Sri Lankan Army Jagath Jayasuriya and Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan alias Karuna Amman.

The imposition of sanctions on three former commanders of Sri Lankan armed forces over alleged human rights violations during the conflict between the terrorist outfit Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the armed forces by the UK is biased, unjustifiable action and a blatant interference on an internal affair of Sri Lanka.

It is most regrettable that the UK thought it fit to impose sanctions that are not based on any transparent investigation or legal proceedings. Instead, they reflect the selective application of international pressure on Sri Lanka, targeting those who played key roles in Sri Lanka’s military victory against the most ruthless terrorist organization, which is banned by many countries, including the UK.

I wish to reiterate that the people of Sri Lanka have the highest respect for the sacrifices made by the military and the Commanders of armed forces and they would always stand by them against any unjustified attempts of prosecution or slander as their valiant fight against terrorists have ensured long-lasting peace in Sri Lanka.

We urge the United Kingdom to withdraw the one-sided sanctions in the interest of our long-standing bilateral relations and norms.”

Continue Reading

News

Modi’s visit: TN poaching issue on the agenda

Published

on

Modi

Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri has said that the arrest of Indian fishermen by the Sri Lankan Navy would be taken up at the forthcoming Indian Premier Narendra Modi’s visit to Colombo.Responding to a query posed at a special media briefing held in New Delhi on March 28 on Modi’s visits to Thailand and Sri Lanka in the first week of April, Misri said: We have throughout been in very close contact with Sri Lankan authorities at all levels and in practically every meeting with Sri Lanka, this issue is taken up very, very forcefully by our side. And our central message has always been that these are issues that should really be seen from the humanitarian and the livelihood concerns lens.”

Misri said: “On the fishermen’s issue, this is something that is a long-standing issue. It is also something whose origin lies in certain arrangements that were arrived at many years ago, in the mid-70s when the international maritime boundary line between India and Sri Lanka was agreed by the then authorities, both at the central and the state level. And, there were formal agreements that were signed with regard to respective rights in this particular area.

Since then, of course, on grounds of alleged crossing of this line by fishermen from our side, there are arrests on the Sri Lankan side and then a process has to be gone through.

We have throughout been in very close contact with Sri Lankan authorities at all levels and in practically every meeting with Sri Lanka, this issue is taken up very, very forcefully by our side. And our central message has always been that these are issues that should really be seen from the humanitarian and the livelihood concerns lens.

There are agreements that have been arrived at from time to time between Indian and Sri Lankan authorities on how to handle this issue. There is a formal mechanism as well of a joint working group on fisheries between the two sides. I think the most recent meeting was held in October last year. There is also a mechanism for fishermen’s associations from the two sides to work.

Our effort is to continue to resolve these issues, find mutual agreement on these issues. Of course, our Mission in Colombo and our Consulate in Jaffna remain very closely involved with these issues. Anytime there are people who are affected, we extend legal as well as other kinds of assistance to them. Sometimes there is medical assistance that is required. We also facilitate the repatriation as early as possible of released fishermen from Sri Lanka to India.

One other thing that we have always focused on with regard to this issue in our discussions with Sri Lanka is the need to avoid the use of force under all circumstances. Therefore, we feel that both sides understand the need to continue our ongoing dialogue, our constructive engagement to eventually achieve long lasting and mutually acceptable solutions to the issue. I have no doubt that the Prime Minister will raise issues related to the welfare of our fishermen during his meeting with the Sri Lankan President.”

Continue Reading

Trending