Connect with us

News

SJB too demands prosecution of ex-President Sirisena and others over Easter carnage

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

The SJB yesterday demanded that the government allow the Attorney General to prosecute all those against whom the Presidential Commission of inquiry on Easter Sunday carnage wanted criminal proceedings instituted.

Addressing the media at the Opposition Leader’s Office in Colombo, Chief Opposition Whip and Kandy District MP Lakshman Kiriella said that the Attorney General could not be forced by the government to spare certain individuals. “The report of the Presidential Commission recommends that legal action be taken against the former head of State Intelligence Service, senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena and the former President Maithripala Sirisena. But the government does not implement those recommendations.

“The Cardinal says that before the election, Gotabaya Rajapaksa promised to prosecute all those responsible for the carnage. After release of the PCoI report the Cardinal has been told by the President that he could not implement some recommendations therein because he would lose his popularity. That is wrong. He cannot do so, it is the job of the Attorney General. It is not the President who implements the law of this country but the Attorney General. The President has no powers to that. “Upon the receipt of the PCoI report the government appointed a cabinet subcommittee under Minister Chamal Rajapaksa to study the report. Now, the government implements the recommendations of that sub-committee which has recommended to select whom should be prosecuted and who should be left out from the original list of persons identified by the PCoI as responsible for the terror attacks.

“The PCoI recommendations are not being properly implemented. We demand that the government should implement all recommendations of the PCoI. Victims demand the same. The Church and the Cardinal demand the same. The AG should prosecute all identified by the PCoI and let the judiciary decide who is guilty and who is not. The President cannot interfere in selecting the list to be prosecuted. That amounts to the Executive interfering in the matters of the judiciary.”

MP Kiriella said that consequences of the October 2018 constitutional crisis and 52-day government had paved the way for the Easter Sunday terror attacks. “That crisis started on 26 Oct., 2018. Thereafter, the then President Sirisena sidelined the UNP, which was the main party in the Yahapalana government. The National Security Council met without anyone representing the UNF government. The NSC was even attended by some SLFP MPs. President Sirisena took over the Ministry of Law and Order under him in addition to the Defence Ministry. The first move against the Yahapalana government was the 52-day government; the second was the Easter Sunday attack. Nilantha Jayawardena received all information and intelligence from India with exact dates, places and even the names of the attackers. He says that he did not pass that intelligence on to President Sirisena, who was the Minister of Defence. That was an offence. When the PCoI asked Jayawardena to surrender his mobile phone, he did so after deleting all its records. That too is an offence. Former President Sirisena says that he did not know anything about the matter because he had not been informed of it. Yet, the PCoI determined that he was responsible. The government should let the Attorney General implement the recommendations of the PCoI by prosecuting all who have been identified as persons responsible for the Easter Sunday carnage.”

SJB Kurunegala District MP JC Alawathuwala also addressed the press.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Suspended Parliament official to move Court of Appeal, seek international intervention

Published

on

Chamindra and Dr. Jagath

Chamindra Kularatne, the suspended Deputy Secretary General of Parliament and Chief of Staff, has told the Opposition that he will seek the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), Association of Secretaries General of Parliament (ASGP) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

Kularatne has also declared his intention to move the Court of Appeal against the suspension that came into effect on 23 January on the basis of an inquiry conducted by retired Additional Secretary S.K. Liyanage.

The inquiry found fault with Kularatne for receiving a pension for a three-year and seven-month period he served as the Secretary to the Chief Government Whip during the previous administration. However, political sources said that though that particular appointment had been on a contract basis, in terms of a gazette issued at that time, it was made pensionable. Therefore, there couldn’t have been any issue with regard to Kularatne receiving a pension as stipulated in the gazette, sources said. The Island learns that Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government Ministry advised that the Cabinet of Ministers be consulted regarding the matter but the Parliament acted even without bothering to seek Kularatne’s explanation.

The Staff Advisory Committee (SAC), chaired by Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, has initiated the inquiry, though such an action should have been the prerogative of the Secretary General of Parliament, Kushani Rohanadeera, sources familiar with the developments relating to the unprecedented case, said. The SAC has also disregarded stipulation that in case of an inquiry against the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, it should have been conducted by an officer senior to him.

The SAC consists of the Speaker, Chief Government Whip Bimal Rathnayake, Deputy Finance Minister Prof. Anil Jayantha (he represents President Anura Kumara Dissanayake who also holds the Finance portfolio) and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa/Chief Opposition Whip Gayantha Karunatilleke. Sources said that the SAC had been deeply divided over the decision, with SJB Karunatilleke expressing opposition to the course of action proposed by the Speaker, while Prof. Jayantha didn’t extend his support. Before Kularatne had been informed of the SAC decision on 23 January, he wasn’t given an opportunity to respond to whatever allegations directed at him, sources said.

Kularatne’s complaint to IPU would be the second against Speaker Dr. Wickremaratne since his appointment as the Speaker on 17 December, 2024. The first complaint has been lodged by Jaffna District independent group member Ramanathan Archuna. Parliament accepted the NPP’s proposal to appoint the Polonnaruwa District lawmaker after their first choice Asoka Ranwala resigned after being exposed for false claims of his higher educational qualifications.

Sources said that the ruling party had targeted Kularatne because an influential section, within the government, believed that he had sneaked on the Speaker. Kularatne’s sacking and related accusations and counter accusations dominated social media.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and ITAK Batticaloa District lawmaker Shanakiyan Rasamanickam threw their weight behind Kularatne with Premadasa questioning the legality of the action taken without seeking an explanation from the official.

Authoritative sources said that in terms of the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act, in addition to members of Parliament, officials, too, received protection.

During the United National Front government of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, the then Speaker, the late W.J. M. Lokubandara, interdicted Director General (Administration) Lacille de Silva over alleged misconduct though the official claimed he was punished for leaking information. Lacille de Silva successfully moved court against his interdiction and secured his position.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Sri Lanka, UAE review energy cooperation; Trincomalee hub plans discussed

Published

on

Abassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to Sri Lanka, Khaled Nasser Al Ameri, with Minister of Power and Energy Eng. Kumara Jayakody

The Ambassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to Sri Lanka, Khaled Nasser Al Ameri, met Minister of Power and Energy Eng. Kumara Jayakody yesterday (26) to review progress on bilateral energy cooperation and explore new avenues for collaboration, with a strong focus on regional energy security and strategic infrastructure development.

The high-level discussion centred on the implementation status of understandings reached in recent years, particularly in the energy sector, and on identifying fresh opportunities to deepen engagement between Sri Lanka and the UAE. Both sides underscored the importance of translating earlier agreements into tangible outcomes amid Sri Lanka’s ongoing energy transition.

A key focus of the talks was the proposed development of the Trincomalee region as a regional energy hub. The meeting reviewed follow-up actions related to the tripartite Memorandum of Understanding signed last year between Sri Lanka, India and the UAE, which envisages collaborative development of energy-related infrastructure and logistics in and around Trincomalee, leveraging its strategic location in the Indian Ocean.

Officials discussed the next steps required to operationalise elements of the agreement, including coordination mechanisms, investment frameworks and timelines, with a view to positioning Trincomalee as a focal point for energy storage, supply and distribution in the region.

The discussions also addressed broader cooperation on regional energy security, with both parties acknowledging the growing importance of resilient, diversified and sustainable energy systems amid global volatility.

The UAE reiterated its willingness to support Sri Lanka’s energy objectives, including through technical expertise, investment and strategic partnerships aligned with the country’s long-term power sector goals.

Minister Jayakody highlighted Sri Lanka’s commitment to strengthening international partnerships to ensure energy security, accelerate infrastructure development and support the shift towards a more reliable and future-ready energy mix.

Ambassador Al Ameri reaffirmed the UAE’s interest in expanding its role as a key partner in Sri Lanka’s energy sector, building on existing goodwill and cooperation.

The meeting reflects Colombo’s broader diplomatic and economic efforts to attract strategic partners to its energy sector, particularly for large-scale projects with regional significance, as Sri Lanka seeks to stabilise supply, enhance security and position itself as an emerging energy and logistics hub in the Indian Ocean, the Ministry said.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

Pathfinder Foundation inaugurates a repository for Sri Lanka’s peace initiatives

Published

on

The Pathfinder Foundation’s Repository for Sri Lanka Peace Initiatives was inaugurated by Erik Solheim—former Norwegian Special Envoy to the Sri Lanka peace process. Milinda Moragoda, Founder Pathfinder Foundation, and Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman of the PF, both among the principal negotiators of the peace process, seen at the event

The Pathfinder Foundation’s Repository for Sri Lanka Peace Initiatives was inaugurated by Erik Solheim—former Norwegian Special Envoy to the Sri Lanka peace process, former Minister of the Environment and International Development of Norway, and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)—at the invitation of Milinda Moragoda, Founder, and Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman of the Pathfinder Foundation, both among the principal negotiators of the peace process.

Over several decades, Sri Lanka repeatedly sought to resolve the separatist conflict through negotiations. Despite several initiatives, none succeeded in bringing the conflict to a negotiated conclusion.

Over the years, numerous publications—both local and foreign—have examined Sri Lanka’s conflict. SCOPP maintained a substantial body of documentation on the peace process, from January 2002 to January 2008, and the Norwegian facilitators also hold an extensive collection of records. Nevertheless, a major gap remains: the absence of a consolidated repository that brings together available documentation on the peace process, particularly one that preserves material relating to negotiations that did not reach a conclusive settlement.

Responding to this gap and encouraged by many associated with or studying the process, the Pathfinder Foundation has taken steps to establish a dedicated repository to collect and preserve documentation on Sri Lanka’s peace initiatives. Under this project, the Foundation will gather relevant information on the peace process from local and international sources.

Continue Reading

Trending