News
SJB asks govt. if mercenaries were involved in attack on Galle Face protesters
By Saman Indrajith
Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella asked the government in Parliament yesterday whether it had employed mercenaries to attack protesters at the Galle Face Aragalaya site on 22 July.
Participating in the debate on extending Emergency regulations, Kiriella said that there were widespread suspicions that the government had employed mercenaries, other than members of the armed forces to attack the protesters at the Galle Face Aragalaya site.
“We too cannot comprehend the need for that brutal assault on unarmed protesters, who had announced that they would leave the site later in the day. There was no need for setting armed troops on protesters. We demand to know from the government who carried out that attack and whether persons other than the seucrity forces were involved in the attack. He said that the MPs who had lost their properties were bent on taking revenge. They want to attack the Aragalaya protesters. “We cannot comprehend how the President endorsed this attack to pacify those MPs because that would place this country in further difficulty. We have worked under him and it is our understanding that he knows much better than many in that camp of the possible international repercussions on an incident like this. Now all human rights activists, the world over, are calling to reject this government.”
Kiriella said that if the government thinks to run the country, making use of the Emergency regulations, then it surely had failed to read the prevailing situation in the country accurately. These Emergency regulations give powers to make arrests and detain people. The police and security forces could harm the privacy of people in the name of these regulations. These draconian regulations have been condemned by all nations in the civilized world. The EU and the UN have already demanded that these regulations should be done away with as they were a threat to the fundamental rights of people. When a person is taken under custody under these regulations, he or she could be held for 90 days without being produced before a court of law. It could be further extended. We are under the observation of the international community and they would not come forward to support this country if the government thinks to run it under Army jackboot.
Kiriella said that Emergency laws were in force soon after the Easter Sunday attacks. Those regulations lapsed four months later. “International norm is to consider that there is no political stability in a country when it is under Emergency laws,” Kiriella said, calling on the government leaders to restrain its members from slandering the foreign envoys in Colombo. These diplomats know their limits and they always would work under international laws. Now we see some government MPs find fault with diplomats for putting up twitter messages and social media posts against the attack on Galle Face Aragalaya and not showing the same concern with regard to people setting their houses on fire. The diplomats raise concern of the way a country is governed and they are permitted to do so by international law. Diplomats could raise concerns of government actions or omissions to act. They would not talk of other internal affairs. That is the international norm. We call on those who make fiery speeches blaming the ambassadors and high commissioners for failing to send tweet messages when those MPs’ houses were set on fire by people to check with the foreign ministry of the international norms and learn. The attack on Galle Face Aragalaya will produce a series of negative repercussions for this country on the international front,” Kiriella said.
The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).
FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.
He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.
Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.
He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.
The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.
Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.
Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.
“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.
He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.
“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.
Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.
He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.
Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.
According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.
The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.
CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.
Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.
She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.
Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.
Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.
The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.
Showers above 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva and Southern provinces and in Anuradhapura district
PSTA worse than PTA: FSP
Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.
Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail
Katchatheevu row: India SC urges fishermen to avoid Sri Lankan waters
Remembering Juvenal, Coke, Acton and Machiavelli
‘Dates have the highest sugar content to fight Coronavirus’
Sunday Island 27 December – Headlines
#SundayIsland 17th December – Headlines
Sunday Island – 28th March
Sunday Island Headlines – 21 March
Sunday Island – 21st February – Headlines
-
Editorial6 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Features4 days agoThe first woman in the foreign service or Ceylon Overseas Service it was then called
-
Editorial5 days agoFuelling discontent and protest
-
News3 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Latest News5 days agoTharindu Rathnayake, bowlers secure Asian Games Bronze for Sri Lanka
-
Foreign News5 days agoTen injured after car crashes into rugby supporters in Australia
-
Features3 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
-
News4 days agoNearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions