News
SC ruling on economic meltdown: Lacille wants wrongdoers appropriately dealt with
By Shamindra Ferdinando
One-rime Secretary of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate and Inquire into Serious Acts of Fraud, Corruption and Abuse of Power, State Resources and Privileges (PRECIFAC) Lacille de Silva yesterday (17) said that leaders of political parties represented in Parliament should set up a committee to study the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the economic crisis.
On the basis of a thorough examination of the ruling, action should be initiated against those who had been found guilty of economic ruin, regardless of their standing in the society, de Silva said.The prominent civil society activist who had served as Director, Administration of Parliament for over a decade during a turbulent period said that if political leaders genuinely responded to the situation, SC ruling could help Parliament to clean up the mess. “They’ll never get another opportunity like this,” de Silva said.
Lacille de Silva said that the political parties couldn’t ignore the Supreme Court faulted former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa who chaired the Cabinet-of-Ministers (Nov 2019-May 2022) and Finance Ministers, Mahinda Rajapaksa (Nov 2019-June 2021) and Basil Rajapaksa (June 2021-April 2022) and the five-member Monetary Board for the current crisis.
The former House official said so responding to The Island queries regarding political developments in the wake of the SC ruling. Pointing out that Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) as one of the petitioners in this case has already underscored the responsibility on the part of Parliament and relevant institutions and ministries to act on the SC ruling, de Silva emphasized that wrongdoers shouldn’t be shielded under any circumstances.
Responding to another query, the ex-House official said that though former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, MP, and MP Namal Rajapaksa commented on the SC ruling, political parties were yet to disclose how they intended to deal with the situation.
“It wouldn’t be an easy task. I know how the powers that be during the Yahapalana administration reacted to investigations undertaken by the PRECIFAC. I was sacked as its Secretary. On a directive given by the then President Maithripala Sirisena, Presidential Secretary P.B. Abeykoon informed me, in writing, of my removal. They didn’t at least give a reason,” de Silva said. “This happened in late Feb or early March 2016,” de Silva said, urging the Parliament to take up the challenge.
The SC ruling meant that the Gotabaya Rajapaksas’ government caused the unprecedented economic crisis, de Silva said, pointing out that the court was told of the need to refer the case to the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
The SC ruling quoted Upul Jayasuriya, PC, appearing for some petitioners that a proper investigation under the relevant laws relating to Bribery and Corruption would ensure due respect to accountability.
Lacille de Silva said that against the backdrop of the SC ruling the Parliament constitutionally responsible for ensuring financial discipline and enactment of laws should inquire into its failure on its part to identify the impending catastrophe. “Perhaps, statements made by Governor of the Central Bank Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe before the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) and Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) on May 24 and 25, 2022, respectively, should be re-examined. Dr. Weerasinghe didn’t mince his words when he quite rightly and clearly placed the blame on those who were found guilty by the SC on Nov 14, 2023.” Dr. Weerasinghe explained how tax revision declared and implemented in Nov 2019 contarry to the advice of IMF triggered the crisis, de Silva said.
The former House official emphasized that consequent to the SC ruling, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena and leaders of political parties represented in Parliament would have to ascertain the requirement for the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) on the economic crisis. Noting that Prof. Charitha Herath, the former COPE Chairman, too, has been preparing a report on the continuing crisis, de Silva suggested the government and Opposition should reach consensus on a common action plan.
Referring to the judgment, de Silva said that the Supreme Court was told how the government ignored interventions made by the Central Bank in a bid to initiate a programme with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The government’s irresponsible response led to the downfall of the economy, the SC was also told.
The IMF according to President’s Counsel Jayasuriya not only denied the last tranche of the IMF programme commenced in 2016 but also refused to grant a relief facility – Rapid Financing Instrument (RFI) – to overcome the ill-effects of the pandemic.
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)
The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.
The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.
News
BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC
… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.
In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.
A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.
The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.
The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.
We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.
Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.
We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.
The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.
This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.
Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.
The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.
We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.
He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.
We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.
On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.
Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.
We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”
The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.
News
Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.
Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.
He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.
Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.
He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.
Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.
He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.
-
News6 days agoMissing doctor’s body found in Mahiyanganaya
-
News6 days agoAustralia declines to release Finance Secy Suriyapperuma’s citizenship details
-
News6 days ago22A: BASL suggests CJ recuse himself from hearing petitions
-
News3 days agoEight politicians in drug kingpin probe
-
Features1 day ago“Wrap Me Up in My Blazer”— A Gentlemanly Bradby Reminiscence
-
Business3 days agoSri Lanka opens up: A new season of direct connectivity
-
Features3 days agoRedefining ageing in Sri Lanka
-
Features5 days agoInsights from Chieftains of Uva: Genealogy of two Kandyan Families – Part II
