Connect with us

News

SC allows TISL to intervene : X-Press Pearl case

Published

on

The Supreme Court, on Friday, granted permission for Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) to intervene in Case No. SC/FR 168/2021, which seeks fair compensation for the victims of the X-Press Pearl disaster.

The decision came after a heated legal battle that saw the Attorney General’s office strongly opposing the TISL’s involvement.

Earlier this year, TISL filed an intervention petition in the Supreme Court, aiming to shed light on several critical issues surrounding the X-Press Pearl disaster and the compensation claims. Senior Counsel Senany Dayaratne represented TISL in court, with a team of Attorneys-at-Law, including Lasanthika Hettiarachchi, Sankhitha Gunaratne, Nishadi Wickramasinghe, and Thiru Amirthalingam, under the guidance of Attorney-at-Law Thushari Jayawardena.

On Friday (06), the Supreme Court delivered its order, allowing TISL’s application for intervention. The decision was based on a careful consideration of the totality of the circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both parties. The Attorney General was represented by ASG Nerin Pulle, PC, and DSG Nayomi Kahawita.

Several key points were raised in TISL’s

intervention petition, highlighting the urgency and significance of its involvement in the case:

1. Allegations of Interference and Extraneous Pressure:

TISL expressed grave concerns about allegations of interference and extraneous pressure related to the compensation claim arising from the XPress Pearl disaster. These allegations cast doubt on the integrity of the compensation process and call for a transparent investigation.

2. Justice Minister’s Statement: TISL referenced the statement made by the Justice Minister in Parliament on April 25, 2023. In this statement, it was revealed that one Chamara Gunasekara, also known as Manjusiri Nissanka, had allegedly received a payment of USD 250 million into a private bank account in connection with the XPress Pearl disaster. TISL seeks clarity on the circumstances surrounding this payment.

3. Claims by Chinthaka Waragoda: TISL pointed to media statements made by Chinthaka Waragoda, who reportedly invented a machine to remove debris that washed ashore after the shipwreck. Waragoda alleged that he was offered payment to discontinue the use of his machine, purportedly to prevent the full extent of the damage caused by the disaster from becoming public knowledge. TISL aims to investigate these claims further.

4. Quantum of Compensation: Questions have been raised about the quantum of compensation due to Sri Lanka for the damages caused by the MV XPress Pearl. TISL intends to ensure that a fair and accurate assessment of the compensation owed to the country is conducted, taking into account the full extent of the environmental and economic impact of the disaster.



News

Child abuse crisis: 108,000 complaints reported in 10 years

Published

on

More than 108,000 complaints of child abuse had been received by the National Child Protection Authority (NCPA) between 2015 and 2025, Women and Child Affairs Minister Saroja Savithri Paulraj told Parliament yesterday.

Responding to a question raised by Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa under Standing Order 27/2, the Minister said 4,421 child abuse cases were pending before High Courts as of April 30 this year, with indictments already filed against the accused.

She said the NCPA was working with 47 Police Child and Women Protection Bureaus under the Police Children and Women Abuse Prevention Division to expedite the hearing and conclusion of these cases.

The Minister said measures were also being taken to protect child victims during legal proceedings by introducing a system to record their evidence through video in a safe and child-friendly environment, thereby reducing the need for them to appear in court.

She said discussions were underway with the Ministries of Health and Mass Media and other relevant institutions to establish nine provincial video evidence recording units.

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

News

CA dismisses  writ petition seeking postponement of A/L exam

Published

on

The Court of Appeal yesterday dismissed a writ petition seeking to postpone the 2026 G.C.E. A/L Examination by two months.

The petition, filed by a group of students due to sit the examination for the first and second time, sought an order delaying the examination, which is scheduled to commence next month.

The Court announced its decision after considering submissions made in support of the application and declined to grant leave to proceed with the petition.

As a result, the 2026 G.C.E. Advanced Level Examination will be held as scheduled in August.

Continue Reading

News

Bimal’s remarks on MP’s conduct spark heated exchange in Parliament

Published

on

Leader of the House and Minister Bimal Rathnayake yesterday criticised the conduct of MP Archchuna Ramanathan in Parliament, describing the behaviour of certain lawmakers as “uncivilised, disgraceful and indecent”, while a heated exchange followed between government and opposition members.

Rathnayake made the remarks when Ramanathan attempted to raise a point of order during parliamentary proceedings.

“This parliament has one or two members who behave in a very uncivilised, disgraceful manner. We tolerate them because one of them is mentally ill,” Rathnayake said.

He alleged that Ramanathan had insulted even members of the Tamil community.

“The things he says may not be heard through the microphone, but the four walls of this Parliament are witnesses,” Rathnayake said, adding that Ramanathan’s conduct was not limited to Parliament.

He claimed that the Jaffna District Coordinating Committee meeting could not be held due to Ramanathan’s behaviour and said MP Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam had written to the Speaker stating that he could not sit near him.

The Speaker intervened during the exchange, warning Ramanathan not to behave in a manner that would turn Parliament into “a joke”. He also said the MP had previously addressed him in an insulting manner.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa criticised the manner in which Rathnayake and the Speaker had addressed the matter, saying MPs should not be spoken to improperly and urging members to follow parliamentary Standing Orders.

Ramanathan, responding to the remarks, said: “I may be a psycho, but I am not a homosexual.”

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending