Connect with us

Features

Requiem for Jimmy Carter

Published

on

Jimmy Carter

by Nanda Pethiyagoda

Prior to American presidential elections on November 5 last year, Jimmy Carter said he wanted to live to vote for Kamala Harris. His wife Rosalyn had died November 19, 2023, aged 96. They lived, invalided, in a recently furbished hospice in their modest home in Plains. He did live and must have voted. At age one hundred he died on December 29, 2024, with his three sons and daughter Amy beside him, so also 22 grandchildren and great grandchildren.

Personal remembrance

I have a photograph of my son and me with Jimmy Carter and Rosalyn. How this came about was that in 2008, when holidaying in Atlanta where my second son lives, he arranged we spend the September 3-4 weekend in Plains, Georgia. I was an admirer of Carter and he would drop me off at the Carter Centre, Atlanta, on many a day when he drove to office. I spent hours getting to know about this 39th President of the US (1977-81). He built the Carter Center to promote and expand human rights; this commitment to HR earning him the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. His life after the years of presidency seemed to have been busier with him active in the Habitat for Humanity organization. Rosalyn and he would travel to countries like Africa to actually work hands-on in building houses for the poor. He also authored many books.

So on Saturday September 3, 2008, we drove to Plains and booked ourselves in a quaint hotel – The Plains Historic Inn and Antiques. The highlight of the weekend was attending Sunday School conducted by Jimmy Carter in the Maranatha Baptist Church in Plains. Seats had to be prior reserved and before the Carters came in, precise, detailed instructions were given by a Southern Steel Magnolia – a church goer – as to how the session would proceed and what we should or could not do. The entire service, though precisely stage managed, was informal and showed Carter’s humane nature and lack of the faintest sign of hubris. He asked who was from outer state. Two seated near me whispered I respond. I did by raising my hand. On Carter pointing to me I said: “From overseas – Sri Lanka” to which he promptly announced: “You have a war going on. We pray for peace in your beautiful island.”

The photograph is a privilege allowed all Sunday School goers when the Carters are back home and he conducts Sunday School. Here too strict instructions to follow were given: “Don’t even wish them good morning or say thank you. Stand with them, have your photograph taken and leave.” But when my son and I stood beside them, Carter recognized me from Sri Lanka and again said he hoped our civil war would end soon and human rights and peace restored. This was surprising as I was not in sari. Maybe my colour gave me away!

Brief bio

The next day my son and I toured the Carter peanut farm and his family home. Also visited were the high school he and Rosalyn attended which is now a museum and the small railway station that was his presidential campaign headquarters. All preserved sites within the American National Park Service.

Carter’s home was small and humble. He, James Earl Carter Jr (1924- 2024) was born at the Wise Sanatorium to businessman farmer James Earl Carter Sr and Bessie Lillian Gardy, a registered nurse, who later made a name for herself with social service in India. In his infancy the family moved several times and once lived in an area populated by impoverished African American families. He had two sisters and brother Billy. Though his father was pro-segregation, Jimmy was allowed to make friends with black children. He was often left in the care of a black sharecropper tenant’s wife – Rachel Clark – when his mother had to work late. He became very close to her. The family owned a radio and thus of an evening the open verandah of their home was full of neighbours come over to listen to news or a speech. The toilet was converted to a water closet when Jimmy was a teenager. Still to be seen was the suspended bucket with holes in its bottom and a tap above which was opened when someone wanted a shower.

Pictures and albums were available to reconstruct his life. He graduated from the US Naval Academy in 1946 and joined the US Navy’s submarine service. Meeting on a blind date arranged by his sister, he fell in love with Rosalyn Smith and they were married on July 7, 1946. Returning home after his naval spell he revived his family’s peanut growing business. He opposed racial segregation and supported the growing civil rights movement and became an activist in the Democratic Party. He served in the Georgia State Senate (1963-67) and became Governor (1971-1975). In 1976, he ran for the presidency as a ‘dark horse’ not well known, and narrowly defeated the incumbent president Gerald Ford. He defeated Ted Kennedy and obtained Democrat Party approval as the contesting candidate for re-election in 1980. He however lost badly to Ronald Reagan.

Evaluation

Robert A Strong wrote: “Jimmy Carter is much more highly regarded today than when he lost his bid for reelection in 1980. He has produced an exemplary post-presidency… Carter took office just thirty months after a President had left the entire federal government in shambles (Nixon). He faced epic challenges – energy crisis, Soviet aggression, Iran and a deep mistrust of leadership by his citizens. He was hard working and conscientious.”

Historians Burton I Kaufman and Scott Kaufman: “It was Carter’s misfortune … of staggering inflation and growing unemployment, oil shock. … hard to avoid the conclusion that Carter’s was a mediocre presidency and his own doing. He was smart rather than shrewd. He was not a careful political planner. He suffered from strategic myopia. He was long on good intentions but short on know-how. He had lofty ideals, such as in human rights … but blinded him to political realities. He was self-righteous, an administrator who micro-managed, but not well. … a president who never adequately defined a mission for his government, a purpose for the country and a way to get there.”

However the general judgment is that he was a fair and just, good human being. His life he lived well in strong Christian faith, often in the service of others.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Recruiting academics to state universities – beset by archaic selection processes?

Published

on

by Kaushalya Perera

Time has, by and large, stood still in the business of academic staff recruitment to state universities. Qualifications have proliferated and evolved to be more interdisciplinary, but our selection processes and evaluation criteria are unchanged since at least the late 1990s. But before I delve into the problems, I will describe the existing processes and schemes of recruitment. The discussion is limited to UGC-governed state universities (and does not include recruitment to medical and engineering sectors) though the problems may be relevant to other higher education institutions (HEIs).

How recruitment happens currently in SL state universities

Academic ranks in Sri Lankan state universities can be divided into three tiers (subdivisions are not discussed).

* Lecturer (Probationary)

recruited with a four-year undergraduate degree. A tiny step higher is the Lecturer (Unconfirmed), recruited with a postgraduate degree but no teaching experience.

* A Senior Lecturer can be recruited with certain postgraduate qualifications and some number of years of teaching and research.

* Above this is the professor (of four types), which can be left out of this discussion since only one of those (Chair Professor) is by application.

State universities cannot hire permanent academic staff as and when they wish. Prior to advertising a vacancy, approval to recruit is obtained through a mind-numbing and time-consuming process (months!) ending at the Department of Management Services. The call for applications must list all ranks up to Senior Lecturer. All eligible candidates for Probationary to Senior Lecturer are interviewed, e.g., if a Department wants someone with a doctoral degree, they must still advertise for and interview candidates for all ranks, not only candidates with a doctoral degree. In the evaluation criteria, the first degree is more important than the doctoral degree (more on this strange phenomenon later). All of this is only possible when universities are not under a ‘hiring freeze’, which governments declare regularly and generally lasts several years.

Problem type 1

Archaic processes and evaluation criteria

Twenty-five years ago, as a probationary lecturer with a first degree, I was a typical hire. We would be recruited, work some years and obtain postgraduate degrees (ideally using the privilege of paid study leave to attend a reputed university in the first world). State universities are primarily undergraduate teaching spaces, and when doctoral degrees were scarce, hiring probationary lecturers may have been a practical solution. The path to a higher degree was through the academic job. Now, due to availability of candidates with postgraduate qualifications and the problems of retaining academics who find foreign postgraduate opportunities, preference for candidates applying with a postgraduate qualification is growing. The evaluation scheme, however, prioritises the first degree over the candidate’s postgraduate education. Were I to apply to a Faculty of Education, despite a PhD on language teaching and research in education, I may not even be interviewed since my undergraduate degree is not in education. The ‘first degree first’ phenomenon shows that universities essentially ignore the intellectual development of a person beyond their early twenties. It also ignores the breadth of disciplines and their overlap with other fields.

This can be helped (not solved) by a simple fix, which can also reduce brain drain: give precedence to the doctoral degree in the required field, regardless of the candidate’s first degree, effected by a UGC circular. The suggestion is not fool-proof. It is a first step, and offered with the understanding that any selection process, however well the evaluation criteria are articulated, will be beset by multiple issues, including that of bias. Like other Sri Lankan institutions, universities, too, have tribal tendencies, surfacing in the form of a preference for one’s own alumni. Nevertheless, there are other problems that are, arguably, more pressing as I discuss next. In relation to the evaluation criteria, a problem is the narrow interpretation of any regulation, e.g., deciding the degree’s suitability based on the title rather than considering courses in the transcript. Despite rhetoric promoting internationalising and inter-disciplinarity, decision-making administrative and academic bodies have very literal expectations of candidates’ qualifications, e.g., a candidate with knowledge of digital literacy should show this through the title of the degree!

Problem type 2 – The mess of badly regulated higher education

A direct consequence of the contemporary expansion of higher education is a large number of applicants with myriad qualifications. The diversity of degree programmes cited makes the responsibility of selecting a suitable candidate for the job a challenging but very important one. After all, the job is for life – it is very difficult to fire a permanent employer in the state sector.

Widely varying undergraduate degree programmes.

At present, Sri Lankan undergraduates bring qualifications (at times more than one) from multiple types of higher education institutions: a degree from a UGC-affiliated state university, a state university external to the UGC, a state institution that is not a university, a foreign university, or a private HEI aka ‘private university’. It could be a degree received by attending on-site, in Sri Lanka or abroad. It could be from a private HEI’s affiliated foreign university or an external degree from a state university or an online only degree from a private HEI that is ‘UGC-approved’ or ‘Ministry of Education approved’, i.e., never studied in a university setting. Needless to say, the diversity (and their differences in quality) are dizzying. Unfortunately, under the evaluation scheme all degrees ‘recognised’ by the UGC are assigned the same marks. The same goes for the candidates’ merits or distinctions, first classes, etc., regardless of how difficult or easy the degree programme may be and even when capabilities, exposure, input, etc are obviously different.

Similar issues are faced when we consider postgraduate qualifications, though to a lesser degree. In my discipline(s), at least, a postgraduate degree obtained on-site from a first-world university is preferable to one from a local university (which usually have weekend or evening classes similar to part-time study) or online from a foreign university. Elitist this may be, but even the best local postgraduate degrees cannot provide the experience and intellectual growth gained by being in a university that gives you access to six million books and teaching and supervision by internationally-recognised scholars. Unfortunately, in the evaluation schemes for recruitment, the worst postgraduate qualification you know of will receive the same marks as one from NUS, Harvard or Leiden.

The problem is clear but what about a solution?

Recruitment to state universities needs to change to meet contemporary needs. We need evaluation criteria that allows us to get rid of the dross as well as a more sophisticated institutional understanding of using them. Recruitment is key if we want our institutions (and our country) to progress. I reiterate here the recommendations proposed in ‘Considerations for Higher Education Reform’ circulated previously by Kuppi Collective:

* Change bond regulations to be more just, in order to retain better qualified academics.

* Update the schemes of recruitment to reflect present-day realities of inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary training in order to recruit suitably qualified candidates.

* Ensure recruitment processes are made transparent by university administrations.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.)

Continue Reading

Features

Talento … oozing with talent

Published

on

Talento: Gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band

This week, too, the spotlight is on an outfit that has gained popularity, mainly through social media.

Last week we had MISTER Band in our scene, and on 10th February, Yellow Beatz – both social media favourites.

Talento is a seven-piece band that plays all types of music, from the ‘60s to the modern tracks of today.

The band has reached many heights, since its inception in 2012, and has gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band in the scene here.

The members that makeup the outfit have a solid musical background, which comes through years of hard work and dedication

Their portfolio of music contains a mix of both western and eastern songs and are carefully selected, they say, to match the requirements of the intended audience, occasion, or event.

Although the baila is a specialty, which is inherent to this group, that originates from Moratuwa, their repertoire is made up of a vast collection of love, classic, oldies and modern-day hits.

The musicians, who make up Talento, are:

Prabuddha Geetharuchi:

Geilee Fonseka: Dynamic and charismatic vocalist

Prabuddha Geetharuchi: The main man behind the band Talento

(Vocalist/ Frontman). He is an avid music enthusiast and was mentored by a lot of famous musicians, and trainers, since he was a child. Growing up with them influenced him to take on western songs, as well as other music styles. A Peterite, he is the main man behind the band Talento and is a versatile singer/entertainer who never fails to get the crowd going.

Geilee Fonseka (Vocals):

A dynamic and charismatic vocalist whose vibrant stage presence, and powerful voice, bring a fresh spark to every performance. Young, energetic, and musically refined, she is an artiste who effortlessly blends passion with precision – captivating audiences from the very first note. Blessed with an immense vocal range, Geilee is a truly versatile singer, confidently delivering Western and Eastern music across multiple languages and genres.

Chandana Perera (Drummer):

His expertise and exceptional skills have earned him recognition as one of the finest acoustic drummers in Sri Lanka. With over 40 tours under his belt, Chandana has demonstrated his dedication and passion for music, embodying the essential role of a drummer as the heartbeat of any band.

Harsha Soysa:

(Bassist/Vocalist). He a chorister of the western choir of St. Sebastian’s College, Moratuwa, who began his musical education under famous voice trainers, as well as bass guitar trainers in Sri Lanka. He has also performed at events overseas. He acts as the second singer of the band

Udara Jayakody:

(Keyboardist). He is also a qualified pianist, adding technical flavour to Talento’s music. His singing and harmonising skills are an extra asset to the band. From his childhood he has been a part of a number of orchestras as a pianist. He has also previously performed with several famous western bands.

Aruna Madushanka:

(Saxophonist). His proficiciency in playing various instruments, including the saxophone, soprano saxophone, and western flute, showcases his versatility as a musician, and his musical repertoire is further enhanced by his remarkable singing ability.

Prashan Pramuditha:

(Lead guitar). He has the ability to play different styles, both oriental and western music, and he also creates unique tones and patterns with the guitar..

Continue Reading

Features

Special milestone for JJ Twins

Published

on

Twin brothers Julian and Jason Prins

The JJ Twins, the Sri Lankan musical duo, performing in the Maldives, and known for blending R&B, Hip Hop, and Sri Lankan rhythms, thereby creating a unique sound, have come out with a brand-new single ‘Me Mawathe.’

In fact, it’s a very special milestone for the twin brothers, Julian and Jason Prins, as ‘Me Mawathe’ is their first ever Sinhala song!

‘Me Mawathe’ showcases a fresh new sound, while staying true to the signature harmony and emotion that their fans love.

This heartfelt track captures the beauty of love, journey, and connection, brought to life through powerful vocals and captivating melodies.

It marks an exciting new chapter for the JJ Twins as they expand their musical journey and connect with audiences in a whole new way.

Their recent album, ‘CONCLUDED,’ explores themes of love, heartbreak, and healing, and include hits like ‘Can’t Get You Off My Mind’ and ‘You Left Me Here to Die’ which showcase their emotional intensity.

Readers could stay connected and follow JJ Twins on social media for exclusive updates, behind-the-scenes moments, and upcoming releases:

Instagram: http://instagram.com/jjtwinsofficial

TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@jjtwinsmusic

Facebook: http://facebook.com/jjtwinssingers

YouTube: http://youtube.com/jjtwins

Continue Reading

Trending