Connect with us

News

Reluctance to celebrate republic day: Outcome of a strange Sri Lankan malady

Published

on

by Prof. Tissa vitarana

After suffering the ignominy and pain of having been colonized by three imperialist powers for 450 years, the last as a part of the British Empire for nearly 150 years, Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) became a completely independent and sovereign Republic only on May 22, 1972. This was the day when Parliament passed the Republican Constitution prepared by Dr. Colvin R. de Silva, at a special Constitutional Assembly.

But for some strange reason, when Sri Lanka should be proud of this fact and, like other such republics, it should celebrate that day every year, it does not do so. For example this is in complete contrast with our vast neighbor India, which celebrates its Republic Day on February 26 each year with even greater pomp and pageantry than it does for Independence Day which falls on August 15. In Sri Lanka We only celebrate Independence Day, which is only a formal mockery of independence, which falls on February 4, but not Republic Day which should fall today on May 22.

In fact Sri Lanka became a Republic only in 1972, as many as 24 long years of continuing shame, after we got Independence in 1948. In contrast India became a Republic in 1950, just three years after it got Independence in 1947. It was quick to cut the umbilical cord and become completely free, unlike in the case of Sri Lanka, which persisted in groveling at the feet of Britain, paying homage to its “Royal Family”.

As we all know, formal Independence from Britain was only partial, a mere mockery, but it appears to have satisfied the UNP rulers of that time. The British Queen remained the head of state, the British Army retained its military bases in Sri Lanka and power remained in their hands, and in the system of legal justice established in Sri Lanka, the final Court of Appeal was the British Privy Council, in London.

The UNP and other capitalist leaders of Sri Lanka were content to retain this colonial subservience for 24 years, while India rushed to sever it. The architect of the Indian Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar, a leader of the small Buddhist minority in India, was given full support by the Congress Party of India, led by Nehru and Gandhi, being true patriots, and he completed the task by 1950, in just three years.

The fact is that the UNP and other rulers of Sri Lanka were in no hurry to achieve true and full independence, and it was left to one of the leaders of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP), Dr. Colvin R. de Silva, to accomplish this task in two years by drafting the Republican Constitution in 1972. In Sri Lanka it was the socialist Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP) that made the achievement of complete independence its principle objective and continuously fought for its implementation.

In fact it was the LSSP, formed in 1935, that had as its main task the achievement of complete independence from rule by British imperialism. It continued the fight even through the period of the Second World War from 1939 to 1945, specially as the country was not directly involved in the war. The British rulers proscribed the LSSP and imprisoned its leaders, Dr.Colvin R de Silva, Dr.N.M.Perera, Philip Gunewardena, Leslie Goonewardena and Edmund Samarakkody.

They escaped from jail in Kandy and continued the fight against British imperialism as part of the Congress Socialist Party of India, and were jailed there as well. On their return the LSSP leaders were treated as heroes by the people. Mr. S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, all along a leader of the UNP, in its Sinhala Maha Sabha wing, finally left the UNP and formed the SLFP in 1951, with Sinhala Buddhist revivalism as his main political plank. The LSSP that was the main opposition to the UNP came under racialist attack for its stand to make both Sinhala and Tamil as official languages in place of English, spoken mainly by the ruling elite.

A majority of the Sinhala supporters of the LSSP left to join the SLFP, and many of its Tamil leaders and supporters, such as MP Anandasangaree, left to join the Federal Party and the TULF. The LSSP was decimated further, when Philip Gunewardena together with the bulk of the Sinhala Buddhist supporters joined Bandaranaike to form the MEP.

In the 1970 General Election an SLFP, LSSP, CP Coalition Government came to power, with the LSSP getting 19 MPs and the CP six. Colvin was made the Minister of Plantation and Constitutional Affairs, and this gave him the opportunity to formulate the Republican Constitution. It was a difficult job well done, but unfortunately the large SLFP majority overcame Colvin’s plea for Tamil to be made an official language, along with Sinhala. Had that been done the nearly 30 years of disastrous internal war with the LTTE could have been averted, and the tragic deaths of our people and the damage prevented. Our economy would not be in such a bad state.

Another shortcoming in retrospect is the electoral system and big swings for the winning party. The Electoral Reform Committee set up in Parliament headed by Dinesh Gunewardena, of which I was a member, has offered a solution, the mixed system that has been a success in Germany and other countries. This along with further devolution to village level would rectify the short comings in Colvin’s Constitution.

But instead of being grateful to Colvin for his work, and to Dr. N.M.Perera for his overcoming a more severe economic crisis than what we face today, Mrs.Bandaranaike fell for the promise of USA led investment, now that economic stability had been restored, but she implemented their condition and got rid of the LSSP from the Coalition Government. The CP too was forced to leave the next year. I suspect that the desire not to celebrate Republic Day in Sri Lanka is due to the fear that the SLFP has that the credit of becoming a Republic would flow to the LSSP.

As the present General Secretary of the LSSP I too have been subject to this type of behavior from the SLFP. I give two instances to support my claim. One is the fact that though I possess a PhD from London University in the field of Virology, I have not been made a member of any committee set up to control the Covid-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka. The Health Consultative Committee met in Parliament only on one occasion since the outbreak of Covid-19. As a member I suggested that the control strategy based on cluster system required to be strengthened to defeat the community spreading of the infection which had just begun.

If quick action is taken by the Health Ministry the further spread of the pandemic could be prevented and or even eliminated. The Minister of Health, Pavithra Wanniarachchi, who was presiding refuse to accept my proposal which, if implemented may have prevented the spread of the epidemic and the more deaths that occurred in the country. The other example is that while I was the Governor in the North Central Province I was asked to resign immediately and come to the office of Basil Rajapaksa in Colombo to sign the National List as they had decided to make me a Cabinet Minister.

But when the new Government was formed I was not even a Minister, but only an ordinary member of Parliament. Consider my record as the Minister of Science and Technology when I set up 163 Vidatha Centres, one in each administrative division, and provided the technology for 12,637 entrepreneurs (SMEs) to arise. I also initiated action to set up Hi-tech Centers to promote Sri Lanka’s export industry. I set up the World’s 18th Nanotechnology Centre (SLINTEC) in Homagama and prepared plans for a Biotechnology Centre (SLIBTEC) which is now on going. It would appear that the good work done for the country and for the people by the LSSP is not appreciated, but even sabotaged.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan

Published

on

By

File photo: Chamari Athapaththu top-scored for Sri Lanka (Cricinfo)

Captain Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helped Sri Lanka chase down 169 with ease against Pakistan. Athapaththu and Vishmi Gunaratne together started strongly, putting up a 159-run stand as Sri Lanka won with eight balls to spare.

With the ball, right-arm seamer Chethana Vimukthi, who was called up as the injured Shashini Gimhani’s replacement. for the T20 World Cup, made an impact for Sri Lanka, finishing with figures of 4 for 31. Vimukthi broke the 60-run stand between openers Muneeba Ali and Gull Feroza, following which Pakistan lost wickets regularly. Captain Fatima Sana top-scored for Pakistan from No. 7 with 37 to push the total past 150. In reply, Sri Lanka made easy work of the chase, with Athapaththu itting five sixes and nine fours in her 56-ball stay.

Scores:

Sri Lanka Women 169 for 1 in 18.4 overs (Chamari Athapaththu 94, Vishmi Gunaratne 63*; Fatima Sana 1-20 ) beat Pakistan Women  168 for 8 in 20 overs (Muneesha Ali 36, Gull Feroza 26. Ayesha Zafar 10, Saira Jabeen 12,  Fatima Sana 37, Aliya Riyaaz 22;  Sugandika Kumari  1-33,  Chethana Vimukthi 4-31, Malki Madara 1-19, Nimasha Meepage 1-16) by nine wickets

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

News

Open hearing on coal procurement inquiry set for July first week

Published

on

Open hearing of evidence into alleged irregularities in coal procurement is scheduled to begin in the first week of July, while the Presidential Commission of Inquiry continues recording statements from relevant officials, investigators said.

So far, the Commission has recorded statements from around 40 government officials, including members of procurement committees and other personnel attached to institutions involved in coal-related transactions.

Officials said that, depending on evidence gathered during the ongoing inquiry, statements may also be obtained from former ministers if required.

The Commission has also received 28 complaints in connection with alleged irregularities in coal imports and related procurement processes.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on April 17 appointed a three-member Presidential Commission of Inquiry under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978 to probe alleged malpractice in coal imports and electricity generation since the inception of coal-based power generation up to April 16, 2026.

The Commission is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Judge Aditya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne serving as members. Former State Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena acts as Secretary to the Commission.

The inquiry covers alleged procurement irregularities, possible financial losses to the State, import of substandard coal, quality inspection failures, contractual breaches and operational issues in power generation, including whether corrective measures were taken where necessary.

It will also identify responsible political authorities, officials of Sri Lanka Coal Company (Private) Limited and suppliers, while recommending legal or administrative action and measures to prevent future lapses.

Meanwhile, the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) is also preparing to table its report on coal procurement in Parliament, with officials from relevant institutions having been summoned during its proceedings. COPE Chairman MP Dr. Nishantha Samaraweera said audit findings had also been considered, and any matters requiring further investigation would be referred to law enforcement and anti-corruption authorities.

Continue Reading

News

TNA MP calls for complete repeal of PTA

Published

on

Trincomalee District TNA MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam has submitted a motion to Parliament calling for the immediate repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), arguing that the controversial law has enabled arbitrary detention, torture and the targeting of minority communities for more than four decades.

In his motion, now published in the Addendum to the Order Book of Parliament, the MP urged the Government to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act, No. 48 of 1979, in its entirety and refrain from introducing any replacement legislation containing similar provisions.

Rasamanickam contended that the PTA had been used for over 40 years to facilitate prolonged arbitrary detention and to obtain false confessions through torture. He further alleged that the law had disproportionately affected minority communities and civil society groups.

The motion states that there is no justification for maintaining a permanent counter-terrorism law that grants sweeping powers to the authorities.

The TNA legislator argued that existing legal provisions were sufficient to address security threats, noting that terrorism-related offences could already be prosecuted under the Penal Code.

He also pointed out that the Government retained the power to declare a state of emergency when circumstances warranted extraordinary measures, rendering a permanent anti-terrorism framework unnecessary.

Accordingly, the motion calls on Parliament to resolve that the Government take immediate steps to abolish the PTA without replacing it with legislation containing comparable powers.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act, enacted in 1979, has long been the subject of criticism from human rights organisations, civil society groups and international bodies, which have raised concerns over provisions relating to detention without trial and safeguards against abuse.

Continue Reading

Trending