Connect with us

Business

Reasons why 2021 saw an increase in global cooperation

Published

on

After a trend towards regionalisation last year, global cooperation increased in 2021

Vaccine cooperation and financial assistance helped meet pandemic challenges

Major economies announced the launch or extension of global infrastructure plans

COP26 and the global tax rate were examples of successful global diplomacy

Following on from a year in which supply chains and international travel were severely disrupted, 2021 saw an increase in global cooperation, as institutions, businesses and governments alike sought to work together to find solutions to some of the world’s major challenges.

The onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020 had a dramatic effect on global connectivity. The implementation of border restrictions greatly disrupted the provision of goods and made cross-border travel extremely difficult.

In order to adapt to these challenges, many governments, businesses and institutions moved towards a strategy of regionalisation.

For example, in April last year the foreign ministers of ASEAN’s 10 member states endorsed several collective initiatives to fight the pandemic, including the establishment of a common Covid-19 fund to enable a rapid response to medical emergencies.

In the same month, the GCC agreed to establish a food supply network to safeguard the region from food insecurity.

Vaccine cooperation

However, while 2020 was marked by a trend towards regional solutions, 2021 has witnessed expanded global cooperation, as governments and international institutions collaborated on initiatives designed to help countries recover from the impacts of Covid-19.

Foremost among these was the Covax initiative. A collaboration between Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and the World Health Organisation, Covax is designed to coordinate international resources to ensure that developing countries have affordable access to Covid-19 tests, therapies and, above all, vaccines.

Since beginning to distribute vaccines in February, the programme has helped ship more than 610m vaccine doses to 144 predominantly low and middle-income countries.

Despite such efforts, however, Covax has not been enough to bridge the vaccination gap between developed and emerging markets.

To take an example, while more than 90m doses have been delivered to Africa through Covax and the African Vaccine Acquisition Trust, only four of the continent’s 54 countries are on track to meet a WHO target of fully vaccinating 40% of the population by the end of the year, according to a recent report from the Mo Ibrahim Foundation.

This has led to calls for greater global coordination with regard to vaccine distribution, particularly in light of the discovery of the Omicron variant in southern Africa. Indeed, leading officials from the WHO, UN High Commission for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration recently called on G20 governments to provide greater assistance to lower-income countries.

Providing financial assistance

While Covax has aimed to address the medical impact of the pandemic, other collaborative measures have sought to provide financial assistance to offset the worst of the economic fallout.

One such was the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI), a G20-run scheme that offers a moratorium on bilateral loan repayments owed to G20 members and their policy banks.

Initially rolled out in June 2020, the DSSI, which is available to 73 low-income nations, was extended until the end of this year.

Complementing that initiative is the G20 Common Framework for Debt Treatments Beyond the DSSI.

Established in November last year by the G20 and the Paris Club – a 22-strong informal group of mainly Western creditors – the Common Framework applies to the same 73 countries that are eligible for support under the DSSI.

It differs from the former in that it provides relief on a case-by-case basis, with assistance ranging from complete debt restructuring or reduction to the longer-term deferral of debt payments.

Another move designed to ease fiscal concerns was the increased allocation of special drawing rights (SDRs). Managed by the IMF, SDRs are international reserve assets defined by a basket of five currencies – the US dollar, Japanese yen, euro, UK pound and Chinese yuan – which are used by member countries to supplement their own reserves.

On August 2 the IMF’s Board of Governors approved the allocation of $650bn worth of SDRs to bolster global economic recovery. This was the first new allocation since 2009 and by far the largest of its kind, doubling the $318bn in SDRs previously released by the IMF.

While not considered blanket solutions to Covid-19-related economic problems, these measures are expected to help emerging markets address any liquidity squeezes they may be facing, which in many cases have become more critical on the back of reduced bilateral aid last year.

Global infrastructure expansion

International institutions were not the only ones who took a global approach in 2021, with a number of the world’s largest economies reaffirming their commitment to globalisation over the course of the past year.

Following a fall in spending in 2020 across many of the projects tied to its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China sketched a reformed vision for the programme’s future, focusing on three aspects: the Green Silk Road, the Health Silk Road and the Digital Silk Road.

As the names suggest, the strategy will focus on developing environmentally sustainable projects, with a particular focus on those in the health and ICT sectors, across various emerging markets.

Meanwhile, in June the G7 announced the launch of its own global infrastructure development plan to rival the BRI, called Build Back Better World.

While specific details of the programme have not yet been released, G7 officials said the programme aims to close the $40trn infrastructure gap in the developing world, thus strengthening some of the connections between high-income and emerging markets.

Elsewhere, on December 1 the EU launched Global Gateway, its own international infrastructure strategy, which aims to mobilise €300bn in investments through to 2027 to help with the global recovery from the pandemic.

The launch or continuation of these initiatives comes as a number of emerging markets are turning towards infrastructure projects to help stimulate their economic recoveries from the coronavirus, with many placing a focus on green or sustainable developments.

Increased diplomacy

Aside from coronavirus recovery-related issues, there was also a higher degree of global cooperation with regard to some longer-term themes throughout 2021.

After a decade of talks and months of negotiation, 136 countries signed up to an agreement to implement a global corporate tax rate of 15%.

The landmark deal aims to limit aggressive tax competition, and could bring in an estimated $150bn in extra tax revenue each year, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The agreement was seen as a triumph for global diplomacy, particularly given that a number of emerging markets use low tax rates as an incentive to attract foreign investment. However, some emerging markets ­– namely Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and Sri Lanka – have not yet signed up to the plan.

Meanwhile, perhaps the largest diplomatic event of the year was the UN Climate Change Convention (COP26). Representatives from more than 200 countries gathered at the event, held in Glasgow between October 31 and November 12, to discuss ways in which they could reduce global emissions.

The outcomes included pledges to “phase down” the use of coal-fired power and reduce deforestation, while more than 100 countries signed up to the US- and EU-led Global Methane Pledge, which aims to reduce methane emissions by 30% by 2030.

In addition, the parties also agreed on a landmark deal to reform global carbon markets and improve rules about carbon trading, seen as key tools in the transition towards decarbonisation.

However, COP26 was weakened by the absence of China’s President Xi Jinping and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, the leaders of two of the world’s leading polluters. In addition, a number of emerging markets criticised some of the proposals put forward by developed nations.

-Oxford Business Group



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Arvind Subramanian: Why hasn’t Sri Lanka’s democracy acted as a hedge against economic chaos?

Published

on

Dr. Arvind Subramanian

In a sobering and intellectually provocative lecture delivered yesterday at the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Dr. Arvind Subramanian, former Chief Economic Advisor to the Government of India, posed a “haunting” question to the nation’s policymakers: Why has one of the world’s oldest democracies outside the West failed to leverage its political system to ensure economic stability?

Titled ‘Reviving Growth While Maintaining Stability,’ the lecture moved beyond technical prescriptions. Dr. Subramanian, now a Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, admitted that his experience with the complexities of the Indian economy had made him “humble and somber,” leading him to focus on the broader socio-political structures that dictate a nation’s fate.

Dr. Subramanian argued that in India, democracy acted as a vital pressure valve that prevented both extreme political violence and economic chaos. He noted that while the process of nation-building is historically violent – citing the West’s decimation of populations and China’s estimated 40–75 million deaths between 1950 and 1976 – India managed to maintain a relatively low degree of mass violence.

“Democracy had a key role to play in that,” he asserted. “It is one of India’s major achievements.”

The speaker extended this logic to the economic sphere, suggesting that Indian democracy created a “societal demand” for low inflation.

In India, he noted, there is a pervasive political belief that if inflation crosses the 5 percent threshold, the government is likely to lose the next election. This political accountability forced the Central Bank and the State to maintain macro-stability.

The crux of Dr. Subramanian’s address was the “intellectual puzzle” of why Sri Lanka, which received universal franchise well before India, did not experience the same stabilising effects of democracy.

He presented two charts that he described as “haunting.” The first revealed that Sri Lanka has spent 60 percent of its time under IMF programmes, indicating a state of “perennial macro-economic stress.” In contrast, India has not sought an IMF programme in the 35 years following its 1991 reforms.

“Why does Indian society demand low inflation and macro-stability, while the same doesn’t happen in Sri Lanka?” he asked. Despite its long democratic tradition, Sri Lanka has consistently seen higher inflation and greater financial instability than its neighbour.

Dr. Subramanian also highlighted a stark difference in how both nations treat foreign capital. Pointing to data on external debt stock as a share of Gross National Income (GNI), he illustrated that Sri Lanka has been consistently and significantly more reliant on foreign capital than India or China.

While some argue that Sri Lanka’s small size necessitates a reliance on foreign capital, Dr. Subramanian remained unconvinced, noting that India also suffered from low domestic savings for decades but chose a more cautious path.

“India has been much more cautious in opening up to foreign capital,” he explained. While foreign capital can drive growth, it brings the “downside of risk and volatility” as capital flows in and out – a reality that came to haunt Sri Lanka in recent years through its high exposure to foreign currency-denominated debt.

The lecture concluded not with a list of “1, 2, 3 points” for recovery as the wider audience had expected, but with a challenge to the Sri Lankan intelligentsia. If democracy is meant to be a safeguard against political and economic disorder, the breakdown of that mechanism in Sri Lanka requires deep introspection.

“Different societies differ,” Dr. Subramanian concluded. “But if democracy had a key role in avoiding volatility in India, why shouldn’t it have been so in such an old democracy as Sri Lanka? It is worth pondering over,” he said.

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Business

HSBC kicks off ‘Clean Waterways’

Published

on

HSBC will launch ‘Clean Waterways’ in partnership with the Beira Lake Restoration Task Force that was convened by the Governor of the Western Province to restore Beira Lake. HSBC in partnership with Clean Ocean Force will build and operate two solar powered, zero emission, waterway cleaning boats, which are the first of their kind in Sri Lanka. They will be used extensively in support of restoring the Beira Lake ecosystem and its surrounding environment.

Once a picturesque centerpiece in Colombo, Biera Lake is now suffering from significant pollution. Urbanization and lack of effective waste management practices have led to large volumes of plastic and floating organic debris, untreated sewage and industrial effluents contaminating the water. Resultant algal blooms, unchecked hyacinth growth and water stagnation further give the lake a detrimental odour and appearance. The pollution has degraded water quality, harmed aquatic life posing health risks to residents living in proximity by attracting disease-carrying fauna.

The Biera Lake Restoration Task Force was convened by the Governor of the Western Province with the purpose of delivering cleaner waterways in the urban environment. It is vital to educate and support change for communities that reside near the Beira Lake. To achieve this, a dedicated community outreach programme will reach over 5000 wider residents through awareness building and education which is anticipated to reduce ‘waste at source’.

Mark Surgenor, Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Sri Lanka stated “With over 130 years presence in Sri Lanka, HSBC understands the importance of Beira Lake to Colombo’s urban environment. Supporting cleaner waterways is a vital step towards restoration of that environment. Through this first ever public-private partnership, multiple stakeholders are coming together to work towards restoring this iconic lake. We have committed to support the Beira Lake Restoration Task force, not just with the much-needed funding, but also bringing best practices through our experience with similar projects in other markets that we operate in. The community outreach programme planned alongside the project is a critical step towards making this impact sustainable. HSBC has always been at the forefront of innovation in Sri Lanka and we look forward to continuing that for our next 130 years here”

Continue Reading

Business

CORALL Conservation Trust Fund – a historic first for SL

Published

on

From left to right – Nigel Bartholomeusz (Director – EFL), Chanaka Wickramasuriya (Trustee), Palitha Gamage (Trustee), Dr Shamen Vidanage (Country Representative – IUCN), Ms. Deshini Abeyewardena (Chairperson – EFL), Nishad Wijetunga (Trustee), Dr. (Ms.) Nishanthi Perera (Trustee), Prof. (Ms.) Sevvandi Jayakody (Trustee), and Nalin Karunatileka (Trustee)

Sri Lanka has moved to strengthen the financial backbone of its marine conservation efforts with the establishment of the country’s first CORALL Conservation Trust Fund, a landmark initiative that positions coral reef protection firmly within the framework of sustainable finance and long-term economic value creation.

The Trust Deed establishing the CORALL (Conservation of Reefs for All Lives and Livelihoods) Conservation Trust Fund was signed on December 31, 2025, by Environment Foundation (Guarantee) Limited (EFL) as Settlor together with the inaugural Board of Trustees. The Fund is designed to support the conservation of Pigeon Island National Park, Bar Reef Marine Sanctuary and Kayankerni Marine Sanctuary, along with their associated seascapes—areas that are central not only to marine biodiversity but also to fisheries, tourism and coastal protection.

From a business and policy perspective, the Trust Fund represents a decisive shift away from short-term, donor-driven conservation projects towards a structured and enduring financing mechanism. It is a key component of the Sri Lanka Coral Reef Initiative (SLCRI), a six-year national programme funded by the Global Fund for Coral Reefs and implemented by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), but critically, the Trust itself is structured to continue well beyond the project’s lifespan, offering a permanent vehicle for mobilising state, private sector and international sustainability-linked funding.

Coral reefs within the three targeted seascapes have been increasingly degraded by destructive fishing methods such as blast fishing, overfishing, coastal pollution, unregulated tourism and unplanned coastal development. These pressures carry significant economic consequences, undermining fish stocks, tourism revenues and the natural coastal protection that reefs provide. Project partners note that a major driver of this degradation is the limited understanding among communities and institutions of the true economic value of coral reefs as natural capital that underpins livelihoods and resilience.

EFL, as an implementing partner to IUCN, played a central role in shaping the Trust’s institutional and financial architecture. It carried out a comprehensive legal, policy and institutional review, provided recommendations on the structure of Conservation Trust Funds, and drafted both the Trust Deed and an operational manual embedding governance, accountability and transparency safeguards. These features are seen as critical in building investor and donor confidence, particularly at a time when environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations are increasingly influencing capital flows.

The Board of Trustees, selected by IUCN and the SLCRI National Steering Committee following a public call for applications, brings together expertise from investment banking, commercial banking and marine science. The Trustees—Palitha Gamage, Prof. (Ms.) Sevvandi Jayakody, Nalin Karunatileka, Dr. (Ms.) Nishanthi Perera, Chanaka Wickramasuriya and Nishad Wijetunga—will oversee grant funding for conservation and restoration proposals submitted by Special Management Area Coordinating Committees, while also ensuring robust monitoring and evaluation to safeguard long-term financial and ecological sustainability.

“This marks a significant step in sustainable financing to conserve coral reef ecosystems which are critical for marine biodiversity conservation, coastal protection, climate resilience, and the livelihoods of coastal communities, said Dr. Shamen Widanage, Country Representative of IUCN Sri Lanka, highlighting the wider economic and social returns expected from the initiative.

EFL chairperson Deshini Abeyewardena said the Trust Fund reflects a broader shift towards innovative financing models for environmental protection.

“EFL is honoured to have been selected by IUCN to implement this landmark initiative. The establishment of the CORALL Conservation Trust Fund reflects EFL’s long-standing commitment to advancing environmental justice through strong governance, legal safeguards and innovative financing mechanisms. As Sri Lanka faces increasing pressures on its marine ecosystems, this Trust provides a credible and transparent platform to secure sustained investment for coral reef conservation, she said.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending